Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Title
Abstract
Introduction
Conclusions
Case Discussion
Case Study
Definitions and Overview
Critical Incident Analysis
Assessment Methods
Case Studies, Case Presentations
Discussions and Skill Rehearsal
Clarity of Objectives and Responsibilities
Conclusion
References
All Topics
Sociology
Social Work

Learning and Teaching in Social Work Practice

Profile image of Gary ClaptonGary Clapton

2009, Social Work Education

Abstract

Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. I would like to dedicate this book to the memory of my beautiful daughter Faith. Her experience as a learner on placement was in part an inspiration for writing a book to assist enablers in their tasks. Tragically Faith died after a battle with cancer during the production of the book and never saw it finished.

Related papers

Introduction (pp. 1-10) from "Contemporary Social Work Practice: A Handbook for Students" Teater (Ed.). (2014)
Barbra Teater
View PDFchevron_right
Placement training and learning outcomes in social work education
Joakim Caspersen

Studies in Higher Education

Field placement has traditionally been an important component of professional and vocational education programmes, and there is a growing interest in workplace experience in higher education programmes in general. In this article, we examine the direct and the indirect links between classroom preparation for placement, placement quality and programme coherence, and the development of student learning outcomes (general competence, knowledge and skills). Using a longitudinal survey of social work students, combined with data from national registers, we find that programme coherence has a direct positive impact on all three types of learning outcomes, classroom preparation for placement has a positive direct impact on knowledge and general competence, while placement quality only indirectly relates to student learning outcomes and is mediated by programme coherence. Placement quality is therefore important, but its positive impact on learning outcomes depends on whether it has a spillover effect on students' experience of programme coherence.

View PDFchevron_right
To fail or not to fail: enhancing our understanding of reasons why social work students failed practice placements (2015–2019)
Caroline Shore

Social Work Education

Social Work qualifying programmes teach students the necessary knowledge, skills, and values during a series of taught modules. Formal opportunities to integrate knowledge into practice are provided through practice placements in social work agencies. Each practice placement enables agency and/or academic staff to gate-keep entry into the profession, through assessing student competence against agreed practice learning requirements, readiness to practice, and adherence to professional social work standards. This research study seeks to expand our understanding of the incidence of and reasons why students failed their practice placement whilst studying social work on the island of Ireland. On receipt of ethical approval, Practice Teacher reports and minutes of Practice Assessment Panels were used for data collection. Sixtythree students (19 male, 44 female; mean age 34 years) failed placement 2015-2019, with the majority (58.7%) failing first placement. Reasons for failing were categorised into knowledge, skills, values and personal reasons. The most common reasons for failing were a poor understanding of the professional social work role, poor time management, poor written work, the inability to follow direction, limited application of knowledge to practice, and poor professional conduct. Results suggest most students disclosed mitigating circumstances, which affected engagement and competence.

View PDFchevron_right
Are Non-Traditional Social Work Placements Second-Best Learning Opportunities for Social Work Qualifying Students?
Hugh McLaughlin

British Journal of Social Work, 2014

This article reports on the evaluation of practice learning opportunities for student social workers within 'non-traditional' placements provided by a major children's charity in England, Scotland and Wales between 2010-12. The student social workers undertook a wellbeing role within the project and the research here reports on the charity's ability to provide a 12 week programme through the use of delivery partners. In particular the research highlights the experiences and perspectives of student social workers, project leaders and HEIs to meet the 6 key roles, and demonstrate working with the legal framework, risk awareness and management and assessment skills. The article also considers how the developments in England will impact upon such placements in the future and their implications for the project. Lastly, the article suggests that these placements are not second-best, but different and raises the more fundamental question as to whether it is becoming easier to practise social work in placements such as these as opposed to those in statutory social service placements.

View PDFchevron_right
Strategies for facilitating social work placements in general practice
Ines Zuchowski

AJGP, 2023

View PDFchevron_right
What makes a good placement? Findings of a social work student-to-student research study
Elaine Wilson

Social Work Education, 2018

Social work fieldwork placements are recognised as a key component of social work education. This article analyses the experiences of students who have completed one social 2 work placement and examines what they felt was most effective in aiding their learning. The innovative methodology used for the research enabled first year students to design an on-line survey which they administered to their second year student colleagues. As a result the first year students gained experience in designing and administering a piece of research, but also gained a greater understanding of what previous students have found assisted their learning on placement. This cross-sectional research surveyed accessed the 2014/15 cohort of year 1 and year 2 Masters in Social Work (MSW) students. It was conducted in two phases: in the first phase a year 1 student-staff team surveyed year 2 students who had just completed their placements, and in the second phase staff researchers surveyed both year 1 and year 2 students who had just completed their placements. Students reported how prepared they felt for placement and also who or what facilitated their learning on placement. Students' perception of the volume of learning on placement was strongly correlated with satisfaction. It is argued that being able to clearly identify types of interaction that enhance students' learning, leads to more positive outcomes for all involved in the placement experience.

