Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Critique of Environmental Impact Assessment Process in India

2020, Environmental Policy and Law

https://doi.org/10.3233/EPL-190171

Abstract

Notes 1 While cases such as T.N. Godavarman Thirumulkpad v. Union of India (Writ Petition (Civil) No. 202 of 1995) demonstrate a pro-environment stance of the Supreme Court, other cases such as Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India [2000] 10 SCC 664 reflect a preference for development over strong environmental concerns on the justification that India is a developing and poor country. 2 The three decisions are M.C. Mehta v. Union of India 1986(2) SCC 176,

Key takeaways
sparkles

AI

  1. The EIA process in India has evolved significantly since the 1994 Notification, emphasizing mandatory assessments.
  2. Cumulative and indirect impacts are often neglected, potentially leading to significant environmental consequences.
  3. Public consultation processes remain ineffective, lacking transparency and accessibility for local communities.
  4. Frequent amendments to the EIA Notification have diluted its original purpose and scope.
  5. Expertise within advisory commissions is often lacking, compromising the integrity of the EIA process.

References (13)

  1. Leelakrishnan, P. 1992. "Environmental Impact Assessment: Legal Dimensions". Journal of the Indian Law Institute 34(4): 541-562.
  2. Glossary of Environment Statistics, Studies in Methods, Series F, No. 67, United Nations, New York, 1997.
  3. As defined by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP); see https://www.cbd.int/impact/whatis.shtml.
  4. Hanly v. Kleindienst, 471 F. 2d 823 (2nd Cir. 1972) 4 ERC 1785, 2 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,717.
  5. United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, held in Stockholm, Sweden from June 5-16 in 1972.
  6. The Brundtland report of the World Commission on Environment and Development, Our Common Future, defined sustainable development as "development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs".
  7. "The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development (1992)", available at http://www.unesco.org/education/pdf/RIO_E.PDF.
  8. Diwan, P. and Diwan, P. 2002. Environment Administration, Law and Judicial Attitude: Studies on Environment Protection Cases. Second edition, at 16. New Delhi: Deep & Deep Publications.
  9. Murthy, A. and Patra, H.S. 2005. "Environment Impact Assessment Process in India and the Drawbacks". Available at https://elibrarywcl.files.wordpress. com/2015/02/environment-impact-assessment-process-in-india-and-the- drawbacks-1.pdf. 12 Item 8(b) EIA notification 2006.
  10. Sterlite Industries (I) Ltd. Etc v. Union of India and Ors. Etc, 2013 AIR SCW 3231. 14 Whether under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, the Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986 or the notifications issued thereunder. 15 [A reasoning or decision is Wednesbury unreasonable (or irrational) if it is so unreasonable that no reasonable person acting reasonably could have made it (Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v. Wednesbury Corporation (1948) 1 KB 223). See https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/6-200-9152?transiti onType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true&bhcp=1. Ed.] 16 [Around US$ 1.4 million. Ed.]
  11. APPEAL NO. 39 OF 2012, order of the Principal bench of the NGT. 18 "NGT Takes Action on Air Pollution in Delhi and Neighbouring States". See https://ercindia.org/archive.ercindia.org/index.php/latest-updates/latest-from- national-green-tribunal.
  12. T.N. Godavarman v. Union of India. Order of the Supreme Court on 6 January 2014 in I.A. Nos 1868, 2091, 2225-2227, 2380, 2568 and 2937 in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 202 of 1995.
  13. MANU/SC/0930/2017 Writ Petition (Civil) Nos 114 and 194 of 2014 (under Article 32 of the Constitution of India).