Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Risk assessment of arsenic mitigation options in Bangladesh

2006, Journal of Health Population and Nutrition

https://doi.org/10.3329/JHPN.V24I3.720

Abstract

The provision of alternative water sources is the principal arsenic mitigation strategy in Bangladesh, but can lead to risk substitution. A study of arsenic mitigation options was undertaken to assess water quality and sanitary condition and to estimate the burden of disease associated with each technology in disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). Dugwells and pond-sand filters showed heavy microbial contamination in both dry and monsoon seasons, and the estimated burden of disease was high. Rainwater was of good quality in the monsoon but deteriorated in the dry season. Deep tubewells showed microbial contamination in the monsoon but not in the dry season and was the only technology to approach the World Health Organization's reference level of risk of 10-6 DALYs. A few dugwells and one pondsand filter showed arsenic in excess of 50 µg/L. The findings suggest that deep tubewells and rainwater harvesting provide safer water than dugwells and pond-sand filters and should be the preferred options.

References (27)

  1. Smith AH, Lingas EO, Rahman M. Contamination of drinking-water by arsenic in Bangladesh: a pub- lic health emergency. Bull World Health Organ 2000;78:1093-103.
  2. Kinniburgh DG, Smedley PL editors. Arsenic con- tamination of groundwater in Bangladesh. Key- worth: British Geological Survey, 2001. 4 v. (BGS technical report no. WC/001/19).
  3. National Arsenic Mitigation Information Center. Upazila-wise summary of screening results. Dhaka: National Arsenic Mitigation Information Center, 2004. (www.bamwsp.org, accessed on 10 September 2004).
  4. Arsenic Policy Support Unit. Arsenic and arsenic mitigation in Bangladesh: activities and achieve- ments to date. Dhaka: Arsenic Policy Support Unit, Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development & Co-operatives, Government of Bangladesh, 2005. 7 p. (www.apsu-bd.org, accessed on 10 November 2005).
  5. Howard G. Arsenic, drinking-water and health risks substitution in arsenic mitigation: a discussion pa- per. Geneva: Sustainable Development and Health Environments, World Health Organization, 2003. 15 p. (SDE/WSH/03.06).
  6. World Health Organization. Guidelines for drinking- water quality. V. 1. Recommendations. 3d ed. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2004. 515 p.
  7. Prüss-Üstün A, Kay D, Fewtell L and Bartram J. Unsafe water, sanitation and hygiene. In: Ezzati M, Lopez AD, Rodgers A, Murray CJL, editors. Comparative quantification of health risks: global and regional burden of disease attributable to selec- ted major risk factors, v. 2. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2004:1321-52.
  8. Milton AH, Hasan Z, Shahidullah SM, Sharmin S, Jakariya MD, Rahman M et al. Association bet- ween nutritional status and arsenicosis due to chro- nic arsenic exposure in Bangladesh. Int J Environ Health Res 2004;14:99-108.
  9. Ahmed MF, Shamsuddin SAJ, Mahmud SG, Rashid H, Deere D, Howard G. Risk assessment of arsenic mitigation options (RAAMO). Dhaka. Arsenic Po- licy Support Unit, 2005. 182 p.
  10. Howard G, Bartram J. Effective water supply sur- veillance in urban areas of developing countries. J Water Health 2005;3:31-43.
  11. Havelaar AH, Melse JM. Quantifying public health risk in the WHO guidelines for drinking-water quality. Bilthoven: Rijksinstute voor Volksgezondheit en Milieu, 2003. 49 p.
  12. Watanabe C, Kawata A, Sudo N, Sekiyama M, Inaoka T, Bae M et al. Water intake in an Asian population living in arsenic-contaminated area. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2004;198:272-82.
  13. Gerba CP, Rose JB, Haas CN, Crabtree KD. Water- borne rotavirus: a risk assessment. Wat Res 1996; 30:2929-40.
  14. Holcomb DL, Smith MA, Ware GO, Hung YC, Brackett RE, Doyle MP. Comparison of six dose- response models for use with food-borne patho- gens. Risk Anal 1999;19:1091-1100.
  15. Messner MJ, Chappell CL, Okhuysen PC. Risk assessment for Cryptosporidium: a hierarchical Bayesian analysis of human dose response data. Wat Res 2001;35:3934-40.
  16. Yu W, Harvey CM, Harvey CF. Arsenic in ground- water in Bangladesh: a geostatistical and epidemio- logical framework for evaluating health effects and potential remedies. Wat Res 2003;39:1146-63.
  17. National Research Council. Arsenic in drinking water. Washington, DC: National Academic Press, 1999. 330 p.
  18. National Research Council. Arsenic in drinking water: 2001 update. Washington, DC: National Academic Press, 2001. 244 p.
  19. Abernathy C. Exposure and health effects. In: United Nations synthesis report on arsenic in drinking water. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001. (http//www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/ en/arsenicum3.pdf, accessed on 10 December 2004).
  20. Guha Mazumder DN, Haque R, Ghosh N, De K, Santra A, Chakraborti D et al. Arsenic levels in drinking water and the prevalence of skin lesions in West Bengal, India. Int J Epidem 1998;27:871-7.
  21. Lloyd B, Bartram J. Surveillance solutions to micro- biological problems in water quality control in deve- loping countries. Wat Sci Tech 1991;24:61-75.
  22. Dhaka community health water quality test: com- munity based arsenic mitigation project in Siraj- dikhan upazila. Dhaka: Dhaka Community Hospital, 2003. 6 p.
  23. Asia Arsenic Network. Water quality and follow- up survey on arsenic contamination of dug wells in Sharsha upazila. Dhaka: Asian Arsenic Network, 2004. 8 p.
  24. Asia Arsenic Network. Arsenic contamination of deep tubewells in Sharsha Upazila. Dhaka: Asian Arsenic Network, 2004. 12 p.
  25. Development Association for Self-reliance, Com- munication and Health. Evaluation of dugwell as a safe water alternative option. Dhaka: Develop- ment Association for Self-reliance, Communication and Health, 2004. 49 p.
  26. Hunter PR. Epidemiological and risk assessment evidence of disease linked to HPC bacteria. In: Bartram J, Cotruvo J, Exner M, Fricker C, Glas- macher A, editors. Heterotrophic plate counts and drinking-water safety. London: IWA Publishing, 2003:119-36.
  27. Howard G, Pedley S, Tibatemwa S. Quantitative microbial risk assessments to estimate health risks in water supply: can they be applied in developing countries with limited data? J Water Health 2006; 4:49-65.