Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Science and the Understanding of Science: A Reply to Schneider

2001, Annals of The Association of American Geographers

Abstract
sparkles

AI

This response engages with Schneider's critique of the author's earlier work on climate change science and the politics surrounding it, emphasizing the necessity for open public dialogue about scientific knowledge. It explores the social processes in knowledge construction, arguing that a nuanced understanding of science as both value-laden and politically charged can enhance both scientific knowledge and public discourse. The author also clarifies their objectives regarding social constructionism, aiming to find a middle ground in the debate over the existence and perception of scientific realities.

References (9)

  1. Brown, G. E., Jr. 1996. Environmental science under siege: Fringe science and the 104th Congress. A report by Rep. George E. Brown to the Democratic Caucus of the Committee on Science, U.S. House of Representatives. Washington, DC: Demo- cratic Caucus, U.S. House of Representatives. http://www. house.gov/science_democrats/archive/envrpt96.html (last accessed 3 October 2000)
  2. Daston L. 1992. Objectivity and the escape from perspective. Social Studies of Science 22:597-618.
  3. Demeritt, D. 1998. Science, social constructivism, and nature. In Remaking reality: Nature at the millenium, edited by B. Braun and N. Castree. New York: Routledge. . 2001a. Being constructive about nature. In Social na- ture: Theory, practice, and politics, edited by N. Castree and B. Braun. Oxford: Blackwell. . 2001b. The construction of global warming and the politics of science. Annals of the Association of American Ge- ographers 91:307-37.
  4. Hacking, I. 1999. The social construction of what? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  5. Oreskes, N., K. Shrader-Frechette, and K. Belitz. 1994. Verifica- tion, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences. Science 263:641-46.
  6. Popper, K. 1959. The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
  7. Rorty, R. 1979. Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. .1991. Objectivity, relativism, and truth. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Schneider, S. H. 2001. A constructive deconstruction of decon- structionists: A response to Demeritt. Annals of the Associa- tion of American Geographers 91:338-44.
  9. Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary. 1977. Springfield, MA: G. & C. Merriam Co. Correspondence: Department of Geography, King's College London, Strand, London WC2R 2LS, U.K., e-mail: david.demeritt@kcl.ac.uk