Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

How People use Twitter in Different Languages

2011, Text

Abstract

In this paper we describe how Twitter is used in various languages. We observe notable differences between languages regarding the use of hashtags, links, mentions, and conversations. We propose two dimensions that can be used to classify languages, each of which is likely to require different ways of analysis.

References (8)

  1. REFERENCES
  2. D. L. Altheide. Qualitative Media Analysis (Qualitative Re- search Methods). Sage Pubn Inc, 1996.
  3. S. Carter, M. Tsagkias, and W. Weerkamp. Semi-supervised priors for microblog language identification. In Dutch-Belgian Information Retrieval workshop (DIR 2011), 2011.
  4. G. Golovchinsky and M. Efron. Making sense of twitter search. In Proceedings of CHI 2010 Workshop on Microblog- ging: What and How Can We Learn From It?, 2010.
  5. B. J. Jansen, M. Zhang, K. Sobel, and A. Chowdury. Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60 (11):2169-2188, 2009.
  6. T. Sakaki, M. Okazaki, and Y. Matsuo. Earthquake shakes twit- ter users: real-time event detection by social sensors. In Pro- ceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web (WWW 2010), pages 851-860, 2010.
  7. A. Tumasjan, T. Sprenger, P. Sandner, and I. Welpe. Predicting elections with twitter: What 140 characters reveal about polit- ical sentiment. In International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM 2010), pages 178-185, 2010.
  8. S. Vieweg, A. L. Hughes, K. Starbird, and L. Palen. Microblog- ging during two natural hazards events: what twitter may con- tribute to situational awareness. In Proceedings of the 28th in- ternational conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI 2010), pages 1079-1088, 2010.