Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

The Penn-Lehman Automated Trading Project

2003, IEEE Expert / IEEE Intelligent Systems

https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2003.1249166

Abstract

The Penn-Lehman automated trading project is a broad investigation of algorithms and strategies for automated trading in financial markets. The PLAT project's centerpiece is the Penn exchange simulator (PXS), a software simulator for automated stock trading that merges automated client orders for shares with real-world, real-time order data. PXS automatically computes client profits and losses, volumes traded, simulator and external prices, and other quantities of interest. To test the effectiveness of PXS and of various trading strategies, we've held three formal competitions between automated clients.

FAQs

sparkles

AI

What distinguishes PXS from traditional trading simulation platforms?add

PXS uniquely integrates real-time limit order book data from Island ECN, enhancing realism in simulations. This innovation eliminates reliance on fill models by using actual market orders.

How do automated strategies developed in PXS compare to Wall Street practices?add

Automated strategies from PXS have shown to reflect common Wall Street tactics, integrating predictive approaches to limit order book data. For instance, strategies like CBR-SOBI utilize volume-weighted averages to gauge market sentiment.

What scoring criteria were established in the PLAT competitions to assess trading strategies?add

Scoring criteria included daily profit and loss, position reversals, and robustness to market variations, rewarding behaviors fostering good trading practices. Overall consistency in profit and adherence to risk limits were also critical factors.

What does the usage of ECN data reveal about market sentiment?add

The availability of limit order book data provides insights into market sentiment, as traders can observe discrepancies in orders to predict price movements. Strategies leveraging this information account for statistical variations and provide adaptability to market conditions.

What were the performance outcomes for the clients during the competitions?add

In PPC 2003, 11 out of 14 clients achieved positive cumulative earnings, with winning strategies including CBR-SOBI exhibiting high profitability and effective risk management. The average Sharpe Ratios highlighted varying levels of risk-adjusted returns among competitors.

References (6)

  1. Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Electronic Commerce. Associa- tion for Computing Machinery, 2003. Forthcoming. Conference web site: http://cs.gmu.edu/ menasce/ec03/s/ec03.htm.
  2. J. Bouchaud, M. Mezard, and M. Potters. Statistical properties of stock order books: Empirical results and models. Quantitative Finance, 2, 2002.
  3. J. Hasbrouck and G. Saar. Limit orders and volatility in a hybrid market: the island ECN. 2002. NYU Finance Department Working Paper.
  4. P. Stone, M. Littman, S. Singh, and M. Kearns. ATTac-2000: An adaptive autonomous bidding agent. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 15, 2001.
  5. M. Wellman, A. Greenwald, P. Stone, and P. Wurman. The 2001 trading agent compe- tition. Electronic Markets, 13(1):4-12, 2003.
  6. M. Wellman, P. Wurman, K. O'Malley, R. Bangera, S. Lin, D. Reeves, and W. Walsh. Designing the market game for a trading agent competition. IEEE Internet Computing, 5(2):43-51, 2001.