A Manifesto for Videographic Vulnerability
https://doi.org/10.5167/UZH-258342Abstract
There is no best practice. (No one asks a painter «Which is your best brush?» Knowing how to edit in AdobePremiere is not any better for making video essays than using iMovie or drawing on a piece of paper.) We use the tools at hand and use them in unplanned ways. Videographic practice is an affective, multi-sensory, and bodily experience. We use our bodies, our memories, our intuitions, our flaws. What does «essay» literally mean? («essayer»: to try, to try out, to test... [and to fail]) Restrictions are productive, they are arbitrary but never random (and meant to be overstepped). None of us know more than the others in the room, but we all know different things. Completeness is not the goal and intactness is not the start -we aim for multiplici-ty and inexhaustibility. Let's not make video essays in order to master anything. Seek process, not outcome! Let's not only use audiovisual sources to analyze, question, and problematize the material itself, but let's also use (misuse? abuse? re-use? appropriate?) them to think about/through/with our lives, cultures, societies at large. Let's stop talking about success and start talking about resonance. Embrace mistakes, accidents, glitches, and chance! Perfection is a disease. Be vulnerable and use your privileges accordingly. The manifesto came out of our own desires and anxieties, and out of multiple conversations we had with each other and our colleagues over the past few months. We noticed how central the term ‹vulnerability› became when we tried to assess the new directions in which video essay culture seems to develop. This includes an increasing trend towards ‹personal› inscriptions, modes, and narratives. The manifesto is an invitation to think through and build on our individual and collective vulnerabilities in videographic thought and practice. The following conversation adds further context and discussion to the points laid out above. I think it's impossible to talk about vulnerability without talking about the personalpersonal investments, motivations, stakes, experiences, identities, bodies, etc. Given how video essays increasingly seem to implicitly and explicitly involve personal modes and the makers' personal positions, I'm wondering whether we can speak of a ‹personal turn› in videographic culture. Evelyn: Evelyn: Certainly, but then the personal and the vulnerability that goes with it was always present. Maybe it was not highlighted though. Or it was something that we as scholars were trained to pretend to not employ. Instead we learned to speak from a position of expertise and established knowledge, one that is more guarded against possible attacks. Speaking for myself, I feel that with video essays I'm doing something for which I wasn't prepared and thus more exposed to criticism. My video essays forced me to rely on my own resources. So, it became inevitably personal. In reaction to this I increasingly have this urge to appear in my videos and thus in the films that I am working with.