Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Study on Integrating Semantic Applications

2005

Abstract

In this paper we describe two approaches to integrating standalone information processing techniques into a semantic application capable of acquiring and maintaining knowledge. We distinguish between integration through aggregation and through choreographing, and argue that the latter is not only simpler to realize but also provides greater benefits. The benefits were, in our experiment, related to developing a capability of maintaining and validating knowledge through an integration of down-and upstream knowledge processing tools. We describe the principles of integration and relate them to pragmatic challenges for the semantic web and to strategic directions of its evolution.

References (17)

  1. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., and Lassila, O., The Semantic Web. Scientific American, 2001. 279(5): p. 34-43.
  2. Cimiano, P., Ladwig, G., and Staab, S. Gimme' the Context: Context-driven Automatic Semantic Annotation with C-PANKOW. In 14th Intl. WWW Conf. 2005. Japan.
  3. Ciravegna, F., Dingli, A., Guthrie, D., et al. Integrating Information to Bootstrap Infor- mation Extraction from Web Sites. In IJCAI Workshop on Information Integration on the Web. 2003. Mexico.
  4. Cunningham, H., Maynard, D., Bontcheva, K., et al. GATE: A Framework and Graphical Development Environment for Robust NLP Tools and Applications. In 40th Anniversary Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2002. Pennsylvania, US.
  5. Dill, S., Eiron, N., Gibson, D., et al. SemTag and Seeker: bootstrapping the semantic web via automated semantic annotation. In Proc. of the 12th Intl. WWW Conf. 2003. Hungary: ACM Press. p. 178-186.
  6. Dzbor, M., Domingue, J., and Motta, E. Magpie: Towards a Semantic Web Browser. In Proc. of the 2nd Intl. Semantic Web Conf. 2003. Florida, USA. p. 690-705.
  7. Dzbor, M., Motta, E., and Domingue, J. Opening Up Magpie via Semantic Services. In Proc. of the 3rd Intl. Semantic Web Conf. 2004. Japan. p. 635-649.
  8. Etzioni, O., Cafarella, M., Downey, D., et al. Methods for domain-independent informa- tion extraction from the web: An experimental comparison. In Proc. of the 19th AAAI Conf. 2004. California, US. p. 391-398.
  9. Gennari, J., Musen, M.A., Fergerson, R., et al., The evolution of Protege-2000: An envi- ronment for knowledge-based systems development. Intl. Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 2003. 58(1): p. 89-123.
  10. Grudin, J., Groupware and Social Dynamics: Eight Challenges for Developers. Commu- nications of the ACM, 1994. 37(1): p. 92-105.
  11. Kahan, J., Koivunen, M.-R., Prud'Hommeaux, E., et al. Annotea: An Open RDF Infra- structure for Shared Web Annotations. In 10th Intl. WWW Conf. 2001. Hong-Kong.
  12. Kalfoglou, Y., Alani, H., Schorlemmer, M., et al. On the Emergent Semantic Web and Overlooked Issues. In Proc. of the 3rd Intl. Semantic Web Conf. 2004. Japan. p. 576-590.
  13. Peltz, C., Web Services Orchestration and Choreography. Web Services J., 2003. 3(7).
  14. Quan, D., Huynh, D., and Karger, D.R. Haystack: A Platform for Authoring End User Semantic Web Applications. In Proc. of the 2nd Intl. Semantic Web Conf. 2003. Florida, USA. p. 738-753.
  15. Takeda, H. and Ohmukai, I. Building semantic web applications as informa- tion/knowledge sharing systems. In UserSWeb: Wksp. on User Aspects of the Semantic Web. 2005. Crete.
  16. Uren, V.S., Cimiano, P., Motta, E., et al. Browsing for Information by Highlighting Automatically Generated Annotations: User Study and Evaluation. In Proc.of the 3rd Knowledge Capture Conf. 2005. Canada. p. (submitted).
  17. Zhu, H., Siegel, M.D., and Madnick, S.E. Information Aggregation -A Value-added e- Service. In Proc. of the Intl. Conference on Technology, Policy and Innovation. 2001. The Netherlands.