Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Title
Abstract
Introduction Skilled Performance
Some Physiological Background
References
All Topics
Psychology

Learning and Practicing Skilled Performance

Profile image of Francis MechnerFrancis Mechner

2010

Abstract
sparkles

AI

The paper explores the concept of "Skilled Performance" across various disciplines, emphasizing methods to enhance learning and practice in areas such as music, athletics, and language. It argues for the importance of interdisciplinary research from fields such as motor behavior, cognitive psychology, and neuroscience, to improve pedagogical techniques in performance training. By focusing on reducing degrees of freedom (DFs) through coordination structures, the approach aims to facilitate more fluid and effective performance as learners enhance their skills.

Related papers

Conceptions ofGiftedness as Great Performance
rena subotnik

2005

View PDFchevron_right
Effect of Two Learning Conditions on a Dancer's Technical Accuracy and Confidence in a Simulated Performance Setting, The
Avery Lux

2021

In dance classes, mirrors are used to help students see if they are using proper alignment and technique. Mirrors are used in the classroom, but are not used in performances. Performances usually take place on a stage, with stage lighting. The purpose of this study is to see if there is a notable impact on the technical accuracy and confidence of the dancer when learning dance with the mirror versus learning dance without the mirror. For this study, participants learned sequences with and without the mirror, and executed the sequences in a simulated performance setting. A faculty panel assessed the performance of the dancers using a survey. Following their performance, the dancers evaluated themselves using an initial survey, generally rating their performance in each testing condition (with the mirror, and without the mirror). After completing both testing conditions, participants filled out a final survey rating their performance in both rounds, and comparing the two. This study a...

View PDFchevron_right
Gallagher et al 2019 - Minds in Skilled Performance
Jesus Ilundain-Agurruza, Katsunori Miyahara, Daniel D. Hutto, Shaun Gallagher

Annual Review of the Phenomenological Association of Japan, 2019

Tn this paper, we present our collective effort to tackle various dimensions of the challenge of understanding minds in ski lied performance. Jt is hased on the plenary symposi,lm on "Phenomenology of Skilled Performance" which took place in !he 40th Annual Meeting of the Phenomenological Association of Japan. We argue that the concept of embodied mind plays a key role in clarifying the mentality needed for skilled performance: The concept allows for theoretical sensitivity to its special features while avoiding both over-intellectualization and mechanical reduction. Such concept of mind and cognition is vigorously developed in recent embodiedenactive approaches, but is also prefigured in Continental phcnomcnologist, American pragmatist, and East Asian traditions of thinking. We actively seek to engage with and benefit from these different traditions of thought in developing our philosophical investigation.

View PDFchevron_right
Expertise is perceived from both sound and body movement in musical performance
Cathy Craig

Human Movement Science, 2012

View PDFchevron_right
Geeves, A., McIlwain, D., Sutton, J., & Christensen, W. (2013). To think or not to think: The apparent paradox of expert skill in music performance. Educational Philosophy and Theory, DOI:10.1080/00131857.2013.779214
Andrew Geeves, Wayne Christensen, Doris J F Mcilwain

Expert skill in music performance involves an apparent paradox. On stage, expert musicians are required accurately to retrieve information that has been encoded over hours of practice. Yet they must also remain open to the demands of the ever-changing situational contingencies with which they are faced during performance. To further explore this apparent paradox and the way in which it is negotiated by expert musicians, this article profiles theories presented by Roger Chaffin, Hubert Dreyfus and Tony and Helga Noice. For Chaffin, expert skill in music performance relies solely upon overarching mental representations, while, for Dreyfus, such representations are needed only by novices, while experts rely on a more embodied form of coping. Between Chaffin and Dreyfus sit the Noices, who argue that both overarching cognitive structures and embodied processes underlie expert skill. We then present the Applying Intelligence to the Reflexes (AIR) approach--a differently nuanced model of expert skill aligned with the integrative spirit of the Noices' research. The AIR approach suggests that musicians negotiate the apparent paradox of expert skill via a mindedness that allows flexibility of attention during music performance. We offer data from recent doctoral research conducted by the first author of this article to demonstrate at a practical level the usefulness of the AIR approach when attempting to understand the complexities of expert skill in music performance.

View PDFchevron_right
Training thought and action for virtuoso performance
Tania Lisboa

Musicae Scientiae, 2018

The skills needed to play fast, challenging music with passion and conviction are much the same as the skills needed to play reliably from memory. We illustrate the relationship between virtuosic performance and memorization by describing how an experienced cellist (the first author) prepared the Prelude from J. S. Bach’s Suite No. 6 (BWV 1012) for solo cello for public performance in more than 30 hours of practice, and then taught a student pianist to memorize by showing her how to practice in a similar fashion. The cellist’s practice was guided by her artistic image of how the piece should sound, which directed her attention during practice to important musical transitions. These transitions were the location of performance cues (PCs), thoughts about musical intentions and technical choices that the cellist reported attending to during performance. These PCs served as retrieval cues, providing places where the cellist could recover from a memory failure, making it possible for her...

View PDFchevron_right
Perceptions and Predictions of Expertise In Advanced Musical Learners
Tony Whyton

Psychology of …, 2009

View PDFchevron_right
Plateaus, Dips, and Leaps: Where to Look for Inventions and Discoveries During Skilled Performance
John K Lindstedt, Wayne D . Gray

The framework of plateaus, dips, and leaps shines light on periods when individuals may be inventing new methods of skilled performance. We begin with a review of the role performance plateaus have played in (a) experimental psychology, (b) human--computer interaction, and (c) cognitive science. We then reanalyze two classic studies of individual performance to show plateaus and dips which resulted in performance leaps. For a third study, we show how the statistical methods of Changepoint Analysis plus a few simple heuristics may direct our focus to periods of performance change for individuals. For the researcher, dips become the marker of exploration where performance suffers as new methods are invented and tested. Leaps mark the implementation of a successful new method and an incremental jump above the path plotted by smooth and steady log--log performance increments. The methods developed during these dips and leaps are the key to surpassing one's teachers and acquiring extreme expertise.

