Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Title
Abstract
Introduction
Conclusions
References
All Topics
Education
Science and Mathematics Education

On the use of metaphors in designing educational interfaces

Profile image of Bipin IndurkhyaBipin Indurkhya

2016, 2016 7th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom)

https://doi.org/10.1109/COGINFOCOM.2016.7804573
visibility

…

description

4 pages

link

1 file

Abstract

Metaphors are present in a wide range of everyday activities. They usually work by understanding or explaining complex subjects by terms from more familiar domains. Metaphors in everyday context are often used unconsciously, as their sources are basic entities and perceptual experiences. They can, however, be used deliberately in educational discourse to explain difficult concepts and introduce new ideas in an intelligible manner. This approach falls under constructivism, which claims that an effective learning strategy is to scaffold on the previous knowledge and conceptual representations. However, there are some limitations of introducing a new concept indirectly via a metaphor. We consider these issues here in the domains of physics education, human-computer interfaces and human-robot interactions. We argue that metaphors are most effective for novices, when one needs to grasp a general idea about a concept and understand its functions without a detailed analysis. In this respect, metaphor can be a powerful tool for bridging gaps in understanding between familiar terms and abstract ideas that are yet to be learned.

Related papers

An Analysis of Metaphors Used by High School Students to Describe Physics, Physics Lesson and Physics Teacher
Ali Çetin

The purpose of this study was to describe high school students' " physics " , physics lesson " and " physics teacher " conceptions by using metaphors. 313 students participated in the study from different high school types in Siirt, Turkey. A metaphorical perception form constructed by researcher was individually conducted, digitally recorded and analyzed. Codes and conceptual categories were created. The results demonstrate that students describe physics and physics lesson by using content, function, affective and cognitive characteristics and physics teacher by using cognitive, affective, personality and physical characteristics. Although constructivist approaches are applied in Turkish physics education program, the results show that most of the high school students still think that physics is a complex and difficult subject. The other result of the study shows that students think that physics is a developing subject area but physics lesson is not developing course. About physics teachers students believe that they are very knowledgeable and intelligent people. Some recommendations are made for researchers and program developers.

View PDFchevron_right
Cathedrals in the Mind: The Architecture of Metaphor in Understanding Learning
Kathleen Forsythe

Cybernetics and Systems ’86, 1986

The pervasiveness of metaphor in our conceptual system suggests a central and basic role in the underlying architecture of thought. Metaphor represents the ability to understand one thing in terms of another as we ascribe an understood pattern to an unknown phenomena and perceive their structural integrity within the environment of our experience. We can then begin to perceive the environment of learning as one in which analogical thinking serves as architecture, analytical thinking serves as engineering and the imagination ensures that the interactions which create life and meaning are always being realized anew. The implications for this approach to applied epistemology provides insight into the design and development of learning systems that support the creative nature of learning.

View PDFchevron_right
Learning and metaphors
Paul Hager

Medical Teacher, 2008

Let us start with what I think is a surprising, but not widely recognised, fact about learning, namely that humans seem to be unable to think about learning without employing metaphors of some kind. Precisely why the use of metaphors is inescapable when we try to understand learning is a complex matter that is well beyond the scope of this paper. (For some suggestive ideas on this matter see Lakoff and Johnson 1980, 1999; Murdoch 1997. See also Hager 2004a). Let me remind you of what exactly a metaphor is. According to the Oxford Companion to English Literature, metaphor can be thought of as "the transfer of a name or descriptive term to an object different from, but analogous to, that to which it is properly applicable, e.g. 'abysmal ignorance'". (The related notion of analogy is, of course, concerned with "likeness in certain respects"). Scheffler (1960, p. 48ff), in an early insightful discussion of the centrality of metaphorical language in educational writing, including writing about learning, noted that metaphors indicate that there is an important analogy between two things, without saying explicitly in what the analogy consists. Now, every two things are analogous in some respect, but not every such respect is important.... the notion of importance varies with the situation.....