View PDFchevron_right
Handbook for Practice Learning in Social Work and Social Care Knowledge and Theory (2)
majid chenaparchi
View PDFchevron_right
Contemporary Social Work Practice: A Handbook for Students
Barbra Teater

2014

This exciting new book provides an overview of fifteen different contemporary social work practice settings, spanning across the statutory, voluntary, private and third sectors. It serves as the perfect introduction to the various roles social workers can have and the numerous places they can work, equipping students with the knowledge, skills and values required to work in areas ranging from mental health to fostering and adoption, and from alcohol and drug treatment services to youth offending. Each chapter provides: An overview of the setting, including the role of the social worker, how service users gain access to the service and key issues, definitions or terms specific to the setting Legislation and policy guidance related to the specific setting The key theories and methods related to the setting Best practice approaches and the benefits and challenges of working within the setting Case examples illustrating the application of the information to practice Social work students will find this an invaluable handbook that they will refer to time and again throughout their education and into their assessed and supported year of employment. Contributors: Mark Baldwin, Jo Bell, Jenny Clifford, Jill Chonody, Clare Evans, Benedict Fell, Alinka Gearon, Issy Harvey, Caroline Hickman, Tony Jeffs, Debbie Martin, Malcolm Payne, Justin Rogers, Sue Taplin, Barbra Teater, John Watson, Michele Winter.

View PDFchevron_right
The Use of Photo Elicitation to Explore the Impact of Social Work Student’s Perceptions of Placements on Social Work Tutors and Consider Their Role in Practice Learning
Julie Bailey-McHale

Practice, 2020

The importance of learning in practice is acknowledged across health and social care professions. Social work students' experiences in practice settings has attracted some attention in academic literature, and the role and impact of the Practice Educator (PE) on student learning is increasingly recognised. However, there is a paucity of research examining the role of the social work tutor generally and particularly within practice learning settings. This paper presents a small-scale qualitative study exploring the impact of visual images produced by social work students reflecting their practice experiences on six social work tutors. Photo elicitation prompted discussion in a focus group setting which was subsequently thematically analysed, with four themes emerging. These were dichotomous relationships, difference and diversity, tutor brokerage skills, and student support. The images encouraged tutors to reflect upon the complexity of their relationship with social work students and question whether they were professionally equipped to support students in complex placement situations. In addition, the effectiveness of the curriculum in preparing social work students for practice was considered, particularly space afforded to students to reflect on practice learning in a safe environment. Opportunities to support SW tutors in their role and SW students in practice are deliberated.

View PDFchevron_right
The experience of social work practicum: activities in the field
Rick Csiernik

to learn more about their practicum experiences. Using a questionnaire developed in conjunction with the practicum committee, 361 (86.8%) interns returned information on their areas of practice, the client populations they worked with, their caseloads, and the field supervision they received. The majority of fieldwork activity was direct service oriented with under 13% of time devoted to community development, policy development, and research. As anticipated, fourth-year students had, on average, more long-term and short-term clients and co-facilitated and facilitated more groups. The majority of supervisors were evaluated as exceptional although, surprisingly, nearly one third of third-year supervisors and one quarter of fourth-year supervisors did not provide regular weekly supervision, despite this being a stipulation of the role. The process of examining and monitoring the practicum has led to changes in curriculum and to the support given to both social work interns and field instructors, suggesting that this is a process that would be beneficial to all schools and faculties of social work. Before starting my placement I was extremely apprehensive. However, the experience turned into more than I envisioned. After finishing at the agency I would encourage other students who feel the same way I did to try it. I feel placement is the best way for students to test the water. The staff was extremely welcoming to me as a student and was willing to help me in any way that they could.

View PDFchevron_right

References (200)

