Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Supervisory Control of AGV’s for Flexible Manufacturing Cells

Abstract

This paper presents a motion coordination strategy based on a hierarchical control architecture for a flexible manufacturing cell equipped with automated guided vehicles (AGVs). The AGV's transport raw material among different workstations and automated warehouses. The hierarchical control architecture is divided into two levels. The high level includes a Discrete-Event plant model using the Finite-State Automata formalism and two supervisors are synthesized to enable concurrent tasks obeying process restrictions, and the product sequences, respectively. In the low level, the transportation tasks are translated to each AGV using motion coordination control laws based on artificial vector fields to guarantee convergence to the goals. Repulsive vector fields are also employed to avoid inter-robot collisions. The approach was tested in both virtual reality environment and a experimental setup with two AGV's for a specific product sequence.

FAQs

sparkles

AI

What advantages do AGVs provide over traditional material-handling systems in FMCs?add

The study reveals that AGVs enhance flexibility and productivity in FMCs by enabling concurrent transport tasks, thus optimizing production cycles compared to fixed systems.

How were the AGVs controlled to ensure collision avoidance?add

The paper describes a control law using attractive potential functions and repulsive vector fields, ensuring AGVs converge to specific locations while avoiding collisions.

What is the role of the supervisory control theory in AGV coordination?add

The findings demonstrate that supervisory control theory synthesizes specifications for AGV tasks and manages event sequences, ensuring compliance with process restrictions and resource sharing.

What method was used to model the AGV coordination and task allocation?add

A hierarchical control strategy models AGV coordination, utilizing a Finite State Automata (FSA) approach for task allocation and process limitation management.

Which experimental setup was utilized to validate the proposed control strategy?add

The validation involved two unicycle-type AGVs tracked using a vision system and evaluated within a distributed computer system, achieving effective task execution and coordination.

References (15)

  1. A. Sánchez, E. Aranda-Bricaire, F. Jaimes, E. G. Hernández-Martínez, A. Nava (2009). Synthesis of product-driven coordination controllers for a class of discrete-event manufacturing systems. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing A. Sánchez, J. Reza, J. Douriet, R. González (2003). A comparison of synthesis tools for supervisory controllers. Proc. European Control Conference (ECC) Cambridge.
  2. C. Canudas-de-Wit, B. Siciliano, G. Bastin (2012). Theory of Robot Control (Communications and Control Engineering). Springer.
  3. C. Pach, A. Bekrar, N. Zbib, Y. Sallez (2012). An effective potential field approach to FMS holonic heterarchical control. ELSEVIER Control Engineering Practice, vol. 20(12), 1293-1309.
  4. C. Cassandras, S. Lafortune (2008). Introduction to discrete event systems. Kluwer Academic.
  5. D. Herrero-Pérez, H. Martínez-Barbera (2010).Modeling Transportation Systems Composed of Flexible Automated Guided Vehicles in Flexible Systems. IEEE Transactions on Industrial vol. 166-180.
  6. E. G. Hernández-Martínez (2009). Control Strategies for Multi-agent Systems. PhD thesis. Mechatronics Section, Cinvestav.
  7. ISA-95 Manufacturing Enterprise Systems Standards CD, Second Edition ANSI/ISA-95.00.03-2005
  8. J. González-Sierra, E. Aranda-Bricaire, E. G. Hernández-Martínez (2011). Strategies with Singularities Avoidance for Groups of Unicycle-type Robots. subdued to IFAC World Congress J. Magallón (2008). Design and Simulation of an Hybrid Controller for AGV Navigation on Manufacturing Systems. M. Sc. thesis. Mecha- tronics Section, Cinvestav.
  9. K. Akesson, M. Fabian, H. Flordal, A. Vahidi (2006).Supremica -A Tool for Verification and Synthesis of Discrete Event Supervisors. De- partment of Signals and Systems Chalmers University of Technology SE-412 96 Goteborg, Sweden K. Eun-Seok, D. Oron (2012). Multi-location production and delivery with job selection. In Press, Corrected Proof.
  10. M. P. Groover (2007). Automation, Production Systems, and Computer- Integrated Manufacturing, 3rd edition
  11. Farahvash, T. O. Boucher (2004). A multi-agent architecture for control of AGV systems. 13th International Conference on Flexible Auto- mation and Intelligent Manufacturing, vol. 20(6), 473-483.
  12. R. W. Brockett (1983). Asymptotic stability and feedback stabilization. In Differential Geometry Control Theory S. Makris, G. Michalos, A. Eytan, G. Chryssolouris (2012). Cooperating Robots for Reconfigurable Assembly Operations: Review and Cha- llenges. 45th CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems 2012, vol. 3, 346-351.
  13. W. M. Wonham (2009). Supervisory Control of Discrete-event Systems, available on website. University of Toronto,Toronto.
  14. Y. U. Cao, A. S. Fukunaga, A. B. Kahng (1997). Cooperative mobile robo- tics: Antecedents and directions. Autonomous Robots, vol. 4(1),34-46.
  15. Z. Kovacic, A. Marozin (2003). Simulator of multi-AGV robotic industrial environments. 2003 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology, vol. 2(2), 979-983.