Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

The Contribution of Geomatic Technologies to Bim

2019, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences

https://doi.org/10.5194/ISPRS-ARCHIVES-XLII-5-W3-85-2019

Abstract

There are many definitions of the commonly used abbreviation BIM, but one can say that each user or data supplier has different idea about it. There can be an economic view, or other aspects like surveying, material, engineering, maintenance, etc. The common definition says that Building Information Modelling or Building Information Management (BIM) is a digital model representing a physical and functional object with its characteristics. The model serves as a database of object information for its design, construction and operation over its life cycle, i.e. from the initial concept to the removal of the building. BIM is a collection of interconnected digital information in both protected and open formats, recording graphical and non-graphical data on model elements. There are two facets: a) BIM created simultaneously with the project, or project designed directly in BIM (it is typical of new objects designed in CAD systems -for example in the Revit software) or b) BIM for old or historical objects. The former is a modern technology, which is nowadays used worldwide. From the engineer's perspective, the issue is the creation of BIM for older objects. In this case, it is crucial to obtain a precise 3D data set -complex 3D documentation of an object is needed and it is created using various surveying techniques. The most popular technique is laser scanning or digital automatic photogrammetry, from which a point cloud is derived. But this is not the main result. While classical geodesy gives selective localized information, the abovementioned technologies give unselected information and provide huge datasets. Fully automatic technologies that would select important information from the point cloud are still under development. This seems to be a task for the coming years. Large amounts of data can be acquired automatically and quickly, but getting the expected information is another matter. These problems will be analysed in this paper. Data conversion to BIM, especially for older objects, will be shown on several case studies. The first is an older technical building complex transferred to BIM, the second one is a historical building, and the third one will be a historic medieval bridge (Charles Bridge in Prague). The last part of this paper will refer to aspects and benefits of using Virtual Reality in BIM.

References (12)

  1. Dekker, A.-M. 2017. What is "Scan to BIM"? Retrieved January 29, 2019. https://constructible.trimble.com/construction-industry/what-is- scan-to-bim-2
  2. Gleason, D., 2013. Laser Scanning for an Integrated BIM. Constance, October 2013, Retrieved November 11, 2019. https://www.tekla.com/de/trimble-5d/laser-scanning-for-bim.pdf Hůlková, M., Poloprutský, Z., Raeva, P., Matoušková, E., Housarová, E. 2016. Complex Analysis and Documentation of Historical Buildings Using New Geomatics Methods. The Civil Engineering Journal., 2016(4), 1-8. ISSN 1805-2576.
  3. Kaijaluoto, R., Hyyppä, J., Kukko, A. 2015. Precise Indoor Localization for Mobile Laser Scanner ISPRS -International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. XL-4/W5. 1-6. 10.5194/isprsarchives- XL-4-W5-1-2015.
  4. Matoušková, E., Hůlková, M. Šedina, J. 2016. Historical Plasters Composition Detection Using Reflectance Spectroscopy. The Civil Engineering Journal., 2016(4), 1-7. ISSN 1805-2576.
  5. Pavelka, jr., Michalík, B. 2019. Laser scanning for BIM and results visualization using VR. Measurement, Visualisation and Processing in BIM for Design and Construction Management. International Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, p. 49-52. vol. XLII-5/W2. ISSN 2194-9034.
  6. Pavelka, K., Hůlková, M., Matoušková, E., Havlín, J. 2016. Exploration of the Charles bridge in Prague by GPR and TLS technology. Interdisciplinarity in Theory and Practice, 2016(11), 264-268. ISSN 2344-2409.
  7. Pavelka, K. 2017. Modern documentation methods in cultural heritage and its benefits. Cultural heritage -perspectives, challenges and future directions. NOVA publishing, New York, USA. p. 113-155. Socisl issues, justice and status. ISBN 978-1- 53612-913-7.
  8. Pavelka, K., Pavelka, K., Šedina, J. 2019. Combined precise documentation and virtual reconstruction of prophet Nahum shrine in Alqosh, Iraq. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. International Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, p. 909-913. XLII-2-W15. ISSN 2194-9034.
  9. Poloprutský, Z., Fraštia, M., Marčiš, M. 2019. 3D Digital reconstruction based on archived terrestrial photographs from metric camera. Acta Polytechnica., 59(4), 384-398. ISSN 1805- 2363.
  10. Shirer, M., Torchia, M. 2017. "Worldwide Spending on Augmented and Virtual Reality Forecast to Reach $13.9 Billion in 2017, According to IDC". International Data Corporation. International Data Corporation. Archived from the original on March 19, 2018. Retrieved March 16, 2018.
  11. Šedina, J. Housarová, E. Raeva, P. 2018. Using RPAS for the detection of archaeological objects using multispectral and thermal imaging. European Journal of Remote Sensing. 2018, 2018(6), ISSN 2279-7254.
  12. Tuttas, S., Braun, A., Borrmann, A., Stilla, U. 2014. Comparision of photogrammetric point clouds with BIM building elements for construction progress monitoring. ISPRS- International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. 1. 341-345. http://doi/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-3-341-2014