What is Technology: A Reflection Based on Bhaskar's Ontology
2024, Journal of Philosophical Theological Research
https://doi.org/10.22091/JPTR.2024.11664.3181Abstract
The article demonstrates that technology is a product of the complex interaction between humans and natural, artificial, and social structures, which enables the creation of various forms of technology. It strives to provide a deeper philosophical understanding of what technology is. This understanding reveals that one cannot be passive when confronted with technology; instead, individuals can play an active role in shaping it. Consequently, the content of the article does not present a favorable view of technological determinism.
References (52)
- Bhaskar, R. (1978). On the possibility of social scientific knowledge and the limits of naturalism. Journal for the Theory of social Behaviour, 8(1), 1-28.
- Bhaskar, R. (1998). The possibility of naturalism: A philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences. Routledge.
- Bhaskar, R. (2008a). A realist theory of science. Routledge.
- Bhaskar, R. (2009). Scientific realism and human emancipation. Routledge.
- Bhaskar, R. (2010a). Plato etc: problem of philosophy and their resolution. Routledge.
- Bhaskar, R. (2010b). Reclaiming reality: A critical introduction to contemporary philosophy. Routledge.
- Bhaskar, R., & Hartwig, M. (2016). Enlightened common sense: The philosophy of critical realism. Routledge.
- Bhaskar, R., Danermark, B., & Price, L. (2017). Interdisciplinarity and wellbeing: A critical realist general theory of interdisciplinarity. Taylor & Francis.
- Feenberg, A. (2002). Transforming technology: A critical theory revisited. Oxford University Press-210/ State University of New York Press.
- Feenberg, A. (1991). Critical theory of technology. Oxford University Press.
- Ihde, D. (1996). Technology and the lifeworld: From garden to earth. Indiana University Press.
- Ihde, D. (2009). Postphenomenology and technoscience. State University of New York Press.
- Latour, B. (1994). On technical mediation. Common knowledge, 3(2), 29-64.
- Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121-36.
- Wyatt, S. (2023). Technological determinism: What it is and why it matters. In Technology Ethics (pp. 26-33). Routledge. References
- Achterhuis, H. (2001). The politics of technology. University of California Press.
- Achterhuis, H. (2003). The failure of technology. University of California Press.
- Achterhuis, H. (2010). The ethics of technology. University of California Press.
- Archer, et al. (1998). General introduction. In M. Archer, R. Bhaskar, A. Collier, T. Lawson & A. Norrie (Eds.), Critical realism: Essential readings. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315008592
- Baert, P. (2005). Philosophy of the social sciences: Towards pragmatism. Polity. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393107307667
- Benton, T., & Craib, I. (2010). Philosophy of social science: The philosophical foundations of social thought. Macmillan International Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-28521-8
- Berlin, I. (2014). Two concepts of liberty. In N. Warburton, Philosophy: Basic readings (pp. 231-237). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315091822-3
- Bhaskar, R. (1978). On the possibility of social scientific knowledge and the limits of naturalism. Journal for the Theory of social Behaviour, 8(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1978.tb00389.x
- Bhaskar, R. (1998). The possibility of naturalism: A philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315756332
- Bhaskar, R. (2008). A realist theory of science. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203090732
- Bhaskar, R. (2009). Scientific realism and human emancipation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203879849
- Bhaskar, R. (2010a). Plato etc: Problems of philosophy and their resolution. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203860069
- Bhaskar, R. (2010b). Reclaiming reality: A critical introduction to contemporary philosophy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203843314
- Bhaskar, R., & Hartwig, M. (2016). Enlightened common sense: The philosophy of critical realism. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315542942
- Bhaskar, R., Danermark, B., & Price, L. (2017). Interdisciplinarity and wellbeing: A critical realist general theory of interdisciplinarity. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315177298
- Borgmann, A. (1984). Technology and the character of contemporary life: A philosophical inquiry. The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/3105376
- Ellul, J. (1964). The technological society. Alfred A. https://doi.org/10.2307/3101837
- Ellul, J. (2003). The "autonomy" of the technological phenomenon. Philosophy of Technology: The Technological Condition, 2, 430-41. https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2015-0037
- Feenberg, A. (1991). Critical theory of technology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513616689388
- Feenberg, A. (2002). Transforming technology: A critical theory revisited. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195146158.002.0001
- Floridi, L. (2014). The 4 th revolution: How the infosphere is reshaping human reality. Oxford University Press.
- Floridi, L., & Sanders, J. W. (2004). On the morality of artificial agents. Minds and Machines, 14(3): 349-79. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MIND.0000035461.63578.9d
- Heidegger, M. (2003). The question concerning technology. In D. M. Kaplan, Readings in the philosophy of technology (pp. 9-24). Rowman & Littlefield.
- Ihde, D. (1996). Technology and the lifeworld: From garden to earth. Indiana University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/3106183
- Ihde, D. (2009). Postphenomenology and technoscience. State University of New York Press.
- Jaspers, K. (2014). Man in the modern age. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315823690
- Kaidesoja, T. (2009). The concept of social structure in Roy Bhaskar's critical realism. In Jyväskylä Studies in Education, Psychology and Social Research 376. University of Jyväskylä.
- Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change, 1, 225-258.
- Latour, B. (1994). On technical mediation. Common knowledge, 3(2).
- Lewis, P. (2000). Realism, causality and the problem of social structure. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 30(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5914.00129
- Mitcham, C. (2022). What is living and what is dead in classic European philosophy of technology? In S. Vallor (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of technology (pp. 19-34). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190851187.013.3
- Outhwaite, W. (2001). In defense of social structure. Studies in Social and Political Thought, Issue, 3-15.
- Verbeek, P. P. (2005). What things do: Philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. Penn State Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-007-9010-0
- Verbeek, P. P. (2011). Moralizing technology: Understanding and designing the morality of things. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-012-0143-5
- Winner, L. (1978). Autonomous technology: Technics-out-of-control as a theme in political thought. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/3103332
- Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121-36. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315259697-21
- Wyatt, S. (2023). Technological determinism: What it is and why it matters. In G. J. Robson & J. Y. Tsou (Eds.), Technology ethics (pp. 26-33). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003189466-6