DOLCE ROCKS: Integrating Geoscience Ontologies with DOLCE
Abstract
Conceptual representations are being developed within many geoscience domains to aid semantic-enabled scientific computing, e.g. geology, geophysics, hydrology, marine science, planetary science. These representations often make different ontological assumptions, causing their integration to be impeded. This is particularly problematic for science issues that involve crossdomain knowledge, such as those related to climate change, biodiversity, and hazards risk. Emerging foundational ontologies have the potential to alleviate this problem by providing a coherent and complete conceptual basis for domain representations. In this paper we present work-in-progress in which the DOLCE foundational ontology is used to integrate two geoscience knowledge representations, the GeoSciML schema and SWEET ontology, to enable cross-domain scientific computing. The preliminary results indicate good conceptual coverage by the foundational ontology, minimal conflict and overlap between the domain ontologies, alternative approaches for aligning with the foundational ontology, and several issues with the domain and foundational ontologies. An OWL-DL encoding is in progress and testing via data integration is planned.
References (25)
- Babaie, H. A., 2006, Desigining dynamic Earth sciences ontologies. In: Brady, S.R., Sinha, A.K., Gundersen, L.C. (Eds.), Geoinformatics 2006, Data to Knowledge, Reston, VA, May 10-12, 2006, USGS Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5201, p.2.
- Babaie, H.A., Oldow, J.S., Babaei, A., Avé Lallemant, H.G., Watkinson, A.J. (2006). Designing a modular architecture for the structural geology ontology. In: Sinha, A.K. (Ed.) Geoinformatics: Data to Knowledge, GSA Special Paper 397, 249-268
- Bermudez, L., Graybeal, J., Arko, R. (2006). A marine platforms ontology: Experiences and lessons. In: Proceedings of the Semantic Sensor Networks Workshop at the Fifth International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), Athens, Georgia.
- Bittner, T. (2007). From top-level to domain ontologies: Ecosystem classifications as a case study. In M. Duckham, B. Kuipers, L. Kulik, and S. Winter, editors, Spatial Information Theory. Cognitive and Computational Foundations of Geographic Information Science. International Conference, COSIT 2007, 61-77.
- Brodaric, B., Gahegan, M. (2006). Representing Geoscientific Knowledge in Cyberinfrastructure: challenges, approaches and implementations. In: Sinha, A.K. (Ed.), Geoinformatics, Data to Knowledge. Geological Society of America Special Paper 397, 1-20.
- Cox, S.J.D., Richard, S.M. (2005). A formal model for the geologic time scale and global stratotype section and point, compatible with geospatial information transfer standards. Geosphere, 1(3):119-137.
- Gangemi A., Guarino N., Masolo C., Oltramari, A. (2003). Sweetening WordNet with DOLCE. AI Magazine, 24(3):13-24.
- Grenon, P., Smith, B. (2004). SNAP and SPAN: Towards Dynamic Spatial Ontology. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 4(1).
- Herre, H., Heller, B., Burek, P., Hoehndorf, R.Loebe, F., Michalek, H. (2006). General formal ontology (GFO) - part I: Basic principles. Technical Report 8, Onto-Med, University of Leipzig, 2006.
- Ludäscher, B., K. Lin, S. Bowers, E. Jaeger-Frank, B. Brodaric, C. Baru, C. (2006). Managing scientific data: From data integration to scientific workflows. In: Sinha, A.K. (Ed.) Geoinformatics: Data to Knowledge, GSA Special Paper 397, 109-130.
- Mascardi V., Cordì V., Rosso P. (2007). A comparison of Upper Ontologies . In: Proc. Conf. on Agenti e industria: Applicazioni tecnologiche degli agenti software, WOA07, Genova, Italy, September 24-25.
- Masolo, C., Borgo, S., Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Oltramari, A. (2003). WonderWeb DeliverableD18, Ontology Library (final). Laboratory For Applied Ontology, http://www.loa-cnr.it/Papers/D18.pdf.
- Mitra, P., Wiederhold, G., and Decker, S., "Dealing with Semantic Interoperation of Data," 2 nd IEEE International Symposium on Data Interoperability, Sardinia, Italy, IEEE Computer Society Press, 134-145, 2005.
- North American Geologic Map Data Model Steering Committee, (2004). NADM Conceptual Model 1.0, A Conceptual Model for Geologic Map Information: Geological survey of Canada, OPEN FILE 4737, 1 CD- ROM, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2004- 1334, 58p; http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2004/1334.
- Noy, N.F. (2003). Tools for Mapping and merging Ontologies. In: Staab, S., Studer, S. (Eds.) Handbook on Ontologies, International Handbooks on Information Systems, Springer:Berlin, 365-384.
- Olsen, L.M., Major, G. , Shein, K., Scialdone, J., Vogel, R. , Leicester, S. , Weir, H. , Ritz, S., Stevens, T. , Meaux, M., Solomon, C., Bilodeau, R., Holland, M., Northcutt, T., Restrepo, R. A. (2007) . NASA/Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Earth Science
- Keywords,http://gcmd.gsfc.nasa.gov/Resources/valids/ar chives/keyword_list.html
- Pease, A., (2006). Formal representation of concepts: The Suggested Upper Merged Ontology and its use in linguistics. In: Schalley, A. C., Zaefferer, D. (Eds.), Ontolinguistics. How Ontological Status Shapes the Linguistic Coding of Concepts. Vorbereitung Berlin:New York (Mouton de Gruyter).
- Probst, F. (2007) Semantic Reference Systems for Observations and Measurements. PhD thesis, University of Münster.
- Probst, F., Espeter, M. (2006) Spatial Dimensionality as Classification Criterion for Qualities. FOIS'06, International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems.
- Pshenichny, C.A., Moukhachov, V.P., Khrabrykh, Z.V. (2003). Logical assessment of observational knowledge in volcanology. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 128(1-3):287-298.
- Raskin, R.G., Pan, M.J. (2005). Knowledge representation in the Semantic Web for Earth and Environmental Terminology (SWEET). Computers and Geosciences, 31(9):1119-1125.
- Richard, S.M. (2006). Geoscience Concept Models. In: Sinha, A.K. (Ed.) Geoinformatics: Data to Knowledge, GSA Special Paper 397, 81-108.
- Sen, M., Duffy, T. (2005). GeoSciML: development of a generic Geoscience Markup Language. Computers and Geosciences, 31(9):1095-1103.
- Sowa, J. F. (2000). Knowledge Representation: Logical, Philosophical, and Computational Foundations. Brooks/Cole: New York.