Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Title
Abstract
Summary & Outlook
References
All Topics
Physics
Nuclear Physics

<i>Colloquium</i> : Neutrino detectors as tools for nuclear security

Profile image of Igor JovanovicIgor Jovanovic

2020, Reviews of Modern Physics

https://doi.org/10.1103/REVMODPHYS.92.011003
visibility

…

description

23 pages

link

1 file

Abstract

For over 40 years, physicists have considered possible uses for neutrino detectors in nuclear nonproliferation, arms control, and fissile materials security. Neutrinos are an attractive fission signature because they readily pass through matter. The same property makes neutrinos challenging to detect in systems that would be practical for nuclear security applications. This colloquium presents a broad overview of several potential neutrino applications, including the near-field monitoring of known reactors, far-field monitoring of known or discovery of undeclared reactors, detection of reactor waste streams, and detection of nuclear explosions. We conclude that recent detector advances have made near-field monitoring feasible. Farther-field reactor detection and waste stream detection monitoring are possible in some cases with further research and development. Very long-range reactor monitoring and nuclear explosion detection do not appear feasible for the foreseeable future due to considerable physical and/or practical constraints.

Related papers

Experimental results from an antineutrino detector for cooperative monitoring of nuclear reactors
Matt Allen

2007

Our collaboration has designed, installed, and operated a compact antineutrino detector at a nuclear power station, for the purpose of monitoring the power and plutonium content of the reactor core. This paper focuses on the basic properties and performance of the detector. We describe the site, the reactor source, and the detector, and provide data that clearly show the expected antineutrino signal. Our data and experience demonstrate that it is possible to operate a simple, relatively small, antineutrino detector near a reactor, in a non-intrusive and unattended mode for months to years at a time, from outside the reactor containment, with no disruption of day-today operations at the reactor site. This unique real-time cooperative monitoring capability may be of interest for the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reactor safeguards program and similar regimes.

View PDFchevron_right
Directionally Accelerated Detection of an Unknown Second Reactor with Antineutrinos for Mid-Field Nonproliferation Monitoring
Igor Jovanovic

2020

When monitoring reactor antineutrinos for nuclear nonproliferation purposes, a hidden nuclear reactor can be obscured by activities of a known reactor of much greater power nearby. Thus any monitor must discriminate known background reactor fluxes from possible unknown reactor signals. We find the confidence to reject the (null) hypothesis of a single proximal reactor, by exploiting directional antineutrino signals in the presence of a second, unknown reactor. In particular, we simulate the IBD response of a 1 kT fiducial GdLS detector. We predict $3\sigma$ confidence to detect the unknown reactor within five weeks, at 3 km or nearer. At longer baselines, this time increases significantly. However, the relative improvement from directional sensitivity also increases, providing an eight-week speedup at 5 km. Therefore, directionally sensitive antineutrino monitoring can accelerate the mid-field detection of unknown reactors whose operation might otherwise be masked by more powerful r...

View PDFchevron_right
Nu Tools: Exploring Practical Roles for Neutrinos in Nuclear Energy and Security
Andrew Conant

2021

For decades, physicists have used neutrinos from nuclear reactors to advance basic science. These pursuits have inspired many ideas for application of neutrino detectors in nuclear energy and security. While developments in neutrino detectors are now making some of these ideas technically feasible, their value in the context of real needs and constraints has been unclear. This report seeks to help focus the picture of where neutrino technology may find practical roles in nuclear energy and security. This report is the final product of the Nu Tools study, commissioned in by the DOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Office of Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Research and Development (DNN R&D). The study was conducted over two years by a group of neutrino physicists and nuclear engineers. A central theme of the study and this report is that useful application of neutrinos will depend not only on advancing physics and technology but also on understanding the needs and constraints of potential end-users. The Study Approach emphasized broad end-user engagement. The major effort, undertaken from May to December 2020, was a series of engagements with the wider nuclear energy and security communities. Interviews with 41 experts revealed points of common understanding, which this report captures in three Cross-Cutting Findings, a Framework for Evaluating Utility, and seven Use Case Findings. The report concludes with two Recommendations. The findings and recommendations are summarized below. The respective ordering within each category does not represent a prioritization or implied value judgement. Cross Cutting Findings Three findings of this study apply across all potential applications of neutrino technology: End-User Engagement: The neutrino technology R&D community is only beginning to engage attentively with endusers, and further coordinated exchange is necessary to explore and develop potential use cases. Technical Readiness: The incorporation of new technologies into the nuclear energy or security toolbox is a methodical process, requiring a novel system such as a neutrino detector to demonstrate sufficient technical readiness. Neutrino System Siting: Siting of a neutrino-based system requires a balance between intrusiveness concerns and technical considerations, where the latter favor a siting as close as possible.

View PDFchevron_right
Using Neutrinos to Monitor Nuclear Reactors: the Angra Neutrino Experiment, Simulation and Detector Status
Gustavo Valdiviesso

Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings, 2015

We present the status of the Angra Neutrino Experiment, aimed at developing an antineutrino detector for monitoring nuclear reactor activity. The detector comprises a 1.42 m 3 Gadolinium-Water Cerenkov target, surrounded by 50 cm of water shielding, placed inside a commercial container about 30 m from the reactor core, at the Angra II nuclear power plant, Brazil. The 4 GW thermal power of the Angra II reactor will provide a few thousand antineutrino interactions per day. The main challenge of the experiment is to overcome the very high cosmic ray induced background at sea level. The present text describes the construction status and simulations results.

