A quantitative method for benchmarking fair income distribution
2022, Heliyon
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2022.E10511Abstract
Concern about income inequality has become prominent in public discourse around the world. However, studies in behavioral economics and psychology have consistently shown that people prefer not equal but fair income distributions. Thus, finding a benchmark that could be used to measure fair income distribution across countries is a theoretical and practical challenge. Here a method for benchmarking fair income distribution is introduced. The benchmark is constructed based on the concepts of procedural justice, distributive justice, and authority's power in professional sports where it is widely agreed as an international norm that the allocations of athlete's salary are outcomes of fair rules, individual and/or team performance, and luck in line with no-envy principle of fair allocation. Using the World Bank data, this study demonstrates how the benchmark could be used to quantitatively gauge whether, for a given value of the Gini index, the income shares by quintile of a country are the fair shares or not, and if not, what fair income shares by quintile of that country should be. Knowing this could be useful for those involved in setting targets for the Gini index and the fair income shares that are appropriate for the context of each country before formulating policies towards achieving the Sustainable Development Goal 10 and other related SDGs.
References (48)
- Almås, I., Cappelen, A.W., Sørensen, E.Ø., & Tungodden, B. (2010). Fairness and the development of inequality acceptance. Science, 328, 1176-1178.
- Almås, I., Cappelen, A.W., & Tungodden, B. (2020). Cutthroat capitalism versus cuddly socialism: Are Americans more meritocratic and efficiency-seeking than Scandinavians?. Journal of Political Economy, 128, 1753-1788.
- Alvaredo, F., Chancel, L., Piketty, T., Saez, E., & Zucman, G. (2017). World Inequality Report 2018. https://wir2018.wid.world/
- Apel, H. (2020). Inequality in development: the 2030 Agenda, SDG 10 and the role of redistribution. Real-World Economics Review, 92, 228-237. http://www.paecon.net/PAEReview/
- Brannon, I. (2014). Income inequality and the NBA. Cato Institute. https://www.cato.org/search/category/reviews- journals?query=income+inequality+and+the+NBA
- Cappelen, A.W., Eichele, T., Hugdahl, K., Specht, K., Sørensen, E.Ø., & Tungodden, B. (2014). Equity theory and fair inequality: A neuroeconomic study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 15368-15372.
- Choshen-Hillel, S., Shaw, A., & Caruso, E.M. (2015). Waste management: How reducing partiality can promote efficient resource allocation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 210-231.
- Coulter, P.B. (1989). Measuring inequality: A Methodological Handbook. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
- Daly, M., Wilson, M., & Vasdev, S. (2001). Income inequality and homicide rates in Canada and the United States. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 43, 219-236.
- Dunham, Y., Durkin, A., & Tyler, T.R. (2018). The development of a preference for procedural justice for self and others. Scientific Reports, 8, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018- 36072-1
- Frank, R.H., Levine, A.S., & Dijk, O. (2014). Expenditure Cascades. Review of Behavioral Economics, 1, 55-73.
- Frankfurt, H.G. (2015). On Inequality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Grigoli, F., & Robles, A. (2017). Inequality overhang. IMF Working Papers No. 17/76. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2017/03/28/Inequality-Overhang-44774
- Karen, G., & Teigen, K.H. (2010). Decisions by coin toss: Inappropriate but fair. Judgement and Decision Making, 5, 83-101.
- Kay, J. (2015). Other People's Money. New York, NY: PublicAffairs.
- Keeley, B. (2015). Income Inequality: The Gap between Rich and Poor. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264246010-en
- Kharas, H., & Seidel, B. (2018). What's happening to the world income distribution? The elephant chart revisited. Global Economy and Development Working Paper No. 114. https://www.brookings.edu/research/whats-happening-to-the-world-income-distribution-the- elephant-chart-revisited/
- Kiatpongsan, S., & Norton, M.I. (2014). How much (more) should CEOs make? A universal desire for more equal pay. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 587-593.
- Kimbrough, E.O., Sheremeta, R.M., & Shields, T.W. (2014). When parity promotes peace: Resolving conflict between asymmetric agents. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 99, 96-108.
- Mayhew, K., & Wills, S. (2019). Inequality: An Assessment. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 35, 351-367.
