Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Title
Abstract
Policy Implications
Implementation and Access Methods
Experimental Evidence
Statistical Evidence
Policy Conclusion
References

THE DIGITAL DIVIDE : DEFINITIONS , MEASUREMENT , AND POLICY ISSUES by

Profile image of Gregory RosstonGregory Rosston

2002

Abstract

Digital divide is the latest evocative term that refers to differences in access to and uses of information technology that are correlated with income, race and ethnicity, gender, age, place of residence, and other measures of socioeconomic status. According to the Department of Commerce, some people “have the most powerful computers, the best telephone service and fastest Internet service, as well as a wealth of content and training relevant to their lives.... [A]nother group of people ... don’t have access to the newest and best computers, the most reliable telephone service or the fastest or most convenient Internet services. The difference between these two groups is ... the Digital Divide.” The purpose of this essay is to provide a brief introduction to the concept of the digital divide. This essay will broadly outline the nature of the digital divide and the policy issues surrounding it, and will review the facts and research findings on three main themes: the magnitude of the...

Related papers

The Digital Divide, framing and mapping the phenomenon
Andrea Calderaro

"This chapter explores the global dimension of the Digital Divide. It frames the concept and maps the status and the causes of the phenomenon today. The first part investigates how the Digital Divide can be measured, framing the question and some of the trends foreseen by scholars on the phenomenon. The second part provides the current status of the Digital Divide, mapping the distribution of the usage of the Internet worldwide with some national indicators and measuring how economic factors cause some of the digital inequalities. The chapter then maps the worldwide unequal distribution of some of the infrastructure of the Internet. By comparing the different measures of the Digital Divide, the chapter finally provides some conclusions on the expectations regarding the trend of the phenomenon."

View PDFchevron_right
THE MULTIPLE FACETS OF THE DIGITAL DIVIDE
Suely Fragoso

After a review of the claims concerning different orders of 'digital divide' an examination is made of some of the presuppositions of the actions intended to overcome the so called 'digital gap', ranging from the provision of equipment and software for lower acquisitive power groups to the widest scale policies formulated in terms of the 'promotion of citizenship'. It is shown that even those actions that claim to be the most democratic and inclusive are based upon a highly closed set of beliefs and are potential sources of exclusion. To overcome this impasse, additional actions of 'digital inclusion' are suggested directed toward, not the minority groups, but just that elite which is digitally included.

View PDFchevron_right
Literature Review: Understading the "second-level digital divide"
Teresa Correa
View PDFchevron_right
Clear thinking on the digital divide
Andrew Leigh

2001

As consumer products are introduced, adoption rates tend to vary across socioeconomic groups. In the case of computers and Internet access, these gaps have been termed by many the" digital divide." People with higher incomes and more education have substantially greater rates of access to technology. Likewise, whites and city-dwellers are more likely to have computers and Internet access than non-whites and those who live outside metropolitan areas.

View PDFchevron_right
The Dimensions of the Digital Divide
Udo Averweg

Bridging the Digital Divide

View PDFchevron_right
Contemporary Concerns of Digital Divide in an Information Society
yasmin ibrahim

2009

View PDFchevron_right
An interrupted history of digital divides
Whisnu Triwibowo

2016

In the early days of the Internet, researchers across various fields and disciplines focused on the phenomenon of digital divides and digital inequalities, and this area is reviving as a focus of research. However, with changing proportions of Internet users and non-users and the perception from the Internet shifting from being a new innovation to something that the majority of citizens in North America and Western Europe take for granted come changing foci of investigation and changing questions. In this paper, we will investigate the history of digital divides and inequalities in the United States, with a case study of an ongoing survey of the State of Michigan. Using data sets reaching back to 1997, this paper examines how the very definition and severity of digital divides have evolved over the last twenty years in Michigan and in the US as a whole. The observed changes in the proportion of users and non-users as well as the frequency of use and the way we inquire about digital ...

View PDFchevron_right
The Digital Divide Shifts to Differences in Usage
Alexander J A M Van Deursen

In a representative survey of the Dutch population we found that people with low levels of education and disabled people are using the Internet for more hours a day in their spare time than higher educated and employed populations. To explain this finding, we investigated what these people are doing online. The first contribution is a theoretically validated cluster of Internet usage types: information, news, personal development, social interaction, leisure, commercial transaction and gaming. The second contribution is that, based on this classification, we were able to identify a number of usage differences, including those demonstrated by people with different gender, age, education and Internet experience, that are often observed in digital divide literature. The general conclusion is that when the Internet matures, it will increasingly reflect known social, economic and cultural relationships of the offline world, including inequalities.

