Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Title
Abstract
Normative Questions in Public Policy
Appendix 1: The Acf Hypotheses
Coalition Hypotheses
Learning Hypotheses
Hypothesis 2
Hypothesis 3
Hypothesis 4
Hypothesis 5
Policy Change Hypotheses
Conclusion
Ummary and Conclusions
Overview
Implications for the Policy Process
Diagnostic Tools for Contextual Analysis
Introduction
References
All Topics
Political Science

Contemporary Approaches to Public Policy

Profile image of Philippe ZittounPhilippe Zittoun

2016, Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks

https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50494-4
visibility

…

description

220 pages

link

1 file

Abstract

The International Series on Public Policy-offi cial series of the International Conference on Public Policy-identifi es major contributions to the fi eld of public policy, dealing with analytical and substantive policy and governance issues across a variety of academic disciplines. A comparative and interdisciplinary venture, it examines questions of policy process and analysis, policy making and implementation, policy instruments, policy change & reforms, politics and policy, encompassing a range of approaches, theoretical, methodological, and/or empirical. Relevant across the various fi elds of political science, sociology, anthropology, geography, history, and economics, this cutting edge series welcomes contributions from academics from across disciplines and career stages, and constitutes a unique resource for public policy scholars and those teaching public policy worldwide.

Related papers

Handbook of Public Policy Analysis
Billel Mounsi

International Standard Book Number-10: 1-57444-561-8 (Hardcover) International Standard Book Number-13: 978-1-57444-561-9 (Hardcover) This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reprinted material is quoted with permission, and sources are indicated. A wide variety of references are listed. Reasonable efforts have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and the publisher cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all materials or for the consequences of their use.

View PDFchevron_right
Recent Developments and Emerging Trends in Public Policy Analysis Guest Editors’ Foreword
FLORIN BONDAR

International Review of Social Research, 2014

Bondar received his BA degree in Political Philosophy and MA degree in Public Policy from the University of Bucharest, and his PhD in Political Science from the National University of Political Studies and Public Administration (NUPSPA). Florin Bondar has a large experience both as a practitioner and as an academic in the field of Public Policy. As a practitioner, he worked at the General Secretariat of the Romanian Government, where he designed policy formulation procedures and an institutional framework for policy development. He is the co-author of the first set of procedures for policy formulation at central level of the Romanian public administration (i.e. Regulatory Impact Assessment). Furthermore, Florin Bondar has an international experience as a consultant, being involved in several OECD/SIGMA missions for central public administration in Romania and Serbia. As an academic, Florin Bondar has lectured MA level courses at NUPSPA and has made several study visits and partaken to workshops within the field of Public Policy organized by University of Birmingham and University of Manchester. Since 2009, Florin Bondar has been working as a consultant for public administration entities at Agora Est Consulting.

View PDFchevron_right
Public policies in contemporary contexts: national and international Tendencies*
Ana Cláudia Niedhardt Capella

Brazilian Political Science Review, 2017

Organizing an edited volume is an intellectual endeavor that, when wellexecuted, results in a rich collection of perspectives, interpretations and contributions about a given subject, offering the reader valuable material for broadening their knowledge. This is the case for 'Gestão e Políticas Públicas no Cenário Contemporâneo' (Management and Public Policies in a Contemporary Context), organized by Telma Menicucci and José Geraldo Gontijo. It brings together articles by specialists and researchers from different teaching and research institutions in Brazil and abroad with experience in areas such as political science, public policy, public administration, sociology, and urban planning, among others. Throughout the 17 chapters, organized in five thematic sections, the authors introduce different frameworks, methodologies and perspectives, supplying the reader with a diversified overview of management and contemporary public policy. The first part of the edited volume brings together four chapters that look at the theoretical and empirical dimensions of governance, emphasizing different aspects of state performance and their interaction with society in the contemporary production of public policies. Jon Pierre's chapter highlights what he considers to be one of today's biggest paradoxes: the reduction of state capacity at the exact moment when society is becoming more complex. The argument developed by Pierre is that political leadership _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ *

View PDFchevron_right
On+the+nature+of+public+policy
martha lusa
View PDFchevron_right
Understanding Public Policies: An Exploration of Proposals in Social Sciences
Deepti Acharya

In the twenty-first century, public policy extends beyond mere political action; it has evolved into a comprehensive process aimed at addressing and mitigating citizens' skepticism and negative attitudes toward the government. Rather than solely focusing on maximizing the happiness of the greatest number of people, contemporary public policy strives to minimize harm and uncertainty while striving to achieve the common good in the most effective manner possible.

View PDFchevron_right
CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF WHAT PUBLIC POLICIES ARE AND ARE NOT
Georgeta Ghebrea

NORDSCI Conference Proceedings, 2022

This paper has as its main objective the critical analysis of certain influential definitions of public policies that exist in the scientific literature of the field. This analysis intends to trace the change in the way public policies are seen, studied and evaluated. The paper in question also investigates the historical context and the process of the birth of public policies, identifying the key factors of a structural, economic, cultural and political nature. The originality of our approach consists in grouping these factors within explanatory paradigms of the emergence of public policies: the structural paradigm, the social control paradigm, the utilitarian paradigm (which includes both economic and social-political pragmatism), the political mobilization paradigm, the humanistic and antioppressive paradigm. We first analyze the metamorphoses of the two concepts: public and policies. Later, we bring together the analysis of the historical evolution of the two respective concepts within the framework of the same approach. The conclusion underlines the fact that public policies are socially constructed. The methods used were from the category of those based on secondary qualitative analysis: bibliographic analysis, conceptual analysis, discourse analysis, processual analysis and hermeneutic analysis.

View PDFchevron_right
Public Policy Research—Born in the USA, at Home in the World?
Nils Bandelow

Politische Vierteljahresschrift

Public policy emerged as an academic subfield in the United States after the second World War. The theoretical foundations of the discipline are essentially based on analyses of Anglo-Saxon policies and politics and were originally aimed at providing knowledge for the policy process of pluralistic democracies. Given the increasing transfer of the subject and related approaches to other countries, it is necessary to clarify how suitable theories, goals, and methods of policy research are applied in other contexts. What needs to be considered when transferring theories of the policy process, and what can be learned from existing applications of the various approaches in different settings? The compilation of contributions on selected theoretical public policy lenses and their transfer to other countries and regions provides a nuanced answer to these questions.

View PDFchevron_right
New Paradigms in Public Policy
Peter Taylor-Gooby

2013

Introduction: Public policy at a crossroads Public policy in Britain, as in other developed countries, faces severe challenges from many directions. The continuing economic crisis and its aftermath bring these issues to the forefront of public debate, but risk obscuring the underlying issues behind immediate political tussles over the recovery programme, constitutional reform, bankers’ bonuses and other pressing questions. This book tackles the basic questions that confront twenty-first-century policy-making in seven substantive chapters, each written by a leading expert in the field: finding a way forward for the British economy; the dilemma of coping with rising demand in the context of limited resources; how to respond to climate change; managing ethnic diversity as multiculturalism appears to have lost its way; whether demographic change equates with a growing burden of dependency; under what circumstances localism helps resolve concentrated neighbourhood problems; and how to overcome public disaffection with politics. A concluding chapter considers the more practical issue of developments in social science that might help it make a more forceful contribution to public policy. The chapters analyse the contribution of social science to understanding the issues in each of these areas. They go on to review the range of possible developments in the medium-term future. We will first set out the contents of the individual chapters and then discuss the notion of policy paradigm that underlies the approach to the relationship between ideas and policy-making contained in them. We will move on to examine emerging themes in the relationship between government and other agencies bound up in policy-making, individual citizens, market actors and community activity, and conclude by reviewing the relationship between social science and public policy.

View PDFchevron_right
Reimagining public policy formulation and analysis: a comprehensive theoretical framework for public policy
Sharique Manazir

Discover Global Society

This research paper delves into the intricate domain of policy science, focusing on the policy-making process itself. Existing theoretical frameworks in policy science often overlook essential nuances, particularly the role of political willingness causing non-linearity in the policy-making process. Three fundamental questions drive the research at hand. First, the research delves into the adequacy of existing policy frameworks in effectively elucidating the complexities of policymaking in the context of large democracies, with a particular focus on India. Second, it investigates the significant role of political willingness in shaping the trajectory of policymaking, particularly within democratic systems. Lastly, the research aims to construct a comprehensive framework capable of accommodating and explaining the non-linear dynamics introduced by the influence of political willingness throughout the policy-making process. Through an analysis of India's Data Protection Regulation...

View PDFchevron_right
The instruments of public policy. A transdisciplinary look
Daniela Londono Restrepo

Cuadernos de Administración, 2019

The implementation of public policies involves knowing and analyzing the different instruments of public intervention from a transdisciplinary perspective involving legal, economic and political aspects, as this allows to broaden the understanding of the tools available to deal with public issues. In this sense, this paper seeks to present in an integrative and systematic way what have disciplines such as public law, the economy of the public sector and the political sciences, especially public policies, understood for public policy instruments. It takes a particular look at this latter approach and shows why this is the most comprehensive approach. Regarding the methodology, this text is the product of qualitative, theoretical, descriptive and exploratory research of a documentary nature. Among the main findings, intervention instruments were found to guide human behavior towards achieving certain public objectives, constitute the rules of the game and, therefore, serve as institut...

View PDFchevron_right

References (554)

