Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

What is Technology: A Reflection Based on Bhaskar's Ontology

2024, Journal of Philosophical Theological Research

https://doi.org/10.22091/JPTR.2024.11664.3181

Abstract

The article demonstrates that technology is a product of the complex interaction between humans and natural, artificial, and social structures, which enables the creation of various forms of technology. It strives to provide a deeper philosophical understanding of what technology is. This understanding reveals that one cannot be passive when confronted with technology; instead, individuals can play an active role in shaping it. Consequently, the content of the article does not present a favorable view of technological determinism.

References (52)

  1. Bhaskar, R. (1978). On the possibility of social scientific knowledge and the limits of naturalism. Journal for the Theory of social Behaviour, 8(1), 1-28.
  2. Bhaskar, R. (1998). The possibility of naturalism: A philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences. Routledge.
  3. Bhaskar, R. (2008a). A realist theory of science. Routledge.
  4. Bhaskar, R. (2009). Scientific realism and human emancipation. Routledge.
  5. Bhaskar, R. (2010a). Plato etc: problem of philosophy and their resolution. Routledge.
  6. Bhaskar, R. (2010b). Reclaiming reality: A critical introduction to contemporary philosophy. Routledge.
  7. Bhaskar, R., & Hartwig, M. (2016). Enlightened common sense: The philosophy of critical realism. Routledge.
  8. Bhaskar, R., Danermark, B., & Price, L. (2017). Interdisciplinarity and wellbeing: A critical realist general theory of interdisciplinarity. Taylor & Francis.
  9. Feenberg, A. (2002). Transforming technology: A critical theory revisited. Oxford University Press-210/ State University of New York Press.
  10. Feenberg, A. (1991). Critical theory of technology. Oxford University Press.
  11. Ihde, D. (1996). Technology and the lifeworld: From garden to earth. Indiana University Press.
  12. Ihde, D. (2009). Postphenomenology and technoscience. State University of New York Press.
  13. Latour, B. (1994). On technical mediation. Common knowledge, 3(2), 29-64.
  14. Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121-36.
  15. Wyatt, S. (2023). Technological determinism: What it is and why it matters. In Technology Ethics (pp. 26-33). Routledge. References
  16. Achterhuis, H. (2001). The politics of technology. University of California Press.
  17. Achterhuis, H. (2003). The failure of technology. University of California Press.
  18. Achterhuis, H. (2010). The ethics of technology. University of California Press.
  19. Archer, et al. (1998). General introduction. In M. Archer, R. Bhaskar, A. Collier, T. Lawson & A. Norrie (Eds.), Critical realism: Essential readings. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315008592
  20. Baert, P. (2005). Philosophy of the social sciences: Towards pragmatism. Polity. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393107307667
  21. Benton, T., & Craib, I. (2010). Philosophy of social science: The philosophical foundations of social thought. Macmillan International Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-28521-8
  22. Berlin, I. (2014). Two concepts of liberty. In N. Warburton, Philosophy: Basic readings (pp. 231-237). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315091822-3
  23. Bhaskar, R. (1978). On the possibility of social scientific knowledge and the limits of naturalism. Journal for the Theory of social Behaviour, 8(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1978.tb00389.x
  24. Bhaskar, R. (1998). The possibility of naturalism: A philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315756332
  25. Bhaskar, R. (2008). A realist theory of science. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203090732
  26. Bhaskar, R. (2009). Scientific realism and human emancipation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203879849
  27. Bhaskar, R. (2010a). Plato etc: Problems of philosophy and their resolution. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203860069
  28. Bhaskar, R. (2010b). Reclaiming reality: A critical introduction to contemporary philosophy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203843314
  29. Bhaskar, R., & Hartwig, M. (2016). Enlightened common sense: The philosophy of critical realism. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315542942
  30. Bhaskar, R., Danermark, B., & Price, L. (2017). Interdisciplinarity and wellbeing: A critical realist general theory of interdisciplinarity. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315177298
  31. Borgmann, A. (1984). Technology and the character of contemporary life: A philosophical inquiry. The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/3105376
  32. Ellul, J. (1964). The technological society. Alfred A. https://doi.org/10.2307/3101837
  33. Ellul, J. (2003). The "autonomy" of the technological phenomenon. Philosophy of Technology: The Technological Condition, 2, 430-41. https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2015-0037
  34. Feenberg, A. (1991). Critical theory of technology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513616689388
  35. Feenberg, A. (2002). Transforming technology: A critical theory revisited. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195146158.002.0001
  36. Floridi, L. (2014). The 4 th revolution: How the infosphere is reshaping human reality. Oxford University Press.
  37. Floridi, L., & Sanders, J. W. (2004). On the morality of artificial agents. Minds and Machines, 14(3): 349-79. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MIND.0000035461.63578.9d
  38. Heidegger, M. (2003). The question concerning technology. In D. M. Kaplan, Readings in the philosophy of technology (pp. 9-24). Rowman & Littlefield.
  39. Ihde, D. (1996). Technology and the lifeworld: From garden to earth. Indiana University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/3106183
  40. Ihde, D. (2009). Postphenomenology and technoscience. State University of New York Press.
  41. Jaspers, K. (2014). Man in the modern age. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315823690
  42. Kaidesoja, T. (2009). The concept of social structure in Roy Bhaskar's critical realism. In Jyväskylä Studies in Education, Psychology and Social Research 376. University of Jyväskylä.
  43. Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change, 1, 225-258.
  44. Latour, B. (1994). On technical mediation. Common knowledge, 3(2).
  45. Lewis, P. (2000). Realism, causality and the problem of social structure. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 30(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5914.00129
  46. Mitcham, C. (2022). What is living and what is dead in classic European philosophy of technology? In S. Vallor (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of technology (pp. 19-34). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190851187.013.3
  47. Outhwaite, W. (2001). In defense of social structure. Studies in Social and Political Thought, Issue, 3-15.
  48. Verbeek, P. P. (2005). What things do: Philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. Penn State Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-007-9010-0
  49. Verbeek, P. P. (2011). Moralizing technology: Understanding and designing the morality of things. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-012-0143-5
  50. Winner, L. (1978). Autonomous technology: Technics-out-of-control as a theme in political thought. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/3103332
  51. Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121-36. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315259697-21
  52. Wyatt, S. (2023). Technological determinism: What it is and why it matters. In G. J. Robson & J. Y. Tsou (Eds.), Technology ethics (pp. 26-33). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003189466-6