So, That is What You Said?
2021, Journal of Invitational Theory and Practice
https://doi.org/10.26522/JITP.V23I.3500Abstract
Classroom learning is a shared experience where ideas and concepts are shaped by the interactions between students and teachers. Different cultural backgrounds of the students compared to the teacher can increase misconceptions or confusion. Although the effective teacher may plan for a range of questions to promote classroom discussion, the more cultural diversity exhibited within a classroom, the greater the likelihood for miscommunication. The intentionally inviting teacher understands different does not mean deficient. This type of effective teacher handles miscommunication, misconceptions, or conceptual confusion by empowering the diverse learner to actively seek or provide greater clarity. By contrast, when a culturally diverse learner's response does not fit the instructor's preconceived expectations, the intentionally disinviting teacher can disable the learner's continued inclusion in class dialogue. As a foundational system for responsive classroom management, Invitational Education theory aligns with culturally responsive teaching practices. A key feature of culturally responsive teaching is presentation of knowledge in a way that builds upon the cultural knowledge, experience, and performance styles of the student. This practice-based analytical paper describes the authors' attempts to apply tenets of Invitational Education theory to optimize responsive communication within the culturally diverse undergraduate classroom.
References (24)
- Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Educational Assessment: Principles, Policy and Practice. 5(1), 7-74
- Brookfield, S. (2011). Discussion as a way of teaching. Retrieved from https://www.stephenbrookfield.com/s/Discussion_as_a_Way_of_Teaching.ppt
- Burns, G. & Martin, B. N. (2010). Examination of the effectiveness of male and female educational leaders who made use of the invitational leadership style of leadership. Journal of Invitational Theory and Practice, 16, 31.
- Erikson, E. (1968). Identity, youth, and crisis. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
- Gay, G. (2002) Preparing for culturally responsive teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53 (2), 106-116
- Lezotte, L. W., & Snyder, K. M. (2011). What effective schools do: Re-envisioning the correlates. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
- Mindszenthy, B., & Roberts, G. (2000). Team leaders and the communication loop", Strategic Communication Management, 5(1), 28.
- Payne, R. K. (2009). A framework for understanding poverty (4 th Ed). Highlands, TX., aha! Process.
- Predmore, C. E. (2009). Oh is that what you meant? Perhaps teaching the wrong communication style or problem solving style. Presented at the Annual International Conference of the Association on Employment Practices and Principles, September 23-25, 2009 Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
- Purkey, W. W., & Novak, J. M. (2015). An introduction to invitational theory. Retrieved from http://www.invitationaleducation.net/intro_to_invitational_theory.pdf
- Purkey, W. W., & Novak, J.M. (2016). Fundamentals of invitational education (2 nd ed). The International Alliance for Invitational Education. Retrieved from https://www.invitationaleducation.net/product-category/books/
- Purkey, W.W., & Schoenlein, A. (Ed.) (2017). Creating a positive school climate: 100 nuts and bolts of invitational education. Nicholasville, KY: International Alliance for Invitational Education.
- Purkey, W. W., & Siegel, B. L. (2013). Becoming an invitational leader: A new approach to professional and personal success. Retrieved from http://invitationaleducation.net/featuredbooks.html.
- Reimer, J. (2016). Balancing educational practice with psychological theory: Lewinsky's study of a bold camp Ramah curriculum. Journal of Jewish Education, 82(2). 159-177, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15244113.2016.1168193
- Roehl, A., Reddy, S. L., & Shannon, G. J. (2013) The Flipped Classroom: An opportunity to engage millennial students through active learning. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences (105) 2: 44-49.
- Skinner, B.F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement; A theoretical analysis. New York: NY Appleton-Century-Crofts.
- Thompson, S.A., & Loveland, J.M. (2015). Integrating identity and consumption: An identity investment theory. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice (23)3, 235-253. To contact the authors: Carolyn Predmore, Ph.D.: carolyn.predmore@manhattan.edu Sr. Remigia Kushner, Ph.D.: Sr.remigia.kushner@manhattan.edu Chris James Anderson, Ed.D.: chrisj.anderson@smsu.edu
- For the blind copy, do not include authors' names on this or subsequent pages. The author(s)' name(s) should not appear anywhere in the blind copy of the manuscript. a. If the author(s)' own research is used, insert the word Author for all within manuscript citations and all References. For the Reference Page, include only Author (year) for each citation -do not include the name of the article/book, etc.
- Include tables: created with MS Word table function only, and figures sparingly. These must be formatted per APA (2010) style. a. All tables and figures should be placed (embedded) within the document. b. Any artwork and diagrams should be included as separate digital graphic files, .tif, .gif, or .jpg.
- Quotations must follow APA (2010) style. a. Lengthy quotations require written permission from the copyright holder for reproduction.
- Authors are responsible for obtaining permissions and providing documentation of permission to the JITP editor.
- Reviews of manuscripts typically take approximately eight weeks. a. Manuscripts are reviewed by two members of the Editorial Review Board b. Manuscripts are rubric-scored. c. Patience is appreciated but author(s) can contact the JITP editor at any time for a status report.
- For accepted manuscripts requiring revisions, the author(s) MUST use the Review>Track Changes function within MS Word..
- Further guidelines for Authors or Book Reviews can be accessed from: https://www.invitationaleducation.net/publications/journal/