Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Representation learning for entity type ranking

Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing

https://doi.org/10.1145/3341105.3374029

Abstract

The type of an entity is a key piece of information to understand what an entity is and how it relates to other entities mentioned in a document. Search engine result pages (SERPs) often surface facts and entity type information from a background Knowledge Graph (KG) in response to queries that carry a semantic information need. In a KG, an entity usually holds multiple type properties. It is then important to, given an entity in a KG, rank entity types attached to the entity by relevance to a certain user and information need as not always the most popular type is the most informative within a textual context. In this paper we address the entity type ranking problem by means of KG embedding models. In our work, we show that entity type ranking can be seen as a special case of the KG completion problem. Embeddings can be learned from both the structural and probabilistic information of the entities. We propose a Representation Learning model for Type Ranking (RL-TRank) and the results of the structure embedding and the probabilistic embedding are combined to get the entity type ranking. Experimental results show that the accuracy of RL-TRank approaches outperform the state-ofthe-art type ranking models while, at the same time, being more efficient and scalable.

References (32)

  1. Hannah Bast, Björn Buchhold, and Elmar Haussmann. 2017. Overview of the triple scoring task at the WSDM Cup 2017. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.08081 (2017).
  2. Kurt Bollacker, Colin Evans, Praveen Paritosh, Tim Sturge, and Jamie Taylor. 2008. Freebase: a collaboratively created graph database for structuring human knowledge. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data. AcM, 1247-1250.
  3. Antoine Bordes, Xavier Glorot, Jason Weston, and Yoshua Bengio. 2014. A seman- tic matching energy function for learning with multi-relational data. Machine Learning 94, 2 (2014), 233-259.
  4. Antoine Bordes, Nicolas Usunier, Alberto Garcia-Duran, Jason Weston, and Ok- sana Yakhnenko. 2013. Irreflexive and hierarchical relations as translations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1304.7158 (2013).
  5. Antoine Bordes, Nicolas Usunier, Alberto Garcia-Duran, Jason Weston, and Ok- sana Yakhnenko. 2013. Translating embeddings for modeling multi-relational data. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 2787-2795.
  6. Antoine Bordes, Jason Weston, Ronan Collobert, Yoshua Bengio, et al. 2011. Learning Structured Embeddings of Knowledge Bases.. In AAAI, Vol. 6. 6.
  7. Yixin Cao, Lei Hou, Juanzi Li, and Zhiyuan Liu. 2018. Neural collective entity linking. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.08603 (2018).
  8. Wei Fang, Jianwen Zhang, Dilin Wang, Zheng Chen, and Ming Li. 2016. Entity disambiguation by knowledge and text jointly embedding. In Proceedings of the 20th SIGNLL conference on computational natural language learning. 260-269.
  9. Aditya Grover and Jure Leskovec. 2016. node2vec: Scalable feature learning for networks. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 855-864.
  10. He He, Anusha Balakrishnan, Mihail Eric, and Percy Liang. 2017. Learning sym- metric collaborative dialogue agents with dynamic knowledge graph embeddings. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.07130 (2017).
  11. Ruining He, Wang-Cheng Kang, and Julian McAuley. 2017. Translation-based recommendation. In Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. ACM, 161-169.
  12. Denis Krompaß, Stephan Baier, and Volker Tresp. 2015. Type-constrained repre- sentation learning in knowledge graphs. In International Semantic Web Conference. Springer, 640-655.
  13. Jens Lehmann, Robert Isele, Max Jakob, Anja Jentzsch, Dimitris Kontokostas, Pablo N Mendes, Sebastian Hellmann, Mohamed Morsey, Patrick Van Kleef, Sören Auer, et al. 2015. DBpedia-a large-scale, multilingual knowledge base extracted from Wikipedia. Semantic Web 6, 2 (2015), 167-195.
  14. Yankai Lin, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun, Yang Liu, and Xuan Zhu. 2015. Learning entity and relation embeddings for knowledge graph completion.. In AAAI, Vol. 15. 2181-2187.
  15. Yashar Moshfeghi, Michael Matthews, Roi Blanco, and Joemon M Jose. 2013. Influence of timeline and named-entity components on user engagement. In European Conference on Information Retrieval. Springer, 305-317.
  16. Maximilian Nickel, Volker Tresp, and Hans-Peter Kriegel. 2011. A Three-Way Model for Collective Learning on Multi-Relational Data.. In ICML, Vol. 11. 809- 816.
  17. Maximilian Nickel, Volker Tresp, and Hans-Peter Kriegel. 2012. Factorizing yago: scalable machine learning for linked data. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 271-280.
  18. Guangyuan Piao and John G Breslin. 2018. A study of the similarities of en- tity embeddings learned from different aspects of a knowledge base for item recommendations. In European Semantic Web Conference. Springer, 345-359.
  19. Md Mostafizur Rahman and Atsuhiro Takasu. 2017. Entity oriented action recommendations for actionable knowledge graph generation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Intelligence. ACM, 686-693.
  20. Md Mostafizur Rahman and Atsuhiro Takasu. 2018. Knowledge Graph Embed- ding via Entities' Type Mapping Matrix. In International Conference on Neural Information Processing. Springer, 114-125.
  21. Richard Socher, Danqi Chen, Christopher D Manning, and Andrew Ng. 2013. Rea- soning with neural tensor networks for knowledge base completion. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 926-934.
  22. Fabian M Suchanek, Gjergji Kasneci, and Gerhard Weikum. 2007. Yago: a core of semantic knowledge. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 697-706.
  23. Yi Tay, Luu Anh Tuan, and Siu Cheung Hui. 2018. Latent relational metric learning via memory-based attention for collaborative ranking. In Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference on World Wide Web. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 729-739.
  24. Alberto Tonon, Michele Catasta, Gianluca Demartini, Philippe Cudré-Mauroux, and Karl Aberer. 2013. Trank: Ranking entity types using the web of data. In International semantic web conference. Springer, 640-656.
  25. Théo Trouillon, Christopher R Dance, Éric Gaussier, Johannes Welbl, Sebastian Riedel, and Guillaume Bouchard. 2017. Knowledge graph completion via complex tensor factorization. The Journal of Machine Learning Research 18, 1 (2017), 4735- 4772.
  26. Denny Vrandečić and Markus Krötzsch. 2014. Wikidata: a free collaborative knowledge base. (2014).
  27. Zhen Wang, Jianwen Zhang, Jianlin Feng, and Zheng Chen. 2014. Knowledge graph and text jointly embedding. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on empiri- cal methods in natural language processing (EMNLP). 1591-1601.
  28. Zhen Wang, Jianwen Zhang, Jianlin Feng, and Zheng Chen. 2014. Knowledge Graph Embedding by Translating on Hyperplanes.. In AAAI, Vol. 14. 1112-1119.
  29. Bishan Yang, Wen-tau Yih, Xiaodong He, Jianfeng Gao, and Li Deng. 2014. Em- bedding entities and relations for learning and inference in knowledge bases. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6575 (2014).
  30. Fuzheng Zhang, Nicholas Jing Yuan, Defu Lian, Xing Xie, and Wei-Ying Ma. 2016. Collaborative knowledge base embedding for recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 353-362.
  31. Yongfeng Zhang, Qingyao Ai, Xu Chen, and Pengfei Wang. 2018. Learn- ing over knowledge-base embeddings for recommendation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.06540 (2018).
  32. Yuyu Zhang, Hanjun Dai, Kamil Toraman, and Le Song. 2018. KGˆ2: Learning to Reason Science Exam Questions with Contextual Knowledge Graph Embeddings. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.12393 (2018).