View PDFchevron_right
What are the main challenges for policy makers today in their efforts to eliminate digital divides ?
Stephen Marshall

This essay will consider the main challenges associated with the digital divide and the work of policy makers in their attempt to eradicate it. A definition will be offered and then placed into a wider context. Digital technology has been considered to revolutionise how people go about their day to day lives although the technology of today can be out of date by tomorrow. The gap between those who are literate in technology and those who are not increases the gap of digital divide as the complexity of technology becomes deeper. A number of individuals alone or in groups can often feel excluded or exclude them from experiencing new technologies. Thus governments are faced with many challenges in an attempt to address the problem. It is a complex problem which needs to be tackled globally as it affects the increasingly aging populations of western developed countries as well as the new developing nations of Africa, Asia and South America. The essay will then focus on the challenges faced using example case studies of the United Kingdom, United States, India and the Philippines. The overall conclusion will most likely show that, it is cost in regards to software and expensive copyrights. The infrastructure network within a country is also highly important, so is the many ways which policy makers approach the issue, some looking at individual ownership while others seek to provide technologies communally to reach more people and potentially better the population in doing so.

View PDFchevron_right
Digital Divide (2010; The Encyclopedia of Science and Technology Communication)
Jacob Groshek

Digital divide generally refers to the relative advantage individuals or groups of people gain over others as the result of their access to and use of communicative technologies, such as the Internet. This gap-or divide-is considered digital largely because many technological advances over the last half of the 20th century have been based on digital, as opposed to analog, technology. While some scholars have limited use of the term digital divide specifically to Internet diffusion and access, there are many who conceptualize being digital as including a wide variety of other information and communication technologies (ICTs) such as cellular phones, satellite television receivers, and personal computers. As these technologies were initially developed, there was little concern that they might contribute to the stratification of societies principally because they were cost prohibitive. More recently, however, it has become apparent that digital communication devices can be economically mass produced and distributed to a vast number of individuals-along with relevant knowledge and skill sets.

View PDFchevron_right

References (27)