View PDFchevron_right
The cognitive role of metaphor in teaching science: Examples from physics, chemistry, biology, psychology and philosophy
Olaf Jäkel

2015

In her seminal work Models and Analogies in Science, Mary Hesse (1966) establishes an important function of metaphor in scientific theorizing – the explanatory function of metaphor in scientific models. While Hesse was concerned with scientists communicating with each other, this paper investigates whether this crucial function of metaphor can also be found when scientific experts communicate with a lay audience of students in the discourse setting of college lectures. For this purpose, we analyze transcriptions of five filmed US-American college lectures in biology, chemistry, psychology and philosophy. Our detailed analysis of authentic language data shows that what Hesse (1966: 157- 177) labeled “the explanatory function of metaphor” is indeed systematically exploited for didactic purposes by the professors when communicating scientific concepts to their students. Additionally, our examination also points out that in this educational setting, the explanatory function of metaphor ...

View PDFchevron_right
Metaphors We Learn By
Elizabeth Dalton

Is learning a matter of transferring knowledge objects from the external world to the internal mind, the construction of such objects internally by the learner, or some other process altogether? Does knowledge exist within the individual, or within the sociocultural context? To what extent do individual characteristics of learners such as age, sociocultural membership, or gender affect learning? Philosophers, educators, and education policy makers have argued about the nature of learning, and of knowledge, for thousands of years, and their various theories have been implemented, in part, in learning programs of all kinds. In this essay I suggest that there is not a single “correct” answer to this question, but that the different theories of knowledge do have implications for the experiences and outcomes in those learning programs organized around them. I propose to analyze these different theories of knowledge and learning in terms of metaphorical cognition, using theories developed by Lakoff and Johnson (1980) and a methodology suggested by Schmitt (2005), concluding with practical recommendations for an adult online college program based on this metaphorical analysis.

View PDFchevron_right
Conceptual Metaphor in Educational Discourse
Eduard Budaev

Biosciences Biotechnology Research Asia, 2015

Studying the functions and types of metaphors in the educational discourse (pedagogical metaphorology) is a scientific direction, actively developed in North America, Europe and other regions. Such research is being conducted in Russia as well, but the results are little known abroad. This overview describes the major achievements of the Russian pedagogical metaphorology, differentiates its leading areas of interest, analyzes methods and heuristics. The conclusion describes the system of pedagogical metaphors being dependent on living conditions and educational system, the author's philosophy and personality, his views on education, on the collaboration of teachers, students and parents.

View PDFchevron_right
Construction of Teaching Metaphors Through the Use of Technology
Cheryl Sundberg

2000

The study of preservice teachers' development of metaphors as personal conceptions of teaching and learning is important not only to the preservice teachers but also to teacher educators. Such metaphors may provide us with snapshots, or glimpses, of our future teachers and can provide information on how we, as teacher educators, can ensure that methodological theories and pedagogical principles become

View PDFchevron_right
METAPHOR AND CREATIVITY IN LEARNING SCIENCE
Lindsey Richland

ABSTRACT While much work has examined how students think and and learn with metaphors, relatively little research has focused on thinking about metaphors, that is, thinking critically about current metaphors and considering creative alternatives. This paper presents results from a classroombased study that involves metaphor in science learning and incorporates a novel computational technique for analyzing metaphors in text.

View PDFchevron_right
Metaphors in educational texts: A case study on history and chemistry teaching material
Juliana Goschler

Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, 2019

It is by now a long established fact that academic and educational discourse (as any other kind of discourse) is full of metaphorical language. On the one hand, metaphors are part of educational discourse because of embodied metaphorical conceptualizations and therefore highly conventionalized and unconsciously used linguistic patterns (such as orientational metaphors like MORE IS UP or ontological metaphors like personifications), but on the other hand metaphors can also be used as a conscious teaching strategy in order to structure abstract things in terms of more concrete domains that are closer to direct experiences. In my paper, I will show that certain subjects in school are characterized by educational texts using highly conventionalized metaphors that are most likely not even recognized as such, whereas in others metaphorical language is less frequent and much less evenly distributed among the text. Based on the analysis of educational texts from history and chemistry text b...