  1. Adams, R., Dominelli, L. and Payne, M. (eds) (2002) Critical Practice in Social Work. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  2. Allinson, C. and Hayes, J. (1996) The Cognitive Styles Index, Journal of Management Studies, 33, pp. 119-135.
  3. Apter, M. (2001) Motivational Styles in Everyday life: A Guide to Reversal Theory. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
  4. Argyris, C. and Schön, D. (1978) Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, Mass: Addison Wesley.
  5. Atherton, J. (1999) Resistance to Learning: A Discussion Based on Participants in In-Service Professional Training Programmes, Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 5 (1), pp. 17-93.
  6. Baldwin, M. and Burgess, H. (1992) Enquiry and Action Learning in Practice Placements, Social Work Education, 11 (3), pp. 36-44.
  7. Barnes, S. and Bulman, C. (2001) Reflective Practice in Nursing. Oxford: Blackwell.
  8. Barron, C. (2004) Fair Play: Creating a Better Learning Climate for Social Work Students in Social Care Settings, Social Work Education, 23 (1), pp. 25-37.
  9. Bartram, S. and Gibson, B. (1993) Developing Training Skills. Aldershot: Connaught Training.
  10. Beale, S. (2005) Preparation for Placement Workbook. Manchester: Manchester Metropolitan University.
  11. Belardi, N. (2002) Social Work Supervision in Germany, European Journal of Social Work, 5 (3), pp. 313-318.
  12. Bloom, B.S. (1956) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. London: Longman.
  13. Boud, D., Keogh, R. and Walker, D. (1985) Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning. London: Kogan Paul.
  14. Bradley, H. (2002) Fractured Identities: Changing Patters of Inequality, Gender and Power in the Workplace. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  15. Brockbank, A. and McGill, I. (1998) Facilitating Reflective Learning in Higher Education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  16. Brookfield, S. (1986) Understanding and Facilitating Adult Learning. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
  17. Brown, S. and Knight, P. (1994) Assessing Learners in Higher Education. London: Kogan Page.
  18. Burns, S. and Bullman, C. (eds) (2000) Reflective Practice in Nursing (The Growth of the Professional Practitioner) 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
  19. Cartney, P. (2000) Adult Learning Styles: Implications for Practice Teaching in Social Work, Social Work Education, 19 (6), pp. 609-627.
  20. Castells, M. (2001) Information Technology and Global Capitalism. In Hutton W. and Giddens, A. (eds) On the Edge. Living with Global Capitalism. London: Vintage.
  21. CCETSW (1996) Guidance on the 'Long-arm' Model of Practice Teaching (revised) London : CCETSW.
  22. Channer, Y. (2000) Understanding and Managing Conflict in the Learning Process: Christians Coming Out. In Cree, V. and Macaulay, C. (2000) Transfer of Learning in Professional and Vocational Education. London: Routledge.
  23. Cheetham, J. and Kazi A.F. Mansoor (1998) The Working of Social Work. London: Jessica Kingsley.
  24. Children Act 1989 (c.41). London: HMSO Children Act 2004 (c.31). London: HMSO
  25. Clark, C.L. (2000) Social Work Ethics, Politics, Principles and Practice. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
  26. Clegg, S. (1999) Professional Education, Reflective Practice and Feminism, International Journal of Inclusive Education 1999, 3 (2), pp. 167-179.
  27. Clutterbuck, D. (2004) Everyone Needs a Mentor: Fostering Talent in Your Organisation. Wiltshire: Chartered Institute of Personnel Development, Cromwell Press.
  28. Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E. and Ecclestone, K. (2004) Should We Be Using Learning Styles? What Research has to Say to Practice? London: Learning and Skills Research Centre.
  29. Cousins, C. (2004) Becoming a Social Work Supervisor: A Significant Role in Transition, Australian Social Work, June 2004, 57 (2), pp. 175-195.
  30. Cowburn, M., Nelson, P. and Williams, J. (2000) Assessment of Social Work Students Standpoint and Strong Objectivity, Social Work Education, 19 (6), pp. 627-639.
  31. Cowen, H. (1999) Community Care, Ideology and Social Policy. London: Prentice Hall.
  32. Cree, V. and Macauley, C. (eds) (2000) Transfer of Learning in Professional and Vocational Education. London: Routledge.
  33. Crisp, B.R. and Lister, P.G. (2003) Literature Review on Assessment Methods, Social Work Education Social, 23 (2), pp. 199-217.
  34. Danbury, H. and Sharp, M. (1999) The Management of Failing DipSW Students. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  35. Dempsey, M., Halton, C. and Murphy, M. (2001) Reflective Learning in Social Work Education: Scaffolding the Process, Social Work Education, 20 (6), pp. 631-641. Department of Health (1998) Partnership in Action. London: HMSO. Department of Health (2002) Requirements for Social Work Training. London: HMSO. Department of Health (2003) Every Child Matters. London: HMSO. Department of Health (2005) Personal Social Services Staff of Social Services Department at 30th September 2004 England. Department of Health (http://www.dh.gov.uk/ PublicationsAndStatistics) accessed August 2005.
  36. Department of Health (2005) Independence Well Being and Choice. London: HMSO. Department of Health and the English National Board (2001) Placements in Focus: Guidance for Education in Practice for Health Care Professions. London: HMSO. Department of Health/DfES (2006) Options for Excellence -Building the Social Care Workforce of the Future. London: COI
  37. Devine, F. and Heath, S. (1999) Sociological Research Methods in Context. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  38. Dewey, J. (1933) How We Think. Boston: Heath & Co.