View PDFchevron_right
A call to Arms Control: Synergies between Nonproliferation Applications of Neutrino Detectors and Large-Scale Fundamental Neutrino Physics Experiments
Sandra Bogetic
View PDFchevron_right
Observation of Reactor Antineutrinos with a Rapidly Deployable Surface-Level Detector
Alireza Haghighat

Physical Review Applied

We deployed a small, 80 kg, antineutrino detector based on solid plastic scintillator, called MiniCHANDLER for nearly three months at a distance of 25 m from a 2.9 GW thermal power reactor core at the North Anna Nuclear Generating Station. We report the detection of an antineutrino signal resulting from inverse beta decay at 5.5 σ significance with no overburden and minimal shielding. This result also demonstrates that 3D segmentation can be used to significantly improve the signal to noise ratio, in this case by a factor of 4. In addition, this measurement represents an observation of the positron spectrum in a small, surface-deployed detector; this observation of reactor antineutrinos was achieved with a mobile neutrino detector mounted in an ordinary, small trailer.

View PDFchevron_right
A novel neutrino detection system
Dr Minh Duong-van

Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, 1984

We describe a new neutrino (v) detection technique which greatly enhances signal-to-noise ratios (S/N) for a variety of experiments with medium energy neutrino beams. This technique involves the simultaneous detection of a lepton and a neutron in various final states of p induced interactions. We take as an example the reaction ~Tp-+ e + n and demonstrate the feasibility of detecting the neutron in fast (~ 30 ns) time coincidence with the positron trigger. The detection efficiency for 1-3 MeV neutrons by proton recoil in a liquid scintillator test module is shown to be 40%. Monte Carlo studies indicate an e ± n detection efficiency of 6% for a sample 6.1 ton detector, to be compared with an e + only detection efficiency of 32%. Cosmic ray and beam induced background rates are reduced by over a factor of 200, improving S/N by a factor of 40. We show that this sample detector, consisting of walls of liquid scintillator modules interspersed with drift chambers and surrounded by active anti-coincidence and passive shielding, can achieve the same sensitivity to ~¢p-~ e ÷ n as a detector three times its size. We point out the utility of such a detector for various potential neutrino experiments and facilities; i.e., the proposed High Intensity Los Alamos Neutrino Facility.

View PDFchevron_right
DANSS: Detector of the reactor AntiNeutrino based on Solid Scintillator
M. Shirchenko

Journal of Instrumentation, 2016

The DANSS project is aimed at creating a relatively compact neutrino spectrometer which does not contain any flammable or other dangerous liquids and may therefore be located very close to the core of an industrial power reactor. As a result, it is expected that high neutrino flux would provide about 15,000 IBD interactions per day in the detector with a sensitive volume of 1 m 3. High segmentation of the plastic scintillator will allow to suppress a background down to a ∼1% level. Numerous tests performed with a simplified pilot prototype DANSSino under a 3 GW th reactor of the Kalinin NPP have demonstrated operability of the chosen design. The DANSS detector surrounded with a composite shield is movable by means of a special lifting gear, varying the distance to the reactor core in a range from 10 m to 12 m. Due to this feature, it could be used not only for the reactor monitoring, but also for fundamental research including short-range neutrino oscillations to the sterile state. Supposing one-year measurement, the sensitivity to the oscillation parameters is expected to reach a level of sin 2 (2θnew) ∼ 5 × 10 −3 with ∆m 2 ⊂ (0.02 − 5.0) eV 2 .

View PDFchevron_right
Search for neutrino oscillations at 15, 40 and 95 meters from a nuclear power reactor at Bugey
H. Kerret

Nuclear Physics B, 1995

We report on high statistics measurements of neutrino energy spectra carded out at 15, 40 and 95 meters from a 2800 Megawatt reactor, using detection modules filled with 6Li-loaded liquid scintillator. No oscillations have been observed. Exclusion zones for oscillation parameters are deduced from the observed consistency of the spectra at the three distances. The minimum excluded values of the 8m: and sin 2 20 parameters are 1 x 10 -2 eV 2 and 2 x 10 -2 (at 90% CL), respectively.

View PDFchevron_right
NEOS Detector for Reactor Antineutrinos
Jaison Lee

Proceedings of 38th International Conference on High Energy Physics — PoS(ICHEP2016)

NEOS intends to understand the short-distance behavior of reactor neutrino oscillation. The detector has been obtaining about 2,000 inverse beta decay (IBD) events on daily base, since its performance was stabilized in September 2015. We present the geometry, the structure, and the current output of NEOS detector. The design of detector and the recipe of liquid scintillator mixture will be introduced, which were well set up enough to reduce the level of background. The signal-to-background ratio reached over 20. Including adjustment procedures for reconstruction, we will show the energy resolution of the detector and the energy calibration with GEANT4 simulation.

View PDFchevron_right

References (129)