  1. Bell S., and A. Hindmoor. 2009. Rethinking governance : The centrality of the state in modern society . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  2. Braybrooke D. 1974. Traffi c congestion goes through the issue machine. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  3. Carter P. 2012. Policy as palimpset. Policy & Politics 40: 423-443.
  4. Cobb R.W., and C.D. Elder. 1972. Participation in American politics : The dynam- ics of agenda-building . Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  5. Dery D. 2000. Agenda-setting and problem defi nition. Policy Studies 21(1): 37-47.
  6. Elmore R.F. 1985. Forward and backward mapping: Reversible logic in the analy- sis of public policy. In Policy implementation in federal and unitary states, ed. K. Han and T.A.J. Toonen, 76-98. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
  7. Fischer F., and H. Gottweiss. 2012. The argumentative turn revisited : Public policy as communicative practice . Durham: Duke University Press.
  8. Hayes M.T. 2006. Incrementalism and public policy. Lanham: University Press of America.
  9. Heald D. 2013. Why is transparency about public expenditure so elusive? International Review of Administrative Sciences 78: 130-149.
  10. Héritier A., and M. Rhodes (eds.). 2012. New modes of governance in Europe : Governing in the shadow of hierarchy . Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  11. Hood C., and H. Margetts. 2007. Tools of government in a digital age. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
  12. Jones C.O. 1984. An introduction to the study of public policy, 2nd ed. Monterey: Brooks-Cole.
  13. Kirschen E.S. 1964. Economic policy in our time. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
  14. Koppenjan j., and E.-H. Klijn. 2004. Managing Uncertainties in network , Routledge, New York.
  15. Lasswell H.D. 1956). The decision process ; Seven categories of functional analysis . College Park: College of Business and Public Administration, University of Maryland.
  16. Lindblom C.E. 1965. The intelligence of democracy : Decision making through mutual adjustment . New York: Free Press.
  17. Linder S.H., and B.G. Peters. 1989. Implementation as a guide to policy formula- tion: A question of 'when' rather than 'whether'. International Review of Administrative Sciences 55: 631-652.
  18. Martin L.W., and G. Vanberg. Parliaments and Coalitions: The Role of Legislative Institutions in Multiparty Governance , Oxford University Press, 2011
  19. May J.V., and A.B. Wildavsky. 1978. The Policy Cycle . Sage Publications.
  20. Payan T. 2006. Cops , soldiers and diplomats : Explaining agency behavior in the war on drugs . Lanham: Lexington Books.
  21. Peters B.G. 2015. An advanced introduction to public policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  22. Peters B.G., and J. Pierre. 2007. The handbook of public policy. London: Sage.
  23. Rhodes R.A.W. 1996. The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies 44: 652-667.
  24. Rossi P.H., M.W. Lipsey, and H.E. Freeman. 2014. Evaluation : A systematic approach . Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  25. Saetren H. 2014. Implementing the third generation research in policy implemen- tation research: An empirical assessment. Public Policy and Administration 29: 84-105.
  26. Salomon L.M. 2001. Introduction. In Handbook of policy instruments, ed. L.M. Salomon. New York: Oxford University Press.
  27. Shipman G.A. 1959. The policy process: An emerging perspective. Western Political Quarterly 12: 535-547.
  28. Simon H.A. 1947. Administrative behavior. New York: Free Press. REFERENCES
  29. Bark, Richard. 1993. Managing technological change in federal communications policy: The role of industry advisory groups. In Policy change and learning , eds. P. Sabatier, and H. Jenkins-Smith, 129-146. Boulder: Westview Press.
  30. Brewer, Garry D. and Peter deLeon. 1983. The foundations of policy analysis, Pacifi c Grove: Brooks/Cole
  31. Dudley, Geoffrey, and Jeremy Richardson. 1999. Competing advocacy coalitions and the process of 'frame refl ection': A longitudinal analysis of EU steel policy. Journal of European Public Policy 6(2): 225-248.
  32. Easton, David. 1965. A framework for political analysis . Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  33. Elgin, Dallas, and Christopher M. Weible. 2013. Stakeholder analysis of Colorado climate and energy issues using policy analytical capacity and the advocacy coalition framework. Review of Policy Research 30(1): 116-134.
  34. Elliott C. and Rodolphe Schlaepfer. 2001. The advocacy coalition framework: Application to the policy process for the development of forest certifi cation in Sweden. Journal of European Public Policy 8(4): 642-661.
  35. Ellison, Brian A. 1998. The ACF and Implementation of the Endangered Species Act: A case study in western water politics. Policy Studies Journal 26(1): 11-29.
  36. Gupta, Kuhika. 2012. Comparative public policy: Using the comparative method to advance our understanding of the policy process. Policy Studies Journal 40(s1): 11-26.
  37. Gupta, Kuhika. 2014. A comparative policy analysis of coalition strategies: Case studies of nuclear energy and forest management in India. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 16(4): 356-372.
  38. Heclo, Hugh. 1974. Social policy in Britain and Sweden . New Haven: Yale University Press.
  39. Heclo, Hugh. 1978. Issue networks and the executive establishment. In The new American political system , ed. A. King, 87-124. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
  40. Heikkila, Tanya, and Andrea K. Gerlak. 2013. Building a conceptual approach to collective learning: Lessons for public policy scholars. Policy Studies Journal 40(3): 484-512.
  41. Heikkila, Tanya, Jonathan J. Pierce, Samuel Gallaher, Jennifer Kagan, Deserai A. Crow, and Christopher M. Weible. 2014. Understanding a period of policy change: The case of hydraulic fracturing disclosure policy in Colorado. Review of Policy Research 31(2): 65-87.
  42. Henry, Adam. 2011. Power, ideology, and policy network cohesion in regional planning. Policy Studies Journal 39(3): 361-383.
  43. Henry, Adam Douglas, Mark Lubell, and Michael McCoy. 2010. Belief systems and social capital as drivers of policy network structure: The case of California regional planning. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21(3): 419-444.
  44. Henry, Adam, Karin Ingold, Daniel Nohrstedt, and Christopher M. Weible. 2014. Policy change in comparative contexts: Applying the advocacy coalition frame- work outside of Western Europe and North America. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 16(4): 299-312.
  45. Hjern, Benny, and David Porter. 1981. Implementation structures: A new unit of administrative analysis. Organization Studies 2: 211-227.
  46. Hofferbert, Richard I. 1974. The study of public policy . Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
  47. Howlett, Michael. 2009. Policy analytical capacity and evidence-based policy-making: Lessons from Canada. Canadian Public Administration 52(2): 153-175.
  48. Ingold, Karin. 2011. Network structures within policy processes: Coalitions, power, and brokerage in Swiss climate policy. Policy Studies Journal 39(3): 435-459.
  49. Ingold, Karin, and Federic Varone. 2012. Treating policy brokers seriously: Evidence from the climate policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22(2): 319-346.
  50. Jenkins-Smith, Hank. 1982. Professional roles for policy analysts: A critical assess- ment. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 2(1): 88-100.
  51. Jenkins-Smith, Hank. 1990. Democratic politics and policy analysis . Pacifi c Grove: Brooks/Cole.
  52. Jenkins-Smith, Hank, Gilbert St. Clair, and Brian Woods. 1991. Explaining change in policy subsystems: Analysis of coalition stability and defection over time. American Journal of Political Science 35(November): 851-872.
  53. Jenkins-Smith, Hank C, Daniel Nohrstedt, Christopher M. Weible, and Paul A. Sabatier. 2014a. The advocacy coalition framework: Foundations, evolution, and ongoing research. In Theories of the policy process , ed. Paul A. Sabatier and Christopher M. Weible3rd ed. Boulder: Westview Press.
  54. Jenkins-Smith, Hank C., Carol L. Silva, Kuhika Gupta, and Joseph T. Ripberger. 2014b. Belief system continuity and change in policy advocacy coalitions: Using cultural theory to specify belief systems, coalitions, and sources of change. Policy Studies Journal 42(4): 484-508.
  55. Jones, Charles. 1970. An introduction to the study of public policy . Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
  56. Jones, Michael, and Hank Jenkins-Smith. 2009. Trans-subsystem dynamics: Policy topography, mass opinion, and policy change. Policy Studies Journal 37(1): 37-58.
  57. Kiser, Larry L., and Elinor Ostrom. 1982. The three worlds of action: A metathe- oretical synthesis of institutional arrangements. In Strategies of political inquiry , ed. E. Ostrom, 179-222. Beverly Hills: Sage.
  58. Kübler, Daniel. 2001. Understanding policy change with the advocacy coalition framework: An application to Swiss Drug Policy. Journal of European Public Policy 8(4): 623-641.
  59. Larsen, Jakob Bjerg, Karsten Vrangbaek, and Janine M. Traulsen. 2006. Advocacy coalitions and pharmacy policy in Denmark. Social Science and Medicine 63(1): 212-224.
  60. Lasswell, Harold. 1970. The emerging conception of the policy sciences. Policy Sciences 1(1): 3-14.
  61. Leach, William D., and Paul A. Sabatier. 2005. To trust an adversary: Integrating rational and psychological models of collaborative policymaking. American Political Science Review 99(4): 491-503.
  62. Leach, William D., Christopher M. Weible, Scott R. Vince, Saba N. Siddiki, and John Calanni. 2013. Fostering learning in collaborative partnerships: Evidence from marine aquaculture in the United States. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 24(3): 591-622.
  63. Leifeld, Philip. 2013. Reconceptualizing major policy change in the advocacy coalition framework: A discourse network analysis of German Pension Politics. Policy Studies Journal 41(1): 169-198.
  64. Lowi, Theodore J. 1964. American Business, public policy, case studies, and politi- cal theory. World Politics 16(4): 677-715.
  65. Mazmanian, Daniel, and Paul Sabatier. 1983. Implementation and public policy . Lanham: University Press of America.
  66. Mazur, Allan. 1981. The dynamics of technical controversy . Washington, DC: Communications Press.
  67. Meijerink, Sander. 2005. Understanding policy stability and change: The interplay of advocacy coalitions and epistemic communities, windows of opportunity, and Dutch Coastal Flooding Policy 1945-2003. Journal of European Public Policy 12(6): 1060-1077.
  68. Mintrom, Michael, and Phillipa Norman. 2009. Policy Entrepreneurship and Policy Change. Policy Studies Journal 37(4): 649-667.
  69. Mintrom, Michael, and Sandra Vergari. 1996. Advocacy coalitions, policy entre- preneurs, and policy change. Policy Studies Journal 24(Fall): 420-434.
  70. Munro, Geoffrey D., and Peter H. Ditto. 1997. Biased assimilation, attitude polarization, and affect in reactions to stereotype-relevant scientifi c informa- tion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 23(6): 636-653.
  71. Munro, Geoffrey D., Peter H. Ditto, Lisa K. Lockhart, Angela Fagerlin, Mitchell Gready, and Elizabeth Peterson. 2002. Biased assimilation of sociopolitical arguments: Evaluating the 1996 U.S. Presidential debate. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 24(1): 15-26.
  72. Nohrstedt, Daniel, and Christopher M. Weible. 2010. The logic of policy change after crisis: Proximity and subsystem interaction. Risks, Hazards, and Crisis in Public Policy 1(2): 1-32.
  73. Olson, Richard Stuart, Robert A. Olson, and Vincent T. Grawronski. 1999. Some buildings just can't dance: Politics, life safety, and disasters . Standford: Jai Press.
  74. Ripberger, Joseph T. Kuhika Gupta, Caral L. Silva, and Hank C. Jenkins-Smith. 2014. "Cultural theory and the measurement of deep core beliefs within the advocacy coalition framework." Policy Studies Journal 42(4): 509-527.
  75. Quattrone, George A., and Amos Tversky. 1988. Contrasting rational and psy- chological analysis of political choice. American Political Science Review 82: 719-736.
  76. Sabatier, Paul A. 1986. Top-down and bottom-up models of policy implementa- tion: A critical analysis and suggested synthesis. Journal of Public Policy 6(January): 21-48.
  77. Sabatier, Paul A. 1988. An advocacy coalition model of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences 21(fall): 129-168.
  78. Sabatier, Paul A. 1998. The advocacy coalition framework: Revisions and rele- vance for Europe. Journal ofEuropeanPublic Policy 5(March): 98-130.
  79. Sabatier, Paul A. 1999. Theories of the policy process . Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  80. Sabatier, Paul A., and Anne M. Brasher. 1993. From vague consensus to clearly differentiated coalitions: Environmental policy at Lake Tahoe, 1964-1985. In Policy change and learning , eds. P. Sabatier, and H. Jenkins-Smith, 177-208. Boulder: WestviewPress.
  81. Sabatier, Paul A., and Hank C. Jenkins-Smith. 1993. Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach . Boulder: Westview Press.
  82. Sabatier, Paul A., and Christopher M. Weible. 2014. Theories of the policy process . Boulder: Westview Press.
  83. Sabatier, Paul A., Susan Hunter, and Susan McLaughlin. 1987. The devil shift: Perceptions and misperceptions of opponents. Western Political Quarterly 40: 51-73.
  84. Schlager, Edella, and Christopher M. Weible. 2013. New theories of the policy process. Policy Studies Journal 41(3): 389-396.
  85. Scott, Ian. 2012. Analyzing advocacy issues in Asia. Administration & Society 44(6s): 4-12.
  86. Simon, Herbert A. 1957. Models of man: Social and rational . New York: Wiley.
  87. Simon, Herbert A. 1985. Human nature in politics: The dialogue of psychology with political science. American Political Science Review 79(June): 293-304.
  88. Simon, Herbert A. 2008. Expert-based information and policy subsystems: A review and synthesis. Policy Studies Journal 36(4): 615-635.
  89. Swedlow, Brendon. 2014. Advancing policy theory with cultural theory: An intro- duction to the special issue. Policy Studies Journal 41(4): 465-483.
  90. Weible, Christopher M. 2005. Beliefs and policy infl uence: An advocacy coalition approach to policy networks. Political Research Quarterly 58(3): 461-477.
  91. Weible, Christopher M., Paul A. Sabatier, and Kelly McQueen. 2009. Themes and variations: Taking stock of the advocacy coalition framework. Policy Studies Journal 37(1): 121-140.