View PDFchevron_right
On the Significance of Conceptual Metaphors in Teaching and Learning Science: Commentary on Lancor; Niebert and Gropengiesser; and Fuchs
David Treagust

Http Dx Doi Org 10 1080 09500693 2015 1025312, 2015

View PDFchevron_right

References (30)

  1. G. Lakoff, M. Johnson, "Metaphors We Live By", Chicago University Press, 1980.
  2. G. Ugur, R. Gokhan, Y. Senpolat, B. Duzgun, "The Effects of Analogy on Students' Understanding of Direct Current Circuits and Attitudes towards Physics Lessons", European Journal of Educational Research, vol. 1, no. 3, 2012, pp. 211-223.
  3. S. F. Caldwell, "The effects of metaphorical graphics in physics instruction", PhD dissertation, California State University, Chico, 2012. http://csuchico-dspace.calstate.edu/handle/10211.4/479. Accessed on 6 July, 2016.
  4. D. Gentner, D. Gentner, "Flowing waters or teeming crowds: Mental models of electricity" in Mental models, D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens Eds., Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1983, p. 99-129.
  5. N. S. Podolefsky, N. D. Finkelstein, "Use of analogy in learning physics: The role of representations", Physics Education Research 2, 2006, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.2.020101.
  6. B. Zubrowski, "The Role of Metaphor, Models, and Analogies in Science Education" in Exploration and Meaning Making in the Learning of Science, Springer Netherlands, 2009.
  7. J. D. Slotta, M. T. Chi, E. Joram, "Assessing students' misclassifications of physics concepts: An ontological basis for conceptual change", Cognition and instruction, vol. 13, no. 3, 1995, pp. 373-400.
  8. C. M. Turbanye, The myth of metaphor, Yale University Press. New Haven (Conn.), 1962.
  9. R. Lancor, "Using metaphor theory to examine conceptions of energy in biology, chemistry, and physics", Science & Education, vol. 23, no. 6, 2014, pp. 1245-1267.
  10. J. L. Alty, R. P. Knott, "Metaphor and human-computer interaction: a model based approach", in Computation for metaphors, analogy, and agents, in Computation for Metaphors, Analogy and Agents. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 1562, C.L. Nehaniv (ed.) Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1999, pp. 307-321.
  11. T. D. Erickson, "Working with interface metaphors", in Human- Computer Interaction, R.M. Baecker et al. (eds.), Morgan Kaufmann, 1995, pp. 147-151.
  12. Y. Rogers, H. Sharp, J. Preece, Interaction Design: beyond human- computer interaction (4th edition), Wiley, 2015.
  13. IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom 2016) • October 16-18, 2016 • Wrocław, Poland
  14. E. M. Wang, A. Y. Huang, "A Study on Basic Metaphors in Human- Computer Interaction", Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 44, no. 1, 2000, pp. 140-143.
  15. F. Halasz, T. P. Moran, "Analogy considered harmful", in Proceedings of the 1982 conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, 1982, pp. 383-386.
  16. A. Hamilton, "Metaphor in theory and practice: the influence of metaphors on expectations", ACM Journal of Computer Documentation (JCD), vol. 24, no. 4, 2000, pp. 237-253.
  17. C. Condon, M. Perry, R. O'Keefe, "Denotation and connotation in the human-computer interface: The 'Save as...' command", Behaviour & Information Technology, vol. 23, no. 1, 2004, pp. 21-31.
  18. A. Cooper, R. Reimann, D. Cronin, About Face 3: The Essentials of Interaction Design, (3 rd ed.). Wiley, 2007.
  19. C. Guo, E. Sharlin, "Exploring the use of tangible user interfaces for human-robot interaction: a comparative study", Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2008, pp. 121-130.
  20. C. Guo, E. Sharlin, "Utilizing physical objects and metaphors for human robot interaction", Proceedings of the Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour Convention (AISB '08), AISB Press, Aberdeen, UK, April 2008.
  21. H. Mi, A. Krzywinski, T. Fujita, M. Sugimoto, "RoboTable: An Infrastructure for Intuitive Interaction with Mobile Robots in a Mixed- Reality Environment", Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 2012.
  22. P. Rouanet, J. Béchu, P-Y. Oudeyer, "A comparison of three interfaces using handheld devices to intuitively drive and show objects to a social robot: the impact of underlying metaphors", The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO- MAN 2009, 2009, pp. 1066-1072.
  23. T. N. Beran, A. Ramirez-Serrano, R. Kuzyk, M. Fior, S. Nugent, "Understanding how children understand robots: Perceived animism in child-robot interaction", International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 69 Issues 7-8, 2011, pp. 539-550.
  24. A. Guneysu, I. Karatas, O. Asık, B. Indurkhya, "Attitudes of Children Towards Dancing Robot Nao: A Kindergarden Observation." International Conference on Social Robotics (ICSR 2013): Workshop on Taking Care of Each Other: Synchronisation and Reciprocity for Social Companion Robots, Bristol, UK, October 2013.
  25. K. Dautenhahn, "Roles and functions of robots in human society implications from research in autism therapy", Robotica vol. 21, 2003, pp. 443-452.
  26. H. Kozima, C. Nakagawa, "Interactive robots as facilitators of children's social development", in Mobile Robots Towards New Applications, A Lazinica (ed.) INTECH Open Access, 2006.
  27. L. J. Wood, K. Dautenhahn, A. Rainer, B. Robins, H. Lehmann, D. S. Syrdal, (2013). Robot-Mediated Interviews -How Effective Is a Humanoid Robot as a Tool for Interviewing Young Children? PloS ONE vol. 8, No. 3, :e59448, 2013.
  28. M. Erard, "Weaving skill ropes: Using metaphor to enhance understanding of what skills are and how they develop", Washington, DC: FrameWorks Institute, 2013.
  29. P. Baranyi, A. Csapo, "Cognitive infocommunications: coginfocom." Computational Intelligence and Informatics (CINTI), 2010 11th International Symposium on. IEEE, 2010.
  30. P. Baranyi, A. Csapo, "Definition and synergies of cognitive infocommunications", Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, vol. 9, no. 1, 67- 83, 2012.