  1. Abazajian, K N, et al. (2012), "Light Sterile Neutrinos: A White Paper," arXiv:1204.5379 [hep-ph].
  2. Abe, Y, et al. (Double Chooz Collaboration) (2012), "Indica- tion of reactor νe disappearance in the double chooz exper- iment," Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 131801.
  3. Abreu, Y, et al. (SoLid Collaboration) (2018a), "Optimisation of the scintillation light collection and uniformity for the SoLid experiment," Journal of Instrumentation 13 (09), P09005-P09005.
  4. Abreu, Y, et al. (SoLid Collaboration) (2018b), "Performance of a full scale prototype detector at the BR2 reactor for the SoLid experiment," Journal of Instrumentation 13 (05), P05005-P05005.
  5. Adey, D, et al. (Daya Bay) (2019), "Extraction of the 235 U and 239 Pu Antineutrino Spectra at Daya Bay," Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (11), 111801, arXiv:1904.07812 [hep-ex].
  6. Ahn, J K, et al. (RENO) (2012), "Observation of Reactor Electron Antineutrino Disappearance in the RENO Ex- periment," Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 191802, arXiv:1204.0626 [hep-ex].
  7. Akimov, D, et al. (COHERENT) (2017), "Observation of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering," Science 357 (6356), 1123-1126, arXiv:1708.01294 [nucl-ex].
  8. Alekseev, I, et al. (DANSS) (2018), "Search for sterile neutri- nos at the DANSS experiment," Phys. Lett. B787, 56-63, arXiv:1804.04046 [hep-ex].
  9. Alekseev, I G, et al. (2019), "Industrial Reactor Power Moni- toring Using Antineutrino Counts in the DANSS Detector," 68th International Conference on Nuclear Spectroscopy and Nuclear Structure (NUCLEI-2018)
  10. Voronezh, Russia, July 2-6, 2018, Phys. Atom. Nucl. 82 (5), 415-424.
  11. Almazn, H, et al. (STEREO) (2018), "Sterile Neutrino Con- straints from the STEREO Experiment with 66 Days of Reactor-On Data," Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (16), 161801, arXiv:1806.02096 [hep-ex].
  12. An, F, et al. (JUNO Collaboration) (2016a), "Neutrino physics with JUNO," Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 43 (3), 030401.
  13. An, F P, et al. (Daya Bay Collaboration) (2012), "Observa- tion of Electron-Antineutrino Disappearance at Daya Bay," Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 171803.
  14. An, Feng Peng, et al. (Daya Bay) (2016b), "Measurement of the Reactor Antineutrino Flux and Spectrum at Daya Bay," Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (6), 061801, [Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett.118,no.9,099902(2017)], arXiv:1508.04233 [hep- ex].
  15. Apollonio, M, et al. (CHOOZ) (1999), "Limits on neutrino os- cillations from the CHOOZ experiment," Phys. Lett. B466, 415-430, arXiv:hep-ex/9907037 [hep-ex].
  16. Ashenfelter, J, et al. (PROSPECT Collaboration) (2016), "The PROSPECT physics program," Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 43 (11), 113001.
  17. Ashenfelter, J, et al. (PROSPECT Collaboration) (2018a), "First search for short-baseline neutrino oscillations at HFIR with PROSPECT," Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 251802.
  18. Ashenfelter, J, et al. (PROSPECT Collaboration) (2018b), "Performance of a segmented 6 Li-loaded liquid scintillator detector for the PROSPECT experiment," Journal of In- strumentation 13 (06), P06023-P06023.
  19. Ashenfelter, J, et al. (PROSPECT Collaboration) (2019), "Measurement of the Antineutrino Spectrum from 235 U Fission at HFIR with PROSPECT," Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 251801, arXiv:1812.10877 [nucl-ex].
  20. Askins, M, et al. (WATCHMAN) (2015), "The Physics and Nuclear Nonproliferation Goals of WATCHMAN: A WAter CHerenkov Monitor for ANtineutrinos," arXiv:1502.01132 [physics.ins-det].
  21. Barna, Andrew, and Steve Dye (2015), "Global Antineutrino Modeling: A Web Application," arXiv:1510.05633.
  22. Beacom, John F (2010), "The diffuse supernova neutrino background," Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Sci- ence 60 (1), 439-462.
  23. Beacom, John F, and Mark R. Vagins (2004), "GADZOOKS! Anti-neutrino spectroscopy with large water Cherenkov detectors," Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 171101, arXiv:hep- ph/0309300 [hep-ph].
  24. Bellini, G, A. Ianni, L. Ludhova, F. Mantovani, and W.F. McDonough (2013), "Geo-neutrinos," Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 73, 1 -34.
  25. Bernstein, A, N. S. Bowden, A. Misner, and T. Palmer (2008), "Monitoring the thermal power of nuclear reactors with a prototype cubic meter antineutrino detector," Jour- nal of Applied Physics 103 (7), 074905.
  26. Bernstein, Adam, Nathaniel S. Bowden, and Anna S. Er- ickson (2018), "Reactors as a source of antineutrinos: the effect of fuel loading and burnup for mixed oxide fuels," Phys. Rev. Applied 9 (1), 014003.
  27. Bernstein, Adam, Todd West, and Vipin Gupta (2001), "An assessment of antineutrino detection as a tool for monitor- ing nuclear explosions," Science & Global Security 9 (3), 235-255, https://doi.org/10.1080/08929880108426496.
  28. Bethe, H, and R. Peierls (1934), "The 'neutrino'," Nature 133, 532.
  29. Boehm, F, et al. (2001), "Final results from the Palo Verde neutrino oscillation experiment," Phys. Rev. D64, 112001, arXiv:hep-ex/0107009 [hep-ex].
  30. Boireau, G, et al. (Nucifer Collaboration) (2016), "Online Monitoring of the Osiris Reactor with the Nucifer Neutrino Detector," Phys. Rev. D 93 (11), 112006.
  31. Borovoi, A A, and L. A. Mikaelyan (1978), "Possibilities of the practical use of neutrinos," Soviet Atomic Energy 44 (6), 589-592.
  32. Bowden, N S (2008), "Reactor monitoring and safeguards us- ing antineutrino detectors," Journal of Physics: Conference Series 136 (2), 022008.
  33. Bowden, N S, A. Bernstein, S. Dazeley, R. Svoboda, A. Mis- ner, and T. Palmer (2009), "Observation of the Isotopic Evolution of PWR Fuel Using an Antineutrino Detector," Journal of Applied Physics 105, 064902.
  34. Bowden, N S, M. Sweany, and S. Dazeley (2012), "A note on neutron capture correlation signals, backgrounds, and efficiencies," Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detec- tors and Associated Equipment 693, 209 -214.