View PDFchevron_right
Performance psychology: Perception, action, cognition, and emotion, by Markus Raab, Babett Lobinger, Sven Hoffmann, Alexandra Pizzera, and Sylvain Laborde
Markus Raab

Journal of Sport Psychology in Action, 2017

View PDFchevron_right
Science in performance
Simon Parry

2020

This series will offer a space for those people who practise theatre to have a dialogue with those who think and write about it. The series has a flexible format that refocuses the analysis and documentation of performance. It provides, presents and represents material which is written by those who make or create performance history, and offers access to theatre documents, different methodologies and approaches to the art of making theatre. The books in the series are aimed at students, scholars, practitioners and theatre-visiting readers. They encourage reassessments of periods, companies and figures in twentieth-century and twentyfirst-century theatre history, and provoke and take up discussions of cultural strategies and legacies that recognise the heterogeneity of performance studies. also available Directing scenes and senses: The thinking of Regie

View PDFchevron_right

References (227)

  1. responsibility of the student and the teacher. Both need to understand the principles of learning and practicing skilled performance. On the basis of the present analysis, the teacher's or coach's over-arching functions are these:
  2. Shaping the learner's internalized model of the desired performance.
  3. Building and shaping valid coordinative structures.
  4. Teaching all necessary routines, including the covert ones.
  5. Teaching the student to apply the principles of performance learning
  6. Motivating the student by teaching appropriate "results" routines.
  7. Adams, J.A. (1971). A closed-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 3, 111-149.
  8. Arutyunyan, G.H., Gurfinkel, V.S., & Mirsky, M.L. (1969). Investigation of aiming at a target. Biophysics, 13, 536-538.
  9. Ashworth, C.A. (1992). Skill as the fit between performer resources and task demands. In The Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Cognitive Science Meeting (pp. 444-449). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  10. Auer, L. (1921). Piano Playing as I Teach it. New York: Stokes.
  11. Azrin, N.H. & Holz, W.C. (1966). Punishment. In W.K. Honig (Ed.), Operant Behavior: Areas of Research and Application (pp 380- 447). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  12. Baddeley, A. (1995). Working memory. In M.S. Gazzaniga (Ed.). The Cognitive Neurosciences (pp. 755-764). Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
  13. Baltes, P.B. & Kliegl, R. (1992). Further testing of limits of cognitive plasticity: Negative age differences in a mnemonic skill are robust. Developmental Psychology, 28, 121-125.
  14. Beaubaton, D. (1976). Viso-motor control and accuracy of of pointing movements in human subjects. Travail Humain, 39, 19-32.
  15. Belen'kii, V.Y., Gurfinkel, V.S., & Pal'tsev, Y.I. (1967). Elements of control of voluntary movements. Biophysics, 12, 154-161.
  16. Bernshtein, N. (1967). The Co-ordination and Regulation of Movements. Oxford: Permagon Press.
  17. Brenner, J. (1986). Operant reinforcement, feedback, and the efficiency of learned motor control. In M.G.H. Coles, E. Donchin, & S. W. Porges (Eds.) Psychophysiology: Systems, Processes & Applications. New York: The Guilford Press.
  18. Brown, J.S., McDonald, J.L., Brown, T.L., & Carr, T.H. (1988). Adapting to processing demands in discourse production: The case of handwriting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 45-59.
  19. Brown, R. (1973). A First Language: The Early Stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  20. Bryan, W.L. & Harter, N. (1897). Studies in the physiology and psychology of the telegraphic language. Psychological Review, 4, 27- 53.
  21. Bryan, W.L. & Harter, N. (1899). Studies on the telegraphic language. The acquisition of a hierarchy of habits. Psychological Review, 6, 345-375.
  22. Buswell, G.T. (1920). An experimental study of the eye-voice span in reading. Supplementary Education Monograph #17.
  23. Carre, F.A. (1972). Effects of imitative learning and augmented feedback on the initial stages of learning a novel complex motor skill. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Oregon.
  24. Carter, M.C. & Shapiro, D.C. (1984). Control of sequential movements: Evidence for generalized motor programs. Journal of Neurophysiology, 52, 787-796.
  25. Carter, D.E. & Werner, T.J. (1978) Complex learning and information processing by pigeons: A critical analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 29, 565-601.
  26. Catalano, J.F. & Kleiner, B.M. (1984) Distant transfer in coincident timing as a function of variability of practice. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 58, 851-856.
  27. Cautela, J. & Kearney, A. (1986). The Covert Conditioning Handbook. New York: Springer Publishing Co.
  28. Cautela, J. (1971). Covert conditioning. In A. Jacobs & L. Sachs (Eds.), The Psychology of Private Events: Perspectives on Covert Response Systems. New York: Academic Press.
  29. Chase, W.G., & Simon, H.A. (1973). The mind's eye in chess. In W.G. Chase (Ed.), Visual Information Processing (pp. 215-281). New York: Academic Press.
  30. Conrad, B., Benneke, R. & Goodman, M. (1983). Pre-movement silent period in fast movement initiation. Journal of Experimental Brain Research, 51, 310-313.
  31. Cook, D.A. (1972) Message type as a parameter of learning to receive international Morse Code, Columbia University Doctoral Dissertation. Document # 72-28,028 at University Microfilms: Ann Arbor Michigan.
  32. Crick, F. & Mitchison, G. (1983). The function of dreaming in sleep. Nature, 304, 111-114.
  33. Cumming, W.W., Berryman, R., & Cohen, L.R. (1965). Acquisition and transfer of zero delay matching. Psychological Reports, 17, 434-445.
  34. Damasio, A.R. (1989). Neural mechanisms. In A.W. Young & H.D. Ellis (Eds.) Handbook of Research on Face Processing. (pp. 405- 423). Amsterdam: North Holland Press.
  35. Deeke, L., Kornhuber, H.H., Lang, W., Lang, M., & Schreiber, H. (1985). Timing functions of the frontal cortex in sequential and motor learning tasks. Human Neurobiology, 4, 143-154.