  39. Dick, E., Hendrick, D. and Scott, M. (2002) Practice Learning for Professional Skills: A review of the literature. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive. Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (c.50). London: HMSO.
  40. Doel, M. (2000) Practice Teaching and Learning. In Pierce, R. and Weinstein, J. (2000) Innovative Education and Training for Care Professionals: A Providers Guide. London: Jessica Kingsley.
  41. Doel, M. (2005) New Approaches to Practice Learning. London: Practice Learning Taskforce.
  42. Doel, M. and Shardlow, S. (1998) The New Social Work Practice: Exercises and Activities for Training and Developing Social Workers. Arena: Aldershot.
  43. Doel, M., Sawdon, C. and Morrison, D. (2002) Learning, Practice and Assessment: Signposting the portfolio. London: Jessica Kingsley.
  44. Dominelli, L. (1996) Deprofessionalising social work: anti-oppressive practice, com- petencies and postmodernism, British Journal of Social Work, 26 (2), pp. 153-175.
  45. Dominelli, L. (2004) Social Work. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  46. Donley, J. and Napper, R. (1999) Assessment Matters in Adult Learning. Oxford: Oxfordshire Country Council and National Institute of Adult and Continuing Education.
  47. Drakeford, M. (2006) Governmental Review of Social Work. Presentation to Third Assembly Forum 22nd May. Birmingham: BASW.
  48. Dunn, R. (2003) The Dunn and Dunn Learning Style Model and its Theoretical Cornerstone. In Dunn, R. and Griggs, S. (eds) Synthesis of the Dunn and Dunn Learning Styles Model and Research. New York: St Johns University.
  49. Dunn, R. and Griggs, S. (2003) Synthesis of the Dunn and Dunn Learning Styles Model and Research. New York: St Johns University.
  50. Durkin, C. and Shergill, M. (2000) A Team Approach to Practice Teaching, Social Work Education, 19 (2), pp. 165-174.
  51. Earwaker, J. (1992) Helping and Supporting Students: Rethinking the Issues. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
  52. Edwards, C. (2003) The Involvement of Service Users in the Assessment of Diploma in Social Work Students on Practice Placements, Social Work Education, 22 (4), pp. 341-349.
  53. Entwhistle, N. (1996) Recent Research on Student Learning and the Learning Environment. In Tait, J. and Knight, P. (eds) The Management of Independent Learning. London: Kogan Page.
  54. Entwhistle, N., McClune, V. and Walker, P. (2001) Conceptions, Styles and Approaches Within Higher Education; Analytical Abstraction and Everyday Experience. In Sternberg, R.J. and Zhang, L.F. (eds) Perspectives on Thinking, Learning and Cognitive Styles. London: Lawrence Eribaum.
  55. Eraut, M. (1994) Developing Professional Knowledge and Competence. London: Falmer Press.
  56. Etzioni, A. (ed.) (1969) The Semi-Professions and Their Organisation: Teachers, Nurses, Social Workers. New York: Free Press.
  57. Evans, D. (1999) Practice Learning in the Caring Professions. Aldershot: Ashgate Arena.
  58. Evans, T. and Harris, J. (2004) Street Level Bureaucracy, Social Work and the Exaggerated Death of Discretion, British Journal of Social Work, 34 (6), pp. 871-895.
  59. Fernandez, E. (1998) Students Perceptions of Satisfaction with Practicum Learning, Social Work Education, 17 (2), pp. 173-203.
  60. Fisher, T. and Somerton, J. (2000) Reflection on Action: The Process of Helping Social Work Students to Develop Their Use of Theory in Practice, Social Work Education, 19 (4), pp. 387-401.
  61. Fook, J. (1996) The Reflective Researcher. New South Wales: Allen and Unwin St Leonrads.
  62. Fook, J. (2002) Social Work: Critical Theory and Practice. London: Sage.
  63. Ford, K. and Jones, A. (1987) Student Supervision. Basingstoke: BASW MacMillan.
  64. Freire, P. (1972) Pedagogy of the Oppressed. London: Penguin.
  65. Freire, P. (1973) Education: The Practice of Freedom. London: Writers and Readers Publishing Co-operative.
  66. Freire, P. (1985) The Politics of Education: Culture, Power and Liberation. London: Macmillan.
  67. French, J.P.R. Jr. and Raven, B. (1960) The Bases of Social Power. In Cartwright, D. and Zander, A. (eds) Group dynamics, pp. 607-623. New York: Harper and Row.
  68. Friedson, E. (1994) Professionalism Reborn: Theory, Prophecy and Policy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  69. Frost, N., Robinson, M. and Anning, A. (2005) Social Workers in Multidiscplinary teams: Issues and Dilemmas for Professional Practice, Child and Family Social Work, 10, pp. 187-196.
  70. Gardiner, D. (1989) The Anatomy of Supervision: Developing Learning and Professional Competence for Social Work Students. Bury St Edmonds: The Society for Research Into Higher Education Open University Press.
  71. General Social Care Council (2002) Accreditation of Universities to Grant Degrees in Social Work. London: GSCC. General Social Care Council (2002) Code of Practice. London: GSCC. General Social Care Council (2003) Statement of Commitment. London: GSCC. General Social Care Council (2005) Specialist Standards and Requirements for Post Qualifying Social Work Education and Training: Children and Young People, their Families and Carers. London: GSCC.
  72. General Social Care Council (2005) Revised Post Qualifying Framework for Social Work. London: GSCC.
  73. General Social Care Council and Training Organisation for the Personal Social Services (2002) Guidance on the Assessment of Practice in the Workplace. London: GSCC.
  74. Gibbs, G. (1995) Learning by Doing. London: FEU Publications.
  75. Gibb, S. (2002) Leaning and Development: Processes, Practices and Perspectives at Work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  76. Gillborn, D. (1990) Race, Ethnicity and Education. London: Unwin Hayman.
  77. Glasby, J. (2003) Bringing Down the Berlin Wall: the Health and Social Care Divide, British Journal of Social Work, 33 (7), pp. 969-975.
