Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Annealing behaviour of GaAs implanted with 70 MeV 120Sn ions

2009, Indian Journal of …

Abstract

Single crystal GaAs substrates implanted with 70 MeV 120 Sn have been investigated by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and electrical resistance measurements after annealing in the temperature range 373-823 K. XRD measurements for the samples annealed up to 723 K show two peaks, one due to the substrate and another due to the implant damaged layer. The strain parameter from the measured separation between the substrate and layer peaks of several symmetric and asymmetric reflections after each annealing step has been calculated. Strain recovery occurs in two predominant annealing stages, one at about 500 K and the other at about 700 K. Temperature dependence (100-300 K) of resistance of these samples indicates that electrical conduction in the samples annealed up to 723 K, is dominated by variable range hopping. Localized states density at the Fermi level N(E F ), estimated from temperature dependence of sample resistance after each annealing step, shows two annealing stages similar to those observed from XRD measurements. Isothermal annealing carried out at two different annealing temperatures (523 and 573 K) indicates the activation energy E a = 0.16 eV for the first annealing stage.

References (17)

  1. Morgan D V & Eisen F H, Ion implantation and damage in GaAs in gallium arsenide, edited by Howes M.J & Morgan D V (John Wiley) 1985, p.161.
  2. Stolte C A, Ion implantation and materials for GaAs integrated circuits in Semiconductors and Semimetals, Vol 20, edited by Willardson R K & Beer A C, (Academic Press, New York) 1984, p.89.
  3. Pearton S J, Ren F, Chu S N G, et al., Nucl Instr and Meth B, 79 (1993) 648.
  4. Pearton S J, Mater Sci Rep, 4 (1990) 313.
  5. Rao M V, IEEE Transactions Electron Devices, ED 40 (1993) 1053.
  6. Mehta G K & Patro A P, Nucl Instr and Meth A, 268 (1988) 97.
  7. Narsale A M, Ali Y P, Bhambhani Uma et al., J Appl Phys, 82 (1997) 4228.
  8. Primak W, Fuchs L H & Day P P, Phys Rev, 103 (1956)1184.
  9. Picraux S T, Doyle B L & Tsao J Y, Structure and characterization of strained-layer superlattices' in Semiconductors and Semimetals, Vol. 33 edited by Pearsall T P, (Academic Press, New York), 1992, p.139.
  10. Zaus R, J Appl Cryst, 26 (1993) 801.
  11. Paine B M & Speriosu V S, J Appl Phys, 62 (1987)1704.
  12. Xie K & Wie C R., Nucl Instr and Meth B, 53 (1991) 294.
  13. Davis E A & Mott N F, Philos Mag, 22 (1970) 903.
  14. Bottger H & Bryskin V V, Phys Status Solidi (b), 78 (1976) 9.
  15. Aukerman L W, Davis P W, Graft R D & Shilliday T S, J Appl Phys, 34 (1963) 3590.
  16. Damle A R, Narsale A M, Ali Y P, et al., Nucl Instr and Meth B, 168 (2000) 229.
  17. Bourgion J & Lannoo M, Point Defects in Semiconductors II (Springer-Verlag Heidelberg, New York), 1983, p.255.