  36. De Groot, A.D. (1965). Thought and Choice in Chess. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton and Co.
  37. DeYoe, E.A. & Van Essen, D.C. (1988). Concurrent processing streams in monkey visual cortex. Trends in Neurosciences, 11, 219-226.
  38. Diewert, G.L., & Stelmach, G.E. (1978). Perceptual organization in motor learning. In G.E. Stelmach, (Ed.), Information Processing in Motor Control and Learning (pp. 241-266). New York: Academy Press.
  39. Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organ of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501-517.
  40. Dunham, P. (1976). Distribution of practice as a factor affecting learning and/or performance. Journal of Motor Behavior, 8, 305-307
  41. Epstein, R. (1985). Extinction-induced resurgence preliminary investigations and possible applications. The Psychological Record, 35, 143-153.
  42. Ericsson, K.A. & Charness, N. (1994). Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. American Psychologist, 49, 725-747.
  43. Ericsson, K.A., Krampe, R.T., & Tesch-Romer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363-406.
  44. Evarts, E.V. & Tanji, J. (1974). Gating of motor cortex reflexes by prior instructions. Brain Research, 71, 479-494.
  45. Ewert, P.H. (1933). Eye movements during reading and recall. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 8, 65-84.
  46. Fairbanks, G. (1955). Selective vocal effects of delayed auditory feedback. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 20, 333-346.
  47. Feldman, A.G. (1966). Functional tuning of the nervous system during control of movement or maintenance of a steady posture-III: Mechanographic analysis of the execution by man of the simplest motor tasks. Biophysics, 11, 766-775.
  48. Feldman, A.G. (1986). Once more on the equilibrium-point hypothesis (Lamda model) for motor control. Journal of Motor Behavior, 18, 17-54.
  49. Felleman, D.J. & Van Essen, D.C. (1991). Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 1, 1-47.
  50. Fentress, J.C. (1973). Development of grooming in mice with amputated forelimbs. Science, 179, 704-705.
  51. Fischer, B., Margulies, S., & Mosenfelder, D. (1966). Bobby Fischer Teaches Chess. New York: Xerox Learning Systems.
  52. Fitch, H.L., Tuller, B., & Turvey, M.T. (1982). The Bernstein perspective: III. Tuning of coordinative structures with special reference to perception. In J.A.S. Kelso (Ed.), Human Motor Behavior: An Introduction (pp. 271-281). Hillsdale, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  53. Forrsberg, Grillner, S., & Rossignol (1975). Phase dependent reflex reversal during walking in the chronic spinal cats. Brain Research, 85, 103-107.
  54. Friedman, A., Polson, M.C., & Dafoe, C.G. (1988). Dividing attention between the hands and the head: Performance trade-offs between rapid finger tapping and verbal memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 60-68.
  55. Gallistel, C.R. (1980). The Organization of Action: A New Synthesis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  56. Gat, J. (1954). The Technique of Piano Playing. Fifth Edition, 1980. London: Collet's (Publishers) Limited.
  57. Gentner, D.R., Grudin, J., & Conway, E. (1980). Finger Movements in Transcription Typing. (Technical report No. 8001). La Jolla, CA. University of California, San Diego, Center for Human Information Processing.
  58. Georgopoulos, A. P. & Massey, J.T. (1987). Cognitive spatial-motor processes: 1. The making of movements at various angles from a stimulus direction. Experimental Brain Research, 65, 361-370.
  59. Georgopoulos, A.P. (1990). Neurophysiology of reaching. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and Performance XIII: Motor Represen- tation and Control (pp. 227-263). Hillsdale, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum, Assoc.
  60. Gerig, R.R. (1974). Famous Pianists and Their Technique. New York: Robert Luce, Inc.
  61. Gieseking, W. & Leimer, K. (1972). Piano Technique. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.
  62. Glencross, D.J. (1973). Temporal organization in a repetitive speed skill. Ergonomics, 16, 765-776.
  63. Glencross, D.J. (1977). Control of skilled movement. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 14-29.
  64. Glenn, S.S. (1977). Imaginal response events in systematic desensitization. ???
  65. Glenn, S.S., Ellis, J., & Greenspoon, J. (1992). On the revolutionary nature of the operant as a unit of behavioral selection. American Psychologist, 47, 1329-1336.
  66. Goldiamond, I. (1962). The maintenance of ongoing fluent verbal behavior and stuttering. Mathetics, 1, 57-95.
  67. Graham, C.H. (1951). Sensation and Perception. In S.S. Stevens (Ed.), Handbook of Experimental Psychology (pp. 868-920). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  68. Graw, H.M.A. (1968). The most efficient usage of a fixed work plus rest practice period in motor learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
  69. Grillner, S. (1981). Control of locomotion in bipeds, tetrapods, and fish. In V. Brooks (Ed.), Handbook of Physiology: Section 1: The Nervous System. Volume II: Motor Control, Part 2 (pp. 1179-1236). Baltimore: American Physiological Society.
  70. Gross, C.G., Rocha-Miranda, C.E., & Bender, D.B. (1972). Visual properties of neurons in the inferotemporal cortex of the macaque. Journal of Neurophysiology, 35, 96-111.
  71. Gruson, L.M. (1988). Rehersal skill and musical competence: Does practice make perfect? In J.A. Sloboda (Ed.). Generative Processes in Music: The Psychology of Performance, Improvisation, and Composition (pp. 91-112). Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
  72. Guthrie, E.R. (1959). Association by contiguity. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A Study of a Science (Vol. 2, pp. 158-195). McGraw- Hill Book Company.
  73. Hackenberg, T.D. & Hineline, P. (1989). Discrimination, symbolic behavior and the origins of awareness. Currents in Psychology, supplement.
  74. Hayes, S.C. & Hayes, L.J. (1989). The verbal action of the listener as a basis for rule governance. In S.C. Hayes (Ed.). Rule-Governed Behavior: Cognition, Contingencies, and Instructional Control. New York: Plenum Press.
  75. Hefferline, R.F. & Keenan, B. (1963). Amplitude-induction gradient of a small-scale (covert) operant. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6, 307-315.