  35. Bowden, NS, A. Bernstein, M. Allen, J.S. Brennan, M. Cun- ningham, J.K. Estrada, C.M.R. Greaves, C. Hagmann, J. Lund, W. Mengesha, T.D. Weinbeck, and C.D. Winant (2007), "Experimental results from an antineutrino detec- tor for cooperative monitoring of nuclear reactors," Nu- clear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 572 (2), 985 -998.
  36. Brdar, Vedran, Patrick Huber, and Joachim Kopp (2017), "Antineutrino monitoring of spent nuclear fuel," Phys. Rev. Applied 8, 054050.
  37. Brooks, FD (1959), "A scintillation counter with neutron and gamma-ray discriminators," Nuclear Instruments and Methods 4 (3), 151 -163.
  38. Carr, Rachel, Jonathon Coleman, Mikhail Danilov, Gior- gio Gratta, Karsten Heeger, Patrick Huber, YuenKeung Hor, Takeo Kawasaki, Soo-Bong Kim, and Yeongduk Kim (2019), "Neutrino-based tools for nuclear verification and diplomacy in North Korea," Science & Global Security 27 (1), 2, arXiv:1811.04737 [physics.soc-ph].
  39. Carr, Rachel, Ferenc Dalnoki-Veress, and Adam Bernstein (2018), "Sensitivity of seismically cued antineutrino detec- tors to nuclear explosions," Phys. Rev. Applied 10, 024014.
  40. Carroll, J, J. Coleman, G. Davies, M. Lockwood, C. Metelko, R. Mills, M. Murdoch, A. Roberts, Y. Schnellbach, and C. Touramanis (2018), "Monitoring Reactor Anti- Neutrinos Using a Plastic Scintillator Detector in a Mobile Laboratory," arXiv:1811.01006 [physics.ins-det].
  41. Cavaignac, J F, A. Hoummada, D. H. Koang, B. Vignon, Y. Declais, H. de Kerret, H. Pessard, and J. M. Thenard (1984), "Indication for Neutrino Oscillation From a High Statistics Experiment at the Bugey Reactor," Phys. Lett. 148B, 387-394.
  42. Chen, JD Gerwing, AF, and P.D. Lewis (2001), Long-cooled spent fuel verification using a digital Cerenkov viewing de- vice, Tech. Rep. IAEA-SM-367 (IAEA).
  43. Choi, J H, et al. (RENO) (2016), "Observation of Energy and Baseline Dependent Reactor Antineutrino Disappear- ance in the RENO Experiment," Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (21), 211801, arXiv:1511.05849 [hep-ex].
  44. Christensen, Eric, Patrick Huber, and Patrick Jaffke (2015), "Antineutrino Reactor Safeguards: A Case Study of the DPRK 1994 Nuclear Crisis," Science & Global Security 23 (1), 20-47.
  45. Christensen, Eric, Patrick Huber, Patrick Jaffke, and Thomas E. Shea (2014), "Antineutrino monitoring for heavy water reactors," Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 042503.
  46. Classen, T, A. Bernstein, N. S. Bowden, B. Cabrera-Palmer, A. Ho, G. Jonkmans, L. Kogler, D. Reyna, and B. Sur (2015), "Development of an advanced antineutrino detector for reactor monitoring," Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A771, 139- 146. Cogswell, Bernadette K, and Patrick Huber (2016), "Detec- tion of breeding blankets using antineutrinos," Science & Global Security 24 (2), 114-130.
  47. Cowan, C L, F. Reines, F. B. Harrison, H. W. Kruse, and A. D. McGuire (1956), "Detection of the free neutrino: a confirmation," Science 124 (3212), 103-104.
  48. Davis, Jay C, and David A. Kay (1992), "Iraq's secret nuclear weapons program," Physics Today 45 (7), 21-27.
  49. Declais, Y, et al. (1995), "Search for neutrino oscillations at 15-meters, 40-meters, and 95-meters from a nuclear power reactor at Bugey," Nucl. Phys. B434, 503-534.
  50. Dentler, Mona, lvaro Hernndez-Cabezudo, Joachim Kopp, Pe- dro A. N. Machado, Michele Maltoni, Ivan Martinez-Soler, and Thomas Schwetz (2018), "Updated Global Analysis of Neutrino Oscillations in the Presence of eV-Scale Sterile Neutrinos," JHEP 08, 010, arXiv:1803.10661 [hep-ph].
  51. Dye, Steve (2017), "Evaluating Reactor Antineutrino Signals for WATCHMAN," in 12th Workshop on Applied Antineu- trino Physics (AAP 2016) Liverpool, UK, December 1-2, 2016, arXiv:1702.06117 [physics.ins-det].
  52. Eguchi, K, et al. (KamLAND Collaboration) (2003), "First results from KamLAND: Evidence for reactor anti-neutrino disappearance," Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 021802.
  53. van Eijk, CWE, A Bessire, and P Dorenbos (2004), "Inor- ganic thermal-neutron scintillators," Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Acceler- ators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equip- ment 529 (1), 260 -267, proceedings of the Joint Meet- ing of the International Conference on Neutron Optics (NOP2004) and the Third International Workshop on Position-Sensitive Neutron Detectors (PSND2004).
  54. Findlay, Trevor (2007), "Looking Back: The Additional Pro- tocol," Arms Control Today.
  55. Freedman, Daniel Z (1974), "Coherent effects of a weak neu- tral current," Phys. Rev. D 9, 1389-1392.
  56. Garrett, A J, M. Casterline, and C. Salvaggio (2010), "Ther- modynamics of Partially Frozen Cooling Lakes," in Proc. SPIE 7661, Thermosense XXXII , Vol. 7661, p. 766105.
  57. Green, D N, and D. Bowers (2010), "Estimating the detec- tion capability of the International Monitoring System in- frasound network," Journal of Geophysical Research Atmo- spheres 115 (18), 1-18.
  58. Greenwood, Z D, et al. (1996), "Results of a two position reactor neutrino oscillation experiment," Phys. Rev. D53, 6054-6064.
  59. Hafemeister, David W (1989), "Infrared monitoring of nuclear power in space," Science & Global Security 1 (1-2), 109- 128, https://doi.org/10.1080/08929888908426326.
  60. Haghighat, Alireza, Patrick Huber, Shengchao Li, Jonathan M. Link, Camillo Mariani, Jaewon Park, and Tulasi Subedi (2018), "Observation of Reactor Antineutrinos with a Rapidly-Deployable Surface-Level Detector," arXiv:1812.02163 [physics.ins-det].
  61. Hayes, Anna C, and Petr Vogel (2016), "Reactor neu- trino spectra," Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 66 (1), 219-244, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev- nucl-102115-044826.
  62. Hecker, Siefried S, Robert L. Carlin, and Elliot A. Serbin (2018), "A technical and political history of North Ko- reas nuclear program over the past 26 years," Cen- ter for International Security and Cooperation, Stanford University, https://cisac.fsi.stanford.edu/content/ cisac-north-korea.
  63. Hellfeld, D, A. Bernstein, S. Dazeley, and C. Marianno (2017), "Reconstructing the direction of reactor antineu- trinos via electron scattering in gd-doped water cherenkov detectors," Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detec- tors and Associated Equipment 841, 130 -138.
  64. Huber, Patrick (2011), "Determination of antineutrino spec- tra from nuclear reactors," Phys. Rev. C 84, 024617.