- Molina, M.D., Bucca, M., & Macy, M.W. (2019). It's not just how the game is played, it's whether you win or lose. Science Advances, 5:eaau1156. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aau1156
- Norton, M.I., & Ariely, A. (2011). Building a better America -One wealth quintile at a time. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 9-12.
- Norton, M.I., Neal, D.T., Govan, C.L., Ariely, D., & Holland, E. (2014). The not-so-common- wealth of Australia: Evidence for a cross-cultural desire for a more equal distribution of wealth. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 14, 339-351.
- Oishi, S., Kesebir, S., & Diener, E. (2011). Income inequality and happiness. Psychological Science, 22, 1095-1100.
- Park, J-W., & Kim, C.U. (2021). Getting to a feasible income equality. PLOS ONE, 16(3): e0249204. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249204
- Pritchett, J.L., & Tiryakian, E. (2020a). Income inequality explained: A sports tutorial from the NBA. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/jonlpritchettandedtiryakian/2020/03/05/income- inequality-explained-a-sports-tutorial-from-the-nba/?sh=4ae528f7769f
- Pritchett, J.L., & Tiryakian, E. (2020b). How sports demonstrate income inequality and the value of competency. Foundation for Economic Education (FEE). https://fee.org/articles/how- sports-demonstrate-income-inequality-and-the-value-of-competency/
- Rochat, P., Dias, M.D.G., Liping, G., Broesch, T., Passos-Ferreira, C., Winning, A., & Berg, B. (2009). Fairness in distributive justice in 3-and 5-year-olds across seven cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40,416-442.
- Rogoff, K.S. (2012). Jeremy Lin and the Political Economy of Superstars. Project Syndicate. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/jeremy-lin-and-the-political-economy-of- superstars
- Schäfer, M., Haun D.B.M., & Tomasello, M. (2015). Fair is not fair everywhere. Psychological Science, 26,1252-1260.
- Shaw, A., & Olson, K. (2014). Fairness as partially aversion: The development of procedural justice. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 119, 40-53.
- Sitthiyot, T. (2021). Annual salaries of the athletes from 11 professional sports (V1) [dataset].
- Mendeley Data. http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/6pf936739y.1
- Sitthiyot, T., & Holasut, K. (2016). On income inequality and population size. Thammasat Review of Economic and Social Policy, 2, 24-48. DOI: 10.14456/tresp.2016.8
- Sitthiyot, T., & Holasut, K. (2020). A simple method for measuring inequality. Palgrave Communications, 6:112. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0484-6
- Sitthiyot, T., & Holasut K. (2021). A simple method for estimating the Lorenz curve. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8, 268. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00948-x
- Starmans, C., Sheskin, M., & Bloom, P. (2017). Why people prefer unequal societies. Nature Human Behaviour, 1, 0082. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0082
- Tinbergen, J. (1930). Mathematiese Psychologie. Mens en Maatschappij, 6, 342-352.
- The World Bank. (2020b). Inequality and Shared Prosperity. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/isp/overview#1
- Trump, K-S. (2020). When and why is economic inequality seen as fair. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 46-51.
- Tyler, T. (2011). Procedural justice shapes evaluations of income inequality: Commentary on Norton and Ariely (2011). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 15-16.
- van Dijke, M., Gobena, L.B., & Verboon, P. (2019). Make me want to pay. Three-way interaction between procedural justice, distributive justice, and power on voluntary tax compliance. Frontiers in Psychology, 10:1632. https://doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01632
- Venkatasubramanian, V. (2009). What is fair pay for executives? An information theoretic analysis of wage distributions. Entropy, 11, 766-781. doi:10.3390/e11040766
- Venkatasubramanian, V. (2010). Fairness is an emergent self-organized property of the free market for labor. Entropy, 12, 1514-1531. doi:10.3390/e12061514
- Venkatasubramanian, V., Luo, Y., & Sethuraman, J. (2015). How much inequality in income is fair? A microeconomic game theoretic perspective. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applicaions, 435, 120-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2015.04.014
- Venkatasubramanian, V. (2019). How much inequality is fair?: Mathematical principles of a moral, optimal, and stable capitalist society. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
- Wilkinson, R.G., & Pickett, K.E. (2007). The problems of relative deprivation: Why some societies do better than others. Social Science & Medicine, 65,1965-1978.
- Wilkinson, R.G., & Pickett, K.E. (2009). Income inequality and social dysfunction. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 493-511.