  76. Hefferline, R.F., Keenan, B., & Harford, R.A. (1959) Escape and avoidance conditioning in human subjects without their observation of the response. Science, 130, 3385, 1338-1339.
  77. Hefferline, R.F. & Perrera, T.B. (1963). Proprioceptive discrimination of a covert operant without its observation by the subject. Science, 139, 834-835.
  78. Henry, F.M. & Rogers, D.E. (1960). Increased response latency for complicated movements and a "memory drum" theory of neuromotor reaction. Research Quarterly, 31, 448-458.
  79. Herrnstein, R.J. (1966). Superstition: A corrolary of the principles of operant conditioning. In W.K. Honig (Ed.), Operant Behavior: Areas of Research and Application (pp. 33-51). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  80. Heuer, H. (1985). How does mental practice work? Psychologische Rundschau, 36, 191-200.
  81. Hoffmann, J. (1909/1976). Piano Playing, with Piano Questions Answered. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.
  82. Holland, J.G. (1958). Human vigilance. Science, 128, 61-67.
  83. Homme, L. (1965). Perspectives in psychology: XXIV. Control of coverants, the operants of the mind. The Psychological Record, 15, 501-511.
  84. Hovland, C.I. (1951). Human learning and retention. In S.S. Stevens (Ed.), Handbook of Experimental Psychology (pp. 613-689). New York: Wiley.
  85. Hubel, D.H. & Wiesel, T.N. (1968). Receptive fields and functional architecture of the monkey striate cortex. Journal of Physiology, 195, 215-243
  86. Hull, C.L. (1920). Quantitative aspects of the evolution of concepts; An experimental study. Psychological Monographs, 28, #123.
  87. Intons-Peterson M.J. (1992). Components of auditory imagery. In D. Reisberg (Ed.), Auditory Imagery (pp. 45-71). Hillsdale, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  88. Ivry, R.I. (1986). Force and timing components of the motor program. Journal of Motor Behavior, 18, 449-474.
  89. Ivry, R.I. & Keele, S.W. (1989). Timing functions of the cerebellum. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1, 136-152.
  90. Ivry, R.I., Keele, S.W., & Diener, H. (1988). Dissociation of the lateral and medial cerebellum in movement timing and movement execution. Experimental Brain Research, 73, 167-180.
  91. Jacobson, E. (1932). The electrophysiology of mental activities. American Journal of Psychology, 44, 677-694.
  92. Johnson, W.A. & Dark, V.J. (1986). Selective attention. Annual Review of Psychology, 37, 43-75.
  93. Kantor, J.R. (1924). Principles of Psychology. New York: Knopf.
  94. Keele, S.W. (1982). Learning and control of coordinated motor patterns: The programming perspective. In J.A.S. Kelso (Ed.) Human Motor Behavior: An Introduction (pp. 161-186). Hillsdale, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum, Associates.
  95. Keele, S.W., Cohen, A. & Ivry, R. (1990). Motor programs: Concepts and issues. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and Performance XIII: Motor Representation and Control (pp. 77-110). Hillsdale, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  96. Keele, S.W. & Posner, M.I. (1968). Processing of visual feedback in rapid movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 155- 158.
  97. Keele, S.W. & Summers, J.G. (1976). Structure of motor programs. In G.E. Stelmach (Ed.), Motor Control: Issues and Trends (pp. 109- 142). New York: Academic Press.
  98. Keller, F.S. (1958). The phantom plateau. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1, 1-13.
  99. Keller, F.S. & Schoenfeld, W.N. (1948). Studies in international Morse code, III: The efficiency of the code as related to errors made during learning. Journal of Applied Psychology, 28, 254-266.
  100. Keller, F.S. & Schoenfeld, W.N. (1950). Principles of Psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  101. Kelso, J.A.S. (1977). Motor control mechanisms underlying human movement reproduction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 529-543.
  102. Kelso, J.A.S. (1982). Human Motor Behavior: An Introduction. Hillsdale, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  103. Kentner, L. (1976). Yehudi Menuhin Music Guides: Piano. New York: Schirmer Books.
  104. Klapp, S.T. (1975). Feedback versus motor programming in the control of aimed movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 104, 147-153.
  105. Klapp, S.T., Anderson, W.G., & Berrian, R.W. (1973). Implicit speech in reading, reconsidered. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 100, 368-374.
  106. Klapp, S.T. & Erwin, C.I. (1976). Relation between programming time and duration of the response being programmed. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 591-598.
  107. Kliegl, R., Smith, J., & Baltes, P.B. (1989). Testing-the-limits and the study of adult age differences in cognitive plasticity of a mnemonic skill. Developmental Psychology, 25, 247-256.
  108. Kliegl, R., Smith, J., & Baltes, P.B. (1990). On the locus and process of magnification of age differences during mnemonic training. Developmental Psychology, 26, 894-904.
  109. Kochevitsky, G. (1967). The Art of Piano Playing: A Scientific Approach. Princeton, NJ: Summy-Birchard Music.
  110. Kohl, R.M. & Roenker, D.L. (1983). Mechanism involvement during skill imagery. Journal of Motor Behavior, 15, 179-190.
  111. Konishi, M. (1965). The role of auditory feedback in the control of vocalization in the white-crowned sparrow. Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie, 22, 770-783.
  112. Konorski, J. (1967). Integrative Activity of the Brain. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  113. Kosslyn, S.M. (1980). Image and Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  114. Kosslyn, S.M. (1994). Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
  115. Kristeva, R. (1984). Bereitschaftspotential of pianists. Sixth International Conference on Event-Related Slow Potentials of the Brain (EPIC VI): Motor Control. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 425, 477-482.
  116. Landa, L. (196?). Algorithmic Learning.
  117. Landa, L. (1974).
  118. Langer, E. J. (1989). Mindfulness. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
  119. Lashley, K.S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In L.A. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior (pp. 112-136). New York: Wiley.