  92. Weible, Christopher M., Paul A. Sabatier, Hank C. Jenkins-Smith, Daniel Nohrstedt, and Adam Douglas Henry. 2011. A quarter century of the advocacy coalition framework: An introduction to the special issue. Policy Studies Journal 39(3): 349-360.
  93. Weiss, Carol. 1977. Research for policy's sake: The enlightenment function of social research. Policy Analysis 3(Fall): 531-545.
  94. Zafonte, Matthew, and Paul A. Sabatier. 2004. Short-term versus long-term coali- tions in the policy process: Automotive Pollution Control, 1963-1989. The Policy Studies Journal 32(1): 75-107.
  95. Ahmed, S. 2004. The Cultural Politics of Emotion . New York, NY: Routledge.
  96. Arendt, Hannah. 1958. What is authority? In Nomos I: Authority , ed. C. Friedrich, 81-112. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  97. Bachrach, Peter S., and Morton S. Baratz. 1963. Decisions and non-decisions: An analytical framework. American Political Science Review 57(3): 641-651.
  98. Barnes, Marianne. 2008. Passionate participation: Emotional experiences and expressions in deliberative forums. Critical Social Policy 28(4): 461-481. doi: 10.1177/0261018308095280 .
  99. Bevir, M., and R. A. Rhodes. 2010. The state as cultural practice. OUP Oxford .
  100. Bourdieu, P., and R. Christin. 1990. La construction du marché, Le champ admi- nistratif et la production de la "politique du logement", Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales Année . Vol. 81. Numéro 1, pp. 65-85.
  101. Clemons, R. S., and M. K. McBeth. 2001. Public policy praxis: Theory and prag- matism, a case approach . Prentice-Hall
  102. Crozier, Michel, and Erhard Friedberg. 1977. L'acteur et le Système . Paris: Seuil.
  103. Dryzek, J. S. (2001). Legitimacy and economy in deliberative democracy. Political theory , 29(5), 651-669.
  104. Durnová, A. 2013a. A Tale of 'Fat Cats' and 'Stupid Activists': Contested values, governance and refl exivity in the Brno Railway Station controversy. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning , 1-17.
  105. Durnová, A. 2013b. Governing through intimacy: Explaining care policies through 'sharing a meaning'. Critical Social Policy 33(3): 494-513. doi: 10.1177/0261018312468305 .
  106. Durnová, A. 2015. Lost in translation: Expressing emotions in policy deliberation. In Handbook of critical policy studies , eds. F. Fischer, D. Torgerson, A. Durnová, and M. Orsini. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  107. Fischer, F. 1980. Politics, values, and public policy: The problem of methodology, Westview Press.
  108. Fischer, F. 2003. Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative prac- tices . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  109. Fischer, F. 2009. Democracy and expertise: Reorienting policy inquiry . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  110. Fischer, F. 2012. Debating the head start program: The Westinghouse reading scores in normative perspective. In Public policy , vol. 1, ed. Hupe Peter and Hil Michael. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
  111. Fischer, F. 2015. In Pursuit of Usable Knowledge: Critical Policy Analysis and the Argumentative Turn. In Handbook of Critical Policy Studies, eds. Frank Fischer, Douglas Torgerson, Anna Durnova, Michael Orsinin. Edgar Elgar.
  112. Fischer, F., and J. Forester. 1993. The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning . Durham: Duke University Press.
  113. Fischer, F., and H. Gottweis. 2012. The argumentative turn revisited: Public policy as communicative practice . Durham: Duke University Press.
  114. Fishkin, James S. 1991. Democracy and deliberation: New directions for democratic reform , vol. 217. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Press.
  115. Fonow, M. M., & Cook, J. A. (1991). Beyond methodology: Feminist scholarship as lived research : Indiana University Press.
  116. Forester John (eds), Critical Theory and political life, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1985.
  117. Foucault, Michel. 1963. Naissance de La Clinique; Une Archéologie Du Regard Médical . Galien Histoire et Philosophie de La Biologie et de La Médecine. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
  118. ---. 1966. Les Mots et Les Choses Une Archéologie Des Sciences Humaines . Bibliothèque Des Sciences Humaines. Paris: Gallimard.
  119. ---. 1971. L'ordre du discours . Editions Flammarion.
  120. ---. 1975. Surveiller et Punir: Naissance de La Prison . Bibliothèque Des Histoires. Paris: Gallimard.
  121. Freund, J. 1986. L'essence du politique . Paris: Dalloz.
  122. Fung, A., and E. O. 2003. Deepening democracy: Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance , vol. 4. Verso.
  123. Goodwin, J. 2001. Passionate politics, emotions and social movements . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  124. Gottweis, H. 2006. Argumentative policy analysis. In Handbook of public policy , eds. J. Pierre, and B.G. Peters, 461-480. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  125. Gottweis, H. 1998. Governing molecules: The discursive politics of genetic engineer- ing in Europe and the United States . MIT press.
  126. Gottweis, H. (2003). Theoretical strategies of poststructuralist policy analysis: towards an analytics of government. Deliberative policy analysis. Understanding governance in the network society , 247-265
  127. Gottweis, Herbert. 2007. Rhetoric in policy making: Between logos, ethos, and pathos. In Handbook of public policy analysis. Theory , politics , and methods , ed. Frank Fischer and G.J. Miller. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.
  128. Gusfi eld, Joseph. 1981. The culture of public problem . Chicago: Chicago University of Chicago Press.
  129. Habermas, Jürgen. 1987. Théorie de L'agir Communicationnel . Vol. L'espace du poli- tique. Tome 1: Rationalité de L'agir et Rationalisation de La Société. Paris: Fayard.
  130. Hajer, M. 1993. Discourse coalition and the institutionalization of practice: the case of acid rain in Britain. In The argumentative Turn in Policy analyzis and Planning , ed. F. Fischer, J. Forester, p. 43-76. Duke University.
  131. Hajer, M. A., and H. Wagenaar. 2003. Deliberative policy analysis: understanding governance in the network society . Cambridge: University Press.
  132. Hallin D.C. 1985. "The American news media: A critical theory perspective" in Forester John, Critical theory and public life , 121-46, MIT Press.
  133. Hawkesworth, M. E. (1988). Theoretical issues in policy analysis . SUNY Press.
  134. Jann, W., and K. Wegrich. 2003. Phasenmodelle und Politikprozesse: der policy cycle. Lehrbuch der Politikfeldanalyse 2: 106.
  135. Jasanoff, S. 2006. Ordering knowledge, ordering society. In States of knowledge. The co-production of science and social order , ed. S. Sheila Jasanoff, 13-45. London: Routledge.
  136. Jasper, J. M. 2006. Emotions and the Microfoundations of Politics: Rethinking and Means. In: Clarke, S., Hoggett, P. & Thompson, Emotion, Politics and Society. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 14-30 .
  137. Jasper, James M. 2011. Emotions and social movements: Twenty years of theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology 37(1): 285-303. doi: 10.1146/ annurev-soc-081309-150015 .
  138. Jobert, Bruno. 1994. Le Tournant Néo-Libéral En Europe . Paris: L'Harmattan. Jobert and Muller (1987), L'Etat en action, Paris, PUF, 1987
  139. Jones, Brian D., and Frank R. Baumgartner. 2005. The politics of attention. How government prioritizes problems . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  140. Kingdon, John. 1995. Agendas, alternatives and public policies . New York: Longman. Larsen, Lars T. 2010. Framing knowledge and innocent victims. Europe bans smoking in public places. Critical Discourse Studies 7(1): 1-17.
  141. Lasswell, Harold. 1942. The relation of ideological intelligence to public policy. Ethics 53(1): 25-34.
  142. Lasswell, H. 1951. The policy orientation. In The policy sciences , eds. H. Lasswell, and D. Lerner. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  143. Lasswell, Harold D. 1971. A pre-view of policy sciences . Houston: Elsevier.
  144. Latour, Bruno. 1990. La Science Telle Qu'elle Se Fait . Anthropologie de La Sociologie Des Sciences de Langue Anglaise. Paris: La découverte.
  145. Lindblom, Charles. 1958. The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review 19(2): 78-88.
  146. Lindblom, Charles. 1965. The intelligence of democracy: Decision making through mutual adjustment New York: Free Press.
  147. Lindblom, Charles. 1968. The policy-making process. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
  148. Lindblom, Charles. 1979. Still muddling, not yet through. Public Administration Review 39(6): 517-526.
  149. Lindblom, C.E., and D. Cohen. 1978. Usable knowledge: Social science and social problem solving . New Haven: Yale University Press.
  150. Majone, Giandomenico. 1989. Evidence, argument and persuasion in the policy process . New Haven: Yale University Press.
  151. Martin, Emily. 2001. The woman in the body: A cultural analysis of reproduction . Boston: Beacon Press.
  152. Mayntz, Renate. 1993. Policy Netzwerke und die Logik von Verhandlungssystemen. Policy Analyse. Kritik und Neuorientierung". Politische Vierteljahresschrift 34: 39-56.
  153. Newman, Janette. 2012. Beyond the deliberative subject? Problems of theory, method and critique in the turn to emotion and affect. Critical Policy Studies 6(4): 465-479. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2012.730799 .
  154. Ney, S. 2009. Resolving messy problems: Handling confl ict in environment, trans- port, health and aging policy . London: Earthscan.
  155. Orsini, M., & Wiebe, S. M. (2014). Between Hope and Fear. Comparing Canada: Methods and Perspectives on Canadian Politics, 147.
  156. Parsons, Wayne. 2003. Public policy: An introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis . Northampton: Edward Elgard Publishing.
  157. Peters, B.G. 2004. Review of "Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices". Poltiical Science Quarterly 119(3): 566-567.
  158. Rein, M. 1976. Social science and public policy . New York: Penguin Books.
  159. Schmidt, V.A. 2008. Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political. Science 11: 303-326.
  160. Schram, S., and P.T. Neisser, eds. 1997. Tales of state: Narrative in contemporary U.S politics and public policy . New York: Rowman and Littlefi eld.
  161. Schubert, K., and N. Bandelow. 2003. Lehrbuch der Politikfeldanalyse . Oldenbourg: Oldenburg Verlag.
  162. Scriven, M. 1987. Probative logic. In Argumentation across the linerw of discipline , eds. F.H. Van Eemeren et al. Amsterdam: Foris.
  163. Simon, Herbert A. 1945. Administration behavior . New York: Free Press.
  164. Stenner, P. & Taylor, D. 2008. Psychosocial welfare: Refl ections on an emerging fi eld. Critical Social Policy , 28 (4), 415-437.
  165. Stone, D. A. (1988). Policy paradox and political reason . Addison-Wesley Longman.
  166. Sullivan, Helen, and Chris Skelcher. 2002. Working across boundaries: Collaboration in public services. Palgrave.
  167. Toulmin, S. 1958. The uses of argument . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  168. Torgerson, D. 1986. Between knowledge and politics: Three faces of policy analy- sis. Policy sciences , 19(1), 33-59.
  169. Wittgenstein, L. 1958. Schriften : Suhrkamp .
  170. Wittgenstein, Philosophische Untersuschungen , Suhrkamp Verlag KG, 2003.
  171. Yanow, D. 1996. How does a policy mean?: Interpreting policy and organizational actions . Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  172. Zittoun, P. 2009. Understanding policy change as a discursive problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 11(1): 65-82.
  173. Zittoun, P. 2013a. Entre défi nition et propagation des énoncés de solution. Revue Française de Science Politique 63(3): 625-646.
  174. Zittoun, P. 2013b. La fabrique des politiques publiques . Paris: Presses de Science Po.
  175. Zittoun, P. 2014. The political process of policymaking: A pragmatic approach to public policy . New York: Palgrave-McMillan.
  176. Braun B., and A. Busch. 1999. Political ideas and public policy . Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  177. Brinton M.C., and V. Nee. 1998. The new institutionalism in sociology . Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
  178. Calvert R.L. 1996. The rational choice theory of institutions: Implications for design. In Institutional design , ed. D.L. Weimer. Newell: Kluwer.
  179. Carter P. 2012. Policy as palimpset. Policy & Politics 40: 423-443.
  180. Crawford S.E.S., and E. Ostrom. 1996. A grammar of institutions. American Political Science Review 89: 582-600.
  181. Dimaggio P.J., and W.W. Powell. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional iso- morphism and collective rationality in organizational fi elds. American Sociological Review 48: 147-160.
  182. Ellis J. 1976. The social history of the machine gun . New York: Pantheon.
  183. Hall P.A., and R. Taylor. 1996. Political science and the three institutionalisms. Political Studies 44: 936-957.
  184. Hay C. 2002. Political analysis: A critical introduction . Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  185. Hay C. 2006. Constructivist institutionalism. In Oxford handbook of political insti- tutions , ed. R.A.W. Rhodes, S. Binder, and B.A. Rockman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  186. Hayes M.T. 2006. Incrementalism and public policy . Lanham: University Press of America.
  187. Huntington S.P. 1968. Political order in changing societies . New Haven: Yale University Press.
  188. Katz D., and R.L. Kahn. 1978. The social psychology of organizations . New York: Wiley.
  189. Lowndes V., and M. Roberts. 2011. Why institutions matter: New institutionalism in political science . Basingstoke: Macmillan.
  190. Mahoney J., and K. Thelen. 2010. Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency and power . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  191. March J.G., and J.P. Olsen. 1984. The new institutionalism: Organizational fac- tors in political life. American Political Science Review 78: 738-749.
  192. North D.C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  193. Ostrom E. 1990. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  194. Page E.C. 2010. Policy without politicians: Bureaucratic infl uence in comparative perspective . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  195. Peters B.G. 2010. Institutional theory in political science: The new institutionalism , 3rd ed. London: Continuum.
  196. Peters B.G., J. Pierre, and D.S. King. 2005. The politics of path dependency: Political confl ict in historical institutionalism. Journal of Politics 63: 1275-1300.
  197. Pierson P. 2000. Increasing return, path dependence and the study of politics. American Political Science Review 94: 251-267.
