Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Theory and Practice in Language Studies

2012

https://doi.org/10.4304/TPLS.2.12.2517-2529

Abstract

This study explored whether the metaphors written by 504 Iranian learners of English and 140 English teachers behaved like semantic features of the schemata they likened themselves to. The 239 student and 249 teacher metaphors elicited from the participants were submitted to four raters who assigned them to 13 conceptual categories established by Saban, Kocbeker, and Saban (2007). The statistical analysis of data showed that the categories behave as collective knowledge because there is no significant difference in the frequency of student metaphors written by both students and teachers who view students as passive recipients of knowledge, developing organisms and absolute compliants. Students and teachers, however, differ significantly as regards teacher categories. While the highest percentage of students metaphorised their teachers as facilitators/scaffolders, the teachers assigned a counselor's role to themselves, indicating that metaphors are sensitive to social positions. Since the categories are pretty stable over age, proficiency level, years and fields of study as well as experience, they reflect the ever-evolving nature of schema in the variety of metaphors with which the categories are depicted and thus reflect the reality of language learning and teaching in Iran.

References (18)

  1. Burke, K. (1945). A grammar of motives. New York: Prentice Hall.
  2. Cameron, L. (1999).
  3. Operationalizing "metaphor" for applied linguistic research. In L. Cameron, & G. Low (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor (pp. 3-28). Cambridge: CUP.
  4. Khodadady, E. (1997). Schemata theory and multiple choice item tests measuring reading comprehension. Unpublished PhD thesis, the University of Western Australia.
  5. Khodadady, E. (1999). Multiple-choice items in testing: Practice and theory. Tehran: Rahnama.
  6. Khodadady, E., & Elahi, M. (2012). The Effect of Schema-Vs-Translation-Based Instruction on Persian Medical Students" Learning of General English. English Language Teaching, 5 (1), xx-xxx.
  7. Khodadady, E., & Herriman, M. (2000). Schemata theory and selected response item tests: from theory to practice. In A. J. Kunnan (Ed.), Fairness and validation on language assessment (pp. 201-222). Cambridge: CUP.
  8. Khodadady, E., Pishghadam, R., & Fakhar, M. (2010). The relationship among reading comprehension ability, grammar and vocabulary knowledge: An experimental and schema-based approach. Iranian EFL Journal, 6(2), 7-49.
  9. Khodadady, E., Shirmohammadi, S., & Talebi, F. (2011). Brainstorming and its effect on critical thinking and speaking skills. Iranian EFL Journal, 7(1), 51-66.
  10. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (2005). Metaforlar Hayat, Anlam ve Dil. (Çev: G. Y. Demir). Istanbul: Paradigma Yayınları.
  11. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  12. Perrine, L. (1971). Four forms of metaphor. College English, 33, 125-138.
  13. Phillips, D. C. (1996). Philosophical perspectives. In D. C. Berliner, & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 1019-1105). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
  14. Richards, I. A. (1936/1979). The philosophy of Rhetoric. Oxford: OUP.
  15. Richards, J. C. & Rodgers, T. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching: A description and analysis (2 nd ed.). Cambridge: CUP.
  16. Saban, A., Kocbeker, B. N., & Saban, A. (2007). Prospective teachers" conceptions of teaching and learning revealed through metaphor analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17, 123-139.
  17. Yazıcı, N. (2010). Metaphors on "Literature" by teachers-to-be graduates of Turkish language and literature departments. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 5339-5343. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.870.
  18. Yob, I. M. (2003). Thinking constructively with metaphors. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 22, 127-138. Ebrahim Khodadady is an academic member of English Language and Literature Department at Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran. His main research interests are Testing, Language Learning and Teaching. Mostafa Morady Moghaddam is currently a PhD student of Teaching English as a Foreign Language (TEFL) at University of Tabriz, Iran. Hoda Kanan Azar is an MA student of Teaching English as a Foreign Language at Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran, International Branch