  120. Lawrence, D.H. (1963). The nature of a stimulus: Some relationships between learning and perception. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A Study of a Science (Vol. 5. pp. 179-212). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  121. Lee, D.N. (1978). On the functions of vision. In H. Pick & E. Saltzman (Eds.), Modes of Perceiving (pp. ???-???). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  122. Lecas, J.C., Requin, J., Anger, C., & Vitton, N. (1986). Changes in neuronal activity of the monkey precentral cortex during preparation for movement. Journal of Neurophysiology, 56, 1680-1702.
  123. Leonard, C.M., Rolls, E.T., Wilson, F.A.W., & Buylis, G.C. (1985). Neurons in the amygdala of the monkey with responses selective for faces. Behaviour and Brain Research, 15, 159-176.
  124. Lhevinne, J. (1924/1972). Basic Principles of Pianoforte Playing. New York: Dover Publications.
  125. Livingstone, M. & Hubel, D.H. (1988). Segregation of form, color, movement and depth: Anatomy, physiology and perception. Science, 240, 740-749.
  126. MacKay, D.G. (1982). The problems of flexibility, fluency, and speed-accuracy trade-off in skilled behavior. Psychological Review, 89, 483-506.
  127. Marteniuk, R.G. (1986). Information processes in movement learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 18, 55-75.
  128. Masserman, J.H. (1946). Principles of Dynamic Psychiatry. Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders Matthay, T. (1911). Some Commentaries on the Teaching of Pianoforte Technique. CITY: Bosworth & Co. Ltd. Matthay (1932).
  129. Max, L.W. (1937). An experimental study of the motor theory of consciousness: IV. Action current responses in the deaf during awakening, kinesthetic imagery, and abstract thinking. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 24, 301-344.
  130. McCracken, H.D. & Stelmach, G.E. (1977). A test of the schema theory of discrete motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 9, 197- 202.
  131. McCutchen, D., & Perfetti, C.A. (1982). The visual tongue-twister effect: Phonological activation in silent reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Learning, 21, 672-687.
  132. Mechner, F. (1963). Science education and behavioral technology. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Teaching Machines and Programmed Learning II (pp. 441-508). Washington, D.C.: National Education Association.
  133. Mechner, F. (1967). Behavioral analysis and instructional sequencing. In P.C. Lange (Ed.), Programmed Instruction: The Sixty-Sixth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 81-103). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  134. Mechner, F. (1968). An overview of behavioral analysis. Unpublished manuscript available from New York: Behavioral Science Applications.
  135. Mechner, F. (1981). A Self-Instructional Course in Behavioral Analysis of Inter-Personal Interaction Skills (Coaching, Counseling, and Leadership) and Equipment Maintenance Skills. Arlington, VA.: U.S. Army Research Institute; and New York: Behavioral Science Applications, Inc.
  136. Mechner, F. (1992). The revealed operant: A way to study the characteristics of individual occurrences of operant responses. In S. Glenn (Ed.) A Behavior Monograph. Cambridge, MA.: Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies.
  137. Mechner, F., Hyten, C., Field, D., & Madden, G. (1992). Using revealed operants to study the structure and properties of individual occurrences of operant responses. (Paper to be published).
  138. Meyer, D.E., Smith, J.E.K., Kornblum, S., Abrams, R.A., & Wright, C.E. (1990). Speed-accuracy tradeoffs in aimed movements: Toward a theory of rapid voluntary action. In M.Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and Performance XIII: Motor Representation and Control (pp. 173-226). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  139. Michon, J.A. (1974). Paper presented at the Human Performance Center, University of Michigan.
  140. Miklaszewski, K. (1989). A case study of a pianist preparing a musical performance. Psychology of Music, 17, 95-109.
  141. Millenson, J.R. (1967). Principles of Behavioral Analysis. New York: MacMillan Company.
  142. Mortimer, J.A., Eisenberg, P., & Palmer, S.S. (1987). Pre-movement silence in agonist muscles preceding maximum efforts. Journal of Experimental Neurology, 98, 542-554.
  143. Mowrer, O.H. (1940). An experimental analogue of "regression" with incidental observations on reaction-formation. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 35, 56-87.
  144. Naatanen, R. (1985). Selective attention and stimulus processing: Reflections in event-related potentials, magnetoencephalogram, and regional cerebral blood flow. In M.I. Posner & O.S.M. Marin (Eds.) Attention and Performance XI (pp.355-373). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  145. Newell, K.M. (1974). Knowledge of results and motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 6, 235-244.
  146. Nihei, Y. (1984). Limit of duration for a generalized motor program for handwriting. Tohoku Psychologica Folia, 43, 127-133.
  147. Normand, M.C., LaGasse, P.P., & Rouillard, C.A. (1982). Modifications occurring in motor programs during learning of a complex task in man. Brain Research, 241, 87-93.
  148. Nottebohm, F. (1970). The ontogeny of bird songs. Science, 176, 950-956.
  149. Ortmann, O. (1929/1962). The Physiological Mechanics of Piano Technique. An Experimental Study of the Nature of Muscular Action as Used in Piano Playing, and of the Effects Thereof Upon the Piano Key and the Piano Tone. New York: E.P. Dutton & Co.
  150. Paillard, J. (1982). Apraxia and the neurophysiology of motor control. Philosphical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 298, 111-134.
  151. Penfield, W. & Perot, P. (1963). The brain's record of auditory and visual experience: A final summary and discussion. Brain, 86, 595- 697.
  152. Penfield, W. & Roberts, L. (1959). Speech and Brain Mechanisms. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  153. Perls, F., Hefferline, R., & Goodman (1951). Gestalt Therapy. New York: Julian Press.
  154. Pierrel, R., & Sherman, J.G. (1963). Train your pet the Barnabus way. Brown Alumni Monthly, February, pp. 8-14.
  155. Polit, A., & Bizzi, E. (1978). Processes controlling arm movements in monkeys. Science, 201, 1235-1237.
  156. Pronko, N.H. (1969). On learning to play the violin at age four without tears. Psychology Today, 2, 52.