  78. Gould, N. and Taylor, I. (eds) (1996 ) Reflective Learning for Social Work Research, Theory and Practice. England: Arena.
  79. Gray, D. (2001) A Briefing on Work-based Learning. Assessment Series 11. Learning Teaching Support Network Generic Centre (accessed through www.bioscience. heacademy.ac.uk).
  80. Greenwood, E. (1957) Attributes of a Profession, Social Work, 2 (3), pp. 8-19.
  81. Gregory, M. and Holloway, M. (2005) Language and the Shaping of Social Work, British Journal of Social Work, 35, pp. 37-53.
  82. Gutierrez, L.M. (1990) Working with Women of Color: An Empowerment Perspective, Social Work, 35 (2), pp. 149-153.
  83. Hammond, M. and Collins, R. (1997) Self Directed Learning. London: Kogan Page. Harvey, L. (1990) Critical Social Research. London: Unwin Hyman.
  84. Hawkins, P. and Shohet, R. (2000) Supervision in the Helping Professions. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  85. Henkel, M. (1995) Conceptions of Knowledge and Social Work Education. In Yelloly, M. & Henkel, M. (eds) Learning and Teaching in Social Work. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  86. Hermann, N. (1989) The Creative Brain. North Carolina: Brain Books, The Ned Hermann Group.
  87. Heron, J. (1989) The Facilitator's Handbook. London: Kogan Page.
  88. Higham, P. (2006) The Challenge of Modernisation: How Social Work is Developing a New Professionalism for Social Work. Keynote address National Organisation for Practice Teaching conference 12th Sept. Manchester.
  89. Hinchliff, S. (ed.) (1999) The Practitioner as Teacher. London: Balliere Tindall. HMSO (2002) Working Together: Effective Partnership Working on the Ground. England: Public Services Productivity Panel HM Treasury. Home Office (2002) Improving Partnerships. England: HMSO.
  90. Honey, P. and Mumford, A. (1996) Building a Learning Environment. Maidenhead: Peter Honey Publications Ltd.
  91. Howe, D. (1994) Modernity, Post modernity and Social Work, British Journal of Social Work, 24 (5), pp. 513-532.
  92. Hudson, B., Hardy, B., Henwood, M. and Wistow G. (1997) Interagency Collaboration: Final Report. Leeds: Nuffield Institute for Health.
  93. Hughes, E.C. (1984) The Sociological Eye. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
  94. Hugman, R. (2005) Looking Back: The View from Here, British Journal of Social Work, 35, pp. 609-620.
  95. Hunt, C. (2001) Shifting Shadows: Metaphors and Maps for Facilitating Reflective Practice, Reflective Practice, 2 (3), pp. 275-287.
  96. Ixer, G. (1999) There's No Such Thing as Reflection, British Journal of Social Work, 29, pp. 513-527.
  97. Jarvis, P. (1987) Adult Learning in the Social Context. London : Croom Helm.
  98. Jarvis, P. (1996) The Adult Learner and Adult Learning. London: Routledge.
  99. Jarvis, P. and Gibson, S. (1997) The Teacher Practitioner and Mentor in Nursing, Midwifery, Health Visiting and the Social Services. Cheltenham: Stanley Thornes.
  100. Jordan, B. (2001) Tough Love: Social Work, Social Exclusion and the Third Way, British Journal of Social Work, 31, pp. 527-546.
  101. Kadushin, A. (1976) Supervision in Social Work. New York: Columbia University Press.
  102. Kerka, S. (1995) The Learning Organization: Myths and Realities. Columbus, OH: Eric Clearing House.
  103. Knowles, M.S. (1980) The Modern Practice of Adult Education: Andragogy Versus Pedagogy. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall/ Cambridge.
  104. Kolb, D.A. (1975) Towards an Applied Theory of Experiential Learning. In Cooper, C. (ed.) Theories of Group Processes. London: Wiley.
  105. Kolb, D.A. (1983) Experiential Learning: Experience on the Source of Learning and Development. New York: Prentice Hall.
  106. Kolb, D.A. (1999) The Kolb Learning Styles Inventory version 3. Boston: Hay Group.
  107. Kondrat, M.E. (1999) Who is the Self in Self Awareness from Critical Theory Perspective? Social Services Review, 73, pp. 451-477.
  108. Lawson, H. (ed.) (1998) Practice Teaching-Changing Social Work. London: Jessica Kingsley.
  109. Lee, D. (1998) Sexual Harassment in PhD Supervision, Gender and Education, 10 (3), pp. 299-312.
  110. Lindsey, T. (2005) Group Learning on Social Work Placements, Groupwork, 15 (1), pp. 61-89.
  111. Littler, L. (2005) Practice Teaching Training Workshop. Unpublished manuscript, Manchester University
  112. Longenecker, L. (2002) The Jotter Wallet: Invoking Reflective Practice in a Family Practice Residency Program (with a commentary by Levine, C.), Reflective Practice, 3 (2), pp. 219-224.
  113. Low, H. and Weinstein, J. (2000) Interprofessional Education. In Pierce, R. and Weinstein, J. (eds) Innovative Education and Training for Care Professionals: A Providers Guide. London: Jessica Kingsley.
  114. Lucas, B. (2002) Power Up Your Mind: Learn Faster Work Smarter. London: Nicholas Brearley.
  115. Lymbery, M. and Butler, S. (2004) Social Work Ideals and Practice Realities. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  116. Macleod-Clark, J., Maben, J. and Jones, K. (1996) Project 2000, Perceptions of the Philosophy and Practice of Nursing. London: English National Board for Nursing Midwifery and Health Visiting.
  117. Maidment, J. and Cooper, L. (2002) Acknowledgment of Client Diversity and Oppression in Social Work Student Supervision, Social Work Education, 21 (4), pp. 399-407.
  118. Mantell, A. (1998) 'On Shifting Sands: Student Social Workers' Experiences of Working in Multi-Disciplinary Teams, Chapter 11. In Lawson, H. (ed.) Practice Teaching: Changing Social Work. London: Jessica Kingsley.
  119. Marsick, V.J. and Watkins, K. (1990) Informal and Incidental Learning in the Workplace. London: Routledge.
  120. Maslow, A. (1986) Towards a Psychology of Being. New York: Van Nostrand.
