Memory-based Pattern Completion in Database Semantics
2005, Eon'eo wa jeong'bo
https://doi.org/10.29403/LI.9.1.5Abstract
Pattern recognition in cognitive agents is based on (i) the uninterpreted input data (e.g. parameter values) provided by the agent's hardware devices and (ii) and interpreted patterns (e.g. templates) provided by the agent's memory. Computationally, the task consists in finding the memory data corresponding best to the input data, for any given input. Once the best fitting memory data have been found, the input is recognized by applying to it the interpretation which happens to be stored with the memorized pattern. This paper presents a fast converging procedure which starts from a few initially recognized items and then analyzes the remainder of the input by systematically checking for items shown by memory to have been related to the initial items in previous encounters. In this way, known patterns are tried first, and only when they have been exhausted, an elementary exploration of the input is commenced. Efficiency is improved further by choosing the candidate to be tested next according to frequency. (Universität Erlangen
References (27)
- high frequency item, the method of choice are non-generic LA-grammars with specific lexical lookup, familiar from natural language anal- ysis (cf. 5.2). These LA-grammars are highly restrictive and only accept input conforming to explicitly defined standards of well-formedness. At each level, rule-based recognition is tried first because it succeeds the fasted if applicable and fails the quickest if not. Also, successful rule-based recognition provides the qualitatively best analysis because it uses domain-specific rather than generic internal relations. If the rule-based method fails at given level, the case- based method is tried next. If the case-based method fails, the 'brand-new' method will succeed as the last resort.
- Barsalu, Lawrence W. 1999. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, chapter Perceptual symbol systems. Cambridge University Press.
- Biederman, Irving. 1987. Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image under- standing. Psychological Review 94.2, 115-147. APA.
- Bransford, J.D. and J.J. Franks. 1971. The Abstraction of Linguistic Ideas. Cognitive Psychology 2, 331-350.
- Bresnan, Joan, editor. 1982. The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relation. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
- Fauconnier, Gilles. 1994. Mental Spaces. Cambridge University Press, New York.
- Gazdar, Gerald, Ewan Klein, G. K. Pullum, and Ivan Sag. 1985. Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., and Blackwell, Oxford, England.
- Gibson, Eleanor J. 1969. Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development. Prentice Hall.
- Hausser, Roland. 1992. Complexity in Left-Associative Grammar. Theoretical Com- puter Science 106.2, 283-308. Dordrecht: Elsevier.
- Hausser, Roland. 1999. Foundations of Computational Linguistics, Human-Computer Communication in Natural Language. Springer Verlag, Berlin, New York. pp. 578. 2nd edition in 2001.
- Hausser, Roland. 2001. Database Semantics for Natural Language. Artificial Intelli- gence 130.1, 27-74.
- Hausser, Roland. 2002. Autonomous Control Structure for Artificial Cognitive Agents. In H. Kangassalo et al. (eds.), Information Modeling and Knowledge Bases XIII, XIII, Amsterdam. IOS Press Ohmsha.
- Hausser, Roland. 2003. Reconstructing Propositional Calculus in Database Semantics. In H. Kangassalo et al. (eds.), Information Modeling and Knowledge Bases, XIV, Amsterdam. IOS Press Ohmsha.
- Hubel, David H. and Torston N. Wiesel. 1962. Receptive Fields, Binocular Interaction, and Functional Architecture in the Cat's Visual Cortex. Journal of Physiology 160, 106-154.
- Johnson-Laird, Philip N. 1983. Mental Models. Harvard U. Press, Cambridge, Mass.
- Kirkpatrick, Kimberly, 2001. Avian Visual Cognition, chapter Object Recognition. cy- berbook in cooperation with Comparative Cognitive Press.
- Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. University of Chicago, Chicago.
- Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live by. University of Chicago, Chicago.
- Neisser, Ulric. 1964. Visual Search. Scientific American 94-102.
- Piaget, Jean. 1962. The Language And Thought of the Child. Routledge.
- Rosch, Eleanor. 1975. Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology General 104, 192-253.
- Schank, Roger C. and Robert P. Abelson. 1977. Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understand- ing. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
- Shieber, S. M. 1986. A Simple Reconstruction of GPSG. In Proc. of the 11th COLING, pp. 211-215, Bonn, Germany.
- Sowa, J. F. 1984. Conceptual Structures: Information Processing in Mind and Machine. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
- Stein, N. L. and T. Trabasso, 1982. Advances in the Psychology of Instruction, 2, chapter What's in a Story? An Approach to Comprehension, pp. 213-268. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N. J.
- Waltz, D. L. 1975. The Psychology of Computer Vision, chapter Understanding Line Drawings of Scenes with Shadows, pp. 19-92. McGraw-Hill.
- Wierzbicka, Anna. 1980. Lingua Mentalis. The Semantics of Natural Language. Aca- demic Press, Sidney.