  65. Huber, Patrick, and Patrick Jaffke (2016), "Neutron capture and the antineutrino yield from nuclear reactors," Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (12), 122503, arXiv:1510.08948 [hep-ph].
  66. IAEA, (1998), "Model protocol additional to the agree- ment(s) between state(s) and the international atomic en- ergy agency for the application of safeguards," https:// www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/infcirc540c.pdf.
  67. Jaffke, Patrick, and Patrick Huber (2017), "Determining re- actor fuel type from continuous antineutrino monitoring," Phys. Rev. Applied 8, 034005.
  68. Jaraysi, M N, J. G. Kristofzski, M. P. Connelly, M. I. Wood, A. J. Knepp, and R. A. Quintero (2006), Initial Single- Shell Tank System Performance Assessment for the Han- ford Site, Tech. Rep. DOE/ORP-2005-01, Rev 0 (United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Department of En- ergy).
  69. Jocher, Glenn R, Daniel A. Bondy, Brian M. Dobbs, Stephen T. Dye, James A. Georges, John G. Learned, Christopher L. Mulliss, and Shawn Usman (2013), "Theo- retical antineutrino detection, direction and ranging at long distances," Physics Reports 527 (3), 131 -204, theoreti- cal Antineutrino Detection, Direction and Ranging at Long Distances.
  70. Johnston, Roger G, Anthony R.E. Garcia, and Adam N. Pacheco (1983), Efficacy of Tamper-Indicating Devices, Tech. Rep. LAUR-02-0492 (Los Alamos National Labora- tory).
  71. Kajita, Takaaki (2016), "Nobel lecture: Discovery of atmo- spheric neutrino oscillations," Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 030501.
  72. Kiff, Scott D, Nathaniel Bowden, Jim Lund, and David Reyna (2011), "Neutron detection and identification using zns:ag/ 6 lif in segmented antineutrino detectors," Nucl. In- strum. Meth. A 652 (1), 412 -416, Symposium on Radia- tion Measurements and Applications (SORMA) XII 2010.
  73. Klimov, Yu A, et al. (1994), "Neutrino method remote mea- surement of reactor power and power output," Atomic En- ergy 76 (2), 123-127.
  74. Ko, YJ, et al. (NEOS Collaboration) (2017), "Sterile Neu- trino Search at the NEOS Experiment," Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (12), 121802.
  75. Krauss, Lawrence M, Sheldon L. Glashow, and David N. Schramm (1984), "Anti-neutrinos Astronomy and Geo- physics," Nature 310, 191-198, [,674(1983)].
  76. Kristensen, Hans M, and Robert S. Norris (2013), "Global nuclear weapons inventories, 1945-2013," Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 69 (5), 75-81.
  77. Kristensen, Hans M, and Robert S. Norris (2017), "World- wide deployments of nuclear weapons, 2017," Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 73 (5), 289-297.
  78. Kudryavtsev, VA (2009), "Muon simulation codes music and musun for underground physics," Computer Physics Com- munications 180 (3), 339 -346.
  79. Kuroda, Y, S. Oguri, Y. Kato, R. Nakata, Y. Inoue, C. Ito, and M. Minowa (2012), "A mobile antineutrino detector with plastic scintillators," Nuclear Instruments and Meth- ods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrom- eters, Detectors and Associated Equipment 690, 41 -47.
  80. Kuvshinnikov, A A, et al. (1991), "Precise measurement of the cross section for the inverse beta decay reaction at a reactor of the rovno nuclear power plant," JETP Letters 54 (5), 253.
  81. Kvaerna, Tormod, and Frode Ringdal (2013), "Detection ca- pability of the seismic network of the International Mon- itoring System for the comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty," Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 103 (2 A), 759-772.
  82. Kwon, H, F. Boehm, A. A. Hahn, H. E. Henrikson, J. L. Vuilleumier, J. F. Cavaignac, D. H. Koang, B. Vignon, F. Von Feilitzsch, and R. L. Mossbauer (1981), "Search for Neutrino Oscillations at a Fission Reactor," Phys. Rev. D24, 1097-1111.
  83. Lane, C, et al. (NuLat Collaboration) (2015), "A new type of Neutrino Detector for Sterile Neutrino Search at Nu- clear Reactors and Nuclear Nonproliferation Applications," arXiv:1501.06935 [physics.ins-det].
  84. Langanke, K, P. Vogel, and E. Kolbe (1996), "Signal for su- pernova νµ and ντ neutrinos in water Čerenkov detectors," Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2629-2632.
  85. Lasserre, Thierry, Maximilien Fechner, Guillaume Mention, Romain Reboulleau, Michel Cribier, Alain Letourneau, and David Lhuillier (2010), "SNIF: A Futuristic Neu- trino Probe for Undeclared Nuclear Fission Reactors," arXiv:1011.3850 [nucl-ex].
  86. Lawrence, Martin W (1999), "Overview of the hydroacous- tic monitoring system for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test- Ban Treaty," The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 105 (2), 1037.
  87. Lee, Si Young, and Alfred J. Garrett (2015), "Thermal Hy- draulic Analysis for Cooling Tower Performance," in 16th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics, pp. 1074-1087.
  88. Lilienthal, David E, Chester I. Barnard, Charles A. Thomas, J. R. Oppenheimer, and Harry A. Winne (1946), Report on the International Control of Atomic Energy, Tech. Rep. (U.S. Government Printing Office).
  89. Littlejohn, B R, A. Conant, D. A. Dwyer, A. Erickson, I. Gustafson, and K. Hermanek (2018), "Impact of Fis- sion Neutron Energies on Reactor Antineutrino Spectra," Phys. Rev. D97 (7), 073007, arXiv:1803.01787 [nucl-th].
  90. McDonald, Arthur B (2016), "Nobel lecture: The sudbury neutrino observatory: Observation of flavor change for solar neutrinos," Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 030502.
  91. Mei, D-M, and A. Hime (2006), "Muon-induced background study for underground laboratories," Phys. Rev. D 73, 053004.
  92. Mention, G, M. Fechner, Th. Lasserre, Th. A. Mueller, D. Lhuillier, M. Cribier, and A. Letourneau (2011), "Re- actor antineutrino anomaly," Phys. Rev. D 83, 073006.
  93. Mikaelyan, L A (1978), "Neutrino laboratory in the atomic plant," in Neutrino 77, Proceedings of the International Conference on Neutrino Physics and Neutrino Astro- physics, Vol. 2, p. 383.
  94. Mueller, Th A, D. Lhuillier, M. Fallot, A. Letourneau, S. Cor- mon, M. Fechner, L. Giot, T. Lasserre, J. Martino, G. Men- tion, A. Porta, and F. Yermia (2011), "Improved predic- tions of reactor antineutrino spectra," Phys. Rev. C 83, 054615.