  121. Mattick, K. and Bligh, J. (2006) Getting the Measure of Interprofessional Learning, Medical Education, 40, pp. 399-400.
  122. McCrystal, P. and Godfrey, A. (2001) Developing a Researcher-Practitioner Partnership for the Effective Evaluation of Professional Social Work Training, Social Work Education, 20 (5), pp. 539-550.
  123. McHale, E. and Carr, A. (1998) The Effect of Supervisor and Trainee Therapist Gender on Supervision Discourse, Journal of Family Therapy, 20, pp. 395-411.
  124. McIvor, G. (ed.) (1996) Working with Offenders: Research Highlights in Social Work. London: Jessica Kingsley.
  125. McLeod, J. (1999) Practitioner Research in Counselling. Sage: London.
  126. Melton, R. (1997) Objectives, Competences and Learning Outcomes Developing Instructional Materials in Open and Distance Learning. London: Kogan Page.
  127. Merton, R.R., Reader, G.G. and Kendall, P.L. (eds) (1957) The Student Physician: Introductory Studies in the Sociology of Medical Education. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
  128. Mezirow, J. (1981) A Critical Theory of Adult Learning and Education, Adult Education, 32 (1), pp. 3-24.
  129. Mezirow, J. and Associates (1990) Fostering Critical Reflection in Adulthood: A Guide to Transformative and Emancipatory Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  130. Miller, A.H., Imrie, B.W. and Cox, K. (1998) Student Assessment in Higher Education. London: Kogan Page.
  131. Moon, J.A. (1999) Learning Journals: A Handbook for Academics, Students and Professional Development. London: Kogan Page.
  132. Morrison, T. (2002) Staff Supervision in Social Care: Making a Real Difference for Staff and Service Users. Brighton: Pavillion.
  133. Myers, I.B. and Mc Caulley, M.H. (1985) Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. National Health Service and Community Care Act 1990 (c.19). London: HMSO O'Hagan, K. (1996) Competence in Social Work Practice: A Practical Guide for Professionals. Bristol: Jessica Kingsley.
  134. Olesen, V.L. and Whittaker E.W. (1970) Critical Notes on Sociological Studies on Professional Socialisation. In Jackson, J. (ed.) Professions and Professionalisation. London: Cambridge University Press.
  135. Palmer, A.M., Burns, S. and Bulman, C. (1994) Reflective Practice in Nursing: The Growth of the Professional Practitioner. Oxford: Blackwell Science Publications.
  136. Parker, J. (2004) Effective Practice Learning in Social Work. Exeter: Learning Matters.
  137. Parsloe, P. (2001) Looking back on social work education, Social Work Education, 20 (1), pp. 9-19.
  138. Parton, N. (1994) Problematics of Government: (post) Modernity and Social Work, British Journal of Social Work, 24 (1), pp. 9-32.
  139. Payne, M. (1991) Modern Social Work Theory: A Critical Introduction. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
  140. Payne, M. (1998) Social Work Theories and Reflective Practice. In Adams, R., Dominelli, L. and Payne, M. (eds) Social Work: Themes, Issues and Critical Debates. London: Macmillan.
  141. Pegg, M. (1999) The Art of Mentoring. Chalford: Management Books 2000.
  142. Petty, G. (2005) Teaching Today (3rd Edition). Cheltenham: Stanley Thornes. Phillipson, J. (2002) Supervision and Being Supervised, Chapter 24. In Adams, R., Dominelli, L. and Payne, M. (eds) (2002) Critical Practice in Social Work. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  143. Pierce, R. and Weinstein, J. (2000) Innovative Education and Training for Care Professionals: A Providers Guide. London: Jessica Kingsley.
  144. Pinker, R. (1997) Recent Trends in British Social Policy and their Implications for Social Work Practice and Education, Issues in Social Work Education, 17 (2), pp. 15-36.
  145. Pollard, K., Miers, M. and Gilchrist, M. (2004) Collaborative Learning for Collaborative Working? Initial Findings from a Longitudinal Study of Health and Social Care Education, Health and Social Care in the Community, 12 (4), pp. 346-358.
  146. Prestonshoot, M. and Williams, J. (1995) Evaluating the Effectiveness of Practice, Social Work Practice, 1 (4), pp. 393-405.
  147. Race, P. (2002) The Lecturers Toolkit. London: Kogan Page.
  148. Raelin, J. (2000) Workbased Learning: The New Frontier of Management Development. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  149. Raelin, J. (2002). 'I Don't Have Time to Think!' Versus the Art of Reflective Practice, Reflections, 4 (1), pp. 66-79. Cambridge, MA: Society for Organizational Learning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  150. Redmond, B. (2004) Reflection in Action: Developing Reflective Practice in Health and Social Services. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  151. Reece, I. and Walker, S. (2000) Teaching, Training and Learning: A Practical Guide. Sunderland: Tyne and Wear Business Educational Publishers Ltd.
  152. Ringel, S. (2001) In the Shadow of Death: Relational Paradigms in Clinical Supervision, Clinical Social Work Journal, 29 (2), pp. 171-179.
  153. Rogers, C. (1969) Freedom to Learn: A View of What Education Might Become. Ohio: CE Merrill.
  154. Rosenstein, B. (2002) The Sorcerer's Apprentice and the Reflective Practitioner, Reflective Practice, 3 (3), pp. 255-261.
  155. Rowlings, C. (2000) Social Work Education and Higher Education: Mind the Gap. In Pierce, R. and Weinstein, J. Innovative Education and Training for Care Professionals: A Providers Guide. Chapter 3, pp. 61-80. London: Jessica Kingsley.
  156. Rowntree, D. (1987) Assessing Students: How Shall We Know Them? London: Kogan Page.
  157. Ruch, G. (2002) From Triangle to Spiral: Reflective Practice in Social Work Education, Practice and Research, Social Work Education, 21 (2), pp. 199-216.
  158. Rynanen, K. (2001) Constructing Physicians Professional Identity -exploration of students critical experience in medical education. Helsinki: Oulu University Press.