  1. Angrist, J., and V. Lavy. "New Evidence on Classroom Computers and Pupil Learning." NBER Working Paper No. 7424 (November 1999), 1-32.
  2. Attewell, P. and J. Battle. "Home Computers and School Performance." The Information Society 15:1 (1999), 1-10.
  3. Baker, E.L., M. Gearhart, and J.L. Herman. "The Apple Classrooms of Tomorrow: The UCLA Evaluation Studies." Center for the Study of Evaluation Technical Report No. 353 (January 1993), 1-20.
  4. Bangert-Drowns, R.L. "The Word Processor as an Instructional Tool: A Meta- Analysis of Word Processing in Writing Instruction." Review of Educational Research 63:1 (1993), 69-93.
  5. Coleman, J., E. Campbell, C. Hobson, J. McPartland, A. Mood, F. Weinfeld, and R. York. Equality of Educational Opportunity. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office (1966). Fletcher-Flinn, C.M. and B. Gravatt. "The Efficacy of CAI: A Meta-Analysis." Journal of Educational Computing Research 12:3 (1995), 219-242.
  6. Becker, H.J. Analysis and Trends of School Use of New Information Technologies. Report prepared for the U.S. Congress Office of Technology Assessment. (March 1994). http://www.gse.uci.edu/doehome/EdResource/Publications/EdTechUse/C-TBLCNT.HTM. Becker, H.J. Findings from the Teaching, Learning, and Computing Survey: Is Larry Cuban Right? Special Report on the Teaching Learning and Computing Survey: 1998 (July 2000). http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/html/findings.html. Downes, T.A., and S. M. Greenstein. "Do Commercial ISPs Provide Universal Access?" Gillett and Vogelsang (eds.), Competition, Regulation and Convergence. LEA Press, 1999.
  7. Fletcher-Flinn, C. M., and B. Gravatt. "The Efficacy of CAI: A Meta-Analysis." Journal of Educational Computing Research 12(3) (1995), pp. 219-242.
  8. Hanushek, E.A. "Assessing the Effects of School Resources on Student Performance: An Update." Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 19:2 (Summer 1997), 141-164.
  9. Haveman, R. and B. Wolfe. "The Determinants of Children's Attainments: A Review of Methods and Findings." Journal of Economic Literature 33 (December 1995), 1829-1878.
  10. Kirkpatrick, H. and L. Cuban. "Computers Make Kids Smarter --Right?" Technos Quarterly for Education and Technology 7:2 (Summer 1998).
  11. Krendl, K.A., and G. Clark. "The Impact of Computers on Learning: Research on In- School and Out-of-School Settings." Journal of Computing in Higher Education 5:2 (1994), 85-112. Kulik, J.A. "Meta-Analytic Studies of Findings on Computer-Based Instruction." In Technology Assessment in Education and Training, eds. E.L. Baker and H.F. O'Neil, Jr. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erblaum Associates (1994), 9-33.
  12. Lenhart, A. "Who's Not Online?" Pew Internet and American Life Project, September 21, 2000 (http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report=21).
  13. Liao, Y. "Effects of Computer-Assisted Instruction on Cognitive Outcomes: A Meta- Analysis." Journal of Research on Computing in Education 24:3 (1992), 367-380.
  14. Mann, D., C. Shakeshaft, J. Becker, R. Kottkamp. West Virginia Story: Achievement Gains from a Statewide Comprehensive Technology Program. Milken Family Foundation Report. http://www.mff.org/publications /publications.taf?page=155 (1999). Miller, M.D. and W.D. McInerney. "Effects on Achievement of a Home/School Computer Project." Journal of Research on Computing in Education 27:2 (1994), 199-211.
  15. Mayfield, K. "Plugged In, Not Dropping Out." Wired News. November 4, 1999 (http://www.wirednews.com/news/culture/0,1284,32159,00.html).
  16. Moller, R.M. "Profile of California Computer and Internet Users." California Research Bureau (January, 2000).
  17. Mueller, M. L. Universal Service: Competition, Interconnection, and Monopoly in the Making of the American Telephone System. MIT Press and AEI Press, 1974. National Telecommunications and Information Administration. Falling Through the Net: A Survey of the "Have Nots" in Rural and Urban America. NTIA, July 1995. National Telecommunications and Information Administration. Falling Through the Net: Defining the Digital Divide. NTIA, July 1999. National Telecommunications and Information Administration. Falling Through the Net: Toward Digital Inclusion. NTIA, October 2000. Rosston, G. L., and B. S. Wimmer, "Winners and Losers from the Universal Service Battle," in Vogelsang and Compaine (eds.), The Internet Upheaval, MIT Press, 2000. Selwyn, N. "The Effect of Using a Home Computer on Students' Educational Use of IT." Computers and Education 31 (1998), 211-227
  18. Sivin-Kachala, J. and E. Bialo. Report on the Effectiveness of Technology in Schools, 1990-1997. Washington, D.C.: Software & Information Industry Association (1999).
  19. Swan, K., F. Guerrero, M. Mitrani, and J. Schoener. "Honing in on the Target: Who Among the Educationally Disadvantaged Benefits Most From What CBI?" Journal of Research on Computing in Education 22:4 (1990), 381-403.
  20. Wenglinsky, Harold. Does It Compute? The Relationship Between Educational Technology and Student Achievement in Mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Policy Information Center, Research Division, Educational Testing Service (1998), 1-38. endix: Summary of Results in Reviewed Studies .S. Department of Commerce, Falling Through The Net, July 1999, available on the department's digital divide website, .digitaldivide.gov/about.htm. arbara Means, quoted in Mayfield, K. (1999).
  21. or example, see Sloan Commission on Cable Communications, On the Cable: The Television of Abundance, McGraw-Hill, , which proposed devoting half the channels on cable television systems to various forms of information services (p. 142). A ber of the Commission's staff, Ralph Lee Smith, expanded upon this recommendation by writing a book about the range of ices that could and ought to be mandatory for cable systems in his book, The Wired Nation, Harper and Row, 1972. Of se, cable television never fulfilled these promises, primarily becaus e these services would have to be subsidized to be ided, and the subsidy costs were very large compared to the cost of cable television (see Roger G. Noll, Merton J. Peck an J. McGown, "Cable and New Television Services," Chapter 7 of Economic Aspects of Television Regulation, Brookings itution, 1974, pp. 183-207).
  22. CC Sixth Annual Report on Competition in Video Market, FCC Docket No 99-418 (rel. Dec. 30, 1999). ueller (1997), p. 148. he title of the first NTIA "Falling Through the Net: A Survey of the 'Have Nots' in Rural and Urban America" was erned specifically with this differential enhart, A. (2000) presents survey data showing a 10% difference (57% vs. 47%)between rural and urban areas. Much of she claims is due to a difference in computer usage between rural and urban residents. ownes, T. and Greenstein, S. "Do Commercial ISPs Provide Universal Access?" entral city is defined to be the largest city within a metropolitan area.
  23. Rosston and Wimmer (2000), "Winners and Losers from the Universal Service Subsidy Battle," discuss the costs to low- me urban residents from an untargeted rural telephone subsidy. UCLA Internet Report, p-15. endix: Summary of Results in Reviewed Studies Sum of sources can exceed 100% if people access the internet at multiple locations. Moller, R. M. (2000) Table 16, p.16. Moller, R. M. (2000) Table 8, p.11.
  24. Lenhart, A. "Who's Not Online," Pew Internet and American Life Project, released September 21,2000, available at ://www.pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report=21.
  25. Lenhart, A. p-3.
  26. Lenhart, A. p-9.
  27. See, e.g., "Cross-Subsidization in Telecommunications: Beyond the Universal Service Fairy Tale," David L. Kaserman, Joh ayo, and Joseph E. Flynn See eg. Crandall and Waverman (2000) "Who Pays for Universal Service?" Rosston and Wimmer (2000) "Winners and Losers from the Universal Service Battles," See, for example, critical reviews by Kirkpatrick and Cuban (1998) and Krendl and Clark (1994) and annual comprehensive ews conducted by the Software Information Industry Association. fect sizes represent the standard deviation increase in the outcome measure attributed to program participation. fect sizes represent the standard deviation increase in the outcome measure attributed to program participation. fect sizes represent the standard deviation increase in the outcome measure attributed to program participation.