  95. Mulmule, D, S. P. Behera, P. K. Netrakanti, D. K. Mishra, V. K. S. Kashyap, V. Jha, L. M. Pant, B. K. Nayak, and A. Saxena (2018), "A plastic scintillator array for reactor based anti-neutrino studies," Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A911, 104-114.
  96. National Research Council, (2012), The Comprehensive Nu- clear Test Ban Treaty: Technical Issues for the United States (The National Academies Press, Washington, DC).
  97. Nature, (2019), "Gigantic Japanese detector prepares to catch neutrinos from supernovae," https://www.nature. com/articles/d41586-019-00598-9.
  98. NYT, (2018), "How to spot a nuclear bomb program? look for ghostly particles,".
  99. Oguri, S, Y. Kuroda, Y. Kato, R. Nakata, Y. Inoue, C. Ito, and M. Minowa (2014), "Reactor antineutrino monitor- ing with a plastic scintillator array as a new safeguards method," Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A757, 33-39.
  100. CTBTO, (2018), "CTBTO preparatory commission -map of facilities," Accessed: 2018-05-15.
  101. GAO, (2014), Spent nuclear fuel management, Tech. Rep. GAO-15-141 (US Government Accounting Office).
  102. IAEA, (2011), Safeguards Techniques and Equipment:, Inter- national Nuclear Verification Series No. 1 (Rev. 2) (Inter- national Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna).
  103. NAS, (2016), Lessons Learned from the Fukushima Nuclear Accident for Improving Safety and Security of U.S. Nuclear Plants: Phase 2 (The National Academies Press, Washing- ton, DC).
  104. Nuclear Energy Agency, (2017), "Joint evaluated fission and fusion file (jeff) 3.3," https://www.oecd-nea.org/dbdata/ jeff/jeff33/.
  105. Nuclear Threat Initiative, (2018), "Proposed Fissile Material Cut-off Treaty," https://
  106. United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs, (1968), "Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons," https://www.un.org/disarmament/wmd/nuclear/npt.
  107. United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs, (1996), "Com- prehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty," https://www.un. org/disarmament/wmd/nuclear/ctbt/.
  108. World Nuclear Association, (2019), "Number of nu- clear reactors operable and under construction," http://www.world-nuclear.org/nuclear-basics/ global-number-of-nuclear-reactors.aspx.
  109. Pushkarjov, V, and E. Tkharev (1986), "International safe- guards aspects of spent-fuel storage," IAEA Bulletin , 53- 57.
  110. Reines, F, H. W. Sobel, and E. Pasierb (1980), "Evidence for Neutrino Instability," Durham NH Workshop 1980:149, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 1307.
  111. Reines, Fred (1995), "Nobel lecture: The neutrino: From poltergeist to particle," https://www.nobelprize.org/ prizes/physics/1995/reines/lecture/.
  112. Renshaw, A, et al. (The Super-Kamiokande Collaboration) (2014), "First indication of terrestrial matter effects on so- lar neutrino oscillation," Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 091805.
  113. Reyna, D, N.S. Bowden, A. Bernstein, S. Dazeley, G. Keefer, B. Cabrera-Palmer, T. Classen, S. Kiff, L. Kogler, and A. Erickson (2012), "A compact and portable antineutrino detector for reactor monitoring," in 53th Annual Meeting of the Institute of Nuclear Materials Management, p. 3300. Richelson, J T (2007), Spying on the Bomb: American Nu- clear Intelligence from Nazi Germany to Iran and North Korea (W. W. Norton & Company, New York).
  114. Riley, S P, Z. D. Greenwood, W. R. Kropp, L. R. Price, F. Reines, H. W. Sobel, Y. Declais, A. Etenko, and M. Sko- rokhvatov (1999), "Neutrino induced deuteron disintegra- tion experiment," Phys. Rev. C59, 1780-1789, arXiv:hep- ex/9904001 [hep-ex].
  115. Rockhold, M L, D. H. Bacon, V. L. Freedman, M. J. Lind- ber, and R.E. Clayton (2012), Numerical Modeling of 90 Sr and 137 Cs Transport from a Spill in the B-Cell of the 324 Building, Hanford Site 300 Area, Tech. Rep. PNNL-21214 (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory).
  116. Saey, PRJ (2007), "Ultra-low-level measurements of argon, krypton and radioxenon for treaty verification," ESARDA Bulletin 36, 42-56.
  117. Safdi, Benjamin R, and Burkhant Suerfu (2015), "Directional antineutrino detection," Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 071802.
  118. Schoeppner, Michael (2017), "Performance Assessment of the CTBTO Noble Gas Network to Detect Nuclear Explo- sions," Pure and Applied Geophysics 174 (5), 2161-2171.
  119. Serebrov, A P, et al. (NEUTRINO-4) (2019), "First Ob- servation of the Oscillation Effect in the Neutrino-4 Experiment on the Search for the Sterile Neutrino," Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 109 (4), 209-218, [JETP Lett.109,no.4,213(2019)], arXiv:1809.10561 [hep-ex].
  120. Stubbs, C W, and S. D. Drell (2013), "Public domain treaty compliance verification in the digital age," IEEE Technol- ogy and Society Magazine 32 (4), 57-64.
  121. Stumpf, Waldo (1996), "South africas nuclear weapons pro- gram: From deterrence to dismantlement," Arms Control Today 25 (10), 3-8.
  122. Usman, Shawn M, Glenn R. Jocher, Stephen T. Dye, William F. McDonough, and John G. Learned (2015), "AGM2015: Antineutrino Global Map 2015," Sci. Rep. 5, 13945, arXiv:1509.03898 [physics.ins-det].
  123. Vidyakin, G S, et al. (1994), "Limitations on the characteris- tics of neutrino oscillations," JETP Letters 59 (6), 390.
  124. Vogel, P, and J. F. Beacom (1999), "Angular distribution of neutron inverse beta decay, νe+ → p e + + n," Phys. Rev. D 60, 053003.
  125. Wahl, C G, W. Kaye, W. Wang, F. Zhang, J. Jaworski, Y. A. Boucher, A. King, and Z. He (2014), "Polaris-h measure- ments and performance," in 2014 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC), pp. 1-4.
  126. Willig, Thomas Mo, Cecilia Futsaether, and Halvor Kippe (2012), "Converting the iranian heavy water reactor ir-40 to a more proliferation-resistant reactor," Science and Global Security 20, 97-116.
  127. Xu, Chenyuan (2016), "Current status of SK-Gd project and EGADS," Journal of Physics: Conference Series 718, 062070.
  128. Zacek, G, et al. (CALTECH-SIN-TUM) (1986), "Neutrino Oscillation Experiments at the Gosgen Nuclear Power Re- actor," Phys. Rev. D34, 2621-2636.
  129. Zendel, Manfred, D L. Donohue, Erwin Kuhn, Stein Deron, and Tamas Biro (2011), "Nuclear safeguards verification measurement techniques," Handbook of Nuclear Chem- istry.