  198. Rowe N. 1997. Rules and institutions . Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  199. Sarigil Z. 2009. Paths are what actors make of them. Critical Policy Studies 3: 121-140.
  200. Schmidt V.A. 2010. Taking ideas and discourse seriously: Explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth new institutionalism. European Political Science Review 2: 1-25.
  201. Selznick P.A. 1996. Institutionalism "old" and "new". Administrative Science Quarterly 41: 270-277.
  202. Shugart M.S., and S. Haggard. 2001. Institutions and public policy in presiden- tial systems. In Presidents, parliaments and policy , ed. S. Haggard and M.D. McCubbins. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  203. Steinmo S. 2008. Historical institutionalism. In Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences: A pluralist approach , ed. D. Della Porta and M. Keating. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. REFERENCES
  204. Ahn, T.K. 2001. 'Foundations for cooperation in social dilemmas.' Ph.D disserta- tion. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.
  205. Andersson, Krister. 2003. What Motivates Municipal Governments? Uncovering the Institutional Incentives for Municipal Governance of Forest Resources in Bolivia. Journal of Environment & Development 12 (1):5-27.
  206. Araral, E. 2008. The strategic games that donors and bureaucrats play: An institu- tional rational choice analysis. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 9: 853-871.
  207. Araral, E. 2009. 'What explains collective action in the commons? Theory and evidence from the Phillipines,' World Development vol. 37, no. 3, 687-697.
  208. Araral, E. 2012. "A Transaction Cost Approach to the Analytics of Climate Adaptation: Insights from Coase, Ostrom and Williamson". Environmental Science and Policy . http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.08.005
  209. Araral, Eduardo Jr., Scott Fritzen, Michael Howlett, M. Ramesh and Xun Wu, eds. 2013. Routledge handbook of public policy . London/New York: Routledge.
  210. Blyth, Mark M. 1997. "Any more bright ideas?" The ideational turn of compara- tive political economy. Comparative Politics 29:2, 229-50.
  211. Botero, Juan C., Simeon Djankov, Rafael La Porta, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, and Andrei Shleifer. 2004. The Regulation of Labor. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 119 (4): 1339-1382. doi: 10.1162/0033553042476215
  212. Braun, D. 1999. "Interests Or Ideas? an Overview of Ideational Concepts in Public Policy Research." In Public Policy and Political Ideas , ed. D. Braun and A. Busch. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 11-29.
  213. Cardenas, Juan-Camilo. 2000. "How Do Groups Solve Local Commons Dilemmas? Lessons from Experimental Economics in the Field." Environment, Development and Sustainability 2:305-322.
  214. Casari, Marco, and Charles R. Plott. 2003. "Decentralized Management of Common Property Resources: Experiments with a Centuries-Old Institution." Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 51:217-247.
  215. Chadwick, Andrew. 2000. "Studying Political Ideas: A Public Political Discourse Approach." Political Studies . 48: 283-301
  216. Choe, Jaesong. 1992. 'The organization of urban common-property institutions: The case of apartment communities in Seoul.' Ph.D dissertation. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.
  217. Damaška, Mirjan R. 1986. The Faces of Justice and State Authority . New Haven: Yale University Press.
  218. DeLeon, P., and D.M. Vogenbeck. 2007. The policy sciences at the crossroads. In Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics and methods , edited by F. Fisher, Miller, G.J., and Sidney, M. NewYork: CRC Press.
  219. Di Tella, Rafael, Sebastian Galiani, and Ernesto Schargrodsky. 2004. Property Rights and Beliefs: Evidence from the allocation of land titles to squatters. Ronald Coase Institute Working Paper Series No. 4, September 2004.
  220. Djankov, Simeon, Caralee McLeish, Tatiana Nenova, and Andrei Shleifer. 2003. "Who Owns the Media?" Journal of Law and Economics , University of Chicago Press, vol. 46(2), pages 341-81, October.
  221. Djankov, Simeon, Rafael La Porta, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, and Andrei Shleifer. 2002. The Regulation of Entry. The Quaterly Journal of Economics , Vol. CXVII: 1.
  222. Donnelly, Shanon. 2009. 'Linking land use, land cover, and land ownership at the parcel scale in the midwest United States'. Ph.D dissertation. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.
  223. Elliott-Teague, Ginger. 2007. 'NGOs in policymaking in Tanzania: The relation- ships of group characteristics, political participation and policy outcomes'. Ph.D dissertation. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.
  224. Fischer, Frank, Gerald Miller, and Mara S. Sidney. 2007. Handbook of public policy analysis: theory, politics, and methods , vol 125. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
  225. Gibson, C.C., J.T. Williams and E. Ostrom. 2005. 'Local enforcement and better forests', World Development 33(2): 273-84.
  226. Green-Pedersen, Christoffer, and Stefaan Walgrave. 2014. Agenda Setting, Policies, and Political Systems: A Comparative Approach . The University of Chicago Press.
  227. Hall, Peter A. 1993. "Policy Paradigms, Social Learning and the State: The Case of Economic Policy Making in Britain." Comparative Politics . 25, no. 3: 275-96.
  228. Hayes, T.M., 2007. Does tenure matter? A comparative analysis of agriculturalex- pansion in the Mosquitia Forest Corridor. Human Ecology 35 (6), 733-747.
  229. Heikkila, Tanya, Edella Schlager and Mark W. Davis. 2011. 'The role of cross-scale institutional linkages in common pool resource management: Assessing inter- state river compact'. Policy Studies Journal 39(1): 121-45.
  230. Hess, C. and E. Ostrom. 2006. Understanding Knowledge as a Commons. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  231. Holzinger, Katharina. 2003. Common goods, matrix games and institutional response. European Journal of International Relations 9(2): 173-212. Doi: 10.1177/1354066103009002002 .
  232. Howlett, M., and J. Rayner. 1995. Do Ideas Matter? Policy Subsystem Confi gurations and the Continuing Confl ict Over Canadian Forest Policy. Canadian Public Administration 38 (3):382-410.
  233. Howlett, Michael, M. Ramesh, and Anthony Perl. 2009. Studying public policy:Policy cycles & policy subsystems . Don Mills: Oxford University Press.
  234. Jagger, P. 2009. Forest sector reform, livelihoods and sustainability in western Uganda. In Governing Africa's forests in a globalized world , eds. German, L., Karsenty, A. and Tiani, A.M. Washington, DC: Earthscan, and Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.
  235. Kauneckis, Derek. 2005. 'The co-production of property rights: Theory and evi- dence from a mixed-right system in southern Mexico'. Ph.D dissertation. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.
  236. Kingdon, John W. 1984. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies . Boston: Little, Brown.
  237. Kiser, Larry L., and Elinor Ostrom. 1982. "The three worlds of action: A metathe- oretical synthesis of institutional approaches". In Strategies of political inquiry , ed. Elinor Ostrom. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
  238. La Porta, Rafael, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, and Andrei Shleifer. 2002. "Government Ownership of Banks". Journal of Finance , 57(1): 265-301.
  239. La Porta, Rafael, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, and Andrei Shleifer. 2008. The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins. Journal of Economic Literature , 46:2, 285-332.
  240. La Porta, Rafael, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert W. Vishny. 1997. "Legal Determinants of External Finance". Journal of Finance , 52(3): 1131-50.
  241. La Porta, Rafael, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert W. Vishny. 1998. "Law and Finance". Journal of Political Economy , 106(6): 1113-55.
  242. March, J., and J. Olsen. 1989. Rediscovering institutions . New York: Free Press.
  243. Marquez Barrientos, L.I., 2011. The Effect of Institutions on Guatemalan Forests: Conceptual, Methodological and Practical Implications . Ph.D dissertation. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.
  244. McConnell, Allan. 2013. Learning from success and failure? In Routledge Handbook of Public Policy , edited by E. Araral, S. Fritzen, M. Howlett, M. Ramesh, and X. Wu. New York, NY: Routledge.
  245. McGinnis, Michael D., ed. 2011. An introduction to IAD and the language of the Ostrom Workshop: A simple guide to a complex framework. Policy Studies Journal 39(1): 169-183. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00401.x .
  246. McGinnis, Michael and Elinor Ostrom. 1996. 'Design principles for local and global commons'. In The International Political Economy and International Institutions , ed. Oran R. Young. Vol. 2. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  247. Miller, Hugh T. and Tansu Demir. 2007. Policy Communities. In Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods , edited by F. Fischer, G. J. Miller, and M. S. Sidney. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
  248. Mintrom, Michael, and Claire Williams. 2013. Public policy debate and the rise of policy analysis. In Routledge handbook of public policy , ed. Eduardo Jr Araral, Scott Fritzen, Michael Howlett, M. Ramesh and Xun Wu, xviii, 528 p. London/ New York: Routledge.
  249. Mulligan, Casey B., and Andrei Shleifer. 2005a. The extent of the market and the supply of regulation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics . November 2005.
  250. Mulligan, Casey B., and Andrei Shleifer. 2005b. "Conscription as Regulation", American Law and Economics Review , VII, 85-111.
  251. Mwangi, Esther. 2003. 'Institutional change and politics: The transformation of property rights in Kenya's Maasailand'. Ph.D dissertation. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.
  252. Myint, Tun. 2005. 'Strength of "weak" forces in multilayer environmental gover- nance: Cases from the Mekong and Rhine River basins'. Ph.D dissertation. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.
  253. Ostrom, Elinor, Larry Schroeder and Susan Wynne. 1993. Institutional Incentives and Sustainable Development: Infrastructure Policies in Perspective . Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  254. Ostrom, Elinor, Roger B. Parks, and Gordon P. Whitaker. 1973. Do we really want to consolidate urban police forces? A reappraisal of some old assertions. Public Administration Review 33(5): 423-432.
  255. Ostrom, Elinor. 1965. Public entrepreneurship: A case study in ground water basin management . Ph.D dissertation. ProQuest: UMI Dissertations Publishing.
  256. Ostrom, Elinor. 1972. 'Metropolitan reform: Propositions derived from two tradi- tions', Social Science Quarterly 53: 474-93.
  257. Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for col- lective action . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  258. Ostrom, Elinor. 1994. Rules, games, and common-pool resources . Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.
  259. Ostrom, Elinor. 1998. A behavioral approach to the rational Choice Theory of Collective Action: Presidential Address, American Political Science Association.
  260. Ostrom, Vincent. 1999. Polycentricity (original 1972). In Polycentricity and local public economies : Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis , ed. Michael D. McGinnis, 405 p. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  261. Ostrom, Elinor. 2005. Doing institutional analysis: digging deeper than markets and hierarchies. In Handbook of new institutional economics , ed. Claude Ménard and Mary M. Shirley, xiii, 884 p. Dordrecht/Great Britain: Springer.
  262. Ostrom, Elinor. 2007. Institutional rational choice: An assessment of the institu- tional analysis. In Theories of the policy process , ed. Paul A.Sabatier. Boulder: Westview Press.
  263. Ostrom, Vincent. 1975. Public choice theory: A new approach to institutional economics. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 57(5): 844-850.
  264. Pacheco, Pablo. 2006. Agricultural expansion and deforestation in lowland Bolivia: the import substitution versus the structural adjustment model. Land Use Policy, Volume 23, Issue 3, July 2006, Pages 205-225.
  265. Parks, Roger B. 1985. "Metropolitan Structure and Systemic Performance: The case of police service delivery". In Policy Implementation in Federal and Unitary Systems, eds. Kenneth Hanf and Theo A. J. Toonen. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
  266. Parsons, D.W. 1995. Public policy: an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Edward Elgar.
  267. Persha, L. and T. Blomley. 2009. Management decentralization and montane for- est conditions in Tanzania. Conservation Biology 23(6): 1485-1496.
  268. Pérard, Edouard. 2009. "Water supply: Public or private? An approach based on cost of funds, transaction costs, effi ciency and political costs". Policy and Society 27: 193-219.
  269. Poteete, Amy, Marco Janssen and Elinor Ostrom. 2010. Working Together: Collective Action, the Commons, and Multiple Methods in Practice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  270. Sabatier, Paul A. 1988. An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences 21(2/3): 129-168. doi: 10.1007/BF00136406 .
  271. Sabatier, Paul A. 1999. The need for better theories. In Theories of the policy process, edited by Paul A. Sabatier. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press.
  272. Sabatier, Paul A., and Hank C. Jenkins-Smith. 1999. The advocacy coalition framework: An assessment. In Theories of the policy process, edited by Paul A. Sabatier. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press.
  273. Saleth, R. Maria, and Ariel Dinar. 2004. Institutional Economics of Water: A Cross-country Analysis of Institutions and Performance. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  274. Sawyer, Amos. 2005. Beyond Plunder: Toward Democratic Governance in Liberia. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  275. Schlager, Edella. 1994. "Fishers' Institutional Responses to Common-Pool Resource Dilemmas". In Elinor Ostrom, Roy Gardner, and James Walker, eds., Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources, pp. 247-266. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  276. Schmid, A. Allan. 2004. Confl ict and Cooperation. Blackwell Publishing.
  277. Schmidt, Vivien A. 2008. Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science 11: 303-326.
  278. Shirley, Mary M. 2008 Institutions and Development: Advances in New Institutional Analysis. Edward Elgar.
