Gravitational Fields Are Electron Densities

It is extremely fascinating and astonishing that the gravitational field on the surface of a neutron star is with a relativistic mass density of 2.65 × 10 16~5 .87 × 10 18 −3 which can be larger than the mass density of the neutron stars (~10 17 −3). Therefore, it is the author's first intuitional imagining that this field could directly convert into mass. In so strong a gravitational field, electron and proton could be produced directly from graviton-photon collision. The gravitational field exists in everywhere in our universe. No vacuum that the region of a space is "empty" does exist. A particle is clearly always being acted on by the gravitational field. The quantum vacuum fluctuation and vacuum polarization need be re-understood with the interaction between photon and gravitational field. Therefore, the gravitational field is naturally one of the foundations of modern physics.

2014

Neutral bodies are composed of equal numbers of positive and negative electric charges whose fields exist in space and are balanced everywhere. So space is crisscrossed by equal and opposite electric field intensities emanating from bodies in accordance with Coulomb’s inverse square law. Mass of a body and Newton’s law of gravitation are expressed in terms of the number of charges constituting each of two separate bodies in space. It is proposed that an electric field from one charge in a body is obstructed and deflected outwards by a like charge encountered in another body, such that force of repulsion is reduced. For unlike charges, the deflection of an incident field is inwards so that force of attraction is increased. While electrostatic forces of repulsion and attraction cancel out exactly, gravitational forces of attraction remain, in accordance with Newton’s inverse square law.

Electrostatic Forces and Gravitation have the same Cause, 2020

17.03.2021: Some formulas and graphics in the file are not correctly converted to PDF format. In addition, there is a mistake in the definition of the spatial acceleration. The value of the spatial acceleration is 675.887 * m / s ^ 2 and not 1352 * m / s ^ 2. A newer and corrected version is in progress. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today's theoretical physics has moved far away from nature in terms of its models. The following work leads back to naturally explainable physics. The abstract forces from mass to mass over empty spaces are explained with real forces. By using this model the fundamental forces can be explained.-Gravity is explained and based on fundamental forces-New insights for the forces in the near field of masses-Electrostatics is explained in terms of fundamental forces-New insights for the forces on the electron in the near field of the nucleus-Gravity and electrostatic force is shown to be due to the same cause-Gravity field and gravitation are the same and result from the same cause.-The equivalence of mass acceleration and gravitation is the logical conclusion-The relativistic mass is a consequence and gives confidence in this argument-There is a logical rationale for Einstein's famous E m c 2  = formula-The whereabouts of the dark mass have been clarified The special feature of this work is that no new theory was invented, but only a single existing convention was questioned, and fundamental connections were recognized. This work does not in any way affect Albert Einstein's ingenious theory of relativity, on which all the findings of modern physics are based. It is an extension of physical considerations from a reality-based perspective.

2014

Gravitational field of an electron, fixed by experimental values of its mass, spin, charge and magnetic moment, is given by the metric of Kerr-Newman (KN) solution. Unexpectedly, this metric contains a singular ring of the Compton radius, which should be regulated resulting in a weeak and smooth source. The consistent source takes the form of an oblate vacuum bubble, bounded by a closed string of the Compton radius. The bubble turns out to be relativistically rotating and should be filled by a coherently oscillating Higgs field in a false vacuum state.

2014

Our present concept about gravity is related with the mass and distance of the object. Still we are following the Newtonian concepts of gravity to measure the gravity of objects. Albert Einstein has made a great work on the concept of gravity, after Newton. But still we are trying to know more about gravity. According to me gravity is the property of energy. One must have to explain gravity on the basis of energy. I am agreeing that mass is also a form of energy. But I prefer to find gravity in accordance with the total energy of a system. Here I am making an attempt on this field. I am sure that I am on the right track. I am not placing any new equations here. I am using the existing equations in physics to find the gravity through my thoughts. The way which I am using these equations are may be strange. Sometimes I am thinking in reverse order, first I have found the gravity with the concept of energy. For that I am applying a constant ''A'' and I am getting the value of ''A'' from the last part of equations. Because the value of gravity is still with Newtonian concepts.

2020

On our forum, there are many discussions about gravitation and general relativity. However, there is a theory, but there is no object. There is no physical model of the gravitational field. Does the energy-momentum tensor push the Moon towards the Earth? Let us look at gravity as a "thing in itself" and not as a "thing for mathematical exercise."

viXra, 2018

We live in a 'physical universe' where bodies follow mathematical laws, and not in a 'mathematical universe'. So the concepts in physics should be inferred from observations, not from equations. Equations come only when we quantify things to verify the concepts. Newtonian gravity, though it contains some gaps, require only 'physical' bodies to explain gravity. But General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics require mathematical-artifacts inferred from equations (like 'spacetime' and 'virtual particles') to explain gravity. This seems unscientific; so let us go back to Newtonian concepts. The following assumptions can fill the gaps in Newtonian concepts, and give a clear and complete picture of gravity: (i). Motion is a fundamental property of bodies (ii). Gravity is reaction to motion

This article proves that the electrostatic and gravitational forces exerted between two electrons are closely related. For example, these two forces can be expressed as related linear and nonlinear effects in nearly identical equations. The vast difference between the electron’s electrostatic and gravitational forces is due to the electron’s wave amplitude term raised to two different powers. This unification was found by adopting John Wheeler’s “quantum foam” model of the quantum vacuum and modeling an electron as a rotating wave in this medium. This rotating wave model of an electron is shown to achieve an electron’s approximate energy and de Broglie wave characteristics while exhibiting no detectable volume. Also, ħ/2 quantized angular momentum gives this electron model wave-particle duality characteristics. It is possible to go directly to Section 12 (page 16) to see the equations that prove the close relationship between the electron’s gravitational and electrostatic forces.

This Paper aims at explaining exactly what the phenomenon of gravity is; why its definition has defied science until now; from whence it comes and its relationship with mass, acceleration, inertia and light. The Paper also explores the implications of the gravity field (G-field) as a reciprocal motion to mass energy. Quantum values for the different physical phenomena expressed in terms of Space-Time (S-T) units of measure, including mass and gravity,

Einstein could not observe gravitating mass at the quantum level. He termed this as the particle problem of General Relativity. Gravity can be co-related with the massive fermion’s electrical field and magnetic field at the quantum level. In this co-relation I observed another force vertical to the gravitational force. This vertical force can cause natural orbital motion to any mass. This vertical force can be named as orbital force. Galaxy rotation also may be due to this orbital force. The gravitational force reverses near the center of the fermion suggesting negative mass. So mass may not be physically present at the center of the fermion. Concept of mass can be co-related with the Inverse Ripple effect of the pressure field generated by the electrical field and the magnetic field of the fermion.