Environmental Policy and Administration in India: Role of Government, Parliament and Supreme CourtIndian Journal of Public Administration, 2004
Industrial development and urbanisation have taken a heavy toll of environment. and ecology. Coupled with the unprecedented pressure of population explosion on natural resources, the detrimental effects of unregulated and rapacious development activities have made it imperative for the state and its agencies to intervene in order to save people and their environment from the resultant ill-effects. This article gives an extensive account of regulatory interventions that have been effected through various legislations and court verdicts. It elaborates upon the environmental law principles which are based on interpretation of Constitution and statues, combined with a liberal view ensuring social justice and human rights. Following these principles the courts have sometimes emphasised environment over development when the situation demanded an immediate and specific policy structure. THE ISSUE of development has been at the centre-stage of the government's policies in all developing countries including India. Since their liberation from colonial rule India launched her massive Five Year Plans to uplift her teeming millions from the scourge of poverty, unemployment, illiteracy, ignorance, malnutrition, ill-health and inequality. The state-led, planned economic development model of the Nehru government pursued policies with the view to build a socialistic pattern of society. Under the impact of the government's Industrial Policy~Resolutions of 1948, 1956, 1980, Science and Technology Development Policy, and Green Revolution, India witnessed modernisation of agriculture, industrialisation, urbanisation, and infrastructure development through an expanding public sector that controlled the commanding heights of the economy. Rural development was sought to be brought about through many poverty alleviation programmes, ENVIRONMENT AL POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION IN INDIA I 73 NOORJAHAN BAVA special schemes for weaker sections, and women, rural credit and irrigation facilities through multipurpose river valley projects. However, the planners and policy-makers failed to arrest the population explosion, growing poverty, galloping unemployment and under employment, increasing illiteracy and inequalities. Until the mid-1970's, neither the developed nor the developing countries had any awareness, let alone concern about the detrimental effects of their unregulated, rapacious economic development efforts, greed, arms race, nuclear build-up, and destruction of forests, flora and fona. A paradigm shift, took place in the world from mere development to that of sustainable development, which became the idiom of the later 20th and the 21st Centuries. 1 ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS (ELs) IN INDIA: ROLE OF THE LEGISLATURE Environmental Laws in India have their sources partly in the Constitutional provisions and amendments, and partly in various statutes enacted by the Parliament/state legislatures and from judicial interpretations, decisions and orders of the Supreme Court and High Courts. The beginnings of Indian ELs were sown at the UN Conference on Human Development held in Stockholm in 1972, where India was a participant, leading to some sort of realisation that a framework of law was necessary to deal with environmental hazards that would result from the stage of development that she was entering in the 1970s. 2 In the light of these laws, the Ministry ofEnviromnent and Forests, Government oflndia which is the nodal ministry for environmental management, frames •and issues rules, regulations, directions and guidelines to Central Pollution Control Boards, government agencies, industrial managements and environmental NGO's. The Forty Second Amendment The 42nd Amendment to the Indian Constitution brought about by Indira Gandhi government in 1976 introduced the principle of environmental protection in an explicit manner into the Constitution through Article 48A and 51A (g). Article 48A, as part of the Directive Principles of State_ Policy (DPSP) obligated the State to protect and improve the environment. It ordains, "The state shall endeavour to protect and improve the environment 1 N.Bava, "Environmental stewardship sustainable development: policy and administration
A Non-trivial Threat to India's Ecological and Economic Security: A Critique of The Report of the High Power Committee to review various Environmental Acts administered by Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change Government of IndiaOn 29th August 2014 the Ministry of Environment, Forests & Climate Change of the Government of India (hereinafter referred to as MoEF & CC) set up a High Level Committee headed by former Union Cabinet Secretary Mr. T. S. R. Subramanian, IAS (Retd.). This Committee was given a comprehensive mandate: to review all laws and judgments pertaining to environment, wildlife and forest protection, and also those relating to pollution control, and then produce a report with specific recommendations for reforms in law and governance. This enormous and complex exercise of review of laws and judgments, and governance practices, followed by the formulation and presentation of a report with recommendations for amendments to existing laws, was to be completed within 2 months. The deadline for completion of the Committee's tasks was extended by a month, and the final report was submitted by the Committee to Shri. Prakash Javadekar, Union Minister of State for Environment, Forests and Climate Change with Independent Charge on 18th November 2014.1 The report was not made public at that time. However, it was leaked, and it soon became available on various websites of media and environmental and social action groups. Soon after, an embarrassed Ministry also made the report available on its website. In our critique of the High Powered Committee Report, we find that the entire exercise has been undertaken in a hurried manner, without sufficient inquiry into the relevant factors, without addressing concerns of a range of communities, especially those which are indigenous and natural resource dependent, and without at all considering the importance of consulting elected representatives from Local Government, Legislatures and the Parliament. This report, thereby, is an outcome of a comprehensively democracy deficit effort, and promotes a schema for environmental reforms, which, if adopted could result in widespread chaos in environmental governance and jurisprudence, and also would result in irreversible damage to the environment, cause widespread loss of natural ecosystems and could further fuel fundamental violation of human rights in a country where discontents over environmental decisions are become increasingly contentious. There are elements in the Committee's report that are worth taking note of and possibly implementing. But these are few and far between, and a bulk of the Committee's recommendations are based on an extraordinary reliance on the capacity of technical bureaucracy to deliver good environmental governance, on market forces to meet environmental management objectives, on a slew of new regulatory and judicial forums to police the system, without actually making an effort to enquire and justify if such comprehensive makeover in the environmental decision making system is essential at all. Neither does the Committee formulate its tasks clearly, nor does it make any effort to clearly explain the basis of its recommendations. In light of which, what the Committee recommends comes across as a set of confusing proposals which if implemented could confound the environmental governance system quite fundamentally. With this in view, and in the interest of present and futures generations of the country, and also in securing the extraordinary biodiversity of the region that has evolved over billions of years, we urge the Government of India to comprehensively reject the recommendations of this Committee. In the national interest we urge the Government to repeat the exercise ensuring terms of reference are clear and not caged by catch phrases that confound more than clarify, by involving an inter-disciplinary committee consisting of women and men, experienced and expert members, and drawn from various geographies, supported by a deeply democratic process and with sufficient time and space for public consultations nation-wide, so that the outcome would be recalled as a monumental effort that not only secured national interest, but also that of a world precariously edging towards runaway climate change induced impacts. A copy of the critique of the High Powered Committee Report, entitled “A Non-trivial Threat to India's Ecological and Economic Security”, may be accessed at: www.esgindia.org. Comments and criticisms are welcomed.