Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

A Transformational Approach to Harmony Improvisation

2020

Abstract

This paper introduces a transformational approach to harmony improvisation within the framework of a Markov decision system. Group theory provides the mathematical background of the transformational approach. While chord progressions are the acceptable basis for harmony composition using Markov models, the transformational approach is interval-based. The capabilities and limitations of the transformational approach are demonstrated and discussed, then enhanced using a UTT-based approach. A decision system optimizes the balance between compatibility, represented by average harmony, and variety, represented by entropy. Musical examples are presented, including sequence matching that demonstrates consistency and sensitivity to the decision parameters.

Key takeaways
sparkles

AI

  1. The paper presents a Markov decision system for interval-based harmony improvisation.
  2. Transformational music theory, particularly UTT, expands improvisational capabilities significantly.
  3. The system balances compatibility and variety through average harmony and entropy measures.
  4. A key finding shows UTT improves reconstruction accuracy compared to traditional methods.
  5. The proposed method can be extended beyond triads to include melody and rhythm.

References (12)

  1. C. Ames. "The Markov Process as a Compositional Model: A survey and tutorial." Leonardo, vol. 22, no. 2, 1989, pp. 175-187.
  2. G. Assayag and S. Dubnov. "Using Factor Oracles for Machine Improvisation." Soft Computing, vol. 8, no. 2, 2004, pp. 604-610.
  3. I. Bica, Z. Zhai, R. Hu and M. H. Melnyk. "Sound Signature Detection by Probability Density Function of Normalized Amplitudes", Bridges Conference Proceedings, Linz, Austria, Aug. 16-20, 2019, pp. 287-294.
  4. G. Bernardes. "Conchord: An Application for Generating Musical Harmony by Navigating in a Perceptually Motivated Tonal Interval Space." Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Computer Music Modeling and Retrieval (CMMR), Plymouth, UK, June 16-19, 2015, pp. 243-260.
  5. C. H. Chuan and E. Chew. "Generating and Evaluating Musical Harmonizations that Emulate Style." Computer Music Journal, vol. 35, no. 4, 2011, pp. 64-82.
  6. S. Cunningham, V. Grout and H. Bergen. "Mozart to Metallica: A Comparison of Musical Sequences and Similarities." Conference on Computer Applications in Industry and Engineering (CAINE), 2005.
  7. D.J. Fernández and F. Vico. "AI Methods in Algorithmic Composition: A comprehensive survey." Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 48, 2013, 513-582.
  8. Y. Garcia, E. Fisher and J. Mendez. "Positioning for a Guitar Playing Robot Using a Single Image." ICR2016, Herzliya, Israel, 2016.
  9. J. Hook. "Uniform Triadic Transformations." Journal of Music Theory, vol. 46, no. 1/2, 2002, pp. 57-126.
  10. D. Lewin. Generalized Musical Intervals and Transformations. Yale University Press, 1987.
  11. M. Mongeau and D. Sankoff. "Comparison of Musical Sequences." Computers and the Humanities, vol. 24, no. 3, 1990, pp. 161-175.
  12. G. Nierhaus. Algorithmic Composition: paradigms of automated music generation. Springer, 2009.