Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Pavement Performance Evaluations Using Connected 1 Vehicles 2

2017

Abstract

The ability of any nation to support economic growth and commerce relies on their capacity to 12 preserve and to sustain the performance of pavement assets. The ever-widening funding gap to 13 maintain pavements challenges the scaling of existing techniques to measure ride quality. The 14 international roughness index is the primary indicator used to assess and forecast maintenance 15 needs. Its fixed simulation procedure has the advantage of requiring relatively few traversals to 16 produce a consistent characterization. However, the procedure also underrepresents roughness 17 that riders experience from spatial wavelengths that fall outside of the model’s sensitivity range. 18 This paper introduces a connected vehicle method that fuses inertial and geospatial position data 19 from many vehicles to expose roughness experienced from all spatial wavelengths. This study 20 produced both roughness indices simultaneously from the same inertial profiler. The statistical 21 distribution o...

References (16)

  1. Smoothness Specifications Online -Overview of Current Practices. The Transtec Group, Inc., March 28, 2012. SmoothPavements.com. Accessed March, 28 2015.
  2. Bridgelall, R. Connected Vehicle Approach for Pavement Roughness Evaluation. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2014, pp. 1-6.
  3. Jazar, R. N. Vehicle Dynamics: Theory and Applications. Springer, New York, 2008.
  4. Besinger, F. H., D. Cebon, and D. J. Cole. Force Control of a Semi-Active Damper. Vehicle System Dynamics: International Journal of Vehicle Mechanics and Mobility, Vol. 24, No. 9, 1995, pp. 695-723.
  5. Griffin, M. J. Handbook of Human Vibration. Elsevier, New York, 1990.
  6. Performance Analysis Via Vehicle Electronic Telemetry (PAVVET). Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute, December 9, 2014. www.ugpti.org/smartse. Accessed March, 28 2015.
  7. Gillespie, T. D., M. W. Sayers and C. A. V. Queiroz. The International Road Roughness Experiment: Establishing Correlation and Calibration Standard for Measurement. The World Bank, Washington, D.C., 1986.
  8. Dawkins, J., D. Bevly, B. Powell and R. Bishop. Investigation of Pavement Maintenance Applications of Intellidrive. University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, 2011.
  9. Du, Y., C. Liu, D. Wu and S. Jiang. Measurement of International Roughness Index by Using Z-Axis Accelerometers and GPS. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014, p. 928980 (1-10).
  10. Bridgelall, R. Precision Bounds of Pavement Deterioration Forecasts from Connected Vehicles. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2015, pp. 04014033 (1-7).
  11. Agresti A., and B. Finlay. Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences, 4th ed., Pearson, New York, 2008.
  12. Papoulis, A. Probalility, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1991.
  13. Perera R. W., and G. E. Elkins. LTPP Manual for Profile Measurements and Processing. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2013.
  14. Bridgelall, R. A Participatory Sensing Approach to Characterize Ride Quality. In Proceedings of SPIE Volume 9061, Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems, Bellingham, Washington, 2014.
  15. Bridgelall, R. Inertial Sensor Sample Rate Selection for Ride Quality Measures. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Vol. 21, No. 2, 2015, pp. 04014039 (1-5).
  16. Highway Functional Classification: Concepts, Criteria and Procedures. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2013.