Related papers

Metaphors we teach by
Saad Farooq

Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, 2014

In this paper we present an initial study of how metaphors are used by university-level Computer Science instructors. The goal of this research is to gain a better understanding of the role that metaphors play in Computer Science education, to catalog the kinds of metaphors that are used, and to assess their effectiveness in supporting learning. We interviewed 10 educators in Computer Science about the metaphors they have used in the classroom, with a focus on introductory "CS1" programming courses. We analyze these interviews with an existing theory of metaphors, which provides a framework for describing their structure and features. The theory predicts that most metaphors have limitations, and eventually fall apart. Therefore, we also asked educators to assess how far they could push their metaphors with and to describe what happens at the breaking point. Our preliminary findings provide a foundation to inform and guide more in-depth analyses in the future.

View PDFchevron_right
Conceptual metaphor in physics education: roots of analogy, visual metaphors, and a primary physics course for student teachers
Hans Fuchs

Journal of physics, 2019

We show in what sense macroscopic physical science is a product of figurative (imaginative) structures of the human mind. Conceptual structure in physics is perception based and schematic and uses metaphoric, analogical, and narrative forms to extend direct perception and conception to cases of less directly accessible phenomena. For instance, a theory of the dynamics of heat can be rendered in a form analogous to that of fluids or electricity. We show how tools using visual forms of metaphors employed in macroscopic physical science can be designed and applied, and we briefly outline one application of the principles discussed here: a novel course for kindergarten and primary school student teachers.

