Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Generating language from conceptual graphs

1983, Computers & Mathematics with Applications

https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-1221(83)90005-6

Abstract

Conceptual graphs are a semantic representation that has a direct mapping to natural language. This article presents a universal algorithm for scanning the graphs, together with a version of augmented phrase-structure grammar for specifying the syntax of particular languages. When combined with a specific grammar, the universal algorithm determines a mapping from graphs to language with several important properties: multiple surface structures may be generated from a common underlying structure, constraints on the mapping result from the connectivity of the graphs rather than ad hoc assumptions, and the graphs combined with phrase-structure rules enforce context-sensitive conditions.

References (23)

  1. C. S. Peirce, Unpublished manuscripts summarized in D. D. Roberts, The Existential Graphs of Char/es S. Peirce. Mouton, The Hague (1973).
  2. L. Tesniere, Elements de Synlaxe Structurule, -n 7 d Edn. Librairie C. Klincksieck, Paris (l%S).
  3. S. Ceccato, Linguistic Analysis and Programming for Mechanical Translation. Gordon & Breach, New York (1961).
  4. M. Masterman, Semantic message detection for machine translation, using an interlingua. Proc. I%1 Int. Conf. on Machine Translation, pp. 438-475 (l%l).
  5. R. C. Schank and G. Tesler, A conceptual parser for natural language. Proc. IICAI-69. pp. 569-578 (1969).
  6. G. G. Hendrix, Expanding the utility of semantic networks through partitioning. In Proc. IJCAI-75, pp. I U-121 (1975).
  7. R. J. Brachmsn, On the epistemological status of semantic networks. In Associative Networks: Representation and Use of Knowledge by Computers (Edited by N. V. Findler), pp. 3-50. Academic Press, New York (1979).
  8. F. Sowa, Conceptual Structures: Information Processing in Mind and Machine. Addison-Wesley. Reading, Mass.
  9. M. R. Quillian, Semantic memory. Rep. Al)-641671, Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Technical Information.
  10. D. McNeil], The Conceptual Basis of Language. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey (1979).
  11. J. H. Greenberg, Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In llniuersals of Language (Edited by 1. H. Greenberg), pp. 58-90. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (1%3).
  12. S. Steele, Word order variation: a typological study. In Universals of Human Language (Edited by J. H. Greenbrg), 4 ~01s.. pp. 585-623. Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif. (1978).
  13. N. Chomsky, Synractic Structures. Mouton & Co., The Hague (1957).
  14. J. F. Sowa, Conceptual structures: A model for language. Unpublished manuscript (1%8).
  15. P. M. Postal. On Raising. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. (1974).
  16. G. E. Heidorn. Natural language inputs to a simulation programming system. Rep. NPS-55HD72lOlA, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey (1972).
  17. G. E. Heidorn, Augmented phrase structure grammar. In Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing (Edited by R. Schank and B. L. Nash-Webber) pp. l-5.
  18. D. E. Knuth, Semantics of context-free languages. Mafh. Systems Theory 2, 127-145.
  19. C. J. Fillmore, The case for case. In Universals in Linguistic Theory (Edited by E. Bach and R. T. Harms), pp. l-88. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York (1968).
  20. R. F. Simmons and 1. Slocum, Generating English discourse from semantic networks. Commun. ACM 15, 891-905 (1972).
  21. H. K. T. Wong, Generating English Sentences from Semantic Structures. Tech. Rep. 84, Dept of Computer Science, University of Toronto (1975).
  22. N. M. Goldman, Conceptual generation. In Conceptual Information Processing (Edited by R. C. Schank) pp. 289-371. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1975).
  23. N. Chomsky, Conditions on rules of grammar. In Current Issues in Linguistic Theory (Edited by R. W. Cole), pp. 3-50. Indiana University Press, Bloomington (1977).