Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Games in algebraic logic: axiomatisations and beyond

2005

Abstract
sparkles

AI

This paper explores the interplay between games and algebraic logic, focusing on the characterisation of representable relation algebras. Utilizing game-theoretic methods aids in the investigation of properties such as consistencies of algebraic structures, with significant implications for the classifications and applications of such algebras.

References (34)

  1. G Birkhoff, On the structure of abstract algebras, Proc. Cambr. Philos. Soc. 31 (1935), 433-454.
  2. C. Chang and H. Keisler, Model theory, 3rd ed., North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1990.
  3. P. Erdős, Graph theory and probability, Canadian Journal of Mathematics 11 (1959), 34-38.
  4. K Fine. Some connections between elementary and modal logic. In S Kanger, editor, Proc. 3rd Scandinavian logic symposium, Uppsala, 1973, pages 15-31. North Holland, Amsterdam, 1975.
  5. R Goldblatt, I Hodkinson, and Y Venema. Erdős graphs resolve Fine's canonicity problem. Bull. Symbolic Logic, 10:186-208, 2004.
  6. Robert Goldblatt, Ian Hodkinson, and Yde Venema. On canonical modal logics that are not elementarily determined. Logique et Analyse, 181:77-101, 2003.
  7. L Henkin, J D Monk, and A Tarski, Cylindric algebras part I, North-Holland, 1971.
  8. R Hirsch and I Hodkinson, Axiomatising various classes of relation and cylindric algebras, Logic J. IGPL 5 (1997), no. 2, 209-229, Proc. WoLLIC95, Recife, Brazil.
  9. Complete representations in algebraic logic, Journal of Symbolic Logic 62 (1997), no. 3, 816-847.
  10. Relation algebras by games, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, vol. 147, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2002.
  11. Strongly representable atom structures of relation algebras, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 130 (2002), 1819-1831.
  12. R Hirsch, I Hodkinson, and R Maddux, Provability with finitely many variables, Bull. Symbolic Logic 8 (2002), 348-379.
  13. Relation algebra reducts of cylindric algebras and an application to proof theory, J. Symbolic Logic 67 (2002), no. 1, 197-213.
  14. I Hodkinson, Atom structures of cylindric algebras and relation algebras, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 89 (1997), 117-148.
  15. I Hodkinson, Sz Mikulás, and Y Venema, Axiomatizing complex algebras by games, Algebra Universalis 46 (2001), 455-478.
  16. I Hodkinson and Y Venema, Canonical varieties with no canonical axiomatisation, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., to appear.
  17. B Jónsson, Representation of modular lattices and of relation algebras, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 92 (1959), 449-464.
  18. The theory of binary relations, Algebraic logic (H Andréka, J D Monk, and I Németi, eds.), Colloq. Math. Soc. J. Bolyai, vol. 54, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1991, pp. 245-292.
  19. B Jónsson and A Tarski. Boolean algebras with operators I. American Journal of Mathematics, 73:891-939, 1951.
  20. B Jónsson and A Tarski. Boolean algebras with operators II. American Journal of Mathematics, 74:127-162, 1952.
  21. R Lyndon, The representation of relational algebras, Annals of Mathematics 51 (1950), no. 3, 707-729.
  22. The representation of relation algebras, II, Annals of Mathematics 63 (1956), no. 2, 294-307.
  23. Relation algebras and projective geometries, Michigan Mathematics Journal 8 (1961), 207-210.
  24. R Maddux, A sequent calculus for relation algebras, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 25 (1983), 73-101.
  25. The origin of relation algebras in the development and axiomatization of the calculus of relations, Studia Logica 3/4 (1991), 421-455.
  26. R McKenzie. The representation of relation algebras. PhD thesis, University of Colorado at Boulder, 1966.
  27. J D Monk, On representable relation algebras, Michigan Mathematics Journal 11 (1964), 207- 210.
  28. F P Ramsey, On a problem of formal logic, Proc. London Math. Soc. 30 (1930), 264-286.
  29. F W K Ernst Schröder, Algebra und Logik der Relative, Part I, Vorlesungen über die Algebra der Logik (exacte Logik), vol. 3, Leipzig, 1895, 2nd edn., Chelsea, Bronx, NY, 1966.
  30. M Stone, The theory of representations for boolean algebras, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 40 (1936), 37-111.
  31. A Tarski, Contributions to the theory of models, I, II, Proc. Konink. Nederl. Akad. van Wetensch., A, vol. 57 (= Indag. Math. 16), 1954, pp. 572-581 and 582-588 resp.
  32. A Tarski and S R Givant, A formalization of set theory without variables, Colloquium Publica- tions, no. 41, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, Rhode Island, 1987.
  33. Y Venema, Atom structures, In M. Kracht, M. de Rijke, H. Wansing, and M. Zakharyaschev, editors, Advances in Modal Logic '96 (1997), pp. 291-305. CSLI Publications, Stanford.
  34. Atom structures and Sahlqvist equations, Algebra Universalis 38 (1997), 185-199.