  159. Salaman, G. (1995) Managing: Managing Work and Organisations. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  160. Schön, D. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. London: Temple Smith.
  161. Schön, D.A. (1973) Beyond the Stable State: Public and Private Learning in a Changing Society. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
  162. Schulman, L. (1982) Skills of Supervision and Staff. Chicago IL: Management Peacock Publications.
  163. Schulman, L. (1984) The Skills of Helping: Individuals and Groups (2nd edition). Itasca, IL: Peacock.
  164. SCIE (2004) Resource Guide 2 Involving Service Users in Social Work Education. London: SCIE. Scottish Executive (2006) Changing Lives. Report of the 21 st Century Review of Social Work. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
  165. Seidel, S. and Blythe, T. (1996) Reflective Practice in the Classroom. Unpublished article, Project Zero/ Massachusetts Schools Network.
  166. Senge, P.M. (1990) The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. London: Random House.
  167. Shardlow, S. and Doel, M. (1996) Practice Learning and Teaching. London: Macmillan.
  168. Sharp, M. and Danbury, H. (1999) The Management of Failing DipSW Students: Activities and Exercises to Prepare Practice Teachers For Work With Failing Students. London: Ashgate.
  169. Shaw, I. (1997) Be Your Own Evaluator: A Guide to Reflective and Enabling Intervention. Wrexham: Prospects Training Publications.
  170. Shaw, I. (1999) Qualitative Evaluation (Introducing Qualitative Methods). London: Sage.
  171. Shennan, G. (1998) Are we asking the experts? Social Work Education, 17 (4), pp. 407-419.
  172. Sinclair, E.A. (1990) Where Practice Enlightens Theory and Theory Enriches Practice. In Jeffs, T. and Smith M. (eds) Using Informal Education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  173. Smith, M.K. (2001) Chris Argyris: Theories of Action, Double-loop Learning and Organizational Learning, the Encyclopaedia of Informal Education (www.infed.org/ thinkers/argyris.htm). accessed August 2005.
  174. Smith, R.M. (1984) Learning How to Learn: Applied Theory for Adults. Milton Keynes: OU Press.
  175. Smith, C. and White, V. (1997) Parton, Howe and Post Modernity: A Critical Commentary on Mistaken Identity, British Journal of Social Work, 27 (2), pp. 275-295.
  176. Social Services Inspectorate (1991) Getting the Message Across: A Guide to Developing and Communicating Policies, Principles and Procedures on Assessment. London: HMSO.
  177. Stevenson, O. (2004) The Future of Social Work, Chapter 10. In Lymbery, M. and Butler, S. (eds) Social Work Ideals and Practice Realities. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  178. Stevenson, O. (2005) Genericism and Specialisation: The Story since 1970, British Journal of Social Work, 35, pp. 569-586.
  179. Taylor, I. (1997) Developing Learning In Professional Education. Buckingham: Open University Press/SRHE.
  180. Taylor, I., Thomas, J. and Sage, H. (1999) Portfolios for Learning and Assessment: Laying the Foundations for Continuing Professional Development. Social Work Education, 18 (2), pp. 147-159.
  181. Taylor, P. (1993) The Texts of Paulo Friere. Buckinghamshire: Open University Press.
  182. Taylor, C. and White, S. (2000) Practising Reflexivity in Health and Welfare: Making Knowledge. Buckingham: Open University Press
  183. Taylor, C. and White, S. (2006) Knowledge and Reasoning in Social Work: Educating for Humane Judgement. British Journal of Social Work, 36, pp. 937-954.
  184. Tennant, M. (1997) Psychology and Adult Learning. London: Routledge.
  185. Thompson, N. (1997) Anti-Discriminatory Practice. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
  186. Thompson, N. (2002) People Skills. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  187. Thompson, N., Osada, M. and Anderson, B. (1994) Practice Teaching in Social Work. Birmingham: Pepar Publications.
  188. Training Organisation for the Personal Social Services UK Partnership (2002) National Occupational Standards for Social Work. England: TOPSS.
  189. Urbanowski, M. and Dwyer, M. (1988) Learning Through Field Instruction: A Guide for Teachers and Students. Milwaukee: Family Service America.
  190. Vermunt, J.D. (1998) The Regulation of Constructive Learning Processes, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, pp. 149-171.
  191. Walker, J., McCarthy, P., Morgan, W. and Timms, N. (1995) In Pursuit of Quality: Improving Practice Teaching in Social Work. Newcastle upon Tyne: Relate Centre for Family Studies, Newcastle University.
  192. Walter, I., Nutley, S., Percy-Smith, J., McNeish, D. and Frost, S. (2004) Knowledge Review 7 Improving the Use of Research in Social Care Practice. London: SCIE Policy Press.
  193. Welsh Assembly (2006) Fulfilled Lives. Supporting Communities Consultation Document. Cardiff: Welsh Assembly Government.
  194. Wilding, P. (2000) The Welfare State 2000-2050. A Paper Presented to the Political Studies Association UK Annual Conference, April 2000.
  195. Wilson, S.J. (1980) Recordings: Guidelines for Social Workers. New York: Free Press.
  196. Worsley, A. (2003) Does Age Equal Experience? National Organisation for Practice Teaching Newsletter, May 2003. NOPT: Stockport.
  197. Worsley, A. (2004) Probation as Profession. Unpublished M.Phil. University of Manchester.
  198. Wray, J., Fell, B., Stanley, N., Manthorpe, J. and Coyne, E. (2005) Best Practice Guide: Disabled Social Work Students and Placements. Hull: University of Hull
  199. Wright, B. (1989) Critical Incidents, Nursing Times 10/05/1989 (www.LSRC.ac.uk) accessed March 2005.
  200. Yelloly, M. and Henkel, M. (eds) Learning and Teaching in Social Work. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Related papers