  157. Quinn, J.T. & Sherwood, D.E. (1983). Time requirements of changes in program and parameter variables in rapid ongoing movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 15, 163-178.
  158. Raibert, M.H. (1977). Motor control and learning by the state space model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation: Massechusetts Institute of Technology.
  159. Reisberg, D. (Ed.) (1992). Auditory Imagery. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  160. Roll, J.P., Gilhodes, J.C., Roll, R., & Velay, J.L. (1990) Contribution of skeletal and extraocular proprioception to kinaesthetic representation. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and Performance XIII: Motor Representation and Control (pp. 549-566). Hillsdale, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum, Assoc.
  161. Rosenbaum, D.A. (1980). Human movement initiation: Specification of arm direction and extent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 444-474.
  162. Ross, S.L. (1985), The effectiveness of mental practice in improving the performance of college trombonists. Journal of Research in Music Education, 33, 221-230.
  163. Ryan, E.D., Blakeslee, T., & Furst, D.M. (1986). Mental practice and motor skill learning: An indirect test of the neuromuscular feedback hypothesis. International Journal of Sports Psychology, 17, 60-70.
  164. Ryan, E., & Simons, J. (1983). What is learned in mental practice of motor skills: A test of the cognitive-motor hypothesis. Journal of Sports Psychology, 5, 419-426.
  165. Sandor, G. (1981). On Piano Playing: Motion, Sound, and Expression. New York: Schirmer Books.
  166. Schick, R.D. (1982). The Vangerova System of Piano Playing. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania University Press.
  167. Schmidt, R.A. (1982). More on motor programs. In J.A.S. Kelso(Ed.), Human Motor Behavior: An Introduction (pp. 189-217). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  168. Schmidt, R.A. (1988). Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis. Champaign, IL.: Human Kinetics Publishers.
  169. Schmidt, R.A. & McGown, C.M. (1980). Terminal accuracy of unexpectedly loaded rapid movements: Evidence for a mass-spring mechanism in programming. Journal of Motor Behavior, 12, 149-161.
  170. Schneider, W. (1985). Toward a model of attention and the development of automatic processing. In M.I. Posner & O.S.M. Marin (Eds.) Attention and Performance XI (pp.475-492). Hillsdale, NJ.:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  171. Schoenfeld, W.N. & Cumming, W.W. (1963). Behavior and perception. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A Study of a Science (Vol. 5. pp. 213-252) New York: McGraw-Hill.
  172. Schultz, A. (1936). The Riddle of the Pianist's Fingers. New York: Carl Fischer, Inc. Seashore, C.E. (1938/1967). Psychology of Music. New York: Dover.
  173. Semjen, A. & Gottsdanker, R. (1990). Rapid serial movements: Relation between the planning of sequential structure and effector selection. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and Performance XIII: Motor Representation and Control (pp. 409-427). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  174. Shaffer, L.H. (1981). Performances of Chopin, Bach, and Bartok: Studies in motor programming. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 326-376.
  175. Shapiro, D.C. (1977). A preliminary attempt to determine the duration of a motor program. In D.M. Landers & R.W. Christina (Eds.) Psychology of Motor Behavior and Sport III (pp. 17-24). Champaign, IL. Human Kinetics Publishers.
  176. Shapiro, D.C., & Schmidt, R.A. (1982). The schema theory: Recent evidence and developmental implications. In J.A.S. Kelso & J. Clark (Eds.), The Development of Movement Control and Coordination. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  177. Shaw, W.A. (1940). The relation of muscular action potentials to imaginal weight lifting. Archives of Psychology, 50, 247.
  178. Shiffrin, R.M. (1988). Attention. In R.C. Atkinson, R.J. Herrnstein, G. Lindzey, & R.D. Luce (Eds.) Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology, Second Edition, Volume 2: Learning and Cognition (pp. 739-812) New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  179. Shik, M.L. & Orlovskii, G.N. (1976). Neurophysiology of locomotor automatism. Physiological Reviews, 56, 465-501.
  180. Sidman, M. (1986). Functional analysis of emergent verbal classes. In T. Thompson & M.D. Zeiler(Eds.), Analysis and Integration of Behavioral Units (pp. 213-245). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  181. Sidman, M. (1988). Equivalence relations: Where do they come from? (EMEAB2, Liege, 1988). In E. Blackman & H. Lejeune (Eds.), Behavior Analysis in Theory and Practice: Contributions and Controversies. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  182. Sidman, M. (1989). Equivalence relations: Some basic considerations. (VB Institute, Aguas de Lindoia). In S.C. Hayes & L.J. Hayes (Eds.), Proceedings of Verbal Behavior Institute. Publisher to be named.
  183. Silman, J. (1991).
  184. Simon, H.A. & Chase, W.G. (1973). Skill in Chess. American Scientist, 61, 394-403.
  185. Skinner, B.F. (1938). The Behavior of Organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  186. Skinner, B.F. (1948). "Superstition" in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 168-172.
  187. Skinner, B.F. (1953). Science and Human Behavior, New York: MacMillan.
  188. Skinner, B.F. (1957). Verbal Behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  189. Slenczynska, R. (1961). Music at Your Fingertips, New York. Da Capo Press.
  190. Slenczynska, R. (1968).
  191. Smith, J.D., Reisberg, D., & Wilson, M. (1992). Subvocalization and auditory imagery: Interactions between the inner ear and inner voice. In D. Reisberg (Ed.), Auditory Imagery (pp. 95-119). Hillsdale, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  192. Smoke, K.L. (1932). An objective study of concept formation. Psychological Monographs, 42, 46-.
  193. Spijkers, W.A. & Sanders, A.F. (1984). Spatial accuracy and programming of movement velocity. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 22, 531-534.
  194. Squire, L.R. & Knowlton, B.J. (1995). Memory, hippocampus, and brain systems. In M.S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences (pp. 825-838). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