View PDFchevron_right
When metaphors come to life: at the interface of external representations, molecelar processes and student learning
Caroline Larsson

2013

Grasping the dynamics of molecular phenomenon appears to be rather challenging for students in the context of life science. To pursue the origin of such difficulties this paper investigates students' (n=43) meaning making, in interaction with peers and an animation, of the dynamic process of ATP-synthase. To support this inquiry we introduce the CharM-framework (Characteristics of Metaphors), which accounts for students' experiences of metaphors while interacting with external representations (ERs) when trying to make meaning of molecular phenomena. Student-expressed metaphors are outlined and related to the animator's intentions while designing the animation. The analysis shows that some of the used metaphors possess in-built problematic characteristics that could act as potential problems for learning. For example, the metaphors machine and watermill possess problematic characteristics that are a possible reason for students' difficulties with understanding the ATP-synthesis as a reversible and non-deterministic process. Furthermore, we also conclude that students' use of metaphors is highly influenced by the ER, which is designed according to the animator's internal representation of the scientific phenomenon and his intentions. The challenge associated with designing educational representations that sufficiently represent molecular processes is somewhat similar to the challenge student face while linking the characteristics of metaphors to the molecular processes. The CharMframework can assist in the design process by allowing designers to reflect on how ERs could be interpreted or misinterpreted and also guide teachers' choice of educational representations.

View PDFchevron_right
The use of metaphors in the processes of teaching and learning in higher education
Ana Vale Pereira

2013

Due to growing concern about the quality of learning, higher education institutions are looking at their academic achievements and developing initiatives related to research into their teaching activities. The main aim of this article is to contribute to broader knowledge about pedagogical issues in higher education regarding reasoning structure used in the classroom. On a more objective level, the article focuses on the importance of analogical reasoning and the specific use of metaphors as vehicles for learning. It is a case study focused on the use of metaphors in a particular course, which seeks to research the mode and effectiveness of using metaphors as interpretive and explanatory models of scientific phenomena in the processes of teaching and learning. Research shows that the two main uses of metaphors served educational purposes and produced foundational knowledge. Additionally, the use of metaphors was an opportunity to promote teacher awareness of his/her own teaching. .

View PDFchevron_right
Conceptual Metaphor and Embodied Cognition in Science Learning: Introduction to Special Issue
Jesper Haglund, Fredrik Jeppsson

We introduce here a special issue of this journal on the theme of "Conceptual Metaphor and Embodied Cognition in Science Learning." The idea for this issue grew out of a symposium that we organized on this topic at the conference of the European Science Education Research Association (ESERA) in September 2013. The eight papers collected in this issue reflect the emergence of a critical mass of studies in science education applying ideas from the perspective of "embodied cognition" in cognitive science. Up until the 1980s, most research in cognitive science assumed a view of the mind as an abstract information processing system. On this view, our sensorimotor systems were often seen as serving a peripheral, input/output role, conveying information to or from a central cognitive processor where abstract, higher level thought took place. The research focused on developing models of cognition incorporating language-like, propositional representations and syntactic processes, and largely ignored the specifics of human physiology and interaction between the person and the material and social world in which he or she thinks and acts. Since then, several different approaches to cognitive science have adopted some version of the assumption that cognition is embodied -that is, they have assumed that models of cognition need to attend to the characteristics of human brains and bodies, and the material contexts in which thought is taking place (e.g. ). The broad assumptions behind embodied cognition are not new to the study of the mind and may be traced back to Merleau-Ponty's (2002) Phenomenology of perception and Gibson's (1979) ecological theory of perception. They are also acknowledged in cognitive developmental traditions, such as the Piagetian emphasis on our sensorimotor system as a basis for the development of abstract concepts, and resonate with Vygotsky's (1978) recognition of the role of our interaction with physical and symbolic artefacts. With regards to the educational sciences, certain ideas of embodied cognition are in line with pragmatic and progressive traditions, e.g. those of Dewey (1916) which emphasise the role of personal and physical experiences in learning. Wilson (2002) carefully distinguishes and assesses six distinct claims that fall under the general heading of embodied cognition: (1) that cognitive processes are situated, varying depending on the real-world contexts in which they are carried out;

View PDFchevron_right

Related topics

  • Computer Science
  • Physics Education
  • Human Computer Interfaces
    • 580 California St., Suite 400
    San Francisco, CA, 94104
    © 2025 Academia. All rights reserved