Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Symbol grounding problem part 7

Abstract

Motion planning in the past was treated as np hard problem because of a large state space. Instead of using faster hardware and improved algorithm, the recommended attempt in solving these problems is to use an abstraction mechanism realized in natural language. The original problem gets converted into written sentences and these sentences are used as facts for the planner. Scene recognition and other image to text translation systems are discussed under the umbrella term "symbol grounding problem" which is about labelling sensory data with natural language. The label space consists of a certain vocabulary list and a grammar which defines the word order of the sentences, while the generated sentences are used in a dialog which captures expert knowledge of a domain. There is no single algorithm or paradigm available how to convert images into text, but the input data is a dataset which contains of example annotations. A certain program has to replicate the dataset which means, it has to generate the same anchored speech acts.

FAQs

sparkles

AI

What is the significance of the symbol grounding problem in robotics?add

The symbol grounding problem addresses the challenge of translating raw sensor data into meaningful, high-level symbolic representations, essential for effective robot control. By exploring this shift from low-level data to natural language understanding, the research reveals new pathways for overcoming complex robotics tasks.

How do low-level robotic tasks become computationally complex?add

Robotic motion planning is classified as NP-hard due to the exponential growth of possible configurations as joints and sensors increase. This high complexity necessitates innovative approaches, such as grounding tasks in natural language, to simplify interactions and reduce the computational burden.

What role do event tables play in reducing robotics state space?add

Event tables categorize significant robot conditions into a smaller, manageable set of predefined states, such as [obstacle_ahead, battery_low]. This reduction allows computers to efficiently process and respond to critical environmental changes without evaluating every possible configuration.

Why are relational databases preferred for managing symbol grounding tasks?add

Relational databases efficiently organize high-level symbolic representations with normalized data structures, reducing redundancy and improving accessibility. Their ability to reference textual data through unique identifiers streamlines the mapping process between sensors and natural language.

How can programming a text adventure enhance robot control systems?add

Text adventure programming exemplifies an interactive framework where user commands are converted into actions, mirroring a robot's need for guided language input. This approach emphasizes the significance of symbolic understanding in managing complex robotic environments.

References (6)

  1. Bily, Milan. "Experience with COMMEN- TATOR, a computer system simulating verbal be- haviour." Proceedings of the 3rd Nordic Conference of Computational Linguistics (NODALIDA 1981). 1981. [Colebrooke2017] Textadventure in Python and SQLite, https://github.com/colebrooke/adventure [Gardenfors2004] Gardenfors, Peter. "Conceptual spaces as a framework for knowledge representa- tion." Mind and matter 2.2 (2004): 9-27. [Harnad1990] Harnad, Stevan. "The symbol grounding problem." Physica D: Nonlinear Phenom- ena 42.1-3 (1990): 335-346. [Kress-Gazit2008] Kress-Gazit, Hadas, Georgios E. Fainekos, and George J. Pappas. "Translating struc- tured english to robot controllers." Advanced Robotics 22.12 (2008): 1343-1359.
  2. Malinowski, Mateusz, and Mario Fritz. "A multi-world approach to question answering about real-world scenes based on uncertain input." Advances in neural information processing systems 27 (2014).
  3. Stuart Russell and Peter Norvig "Arti- ficial intelligence: a modern approach." (1995).
  4. Schneider, Alexander, et al. "Ob- ject identification with tactile sensors using bag-of- features." 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE, 2009. [Siskind1993] Siskind, Jeffrey Mark. "Grounding language in perception." Intelligent Robots and Com- puter Vision XII: Algorithms and Techniques. Vol. 2055. SPIE, 1993.
  5. Tellex, Stefanie, et al. "Understanding natural language commands for robotic navigation and mobile manipulation." Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence. Vol. 25. No. 1. 2011.
  6. Welke, Kai, et al. "Grounded spa- tial symbols for task planning based on experience." 2013 13th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Hu- manoid Robots (Humanoids). IEEE, 2013.