Related papers

Advances towards readily deployable antineutrino detectors for reactor monitoring and safeguards
David Reyna

2009

The large flux of neutrinos that leaves a nuclear reactor carries information about two quantities of interest for safeguards: the reactor power and fissile inventory. Our SNL/LLNL collaboration has demonstrated that antineutrinobased nuclear reactor monitoring is feasible using a relatively small cubic scale detector made of Gadolinium loaded liquid scintillator at tens of meters standoff from a commercial Pressurized Water Reactor, deployed in an underground gallery that lies directly under the containment. Recently we have investigated several technologies paths that could allow such devices to be more readily deployed in the fieldof particular concern to reactor operators and safeguards practitioners is the flammability of the Gd doped liquid scintillator. In addition, many PWR facilities do not have an available underground gallery to provide the screening of muon induced backgrounds. As a result, we have developed and fielded three new detectors: a low cost, non-flammable water based design; a robust solid-state design based upon plastic scintillator; and a smaller cryogenic detector based on ultra-high purity Germanium. All three of these technologies have been deployed at our below-ground facility at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station in southern California. We first present an overview of the use of antineutrinos in reactor monitoring. We then explain the detection mechanism based on inverse beta decay and the dominant sources of aboveground background that would contaminate this signal. Next, we discuss conceptual ideas under consideration for a future aboveground detector. Separate sections are devoted to describe the design, construction and deployment of each of our three new technologies that have already been deployment. We discuss the various levels of sensitivity to the reactor antineutrino signature that each of these detectors was able to demonstrate and the tradeoffs that accompany them.

