Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Using Auxiliary Data for Adjustment in Longitudinal Research

2009, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd eBooks

Abstract
sparkles

AI

Auxiliary data can play a crucial role in adjusting for biases in longitudinal research, particularly in studies that may suffer from nonresponse or attrition. This paper discusses the applications of auxiliary data in panel studies, emphasizing the differences between probability and non-probability samples. It highlights the challenges of volunteer panels, the mechanisms of attrition, and suggests methods for employing auxiliary data to enhance representativeness and data quality in longitudinal designs.

References (13)

  1. Bethlehem J.G. and W.J. Keller (1987). Linear Weighting of Sample Survey Data. Journal of Official Statistics 3, 141-153.
  2. Collins, L.M., J.L. Schafer, & C.M. Kam (2001). A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures, Psychological Methods, 6, 330-351.
  3. Deville, J.C. and C.E. Särndal (1992). Calibration Estimators in Survey Sampling. Journal of the American Statistical Association 87, 376-382.
  4. Hajek, J. (1981). Sampling from a finite population. Marcel Dekker, New York.
  5. Kalton, G and I. Flores-Cervantes (2003). Weighting Methods. Journal of Official Statistics 19, 81-97.
  6. Kish, L. (1992). Weighting for Unequal P i . Journal of Official Statistics 8, 183-200.
  7. De Leeuw, E.D., Hox, J., and Huisman, M. (2003). Prevention and treatment of item nonresponse. Journal of Official Statistics, 19, 2, 153-176.
  8. Little, R.J.A and D.B. Rubin (2002). Statistical Analysis with Missing Data (2 nd . ed.). New York, Wiley.
  9. Potter, F. J., 1988, Survey of Procedures to Control Extreme Sampling Weights. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Section on Survey Research Methods, 453-458.
  10. Potter, F. J., 1990, A Study of Procedures to Identify and Trim Extreme Sampling Weights. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Section on Survey Research Methods, 225-230.
  11. Potter, F. J., 1993, The Effect of Weight Trimming on Nonlinear Survey Estimates. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Section on Survey Research Methods, 758-763.
  12. Rubin, D.B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: Wiley.
  13. Schafer, J.L. (1996). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. New York: Chapman and Hall.