  195. Stelmach, G.E. (1969). Efficiency of motor learning as a function of intertrial rest. Research Quarterly, 40, 200.
  196. Stelmach, G.E., Mullins, P.A., & Teulings, H.L. (1984). Motor programming and temporal patterns in handwriting. New York Academy of Sciences conference on timing and time perception: Timing of motor programs and temporal patterns. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 423, 144-157.
  197. Sternberg, S., Monsell, S., Knoll, R.L., & Wright, C.E. (1978). The latency and duration of rapid motor sequences: Comparisons of speech and typewriting. In G.E. Stelmach (Ed.), Information Processing in Motor Control and Learning. New York: Academy Press.
  198. Summers, J.J. (1975). The role of timing in motor program representation. Journal of Motor Behavior, 7, 229-241.
  199. Summers, J.J., Sargent, G.I., & Hawkins, S.R. (1984). Rhythm and the timing of movement sequences. Psychological Research, 46, 107-119.
  200. Suzuki, S. (1981). Discovery of the law of ability and the principle of ability development: Proof that talent is not inborn. In E. Hermann (Ed.), Shinichi Suzuki: The Man and His Philosophy (pp. 223-246). Athens, OH: Ability Development Associates.
  201. Tanji, J. & Kurata, K. (1983). Functional organization of the supplementary motor area. In J.E. Desmedt (Ed.), Motor Control Mechanisms in Health and Disease, (pp. 421-431). New York: Raven.
  202. Thomson, J.A. (1983). Is continuous visual monitoring necessary in visually guided locomotion? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 427-443.
  203. Treisman, A & Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95, 15- 48.
  204. Trowbridge, M.H. & Cason, H. (1932). An experimental study of Thorndike's theory of learning. Journal of General Psychology, 7, 245-288.
  205. Tuller, B.,Fitch, H.L., & Turvey, M.T. (1982). The Bernstein perspective: II. The concept of muscle linkage or coordinative structure. In J.A.S. Kelso (Ed.), Human Motor Behavior: An Introduction (pp. 253-270). Hillsdale, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1982.
  206. Turvey, M.T. (1990). Coordination. American Psychologist. 45, 938-955.
  207. Turvey, B., Fitch, H.L., & Tuller, B. (1982). The Bernstein perspective: I. Problems of degrees of freedom and context-conditioned variability. In J.A.S. Kelso (Ed.), Human Motor Behavior: An Introduction (pp. 239-252). Hillsdale, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  208. Turvey, M.T., Schmidt, R.C., Rosenblum, L.D., & Kugler, P.N. (1988). On the time allometry of coordinated movements. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 130, 285-325.
  209. Van Galen, G.P., & Teulings, H.L. (1983). The independent monitoring of form and scale factors in handwriting. Acta Psychologica, 54, 9-22.
  210. Verhave, T. (1966). An introduction to the experimental analysis of behavior. In T. Verhave (Ed.), The Experimental Analysis of Behavior (pp. 1-47). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  211. Von Hofsten, C. (1990). A perception-action perspective on the development of manual movements. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and Performance XIII: Motor Representation and Control (pp. 739-762). Hillsdale, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  212. Watt, R. (1988) Visual Processing: Computational, Psychophysical, and Cognition Research. Hillsdale, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Welford, A.T. (1968). Fundamentals of Skill. London: Methuen.
  213. Whiteside, A. (1955).
  214. Whiteside, A. (1961). Indispensables of Piano Playing. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
  215. Wiesendanger, M. (1990). The motor cortical areas and the problem of hierarchies. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and Performance XIII: Motor Representation and Control (pp. 59-75). Hillsdale, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  216. Williams, B.A. (1988). Reinforcement, choice, and response strength. In R.C. Atkinson, R.J. Herrnstein, G. Lindzey, & R.D. Luce (Eds.), Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology, Second Edition, Volume 2: Learning and Cognition (pp. 167-244). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  217. Wilson, D.M. (1961). The central nervous control of flight in a locust. Journal of Experimental Biology, 38, 471-490.
  218. Witkin, A.P. & Tenenbaum, J.M. (1983). On the role of structure in vision. In J. Beck, B. Hope, & A. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Human and Machine Vision (pp. 481-543). New York: Academy Press.
  219. Wolpe, J. (1978). Cognition and causation in human behavior and its therapy. American Psychologist, 33, 437-446.
  220. Woodworth, R.S. & Schlosberg, H. (1955). Experimental Psychology. New York: Henry Holt & Co.
  221. Wright, A.A. & Cumming, W.W. (1971). Color-naming functions for the pigeon. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 15, 7-17.
  222. Wright, C.E. (1990). Generalized motor programs: Reexamining claims of effector independence in writing. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and Performance XIII: Motor Representation and Control (pp. 294-320) Hillsdale, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  223. Wrisberg, C.A., & Schmidt, R.A. (1975). A note on motor learning without post-response knowledge of results. Journal of Motor Behavior, 7, 221-226.
  224. Wulf, G. & Schmidt, R.A. (1988). Variability in practice: Facilitation in retention. Journal of Motor Behavior, 20, 133-149.
  225. Young, D.E. & Schmidt, R.A. (1990). Units of motor behavior: Modifications with practice and feedback. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and Performance XIII: Motor Representation and Control (pp. 763-795) Hillsdale, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  226. Zelaznik, H.N., Hawkins, B., & Kisselburgh, L. (1983). Rapid visual feedback processing in single-aiming movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 15, 217-236.
  227. Zentall, T.R., Jackson-Smith, P., & Jagielo, J.A. (1990). Categorical color and shape coding by pigeons. In M.L. Commons, R.J. Herrnstein, S.M. Kosslyn, & D.B. Mumford (Eds.), Quantitative Analyses of Behavior, XIII (pp. 23-49). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Related papers