  279. Tang, Shui Yan. 1991. "Institutional Arrangements and the Management of Common-Pool Resources". Public Administration Review 51: 42-51.
  280. Weissing, Franz J., and Elinor Ostrom. 1991. Irrigation Institutions and the Games Irrigators Play: Rule Enforcement without Guards. In Game Equilibrium Models II: Metods, Morals, and Markets, ed. Reinhard Selten, 188-262. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  281. Weissing, Franz J., and Elinor Ostrom. 1993. Irrigation Institutions and the Games Irrigators Play: Rule Enforcement on Government-and Farmer- Managed Systems. In Games in Hierarchies and Networks: Analytical and Empirical Approaches to the Study of Governance Institutions, ed. Fritz W. Scharpf, 387-428. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag; Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  282. Wu, Chen-Yu and David Knoke. 2013. Policy Network Models. In Routledge Handbook of Public Policy , edited by E. Araral, S. Fritzen, M. Howlett, M. Ramesh, and X. Wu. New York, NY: Routledge. REFERENCES
  283. Arrow, Kenneth. 1951. Social choice and individual values . New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  284. Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones. 2009. Agendas and instability in American politics , 2nd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  285. Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones. 2015. The politics of information: Problem defi nition and the course of public policy in America . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  286. Baumgartner, Frank R., Suzanna L. De Boef, and Amber E. Boydstun. 2008. The decline of the death penalty and the discovery of innocence . New York: Cambridge University Press.
  287. Baumgartner, Frank R., Jeffrey M. Berry, Marie Hojnacki, David C. Kimball, and Beth L. Leech. 2009a. Lobbying and policy change: Who wins, who loses, and why . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  288. Baumgartner, Frank R., Christian Breunig, Christoffer Green-Pedersen, Bryan D. Jones, Peter B. Mortensen, Michiel Nuytemans, and Stefaan Walgrave. 2009b. Punctuated equilibrium in comparative perspective. American Journal of Political Science 53(3): 603-620.
  289. Berry, Frances Stokes, and William D. Berry. 1990. State lottery adoptions as pol- icy innovations: An event history analysis. American Political Science Review 84: 395-415.
  290. Bikhchandani, Sushil, David Hirshleifer, and Ivo Welch. 1992. A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. Journal of Political Economy 100: 992-1026.
  291. Black, Duncan. 1958. The theory of committees and elections . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  292. Boydstun, Amber E. 2013. Making the news: politics, the media, and agenda set- ting . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  293. Boushey, Graeme. 2010. Policy diffusion dynamics in America . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  294. Boushey, Graeme. 2012. Punctuated equilibrium theory and the diffusion of inno- vations. Policy Studies Journal 40(1): 127-146.
  295. Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes. 1960. The American voter . New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  296. Cobb, Roger, and Charles D. Elder. 1972 (1983). Participation in American poli- tics . Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  297. Cohen, Bernard. 1963. The press and foreign policy . Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  298. Cohen, Michael, James March, and Johan Olsen. 1972. A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly 17: 1-25.
  299. Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Scott Keeter. 1996. What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  300. Downs, Anthony. 1957. A theory of political action in a democracy. Journal of Political Economy 65: 135-160.
  301. Freedman, P., and K. Goldstein. 1999. Measuring media exposure and the effects of negative campaign ads. American Journal of Political Science 43(4): 1189-1208.
  302. Grossbeck, Lawrence J., David A.M. Peterson, and James A. Stimson. 2006. Mandate politics . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  303. Jamieson, Kathleen. 1992. The paradox of political ads: Reform depends on voter savvy. Media & Values : 13-14.
  304. Jennings, M. Kent, and Richard G. Niemi. 1968. The transmission of political values from parent to child. American Political Science Review 62: 169-184.
  305. Jones, Bryan. 1994. Reconceiving decision-making in democratic politics: Attention, choice and public policy . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  306. Jones, Bryan. 2001. Politics and the architecture of choice . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  307. Jones, Bryan D. 2016. The Comparative Policy Agendas Projects as measurement systems: response to Dowding, Hindmoor and Martin. Journal of Public Policy . 36 (1): 31-46
  308. Jones, Bryan D., and Frank R. Baumgartner. 2005. The politics of attention . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  309. Jones, Bryan D., and Frank R. Baumgartner. 2012. From there to here: Punctuated equilibrium to the general punctuation thesis to a theory of government infor- mation processing. The Policy Studies Journal 40: 1-18.
  310. Jones, Bryan D., Frank R. Baumgartner, and James L. True. 1996. The shape of change: Punctuations and stability in US budgeting, 1947-96 . Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
  311. Jones, Bryan D., Tracy Sulkin, and Heather Larsen. 2003. Policy punctuations in American political institutions. American Political Science Review 97: 151-170.
  312. Jones, Bryan D., Graeme Boushey, and Samuel Workman. 2006. Behavioral ratio- nality and the policy processes: Towards a new model of organizational infor- mation processing. In Handbook of public policy , eds. B.G. Peters, and J. Pierre. Thousand Oakes: Sage Publications.
  313. Jones, Bryan D., Frank R. Baumgartner, Christian Breunig, Christopher Wlezien, Stuart Soroka, Martial Foucault, Abel Francois, Christoffer Green-Pedersen, Chris Koski, Peter John, Peter Mortensen, Frederic Varone, and Steffan Walgrave. 2009. A general empirical law of public budgets: A comparative analysis. American Journal of Political Science 53: 855-873.
  314. Jones, Bryan D., Herschel F. Thomas III, and Michelle Wolfe. 2014. Policy bub- bles. Policy Studies Journal 42(1): 146-171.
  315. John, Peter, and Shaun Bevan. 2012. What are policy punctuations? Large changes in the legislative agenda of the UK Government, 1911-2008. Policy Studies Journal 40(1): 89-107.
  316. Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking fast and slow . New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
  317. Karch, Andrew. 2009. Venue shopping, policy feedback, and American preschool education. Journal of Policy History 21(1): 38-60.
  318. Kingdon, John. 1984. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies . New York: Longman Classics.
  319. Krehbiel, Keith. 1992. Information and legislative organization . Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
  320. Leech, Beth L., Frank R. Baumgartner, Timothy M. La Pira, and Nicolas Semanko. 2005. Drawing Labbyists to Washington: Government activity and the demand for advocacy. Political Research Quarterly 58: 19-30.
  321. Lindblom, Charles. 1959. The science of "Muddling Through. Public Administration Review 19: 79-88.
  322. Lippmann, Walter. 1922. Public opinion . New York: Free Press.
  323. Lupia, Arthur, and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1998. The democratic dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  324. Rose, Max, and Frank R. Baumgartner. 2013. Framing the poor: Media coverage and U.S. Poverty Policy, 1960-2008. Policy Studies Journal. 41: 22-53.
  325. Sabatier, Paul and Christopher M. Weible. 2007. The advocacy coalition frame- work: Innovations and clarifi cations. Theories of the Policy Process , Second Edition. Boulder: Westview Press.
  326. Schattschneider, Elmer E. 1960. The Semisovereign people . New York: Holt, Reinhart, and Winston.
  327. Simon, Herbert A. 1957. Models of man, social and rational: Mathematical essays on rational human behavior in a social setting . New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  328. Simon, Herbert A. 1983. Reason in human affairs . Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  329. Simon, Herbert A., and Associates. 1986. Decision-making and problem-solving . Research briefi ngs: Report of the Research briefi ng panel on decision-making and problem-solving. Washington DC: National Science Academy Press.
  330. Shipan, Charles R., and Craig Volden. 2006. Bottom-up federalism: The diffusion of antismoking policies from U.S. cities to states. American Political Science Journal 50(4): 825-843.
  331. Shipan, Charles R., and Craig Volden. 2008. The mechanisms of policy siffusion. American Political Science Journal 52(4): 840-857.
  332. Shipan, Charles R., and Craig Volden. 2012. Policy diffusion: Seven lessons for scholars and practitioners. Public Administration Review 72(6).
  333. Snyder, James M., and Michael M. Ting. 2002. An informational rationale for political parties. American Journal of Political Science 46(1): 90-110.
  334. True, James, Bryan D. Jones, and Frank R. Baumgartner. 2007. Punctuated equi- librium theory: Explain-ing stability and change in policymaking. In Theories of the policy process , ed. Paul A. Sabatier, 155-187. Boulder: Westview Press.
  335. Wildavsky, Aaron. 1964. The politics of the budgetary process . Boston: Little, Brown.
  336. Workman, Samuel, Bryan D. Jones, and Ashely Jochim. 2009. Information pro- cessing and policy dynamics. Policy Studies Journal 37: 75-92. REFERENCES
  337. Allison, Graham T. 1971. Essence of decision. Explaining the Cuban missile crisis . New York: Harper Collins.
  338. Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones. 1993. Agendas and instabilities in American politics . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  339. Becker, Gary. 1968. Crime and punishment: An economic approach. The Journal of Political Economy 76: 169-217.
  340. Benartzi, Shlomo, and Richard H.Thaler. 2004. Save more tomorrow: Using behavioral economics to increase employee saving. Journal of Political Economy 112(1): 164-187.
  341. Butler, Daniel M., and David W. Nickerson. 2011. Can learning constituency opinion affect how legislators vote? Results from a fi eld experiment. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 6: 55-58.
  342. Cabinet Offi ce. 2012. Applying behavioural insights to reduce fraud , error and debt . London: Cabinet Offi ce. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/ system/uploads/attachment_data/file/60539/BIT_FraudErrorDebt_ accessible.pdf .
  343. Camerer, Colin, Linda Babcock, George Loewenstein, and Richard Thaler. 1997. Labor supply of New York City cabdrivers: One day at a time. The Quarterly Journal of Economics : 407-441.
  344. Campbell, Angus, Phillip E. Converse, William E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes. 1960. The American voter . New York: Wiley.
  345. Cartwright, Edward. 2011. Behavorial economics . Abingdon: Routledge.
  346. Chin, Michelle L. 2005. Constituents versus fat cats: Testing assumptions about congressional access decisions. American Politics Research 33: 751-786.
  347. Chin, Michele L., Jon R. Bond, and Nehemia Geva. 2000. A foot in the door: An experimental study of PAC and constituency effects on access. Journal of Politics 62: 534-549.
  348. Cutts, David, Ed. Fieldhouse, and Peter John. 2009. Is voting habit forming? The longitudinal impact of a GOTV campaign in the UK. Journal of Elections of Public Opinion and Parties 19(3): 251-263.
  349. Dawnay, Emma, and Hetan Shah. 2005. Behavioural economics: Seven principles for policy-makers . London: New Economics Foundation.
  350. Dolan, Paul, Michael Hallsworth, David Halpern, Dominic King, and Ivo Vlaev. 2010. MINDSPACE: Infl uencing behaviour through public policy . UK: Report for the Cabinet Offi ce.
  351. Fung, Archong. 2006. Empowered participation: Reinventing urban democracy . Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  352. Gerber, Alan S., Donald P. Green, and Christopher W. Larimer. 2008. Social pres- sure and voter turnout: Evidence from a large-scale fi eld experiment. American Political Science Review 102(1): 33-48.
  353. Green, Donald P., and Alan S. Gerber. 2008. Get out the vote: How to increase voter turnout , 2nd edn. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  354. Grose, Christian. 2010. Priming rationality : A theory and fi eld experiment of par- ticipation in legislatures . Presented at New York Univ-Coop. Congr. Elect. Study Exp. Polit. Sci. Conf., 5-6 February, New York.
  355. Grose, Christian. 2014. Field experimental work on political institutions. Annual Review of Political Science 17: 355-370.
  356. Haynes, Laura, Owain Service, Ben Goldacre, and David Torgerson. 2012. Test, learn, adapt: Developing public policy with randomised controlled trials . London: Cabinet Offi ce.
  357. Haynes, Laura, Donald P. Green, Rory Gallagher, Peter John, and David Torgerson. 2013. Collection of delinquent fi nes: A randomized trial to assess the effectiveness of alternative messages. Journal of Public Management Research and Theory 32(4): 718-730.
  358. House of Lords. 2011. Science and Technology Sub-Committee, 2nd report of session 2010-12, Behaviour change. London: The Stationery Offi ce Limited.
  359. John, Peter. 2013a. Political science, impact and evidence. Political Studies Review 11: 168-173.
  360. John, peter. 2013b. All tools are informational now: How information and persua- sion defi ne the tools of government. Policy and Politics 41(4): 605-620.
  361. John, peter. 2014. Policy entrepreneurship in British government: The Behavioural Insights Team and the use of RCTs. Public Policy and Administration 29(3): 257-267.
  362. John, Peter, Sarah Cotterill, Alice Moseley, Liz Richardson, Graham Smith, Gerry Stoker, and Corinne Wales. 2011. Nudge nudge, think think: Experimenting with ways to change civic behaviour . Bloomsbury: Academic.
  363. Kahneman, Daniel. 1973. Attention and effort . Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
  364. Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking, fast and slow . London: Penguin.
  365. Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of deci- sion under risk. Econometrica 47(2): 263-291.
  366. Kahneman, Daniel, Paul Slovic, and Amos Tversky. 1982. Judgment under uncer- tainty: Heuristics and biases . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  367. Kingdon, John W. 1984. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies . Boston: Little, Brown.