Related papers

The digital divide
Chad Raphael

Battleground: The media, 2007

Many have argued that inequalities of access to the Internet in an information-driven society pose a serious social problem and that public investment is needed to solve it. Others contend that the digital divide is a minor concern that will resolve itself without government involvement and spending. The positions we take on this debate depend upon our understanding of how new technologies spread throughout society, whether we think Internet access is a frill or a necessity, and our vision of whether government can and ought to help broaden access.

View PDFchevron_right
Digital Divide
Solen Feyissa
View PDFchevron_right
Digital Divide: Have’s and Have Not’s
Tarun Shyam

International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 2020

In the era of internet age each individual has an ample opportunity to access the information. But, the researchers had found inequalities in accessing the internet in terms of access of the devices, skills and tangible outcomes. This research had been carried out to elaborate the concept of the digital divide along with its different levels. It discusses on social and economic development opportunities because the digital divide is evolving from those have access, to use, to outcomes. Some people can use computers, mobile devices, the Internet, and other information and communication technologies (ICTs) and get benefitted from it. The present research will be giving the holistic view of digital divide which will help the researchers to understand the digital divide and encourage them to study on digital divide with respect to the different levels in developed and developing countries.

View PDFchevron_right
The Digital Divide as a Complex and Dynamic Phenomenon
Ken Hacker, Jan van Dijk

The Information Society, 2003

The purpose of this article is to propose a fruitful analytical framework for data supposedly related to the concept of the socalled "digital divide." The extent and the nature of this divide depend on the kind of access defined. Considering the possession of hardware, growing divides among different categories of income, employment, education, age, and ethnicity can be proved to have existed in the 1980s and 1990s according to official American and Dutch statistics. If only by effects of saturation, these gaps will more or less close. However, it is shown that differential access of skills and usage is likely to increase. The growth of a usage gap is projected. Multivariate analyses of Dutch official statistics reveal the striking effect of age and gender as compared to education. The usage gap is related to the evolution of the information and network society. Finally, policy perspectives are discussed.

View PDFchevron_right
The digital divide issues: Is the gap getting bigger?
Mohd Haniff Nizam

Jurnal Komunikasi, 2007

This paper addresses the digital divide issues based on a survey of 150 respondents comprising of governments and respondents from rural and urban sectors of selected areas as well as in-depth interviews. The study explored various government measures to ...

View PDFchevron_right
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved