Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Choice of Intensity Measure in Incremental Dynamic Analysis

2014

Abstract

Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) is a powerful method for evaluating the seismic performance of structural systems. When undertaking IDA, ground motion records are scaled in accordance with a certain seismic intensity level up until the limit of collapse of the structure is reached. Peak ground acceleration (PGA) is often used as intensity measure (IM) for scaling purposes whilst peak ground velocity and response spectral accelerations can also be used as IM parameters. One of the challenges with the IDA methodology is that the performance (IDA) curve obtained for a structural system is non-unique meaning that it can be sensitive to changes in the frequency properties of the input excitations. Thus, there is a practice of holding the frequency content of the excitation unchanged (or constrained to a model design spectrum) when applying the scaling. The shortcomings with this modelling approach is that real conditions can be misrepresented given that frequency contents of the earth...

References (21)

  1. Abrahamson, N.A. (1992). Non-stationary spectral matching, Seismological Research Letters. Vol. 63, (1), pp 30.
  2. AISI S213-07 (2007). North American standard for cold-formed steel framing-lateral design. American Iron and Steel Institute, USA. AS 1170.4 (2007). Structural design actions-Part 4: Earthquake actions in Australia. Standards Australia.
  3. Bradley, B.A., Dhakal, R.P., Mander, J.B. and Li, L. (2008). Experimental multi-level seismic performance assessment of 3D RC frame designed for damage avoidance. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 37(1), pp. 1-20.
  4. Buildex Screw, Available: http://buildex.com.au/.
  5. Cordova, P.P., Deierlein, G.G., Mehanny, S.S.F. and Cornell, C.A. (2001). Development of two-parameter seismic intensity measure and probabilistic assessment procedure. The Second U.S.-Japan Workshop on Performance-based Earthquake Engineering Methodology for Reinforced Concrete Building Structures, Sapporo, Japan, pp. 187-206.
  6. Experimental Building Station (1978). Guidelines for testing and evaluation of products for cyclone-prone areas. Technical Record 440 Recommendations of a Workshop Held during July 1977, Department of construction, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia.
  7. Filiatrault, A and Folz, B (2002). Performance-based design of wood framed buildings. Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 128(1), pp. 39-47.
  8. Folz, B. and Filiatrault, A. (2001). Cyclic analysis of wood shear walls. Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 127(4), pp. 433-441.
  9. Folz, B. and Filiatrault, A. (2004). Seismic analysis of woodframe structures. Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 130(9), pp. 1353-1360.
  10. Hancock, J., Watson-Lamprey, J., Abrahamson, N.A., Bommer, J.J., Markatis, A., McCoy, E. and Mendis, R. (2006). An improved method of matching response spectra of recorded earthquake ground motion using wavelets. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 10, pp. 67-89.
  11. Idriss, I.M. and Sun, J.I. (1992). User Manual for SHAKE91. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Maryland, USA and Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis, USA.
  12. Lam, N.T.K. (1999). Program 'GENQKE' user's Guide. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Australia.
  13. Lam, N., Wilson, J., Chandler, A. and Hutchinson, G. (2000). Response spectrum modeling for rock sites in low and moderate seismicity regions combining velocity, displacement, and acceleration predictions. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 29(10), pp. 1491-1525.
  14. PEER ground motion database, http://peer.berkeley.edu/peer_ground_motion_database/, Beta Version, viewed on 25 th March 2013.
  15. Pei, S. and van de Lindt, J. W. (2010). User's manual for SAPWood for Windows, Version 2.0. Availabe from http://nees.org/resources/sapwood/supportingdocs.
  16. Rosowsky, D.V. (2002). Reliability-based Seismic Design of Wood Shear Walls. Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 128(11), pp. 1439-1453.
  17. Seismosoft (2013). SeismoMatch V2.1 -A computer program for spectrum matching of earthquake records. Available from http://www.seismosoft.com.
  18. Shahi, R., Lam, N., Gad, E. and Wilson, J. (2013). Protocol for testing of cold-formed steel wall in regions of low-moderate seismicity. Earthquakes and Structure, 4(6), 629-647.
  19. Shahi, R., Lam, N., Gad, E., Saifullah, I., Wilson, J. and Watson, K. (2014). Application of a New Racking Cyclic Loading Protocol on Cold-Formed Steel-Framed Wall Panels. Proceedings of the Structural Engineering in Australasia ASEC 2014 Conference, Auckland, New Zealand.
  20. Shome, N., Cornell, C.A., Bazzurro, P. and Carballo, J.E. (1998). Earthquakes, records, and nonlinear responses. Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 14(3), pp. 469-500.
  21. Vamvatsikos, D. and Cornell, C.A (2002). Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 31(3), pp. 491-514.