Practice Placement in Social Work: Innovative Approaches for Effective Teaching and Learning
Avril Bellinger

Practice, 2016

View PDFchevron_right
Social work placements
Amutenya Lydia

The Journal of Practice Teaching and Learning, 2006

This article is a reflective account of my student experiences of practice teaching whilst on placements during the Social Work Degree. I consider what and how my Practice Teachers and on-site supervisors have been able to teach me about Social Work and Social Work skills and what I have learnt about myself as a person and future practitioner. I look at what, I believe makes a good Practice teacher and how different styles of teaching have enhanced my learning. I reflect on the benefits, under the new degree, of increased days on placement and how this has helped me in applying theory, methods and models which are not always easy in the classroom. At the time of completing this article I am three quarters of the way through my last placement of 100 days. I am undertaking my Social Work degree at the University of Northampton, which has a full time degree course of three years and a part time route taking four years. I am due to graduate with a B.A Honours degree in Social Work in July 2007.

View PDFchevron_right
Social work placements: A student perspective
Amutenya Lydia

This article is a reflective account of my student experiences of practice teaching whilst on placements during the Social Work Degree. I consider what and how my Practice Teachers and on-site supervisors have been able to teach me about Social Work and Social Work skills and what I have learnt about myself as a person and future practitioner. I look at what, I believe makes a good Practice teacher and how different styles of teaching have enhanced my learning. I reflect on the benefits, under the new degree, of increased days on placement and how this has helped me in applying theory, methods and models which are not always easy in the classroom. At the time of completing this article I am three quarters of the way through my last placement of 100 days. I am undertaking my Social Work degree at the University of Northampton, which has a full time degree course of three years and a part time route taking four years. I am due to graduate with a B.

View PDFchevron_right
Creating a Standardised Teaching and Learning Framework for Social Work Field Placements
Linette Hawkins

Australian Social Work, 2014

Mapping and evaluating a student's progress on placement is a core element of social work education but there has been scant attention to indicate how to effectively create and assess student learning and performance. This paper outlines a project undertaken by the Combined Schools of Social Work to develop a common learning and assessment tool that is being used by all social work schools in Victoria. The paper describes how the Common Assessment Tool (CAT) was developed, drawing on the Australian Association of Social Work Practice Standards, leading to seven key learning areas that form the basis of the assessment of a student's readiness for practice. An evaluation of the usefulness of the CAT was completed by field educators, liaison staff, and students, which confirmed that the CAT was a useful framework for evaluating students' learning goals. The feedback also identified a number of problematic features that were addressed in a revised CAT and rating scale.

View PDFchevron_right
Involvement and the Empowerment of Users During the Field Placements of Social Work Students
kristina urbanc

2009

The article presents the results of an evaluative research conducted in 2005, related to fi eld placements of second year social work students as seen from the social service user perspective. The aim of this evaluative research was to gain insight into the perception of the fi eld placement programme from the perspective of service users as well as to include them in the process of programme evaluation, thus opening additional possibilities of the cooperative creation of the programme. The objective was to discover how social service users experience experts, perceive the fi eld placement programme. More precisely, the objective was to gain insight into the users’ motivation for the participation in the programme, into their perception of the content and the course of the placement as well as into their recommendations for the improvement of the programme.

View PDFchevron_right

Related topics

  • Sociology
  • Psychology
  • Social Work
  • Assessment
  • Social Work Education
  • Curriculum and Pedagogy
    • 580 California St., Suite 400
    San Francisco, CA, 94104
    © 2025 Academia. All rights reserved