Managerial Economics and Organizational Architecture
1996
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
Abstract
AI
AI
This paper explores the intersection of managerial economics and organizational architecture, emphasizing how strategic decision-making influences firm performance. It discusses various pricing strategies, market structures, incentive conflicts, and contract management within firms. By analyzing key concepts such as market power, organizational design, and corporate governance, it seeks to provide insights into effective management practices and value creation.
Related papers
In their effort to differentiate themselves from cost-driven rivals, many industrial companies are beginning to serve their customers through value-based offerings. Such companies often engage actively in collaborative value creation with their customers. To capture a fair share of the value created, they need to adopt a value based pricing approach. Therefore, value-driven competition necessitates value-based pricing (VBP). The present study explores the barriers to exercising value-based pricing and suggests ways to overcome those obstacles in putting value-based pricing into action in B2B sales. The study is implemented as an exploratory multi-case study applying an abductive research methodology. Our cases show that industrial sellers try to understand and influence their customers' desired value perception, influence customer-perceived value (CPV), and improve their bargaining position as means to overcome these barriers to improved value capture. Hence, our findings deepen the current understanding of value-based pricing in industrial buyer–seller relationships. In doing so, it contributes to the literature on customer value, organizational capabilities, business models, and sales management in previously unexplored areas. Moreover, the study provides guidance to business practitioners willing to develop value-based pricing as part of their business model.
Journal of Marketing, 2012
Although pricing is one of the strongest drivers of profitability, little empirical research has examined how a firm should organize pricing internally. This research draws on the information-processing view of organizational design to conceptualize a framework of how firms organize their pricing authority both within the sales function and across the sales, marketing, and finance functions. The authors find a nonlinear, inverted U-shaped relationship between the vertical delegation of pricing authority and profitability as well as a positive relationship between the horizontal dispersion of pricing authority across sales, marketing, and finance and profitability. Another key finding is a positive interaction between vertical delegation and horizontal dispersion, indicating that firms need to jointly design vertical delegation and horizontal dispersion. In addition, the results identify price-related market dynamism as a moderator of the horizontal dispersion of the pricing authorit...
2000
Pricing of products and services is a complex task for industrial marketing practitioners. The failure to understand the connection between business strategy and the pricing decision at the level of industrial products and services may lead to lost business opportunities and unsatisfied customers. In this article, the importance of strategic pricing in business relationships is discussed by examining the effects
Revista de Administração, 2016
Pricing strategies and levels and their impact on corporate profitability Estratégias e níveis de preços e seus impactos sobre a lucratividade das empresas Estrategias y niveles de precios y su impacto en la rentabilidad de las empresas
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2008
THE JOURNAL OF APPLIED BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS, 2014
Variations in the pricing approaches firms employ may partially explain why observed industry prices appear inconsistent with economic theory. Some firms may use principles developed from psychology that do not fit traditional economic models to enhance their profits beyond the basic solutions from economic theory. This paper describes more than fifty of these principles, dividing them into four categories: framing, congruency, context, and signaling. By studying these principles from psychology, researchers and policy makers can better understand the prices they observe in the marketplace. By following more of these principles, firms may be able to enhance their performance.
1998
Despite a great deal of theoretical research on competition, there has been limited empirical work assessing the type of competitive interaction that actually exists in the marketplace. The empirical work that has been conducted has suggested that there is significant variation in the type of competitive interaction across categories and across marketing instruments. Consequently, the central objective of this paper is descriptive in naturewhat does competition look like? Focusing on the competition that exists across strategic groups (Porter 1985), we categorize competitive interaction between private labels and national brands for each of 58 categories and four marketing instruments. Specifically, we look at five types of competitive interaction. Three, cooperative, non-cooperative, and independent (Nash) are symmetric in nature, while two, leader-follower (Stackelberg) and dominant/fringe-firm, are asymmetric. The empirical results suggest that general comments or assumptions about competitive interaction can produce very misleading conclusions. There is no consistent pattern of competition that exists between private labels and national brands across categories. Further, the pattern of interaction is quite complex, while there is likely to be a significant variation across instruments within a category. National brand leadership is the most common form of interaction for each marketing mix variable. However, it characterizes only 19 out of 58 categories for regular price, and 16, 19, and 15 out of 58 categories for temporary price reduction, feature and display, respectively. Further, the interaction is idiosyncratic to the category, depending heavily upon the demand and competitive characteristics of the category. Implications for both game theorists and for managers are explored.
2 During the 90's decade, there was a shift in the organizational structures of many companies. The world entered an era of global markets, intense competition, new and complex technology. As a result of these changes a growing number of corporations started moving to a more organic system. Companies became clusters of self-directed divisions that behaved as separate firms . This type of structure is known as internal markets. In this essay,

Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.