Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Resources for Action: A Resource-Based View of Service Systems

Abstract

This paper presents a new, operational view of service activities and service systems in the form of an extension of the resources-for-action (RA) section of an existing service system metamodel. The original metamodel represented the fact that service activities need resources in order to occur and also produce products/services that are resources for subsequent service activities and/or the service system's customers. The new RA section clarifies the different types of resources that are created or used by service activities within service systems. This paper addresses an area of service science that is not well-developed. The literature related to service science tends to treat resources in a general and nonspecific manner that provides relatively little insight about how to identify specific resources that are needed or used in specific service systems. This paper combines ideas from two streams of research, one related to a service system metamodel and the other related to a new tool for systems analysis and design. After summarizing a new extension of the RA section of the service system metamodel, it uses an example related to service activities in a medical clinic to illustrate how the new RA section leads to a tabular documentation, analysis, and design tool. That tool can be used for examining the design or operation of a service system with emphasis on the timely availability of necessary resources.

References (19)

  1. Alter, S. 2006. The Work System Method: Connecting People, Processes, and IT for Business Results, Larkspur, CA: Work System Press.
  2. Alter, S. 2008. Service System Fundamentals: Work System, Value Chain, and Life Cycle, IBM Systems Journal, 47(1), 71-85.
  3. Alter, S. 2010a. Bridging the Chasm between Sociotechnical and Technical Views of Systems in Organizations, Proceedings of ICIS 2010, the 31st International Conference on Information Systems.
  4. Alter, S. 2010b. Viewing Systems as Services: A Fresh Approach in the IS Field, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 26(11), 195-224
  5. Alter, S. 2011a. Making a Science of Service Systems Practical: Seeking Usefulness and Understandability while Avoiding Unnecessary Assumptions and Restrictions, pp. 61-72 in
  6. Demirkan, H., Spohrer, J., Krishna, V., The Science of Service Systems, Springer, New York, NY. Alter, S. 2011b. Metamodel for Service Design and Service Innovation: Integrating Service Activities, Service Systems, and Value Constellations, Proceedings of ICIS 2011, the 32nd International Conference on Information Systems.
  7. Alter, S. 2012. Metamodel for Service Analysis and Design Based on an Operational View of Service and Service Systems, Service Science, in press.
  8. Alter, S. and Bolloju, N. 2012. "A Work System Front End for Object-Oriented Analysis and Design," SIGSAND (Special Interest Group on Systems Analysis and Design), Vancouver, June 2012.
  9. Barney, J. B. 1986. Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Science, 32(10), 1231-1242.
  10. Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99-121.
  11. Bitner, MJ, Ostrom, A., and Morgan, F. 2008. Service Blueprinting: A Practical Technique for Service Innovation, California Management Review, 50(3), 66-94.
  12. Edvardsson, B., Skålén, P., Tronvoll, B. 2012. Service Systems as a Foundation for Resource Integration and Value Co-Creation", in Vargo, S. L. and Lusch, R. F. (eds.) Review of Marketing Research, Special Issue -Toward a Better Understanding of the Role of Value in Markets and Marketing (Volume 9), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 79 -126
  13. Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
  14. Grönroos, C. 2011. "Value creation in service logic: A critical analysis," Marketing Theory, 11(3), 279-301.
  15. Hamel, G., and Prahalad, C. K. 1994. Competing for the future. Harvard Business Review,72(4): 122-129.
  16. Menschner, P.; Prinz, A.; Koene, P.; Köbler, F.; Altmann, M.; Krcmar, H., Leimeister, J. M. (2011): Reaching into patients' homes -participatory designed AAL services. In: Electronic Markets, Number: 1, Vol. 21, Pages: 63-76.
  17. Vargo, S.L. and Lusch, R.F. 2004. Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing, Journal of Marketing, 68, 1-17.
  18. Vargo, S.L. and Lusch, R.F. 2008. Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 1-10.
  19. Sprouts -http://sprouts.aisnet.org/12-32