  368. Leach, Steve. 1982. In defence of the rational model. In Approaches in public pol- icy , ed. Steve Leach and John Stewart. London: Allen & Unwin.
  369. Lindblom, Charles E., and David Braybrooke. 1963. A strategy of decision: Policy evaluation as a social process . New York: Free Press.
  370. Loomes, Graham, and Robert Sugden. 1982. Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. Economic Journal 92: 805-824.
  371. Margetts, Helen, Peter John, Scott Hale, and Taha Yasseri. 2016. Turbulent poli- tics . Princeton: Princeton University.
  372. Marteau, Theresa M., David Ogilvie, Martin Roland, Marc Suhrcke, and Michael P. Kelly. 2011. Judging nudging: Can nudging improve population health? British Medical Journal 342: 263-265.
  373. Oliver, Adam. 2013a. Behavioural public policy . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  374. Oliver, Adam. 2013b. From nudging to budging: Using behavioural economics to inform public sector policy. Journal of Social Policy 42(4): 685-700.
  375. Park, Andreas, and Hamid Sabourian. 2011. Herding and contrarian behavior in effi cient fi nancial markets. Econometrica 79: 973-1026.
  376. Richardson, Liz, and Peter John. 2012. Who listens to the grassroots? A fi eld experiment on informational lobbying in the UK. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 14: 595-612.
  377. Shafi r, Eldar, ed. 2013. The behavioral foundations of public policy . Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  378. Simon, Herbert. 1947. Administrative behavior . New York: Free Press.
  379. Simon, Herbert. 1957. Models of man . New York: Wiley.
  380. Sugden, Robert. 2004. The opportunity criterion: Consumer sovereignty without the assumption of coherent preferences. American Economic Review 94(4): 1014-1033.
  381. Sugden, Robert. 2013. The behavioural economist and the social planner: To whom should behavioural welfare economics be addressed? Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 56(5): 519-538.
  382. Thaler, Richard H., and Cass R. Sustein. 2008. Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness . New Haven: Yale University Press.
  383. REFERENCE S
  384. Ackerknecht, E.H. 1948. Anticontagionism between 1821 and 1867. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 22(5): 562-593.
  385. Baldwin, P. 1999. Contagion and the state in Europe 1830-1930 . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  386. Bertelmans-Videc, M., R. Rist, and E. Vedung. 1998. Carrots, sticks and sermons: Policy instruments and their evaluation . New Brunswick: Transaction.
  387. Dahl, R. and C. Lindblom. 1953. Politics, Economics and Welfare . New York: Harper & Row
  388. Dudley, T., J. Listgarten, O. Stegle, S.E. Brenner, and L. Parts. 2014, December. Personalized medicine: From genotypes, molecular phenotypes and the quanti- fi ed self, towards improved medicine. In Pacifi c symposium on biocomputing , vol. 20, 342-346.
  389. Dunleavy, P., and H. Margetts. 2015. Designing essentially digital governance . Paper to the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, 2-5 September 2015.
  390. Dunleavy, P., H. Margetts, S. Bastow, and J. Tinkler. 2006. Digital era governance: IT corporations, the state, and e-government . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  391. Dobuzinskis, L., Howlett, M. and D. Laycock 2007. Policy Analysis in Canada. The State of the Art . Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  392. Eliadis, Pearl, Margaret M. Hill, and Michael Howlett. 2005. Designing government: From instruments to governance . Montreal: McGill-Queen's Press-MQUP.
  393. Elmore, R.F. 1987. Instruments and strategy in public policy. Review of Policy Research 7(1): 174-186.
  394. Etzioni, A. 1961. A comparative analysis of complex organizations: On power. Involvement and their Correlates .
  395. Foster, C.D. 1992. Privatization, Public Ownership and the Regulation of Natural Monopoly. Oxford: Blackwell.
  396. Holmes, O.W. 1920. The Path of the Law, in Collected Papers , Collected Papers, pp. 167-202. London: Constable.
  397. Hood, C. 1983. The tools of government . London: Macmillan.
  398. Hood, C., and H. Margetts. 2007. The tools of government in the digital age . London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  399. Howlett, M. 1991. Policy instruments, policy styles, and policy implementation. Policy Studies Journal 19(2): 1-21.
  400. Howlett, M. 2000. Managing the "hollow state": Procedural policy instruments and modern governance. Canadian Public Administration 43(4): 412-431.
  401. Howlett, M. 2004. Beyond good and evil in policy implementation: Instrument mixes, implementation styles, and second generation theories of policy instru- ment choice. Policy and Society 23(2): 1-17.
  402. Howlett, M. 2005. What is a policy instrument? Policy tools, policy mixes and policy implementation styles. In Designing government: From instruments to governance , eds. F. Eliadis, M. Hill, and M. Howlett. Montreal: McGill Queens University Press.
  403. Howlett, M. 2007. Policy Analysis in Canada .
  404. Howlett, Michael. 2009a. Governance modes, policy regimes and operational plans: A multi-level nested model of policy instrument choice and policy design. Policy Sciences 42(1): 73-89.
  405. Howlett, M. 2009b. Government communication as a policy tool: A framework for analysis. Canadian Political Science Review 3(2) June.
  406. Howlett, M. 2011. Designing public policies: Principles and instruments . Abingdon: Routledge.
  407. Hyman, H., and P. Sheatsley. 1947. Some reasons why information campaigns fail.
  408. John, P. 2011. Making policy work . Taylor & Francis.
  409. John, P. 2013. All tools are informational now: How information and persuasion defi ne the tools of government. Policy & Politics 41(4): 605-620.
  410. King, G., J. Pan, and M.E. Roberts. 2013. How censorship in China allows gov- ernment criticism but silences collective expression. American Political Science Review 107(02): 326-343.
  411. Lascoumes, P., and P. Le Gales. 2007. Introduction: Understanding public policy through its instruments-From the nature of instruments to the sociology of public policy instrumentation. Governance 20(1): 1-21.
  412. Lehdonvirta, Vili, and Edward Castronova. 2014. Virtual economies: Design and analysis . Cambridge: MIT Press.
  413. Linder, S.H., and B.G. Peters. 1989. Instruments of government: Perceptions and contexts. Journal of Public Policy 9(01): 35-58.
  414. Linder, S.H., and , B.G. Peters. 1992. The Study of Policy Instruments. Policy Currents 2: 1-7.
  415. Linder, S.H., and B.G. Peters. 1998. The study of policy instruments: Four schools of thought. In Public policy instruments. Evaluating the tools of public adminis- tration , eds. B.G. Peters, and F.K.M. Nispen, 33-45. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  416. Lessig, L. 1999. Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books. Margetts, H. 1999. Information Technology in Government: Britain and America . New York: Routledge.
  417. Margetts, H. 2012. Information technology in government: Britain and America . London: Routledge.
  418. Margetts, H., and P. Dunleavy. 2013. The second wave of digital-era governance: A quasi-paradigm for government on the Web. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 371(1987): 20120382.
  419. Margetts, H., John, P., Hale, S., and T. Yasseri. 2015. Political Turbulence: How Social Media Shape Collective Action . Princeton University Press.
  420. Osborne, D., and T. Gaebler. 1992. Reinventing government: How the entrepre- neurial spirit is transforming the public sector . Reading: Addison-Wesley.
  421. Salamon, L.M., ed. 2002. The tools of government: A guide to the new governance . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  422. Salamon, L.M., and M.S. Lund, eds. 1989. Beyond privatization: The tools of gov- ernment action . Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
  423. Schneider, A., and H. Ingram 1990. Behavioural Assumptions of Policy Tools. Journal of Politics 52(2) 510-529.
  424. Smith, A. 1910. The Wealth of Nations , vol. 2, London: Dent. First published 1776.
  425. Thaler, R.H. and C.R. Sunstein. 2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness . Yale University Press.
  426. Wright, Joss. 2014. Regional variation in Chinese internet fi ltering. Information, Communication & Society 17(1): 121-141.
  427. Ackrill, Robert, and Adrian Kay. 2011. Multiple streams in EU policy-making: The case of the 2005 sugar reform. Journal of European Public Policy 18(1): 72-89.
  428. Allison, Graham K. 1971. Essence of decision . Boston: Little, Brown & Company. Baier, Vicki Eaton, James G. March, and Harald Saetren. 1986. Implementation and ambiguity. Scandinavian Journal of Management Studies 2(3-4): 197-212.
  429. Bendor, Jonathan, Terry M. Moe, and Kenneth W. Shotts. 2001. Recycling the garbage can: An assessment of the research program. American Political Science Review 95(1): 169-190.
  430. Birkland, Thomas A. 1997. After disaster: Agenda setting, public policy and focus- ing events . Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  431. Birkland, Thomas A. 2004. The world changed today: Agenda-setting and policy change in the wake of the September 11 terrorist attacks. Review of Policy Research 21: 179-200.
  432. Blankenau, Joe. 2001. The fate of national health insurance in Canada and the United States: A multiple streams explanation. Policy Studies Journal 29(1): 38-55.
  433. Bromiley, Philip. 1986. Planning systems in large organizations: A garbage can approach with application to defense PPBS. In Ambiguity and command , eds. James G. March, and Roger Weissinger-Baylon, 120-139. Marshfi eld: Pitman.
  434. Brouwer, Stijn, and Frank Biermann. 2011. Towards adaptive management: Examining the strategies of policy entrepreneurs in Dutch water management. Ecology and Society 16(4): 5. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-04315-160405 .
  435. Brunner, Steffen. 2008. Understanding policy change: Multiple streams and emis- sions trading in Germany. Global Environmental Change 18: 501-507.
  436. Cairney, Paul. 2013. Standing on the shoulders of giants: How do we combine the insights of multiple theories in public policy studies? Policy Studies Journal 41(1): 1-21.
  437. Chen, Zhenhua. 2011. Is the policy window open for high-speed rail in the United States? A perspective from the multiple streams model of policymaking. Transportation Law Journal 38(2): 115-144.
  438. Clarke, Lee. 1989. Acceptable risk? Making decisions in a toxic environment . Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  439. Cohen, Michael D. 1986. Artifi cial intelligence and the dynamic performance of organizational designs. In Ambiguity and command , eds. James G. March, and Roger Weissinger-Baylon, 53-71. Marshfi eld: Pitman.
  440. Cohen, Michael D., James G. March, and Johan P. Olsen. 1972. A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly 17: 1-25.
  441. Corbett, Anne. 2005. Universities and the Europe of knowledge: Ideas, institutions and policy entrepreneurship in European Union higher education policy, 1955- 2005 . New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  442. Crecine, John P. 1986. Defense resource allocation: Garbage can analysis of C3 procurement. In Ambiguity and command , eds. James G. March, and Roger Weissinger-Baylon, 72-119. Marshfi eld: Pitman.
  443. Cyert, Richard M., and James G. March. 1963. A behavioral theory of the fi rm . Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
  444. Durant, Robert F., and Paul F. Diehl. 1989. Agendas, alternatives, and public policy: Lessons from the US policy arena. Journal of Public Policy 9(2): 179-205.
  445. Edelman, Murray. 1971. Politics as symbolic action . Chicago: Markham.
  446. Elster, Jon. 1989. Solomonic judgements . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  447. Epstein, David, and Sharyn O'Halloran. 1999. Delegating powers: A transaction cost politics approach to policy making under separate powers . New York: Cambridge University Press.
  448. Feldman, Martha, and James G. March. 1981. Information in organizations as signal and symbol. Administrative Science Quarterly 26(2): 171-186.
  449. Gordenker, Leon, Roger A. Coate, Christer Johnsson, and Peter Soderholm. 1995. International cooperation in response to AIDS . London: Pinter.
  450. Guldbrandsson, Karin, and Bjöörn Fossum. 2009. An exploration of the theoreti- cal concepts policy windows and policy entrepreneurs at the Swedish public health arena. Health Promotion International 24(4): 434-444.
  451. Hayes, Michael T. 2006. Incrementalism and public policy . Lanham: University Press of America.
  452. Henstra, Daniel. 2010. Explaining local policy choices: A multiple streams analysis of municipal emergency management. Canadian Public Administration 53(2): 241-258.
  453. Howlett, Michael. 1998. Predictable and unpredictable policy windows: Institutional and exogenous correlates of Canadian federal agenda-setting. Canadian Journal of Political Science 31(3): 495-524.
  454. Khayesi, Meleckidzedeck, and Adjo A. Amekudzi. 2011. Kingdon's multiple streams model and automobile dependence reversal path: The case of Curitiba, Brazil. Journal of Transport Geography 19(6): 1547-1552.
  455. Kingdon, John. 1995. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies , 2nd edn. New York: Harper Collins.
  456. Lasswell, Harold D. 1951. The policy orientation. In The policy sciences , eds. Daniel Lerner, and Harold Lasswell, 3-15. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  457. Lindblom, Charles E. 1959. The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review 19: 79-88.
  458. Lindblom, Charles E. 1963. The intelligence of democracy: Decision making through mutual adjustment . New York: Free Press.
  459. Lipson, Michael. 2007. A garbage can model of UN peacekeeping. Global Governance 1: 79-97.
  460. Liu, Xinsheng, Eric Lindquist, Arnold Vedlitz, and Kenneth Vincent. 2010. Understanding local policy making: Policy elites' perceptions of local agenda setting and alternative policy selection. Policy Studies Journal 38(1): 69-91.
  461. Lomi, Alessandro, and J. Richard Harrison, eds. 2012. The garbage can model of organizational choice: Looking forward at forty . Emerald Group: Bingley.
  462. March, James G. 1976. The technology of foolishness. In Ambiguity and choice in organizations , eds. James G. March, and Johan P. Olsen, 69-81. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
  463. March, James G. 1991. How decisions happen in organizations. Human-Computer Interaction 6: 95-117.
  464. March, James G. 1994. A primer on decision making . New York: Free Press. March, James G., and Johan P. Olsen. 1976a. Ambiguity and choice in organiza- tions . Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
