A Delphi consensus statement for digital surgery
npj Digital Medicine
https://doi.org/10.1038/S41746-022-00641-6Abstract
The use of digital technology is increasing rapidly across surgical specialities, yet there is no consensus for the term ‘digital surgery’. This is critical as digital health technologies present technical, governance, and legal challenges which are unique to the surgeon and surgical patient. We aim to define the term digital surgery and the ethical issues surrounding its clinical application, and to identify barriers and research goals for future practice. 38 international experts, across the fields of surgery, AI, industry, law, ethics and policy, participated in a four-round Delphi exercise. Issues were generated by an expert panel and public panel through a scoping questionnaire around key themes identified from the literature and voted upon in two subsequent questionnaire rounds. Consensus was defined if >70% of the panel deemed the statement important and <30% unimportant. A final online meeting was held to discuss consensus statements. The definition of digital surgery ...
References (37)
- Kinross, J. M., Mason, S. E., Mylonas, G. & Darzi, A. Next-generation robotics in gastrointestinal surgery. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 17, 430-440 (2020).
- Tepper, O. M. et al. Mixed reality with hololens: where virtual reality meets augmented reality in the operating room. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 140, 1066-1070 (2017).
- Hashimoto, D. A., Rosman, G., Rus, D. & Meireles, O. R. Artificial intelligence in surgery: promises and perils. Ann. Surg. 268, 70-76 (2018).
- Maier-Hein, L. et al. Surgical data science -from concepts toward clinical trans- lation. Med Image Anal. 76, 102306 (2022).
- Maier-Hein, L. et al. Surgical data science for next-generation interventions. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 1, 691-696 (2017).
- Gillaspie, E. A. et al. From 3-dimensional printing to 5-dimensional printing: enhancing thoracic surgical planning and resection of complex tumors. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 101, 1958-1962 (2016).
- Monsalve-Torra, A. et al. Using machine learning methods for predicting inhos- pital mortality in patients undergoing open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J. Biomed. Inf. 62, 195-201 (2016).
- Hung, A. J., Chen, J. & Gill, I. S. Automated performance metrics and machine learning algorithms to measure surgeon performance and anticipate clinical outcomes in robotic surgery. JAMA Surg. 153, 770-771 (2018).
- Lam, K. et al. Machine learning for technical skill assessment in surgery: a sys- tematic review. NPJ Digit. Med. 5, 24 (2022).
- Research and Markets. Global surgical robotics market 2021-2031: focus on vendor analysis, key enabling technologies, emerging platforms in pipeline, 26 company profiles, and 45 countries data & cross segmentation, https://www. researchandmarkets.com/reports/5318090/global-surgical-robotics-market-2021- 2031-focus.
- The AHSN Network. Accelerating Artificial Intelligence in health and care: results from a state of the nation survey, https://wessexahsn.org.uk/img/news/AHSN% 20Network%20AI%20Report-1536078823.pdf (2018).
- Lam, K., Purkayastha, S. & Kinross, J. M. The ethical digital surgeon. J. Med. Internet Res. 23, e25849 (2021).
- Jobin, A., Ienca, M. & Vayena, E. The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nat. Mach. Intell. 1, 389-399 (2019).
- Abramoff, M. D. et al. Foundational considerations for artificial intelligence uti- lizing ophthalmic images. Ophthalmology https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ophtha.2021.08.023 (2021).
- NHS X. Artificial Intelligence: how to get it right. Putting policy into practice for safe data-driven innovation in health and care, https://www.nhsx.nhs.uk/media/ documents/NHSX_AI_report.pdf (2019).
- World Health Organisation. Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health, https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240029200 (2021).
- Garrow, C. R. et al. Machine learning for surgical phase recognition: a systematic review. Ann. Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000004425 (2020).
- Maier-Hein, L. et al. Heidelberg colorectal data set for surgical data science in the sensor operating room. Sci. Data 8, 101 (2021).
- Collins, J. W. et al. Ethical implications of AI in robotic surgical training: a Delphi consensus statement. Eur. Urol. Focus, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2021.04.006 (2021).
- Hasson, F., Keeney, S. & McKenna, H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J. Adv. Nurs. 32, 1008-1015 (2000).
- IEEE standard glossary of software engineering terminology. IEEE Std 610.12-1990, 1-84, (1990). http://www.mit.jyu.fi/ope/kurssit/TIES462/Materiaalit/IEEE_SoftwareEng Glossary.pdf.
- Powles, J. & Hodson, H. Google DeepMind and healthcare in an age of algorithms. Health Technol. 7, 351-367 (2017).
- American Medical Association. Augmented intelligence in health care, https:// www.ama-assn.org/system/files/2019-08/ai-2018-board-policy-summary.pdf (2019).
- Meireles, O. R. et al. SAGES consensus recommendations on an annotation fra- mework for surgical video. Surgical Endosc. 35, 4918-4929 (2021).
- Martin, G., Kinross, J. & Hankin, C. Effective cybersecurity is fundamental to patient safety. BMJ 357, j2375 (2017).
- Martin, G., Ghafur, S., Kinross, J., Hankin, C. & Darzi, A. WannaCry-a year on. BMJ 361, k2381 (2018).
- DʼSouza, N. et al. Definition of the rectum: an international, expert-based Delphi consensus. Ann. Surg. 270, 955-959 (2019).
- Ferguson, N. D., Davis, A. M., Slutsky, A. S. & Stewart, T. E. Development of a clinical definition for acute respiratory distress syndrome using the Delphi technique. J. Crit. Care 20, 147-154 (2005).
- Keeney, S., Hasson, F. & McKenna, H. P. A critical review of the Delphi technique as a research methodology for nursing. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 38, 195-200 (2001).
- Lam, K., Iqbal, F. M., Purkayastha, S. & Kinross, J. M. Investigating the ethical and data governance issues of artificial intelligence in surgery: protocol for a delphi study. JMIR Res Protoc. 10, e26552 (2021).
- Rudzicz, F. & Saqur, R. Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Surgery. Priprint at https:// arxiv.org/abs/2007.14302 (2020).
- O'Sullivan, S. et al. Legal, regulatory, and ethical frameworks for development of standards in artificial intelligence (AI) and autonomous robotic surgery. Int. J. Med. Robot. Computer Assist. Surg. 15, e1968 (2019).
- Jarvis, T., Thornburg, D., Rebecca, A. M. & Teven, C. M. Artificial intelligence in plastic surgery: current applications, future directions, and ethical implications. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Glob. Open 8, e3200-e3200 (2020).
- Char, D. S., Abràmoff, M. D. & Feudtner, C. Identifying ethical considerations for machine learning healthcare applications. Am. J. Bioeth. 20, 7-17 (2020).
- Gerke, S., Minssen, T. & Cohen, G. Ethical and legal challenges of artificial intelligence-driven healthcare. Artif. Intel. Healthcare, 12, 295-336, (2020).
- Fitch, K. et al. The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method user's manual (RAND Corporation, 2001).
- Foundation (DFG) as part of Germany's Excellence Strategy -EXC2050/1 -Project ID 390696704 -Cluster of Excellence "Centre for Tactile Internet with Human-in-the- Loop" (CeTI).