7 – Expert Performance, Phenomenology, and Skillful Fluency.pdf
Jesus Ilundain-Agurruza

Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, 2014

The article lays out the positive case to complement and fill in the space opened by the previous article's critique. The first section develops a phenomenology of skillful movement. Reframing the bodymind theme, it abandons ontology for description, and examines and describes the invariant structure of the skillful experience in terms of proprioceptive and kinesthetic dynamics central to active pursuits. These dynamics act as experiential doors toward superb performance. The second section presents the idea of “exemplar execution” under the rubric of skillful fluency, specifically discussing its normative facets, specifically, aesthetic and moral, which conflate under the Greek concept of kalon—the noble and beautiful deed. Normative valuations arise from our kinetic possibilities, the kind of movements we can do, which the rules of sports, especially, and other practices exploit. Further, the limits and applications of said fluency are analyzed, and it is argued that the experience of masterly performers is qualitatively different from that of non-experts on account of better perceptual discrimination and enhanced kinesthetic and proprioceptive dynamics.

View PDFchevron_right
Performance Psychology in the Performing Arts
Sanna Nordin-Bates

Oxford Handbooks Online, 2012

In this chapter, a wide range of performance psychology-related topics are considered in relation to the performing arts. Existing research with musicians, dancers and, to a smaller extent, actors is reviewed and contrasted with sport research within a tripartite structure. In the first section, Exploring Convergence, topics with largely similar research results to sport are considered. These include expertise, talent, and deliberate practice; motivation; flow; perfectionism; disordered eating; and injury and pain. In the second section, Exploring Divergence, topics that have been tackled differently in the performing arts and sports are considered. These include psychological skills; personality; anxiety, stress, and coping; and self-confidence and self-esteem. In a third and final section, Exploring Novelty, topics that appear promising for an emerging psychology of performing arts, yet which have less precedent in sport research, are outlined. These comprise creativity and inspiration; memorization; emotional expression; and audience research. of dance, music, and theater. In the last decade, a few papers (e.g., Hays, 2002), a couple of book chapters , and one book have been written on the topic of applying sport psychology to performing arts. As will become apparent, my conclusion is that, in some areas, sport psychology approaches dovetail well with the psychology of performing arts; in other areas, much work remains to be done; and in some key areas, the issues that arise are diff erent, perhaps unique to each fi eld.

View PDFchevron_right
The role of attention and movement variability in the production of skilled performance
Gershon Tenenbaum

Land, W., & Tenenbaum, G. (2009). The role of attention and movement variability in the production of skilled performance. In D. Araujo, H. Ripoll, & M. Raab (Eds.), Perspectives on cognition and action in sport (pp. 207-221). Nova.

View PDFchevron_right
The Psychology of Performance and Its Implications for Deliberate Practice
Andrea Vos-Rochefort

Elite performance often conjures up electricity in the air— intense concentration, coiled muscles, and expectation combine to create a moment of anticipation and pressure. It is easy to imagine the determination in a runner’s eyes as they verify their shoes and settle into the elasticity of the starting position. Time stands still for a minute and the spectators may even hold their collective breath. Common conceptions of elite performance in action such as this image tend to identify with Olympic athletes and professional athletes and focus on the physical aspect of the feat while glossing over the mental preparation endemic to elite performance and the various other disciplines of a less physical nature that are involved. It is less common to recall the concentration of an oboist checking the position of his reed as he refocuses in preparation for a significant solo. For this reason, literature concerning elite musical performance in the lens of sport psychology retains some novelty as the push for application of psychological skills training in artistic milieus is relatively recent. Sport and exercise psychology is considered to be the scientific study of people and their behaviors in sport and exercise contexts and the practical application of that knowledge and is generally used to both understand how psychological factors affect an individual’s physical performance and how participation in sport and exercise affects a person’s psychological development, health, and well-being.1 Sport psychology is considered to fall under the umbrella of performance psychology. While there are significant differences between the performance aspects facing musicians and athletes, sport psychology is a well-developed field and the 1 Robert S. Weinberg, PhD. & Daniel Gould, PhD., Foundations of Sport and Exercise Psychology (Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2015): 4. sophistication of its psychological skills training program suggests many practical applications to serious musicians seeking optimal performance as well as to world-class athletes seeking personal records. It is the task of this paper to seek out comparisons in performance psychology research, address psychological skills training, specify techniques and their applications in music performance, and discuss how the psychology of performance can inform deliberate and efficient practice.

View PDFchevron_right
A theory of the skill-performance relationship
Seppo E. Iso-Ahola

Frontiers in Psychology, 2024

The skill-performance relationship is a cornerstone of a meritocratic society. People are selected for schools, colleges and jobs based on the premise that more skillful individuals perform better. Scientific understanding of the skillperformance relationship demands that the effect of skill on performance is objectively assessed without subjective, social, and political considerations. One of the best areas for this analysis is sports. In many sports settings, the skill-performance relationship can objectively be examined at the technical, behavioral, psychological, and neurological levels. This examination reveals that skill and performance are inextricably intertwined. While skill affects performance, performance in turn defines and affects skill. To disentangle the previously confusing and interchangeable use of these key constructs, the paper presents a theoretical model specifying that ability and effort have their own direct effects on performance, as well as indirect effects on performance through skill possession and skill execution in cognitive and physical domains of human performance. Thus, ability and skill are not the same. Although skill is a key determinant of performance, recent theory and research suggests that successful performers are successful not just because of their skills per se, but because they take advantage of their skills by creating more occurrences of momentum, making them last longer, and using them to bounce back faster from streaks of unsuccessful performance. Thus, momentum is an important mediator of the effects of skill on performance.

View PDFchevron_right

Related topics

  • Psychology
    • 580 California St., Suite 400
    San Francisco, CA, 94104
    © 2025 Academia. All rights reserved