  465. March, James G., and Johan P. Olsen. 1976b. Organizational learning and the ambiguity of the past. In Ambiguity and choice in organizations , eds. James G. March, and Johan P. Olsen, 54-68. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
  466. March, James G., and Johan P. Olsen. 1983. Organizing political life: What administrative reorganization tells us about government. American Political Science Review 77(2): 281-296.
  467. March, James G., and Pierre J. Romelaer. 1976. Position and presence in the drift of decisions. In Ambiguity and choice in organizations , eds. James G. March, and Johan P. Olsen, 251-276. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
  468. March, James G., and Herbert A. Simon. 1958. Organizations . New York: Wiley. March, James G., and Roger Weissinger-Baylon, eds. 1986. Ambiguity and com- mand . Marshfi eld: Pitman.
  469. Matland, Richard E. 1995. Synthesizing the implementation literature: The ambiguity-confl ict model of policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 5(2): 145-174.
  470. Mazzar, Michael J. 2007. The Iraq war and agenda setting. Foreign Policy Analysis 3(1): 1-24.
  471. McCann, Lisa Marie. 2012. Peacebuilding as global policy : Multiple streams and global policy discourse in the creation of the United Nations Peacebuilding Commission . Doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado at Denver.
  472. McLendon, Michael K. 2003. Setting the governmental agenda for state decen- tralization of higher education. The Journal of Higher Education 74(5): 479-515.
  473. Mintrom, Michael, and Philippa Norman. 2009. Policy entrepreneurship and pol- icy change. Policy Studies Journal 37(4): 649-667.
  474. Mucciaroni, Gary. 1992. The garbage can model and the study of policy making: A critique. Polity 24: 459-482.
  475. Natali, David. 2004. Europeanization, policy arenas, and creative opportunism: The politics of welfare state reforms in Italy. Journal of European Public Policy 11(6): 1077-1095.
  476. Oborn, Eivor, Michael Barrett, and Mark Exworthy. 2011. Policy entrepreneur- ship in the development of public sector strategy: The case of London health reform. Public Administration 89(2): 325-344.
  477. Olsen, Johan P. 1976. Reorganization as a garbage can. In Ambiguity and choice in organizations , eds. James G. March, and Johan P. Olsen, 314-337. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
  478. Olsen, Johan P. 1988. Administrative reform and theories of organization. In Organizing governance, governing organizations , eds. Colin Campbell, and B. Guy Peters, 233-254. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  479. Olsen, Johan P. 2001. Garbage cans, new institutionalism, and the study of poli- tics. American Political Science Review 95(1): 191-198.
  480. Olsen, Johan P. 2008. The ups and downs of bureaucratic organization. Annual Review of Political Science 11: 13-37.
  481. Ostrom, Elinor, Michael Cox, and Edella Schlager. 2014. An assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework and introduction of the social-ecological systems framework. In Theories of the policy process , 3rd edn, eds. Paul A. Sabatier, and Christopher M. Weible, 267-306. Boulder: Westview.
  482. Padgett, John F. 1980. Managing garbage can hierarchies. Administrative Science Quarterly 25: 583-604.
  483. Peters, B. Guy. 2002. Governance : A garbage can perspective . In Political science series #84 . Vienna: Institute for Advanced Studies.
  484. Pierre, Jon, and B. Guy Peters. 2005. Governing complex societies . New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  485. Protopsaltis, Spyros. 2008. Theories of the policy process and higher education reform in Colorado : The shaping of the fi rst state postsecondary education voucher system . Doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado at Denver.
  486. Richardson, Jeremy. 2006. Policy-making in the EU: Interests, ideas and garbage cans of primeval soup. In European Union: Power and policy-making , 3rd edn, ed. Jeremy Richardson, 3-30. New York: Routledge.
  487. Ridde, Valéry. 2009. Policy implementation in an African state: An extension of Kingdon's multiple streams approach. Public Administration 87(4): 938-954.
  488. Robinson, Scott E., and Warren S. Eller. 2010. Participation in policy streams: Testing the separation of problems and solutions in subnational policy systems. Policy Studies Journal 38(2): 199-216.
  489. Rommetveit, Kåre. 1974. Decision-making under a changing normative struc- ture -The case of the location of Norway's third medical school. Acta Sociologica 17(3): 256-272.
  490. Scharpf, Fritz W. 1997. Games real actors play: Actor-centered institutionalism in policy research . Boulder: Westview.
  491. Schlager, Edella. 2007. A comparison of frameworks, theories, and models of pol- icy processes. In Theories of the policy process , 2nd edn, ed. Paul A. Sabatier, 293-319. Boulder: Westview.
  492. Simon, Herbert A. 1957. Models of man . New York: Wiley.
  493. Simon, Herbert A. 1976. Administrative behavior , 3rd edn. New York: Free Press.
  494. Simon, Herbert A. 1981. The sciences of the artifi cial , 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  495. Travis, Rick, and Nikolaos Zahariadis. 2002. A multiple streams model of US for- eign aid policy. Policy Studies Journal 30(4): 495-514.
  496. Weiner, Stephen S. 1976. Participation, deadlines, and choice. In Ambiguity and choice in organizations , eds. James G. March, Johan P. Olsen, et al., 225-250. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
  497. Wildavsky, Aaron. 1987. Speaking truth to power , 2nd edn. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
  498. Williamson, Oliver E. 1985. The economic institutions of capitalism . New York: Free Press.
  499. Zahariadis, Nikolaos. 2003. Ambiguity and choice in public policy: Political decision- making in modern democracies . Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  500. Zahariadis, Nikolaos. 2005. Essence of political manipulation: Emotion, institutions, andGreekforeign policy . New York: Peter Lang.
  501. Zahariadis, Nikolaos. 2008a. Ambiguity and choice in European public policy. Journal of European Public Policy 15(4): 514-530.
  502. Zahariadis, Nikolaos. 2008b. Europeanization as program implementation: Effective and democratic? Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 10(3): 221-238.
  503. Zahariadis, Nikolaos. 2014. Ambiguity and multiple streams. In Theories of the policy process , 3rd edn, eds. Paul A. Sabatier, and Christopher M. Weible, 25-58. Boulder: Westview.
  504. Zahariadis, Nikolaos. 2015a. Plato ' s receptacle : Deadlines , ambiguity , and temporal sorting in public policy . Leviathan.
  505. Zahariadis, Nikolaos. 2015b. The shield of Herakles: Multiple streams and the emotional endowment effect. EuropeanJournal of Political Research . REFERENCES
  506. Amnesty International. 2015. Czech Republic systematically discriminates against Romani children in schools. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/ 2015/04/czech-republic-systematic-discrimination-against-romani- children-in-schools/ .
  507. Bobrow, D.B., and J. Dryzek. 1987. Policy analysis by design . Pittsburg: University of Pittsburg Press.
  508. Brucker, D. 2009. Social construction of disability and substance abuse within public disability benefi t systems. International Journal of Drug Policy 20(5): 418-423.
  509. Council of Europe. 2014. State of democracy, human rights and the rule of law in Europe: Report by the Secretary General of the Council of Europe . www.coe.int. deLeon, P. 1995. Democratic values and the policy sciences. American Journal of Political Science 39(4): 886.
  510. deLeon, P. 1997. Democracy and the policy sciences . Albany: State University of New York Press.
  511. deLeon, P. 1998. Advice and consent: The development of the policy sciences . New York: The Russell Sage Foundation.
  512. deLeon, P. 2009. Introduction to the transaction edition in H. D. Lasswell. In Power and personality . New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
  513. Dorling, Danny. 2015. Why social inequality still persists . Bristol: Policy Press.
  514. Dryzek, J., and S. Niemeyer. 2008. Discursive representation. American Political Science Review 102(4): 481-493.
  515. Erlanger, S., and K. DeFretas-Tamura. 2015. Old tradition of secularism clashes with France's new reality. New York Times , February 5, p. 1.
  516. Fischer, F. 2003a. Beyond empiricism: Policy analysis and deliberative practice. In Deliberative policy analysis : Understanding governance in a networked society , ed. Maarten Hajer, and H. Wagener, 209-227. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  517. Fischer, F. 2003b. Redefi ning policy analysis . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  518. Gabriel, T. 2014. 50 Years into the war on poverty, hardship hits back. New York Times , April 20. Downloaded, April 24, 2015, htpp://nyti.ms/QyiHKt.
  519. Gilens, M. 2009. Preference gaps and inequality in representation. PS: Political Science and Politics 42(2): 335-341.
  520. Goffman, A. 2014. On the run: fugitive life in an American City . Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  521. Grosse, R. 2012. Bank regulation, governance and the crisis: A behavioral fi nance view. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance 20(1): 4-25.
  522. Haidt, J. 2012. The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion . New York: Pantheon.
  523. Hanson, A., I. Brannon, and Z. Hawley. 2014. Rethinking tax benefi ts for home owners. National Affairs no 19, Spring .
  524. Hofferbert, R. 1986. Policy analysis and political morality: A rejoinder to Anne E Schneider's critique of my prescription for scholarly division of labor. Policy Studies Review 6(2): 234.
  525. Human Rights First. 2015. Guantanamo by the numbers . https://www.human- rightsfi rst.org/sites/default/fi les/gtmo-by-the-numbers.pdf.
  526. Ingram, H., and A. Schneider. 1990. Improving implementation through framing smarter statutes. Journal of Public Policy 10(1): 67-88.
  527. Johnson, Genevieve Fugi, 2015. Democratic Illusion: Deliberative Democracy in Canadian Public Policy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  528. Jørgensen, M.B. and T. L. Thomsen, T.L. Crises Now and then--Comparing Integration Policy Frameworks and Immigrant Target Groups in Denmark in the 1970s and 2000s. 2013 Journal of International Migration and Integration, 05, vol. 14, no. 2. pp. 245-262.
  529. Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking fast and slow . New York: Farrar, Straus, and Gilroux.
  530. Lewis, P.G. 2013. Policy thinking, fast and slow. Annual Political Science Association Meeting , August.
  531. Lowi, T.J. 1992. The state in political science: How we become what we study. The American Political Science Review 86(1): 1-7.
  532. Metsch, L., and H. Pollack. 2005. Welfare reform and substance abuse. The Milbank Quarterly 83(1): 65-99.
  533. Mettler, S. 2002. Bringing the state back in to civic engagement: Policy feedback effects of the G.I. Bill for World War II veterans. American Political Science Review 96(2): 351-365.
  534. Mettler, S., and J. Soss. 2004. The consequences of public policy for democratic citizenship: Bridging policy studies and mass politics. Perspectives on Politics 2(1): 55-73.
  535. Mettler, S. 2005. Soldiers to citizens: The G.I. Bill and the making of the greatest generation . New York: Oxford University Press.
  536. Mettler, S. 2011. The submerged state: How invisible government policies undermine American democracy . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  537. Moisi, D. 2010. Geopolitics of emotion : How cultures of fear humiliation , and hope are reshaping the world. New York: Anchor Books (Moisi has a .. over the I but I do not know how to insert it).
  538. Murphy, C.C. 2012. EU counter terrorism law : Preemption and the rule of law . In Modern studies in European Law . Oxford: Hart.
  539. Pressman, J., and A. Wildavsky. 1973. Implementation: Or, how great expectations are dashed in Oakland…. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  540. Putnam, R.D. 2015. Our kids: The American dream in crisis . New York: Simon &Schuster.
  541. Ranney, A. 1968. Political science and public policy . Ontario: Markham.
  542. Rogers, T., C.R. Fox, and A.S. Gerber. 2013. Rethinking why people vote: Voting as dynamic social expression. In The behavioral foundations of policy , ed. E. Shafi r. Princeton University Press: Princeton.
  543. Romano, Serena. 2014. The political and social construction of poverty: Central and East European countries in transition. University of Bristol Press, Bristol (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
  544. Schneider, A.L., and H. Ingram. 1990. Behavioral assumptions of policy tools. Journal of Politics 52(2): 510-529.
  545. Schneider, A.L., and H. Ingram. 1993. The social construction of target popula- tions: Implication for politics and policy. The American Political Science Review 87(2): 334-347.
  546. Schneider, A.L., H. Ingram, and P. deLeon. 2013. Democratic policy design: Social construction of target populations. In Theories of the policy process , eds. P. Sabatier, and C.M. Weible, 105-149. Boulder: Westview Press.
  547. Schneider, Anne, and Helen Ingram. 1997. Policy design for democracy . Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.
  548. Sharkansky, I.. 1970. Policy analysis in political science. Ontario: Markham Soss, J. 2005. Making clients and citizens: Welfare policy as a source of status, belief, and action. In Deserving and entitled: Social construction of public policy , eds. A.L. Schneider, and H. Ingram, 291-328. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  549. Stone, D. 2013. Keynote address to Interpretive policy analysis conference , Vienna . The Economist . 2014. Reforms and democracy but no rule of law . November 15. http//www.economist.com.
  550. Vincent, John A., MGuy Patterson, and Karen Wale. 2001. Politics and old age: Older citizens and political processes in Britain . Aldershot: Ashgate.
  551. Voigtländer, Michael. 2009. Why is the German homeownership rate so low? Housing Studies 24(3): 355-372. doi: 10.1080/02673030902875011 .
  552. Weaver, V., and A.E. Lerman. 2010. Political consequences of the carceral state. American Political Science Review . doi: 10.1017/S0003055410000456 .
  553. Yanow, D. 1998. The communication of policy meanings: Implementation as interpretation and text. Policy Sciences 16(1): 41-61.
  554. T theory (ies) , 2, 7, 9, 15, 17, 21, 23, 25-7, 29, 40, 43-5, 58-60, 62, 78, 83, 87, 96-100, 105-9, 115, 117, 118, 123, 141, 148, 161, 163, 165, 167, 168, 178-81 transfer , 84, 114, 128, 192 translation , 21

