Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

A Note on Full-Rank Factorization of Matrix

2019, Journal of the Institute of Engineering

Abstract

We exhibit that the Singular Value Decomposition of a matrix implies a natural full-rank factorization of the matrix

FAQs

sparkles

AI

What role does SVD play in full-rank factorization of matrices?add

The study reveals that the Singular Value Decomposition naturally provides a full-rank factorization for any real matrix, ensuring structural integrity across various forms of matrices.

How does the Jordan matrix relate to the eigenvalue problem in SVD?add

Lanczos' analysis indicates that the Jordan matrix facilitates the understanding of the eigenvalue problem, particularly emphasizing real proper values due to the symmetric nature of matrix S.

What are the implications of zero eigenvalues in full-rank factorization?add

The findings show that zero eigenvalues can notably affect the uniqueness of the solutions to linear systems associated with A, especially when the rank p equals n or m.

What distinguishes 'essential axes' in the context of these matrices?add

Essential axes, defined as the proper vectors of symmetric matrix S, are crucial since they correspond to positive eigenvalues necessary for constructing relevant factorization matrices.

How does the constructed factorization ensure uniqueness in linear system solutions?add

The factorization indicates that information from non-null eigenvalues is sufficient to study the existence and uniqueness of linear solutions, allowing for a complete analysis of the matrix A.

References (14)

  1. Ben-Israel A and Greville TNE (2003), Generalized inverses: Theory and applications, Springer, New York, USA.
  2. Frazer RA, Duncan WJ and Collar AR (1963), Elementary matrices and some applications to dynamics and differential equations, Cambridge University Press.
  3. Gaftoi V, López-Bonilla J and Ovando G (2007), Singular value decomposition and Lanczos potential, in "Current topics in quantum field theory research", Ed. O. Kovras, Nova Science Pub., New York, Chap. 10, 313-316.
  4. Guerrero-Moreno I, López-Bonilla J and Rosales-Roldán L (2012), SVD applied to Dirac super matrix, The SciTech, J. Sci. & Tech. (India), Special Issue, 111-114.
  5. Jordan C (1874), Mémoire sur les forms bilinéaires, J. de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées, Deuxiéme Série, 19: 35-54.
  6. Kalman D (1996), A singularly valuable decomposition: The SVD of a matrix, The College Mathematics Journal, 27: 2-23.
  7. Lanczos C (1958), Linear systems in self-adjoint form, Am. Math. Monthly, 65(9): 665-679.
  8. Lanczos C (1960), Extended boundary value problems, Proc. Int. Congr. Math. Edinburgh- 1958, Cambridge University Press, 154-181.
  9. Lanczos C (1966), Boundary value problems and orthogonal expansions, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 14(4): 831-863.
  10. Lanczos C (1997), Linear differential operators, Dover, New York, USA.
  11. Ruhe A (1998), Commentary on Lanczos 'Linear systems in self-adjoint form', Cornelius Lanczos Collected Published Papers. Vol. V, North Carolina State University, North Carolina, USA, 213.
  12. Schwerdtfeger H (1960), Direct proof of Lanczos decomposition theorem, Am. Math. Monthly, 67(9): 855-860.
  13. Stewart GW and Sun J (1990), Matrix perturbation theory, Academic Press, San Diego.
  14. Thapa GB, Lam-Estrada P and López-Bonilla J (2018), On the Moore-Penrose generalized inverse matrix, World Scientific News, 95: 100-110.