View PDFchevron_right
Nuclear Security Applications of Antineutrino Detectors: Current Capabilities and Future Prospects
Jim Lund

Science & Global Security, 2010

Antineutrinos are electrically neutral, nearly massless fundamental particles produced in large numbers in the cores of nuclear reactors and in nuclear explosions. In the half century since their discovery, major advances in the understanding of their properties, and in detector technology, have opened the door to a new discipline—Applied Antineutrino Physics. Because antineutrinos are inextricably linked to the process of

View PDFchevron_right
An assessment of antineutrino detection as a tool for monitoring nuclear explosions
Todd West

Science &amp; Global Security, 2001

The antineutrino is the only real-time nuclear signature from a fission explosion that propagates great distances through air, water, and ground. The size and sensitivity of antineutrino detectors has increased dramatically in the last decade, and will continue to do so in the next, thanks in part to the renewed interest in neutrino physics brought on by the recent discovery that neutrinos may have mass. The evolution of antineutrino detectors, and the evident interest of the signature as a means for monitoring nuclear tests motivates this review of the capabilities of existing and possible future detectors as test ban verification tools. We find that existing liquid scintillator ionization detectors, operating a few tens of meters below the Earth's surface and containing a few thousand tons of active material, could be used to monitor an area of a few square kilometers for nuclear explosions at the 1 kt level. Purified water Cerenkov detectors of sizes comparable to existing detectors (50,000 m3) could be used to detect 1 kt explosions at distances of a few tens of kilometers. If neutron-absorbing dopants such as sodium chloride or gadolitium could be added to purified water, the resulting background reduction would allow extension of the range for sensitivity to a pulse of 10 antineutrino events from a 1 kt explosion out to approximately 1000 km. Beyond 1000 km, backgrounds from the world's nuclear reactors would become prohibitively large.

View PDFchevron_right
Nuclear reactor safeguards and monitoring with antineutrino detectors
Todd West

Journal of Applied Physics, 2002

Cubic-meter-sized antineutrino detectors can be used to non intrusively, robustly, and automatically monitor and safeguard a wide variety of nuclear reactor types, including power reactors, research reactors, and plutonium production reactors. Since the antineutrino spectra and relative yields of fissioning isotopes depend on the isotopic composition of the core, changes in composition can be observed without ever directly accessing the core itself. Information from a modest-sized antineutrino detector, coupled with the well-understood principles that govern the core’s evolution in time, can be used to determine whether the reactor is being operated in an illegitimate way. A group at Sandia is currently constructing a 1 m3 antineutrino detector at the San Onofre reactor site in California to demonstrate these principles.

View PDFchevron_right
Above-ground antineutrino detection for nuclear reactor monitoring
David Reyna

Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 2015

Antineutrino monitoring of nuclear reactors has been demonstrated many times [1, 2, 3], however the technique has not as of yet been developed into a useful capability for treaty verification purposes. The most notable drawback is the current requirement that detectors be deployed underground, with at least several meters-water-equivalent of shielding from cosmic radiation. In addition, the deployment of liquid-based detection media presents a challenge in reactor facilities. We are currently developing a detector system that has the potential to operate above ground and circumvent deployment problems associated with a liquid detection media: the system is composed of segments of plastic scintillator surrounded by 6 LiF/ZnS:Ag. ZnS:Ag is a radio-luminescent phosphor used to detect the neutron capture products of lithium-6. Because of its long decay time compared to standard plastic scintillators, pulse-shape discrimination can be used to distinguish positron and neutron interactions resulting from the inverse beta decay (IBD) of antineutrinos within the detector volume, reducing both accidental and correlated backgrounds. Segmentation further reduces backgrounds by identifying the positron's annihilation gammas, a signature that is absent for most correlated and uncorrelated backgrounds. This work explores different configurations in order to maximize the size of the detector segments without reducing the intrinsic neutron detection efficiency. We believe this technology will ultimately be applicable to potential safeguards scenarios such as those recently described by [4, 5].

View PDFchevron_right

Related topics

  • Physics
  • Nuclear Physics
  • Particle Physics

    • Cited by

    Reactor neutrino applications and coherent elastic neutrino nucleus scattering
    Maitland Bowen

    Physical Review D, 2020

    Potential applications of neutrino detection to nuclear security have been discussed since the 1970s. Recent years have seen great progress in detector technologies based on inverse beta decay, with the demonstration of ton-scale surface-level detectors capable of high quality neutrino spectrum measurements. At the same time coherent elastic neutrino nucleus scattering has been experimentally confirmed in 2017 with neutrinos from stopped pion decay and there is a number of experiments aimed at seeing this reaction with reactor neutrinos. The large cross section and threshold-less nature of this reaction make it plausible to consider it for applications to nuclear security and here, we present a first direct comparison of the two reaction modes. 1 In this letter we deal exclusively with electron antineutrinos and for brevity will refer to them simply as neutrinos.

    View PDFchevron_right
    580 California St., Suite 400
    San Francisco, CA, 94104
    © 2025 Academia. All rights reserved