Related papers

PUBLIC POLICY (Public Administration and public policy 125) Handbook of Public Policy Analysis Th
Harsu Gie

International Standard Book Number-10: 1-57444-561-8 (Hardcover) International Standard Book Number-13: 978-1-57444-561-9 (Hardcover) This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reprinted material is quoted with permission, and sources are indicated. A wide variety of references are listed. Reasonable efforts have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and the publisher cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all materials or for the consequences of their use.

View PDFchevron_right
Handbook of Public Policy Analysis Theory, Politics, and Methods
启聪 张

This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reprinted material is quoted with permission, and sources are indicated. A wide variety of references are listed. Reasonable efforts have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and the publisher cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all materials or for the consequences of their use. No part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or utilized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the publishers.

View PDFchevron_right
Introduction to the Special Issue: Public Policy
Rachel Baker
View PDFchevron_right
Studying Public Policy: From 1976 to 2013
Milan Ilnyckyj

2013

View PDFchevron_right
Vol 3 International Encyclopedia of Public Policy: Public Policy & Political Economy
Phillip O'Hara

INTERNATIONAL ENCYCLOPEDIA OF PUBLIC POLICY VOLUME 3─PUBLIC POLICY AND POLITICAL ECONOMY EDITOR: PHILLIP ANTHONY O’HARA Global Political Economy Research Unit (GPERU), PERTH AUSTRALIA 2009

View PDFchevron_right

Related topics

  • Political Science

    • Cited by

    Mismatch of Policy Theory and Policy Practice in Eastern Europe: Cross-Sectoral Comparison of Croatian Policymaking
    Ana Petek

    NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy

    The aim of the paper is to improve empirical policy theory by examining Eastern European policymaking, using Croatia as a case for analysis. Data sources are published studies that describe 11 sectors from diverse policy areas. The whole material was coded by the rules of qualitative content analysis. The results show 15 basic features of Croatian policymaking combined into six policymaking types: administrative, analytical, economic, external, incremental, and political. All detected policymaking types were successfully connected to several policy concepts, theories, frameworks, and approaches. The analysis revealed three points of theory-practice mismatch that are fruitful for theoretical improvements: the need for mainstreaming Europeanization and policy transfer into policy theory; the need to modify rationalistic approaches for more empirical studies on obstacles and barriers to rationality in policymaking; and the need for adapting actor-centered approaches for a more broad ap...

    View PDFchevron_right
    Bureaucratic policy and defense cooperation among the Baltic states
    Olevs Nikers

    Security and Defence Quarterly, 2022

    The objectives of this paper are to (1) comparatively analyse defence strategies of the Baltic countries against the theory of institutionalism, focusing on factors that affect policy maintenance or change within defence cooperation and (2) assess the current state of defence cooperation in the Baltic countries. The study gives a theoretical overview, relating the theory of new institutionalism to the subject of debate over bureaucratic institutions, which also plays a role in the regional security politics of the Baltic countries. An empirical study compares the defence strategies of Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania. While few studies have investigated this subject before, that the conclusion reached by this investigation is that administrative bodies in the defence sector of the Baltic countries are affected by politically driven processes pertaining to the foreign affairs domain, which play a key role in matters related to cooperation and synchronisation of the defence and security of the Baltic States. The findings suggest that a more focused analysis of the role of institutions and bureaucratic policy in the policy making of the three Baltic countries needs to take place. The study concludes that (1) the current state of defence cooperation in the Baltic countries can be called "developing"; (2) the operation of defence establishments can be called "path dependent", which is mainly influenced by "external" factors or pressures.

    View PDFchevron_right
    Rezension: Colebatch, Hal K. Hoppe, Robert (Eds.) (2018). Handbook on Policy, Process and Governing. Edward Elgar. 528 Seiten. ISBN-10: 1784714860
    Werner Jann

    Politische Steuerung von Transformation ‒ Das Beispiel der Energiepolitik, 2019

    Unlike its numerous predecessors, this new handbook does not aim at offering an authoritative overview about the foundations of public policy research, and its many branches and achievements, but strives to improve and integrate the theorizing about policies and the policy process, embracing both the practice of governing and the analysis of this practice. For this, it wants "to shift the focus from 'the policy process' to 'policy-as-process' ". The book contains 27 contributions from 32 authors, both established colleagues as well as younger ones. It is organized in five sections (foundations, policies as authoritative choice, as structured interaction, as sense-making and finally the limits of policy). In order to better understand the intentions and achievements of the book it is best to start with the final, summarizing chapter. The editors concede, "since the 1990s policy process theorizing has reached a plateau with only incremental additions", so there are not many new theoretical insights, but an interesting and stimulating overview about the theoretical implications of existing theories and research.

    View PDFchevron_right
    The Role of Social Trust in Governing the Sharing Economy for Poverty Reduction
    Pairach (Champ) Piboonrungroj

    Economics, Law, and Institutions in Asia Pacific, 2021

    Trust can be applied to many sectors, including the sharing economy. The sharing economy, a relatively new economic model, can be defined as an peer-to-peer (P2P) transactions. Online community platforms have been innovated to facilitate the sharing economy. This chapter aims to answer these two questions. First, what is the role of 'trust' in the sharing economy? Second, what are the reasons behind sharing economy growth through the transaction cost economics (TCE) lens? This research found that culture and the social background are determining factors in the level of trust. The finding from this research helps to fill the gap in regulating the sharing economy in emerging markets. Moreover, this chapter provides recommendations on how to design appropriate policy to regulate the sharing economy by using the TCE lens.

    View PDFchevron_right
    580 California St., Suite 400
    San Francisco, CA, 94104
    © 2025 Academia. All rights reserved