Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Title
Abstract
Introduction
Method
Procedure
Results
Conclusion
References
All Topics
Law
Law Enforcement and Corrections

Police interrogation practice in Slovenia

Profile image of Igor ArehIgor Areh

2015, Psychology Crime & Law

https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2015.1114113
visibility

…

description

15 pages

link

1 file

Abstract

Interrogation techniques are well explored, but in Slovenia it has remained unknown what interrogation techniques are used and what the basic characteristics of suspect interrogations are. The Slovenian interrogation manual proposes some coercive interrogation techniques and neglects their weaknesses. The aim of the current study was to examine Slovenian police officers' beliefs as to the basic characteristics of their interrogations and whether techniques proposed by the manual are used in practice to begin to provide some insight into what actually happens in such interrogations. A survey instrument was used to obtain selfreport data from a sample of criminal investigators. From 86 completed questionnaires it was found that a typical interrogation of a suspect lasts around 90 minutes and is not recorded. Interviewers typically use three interrogation techniques namely (i) conducting interrogations in isolation; (ii) identifying contradictions in the suspect's story; and (iii) confronting the suspect with evidence. Findings suggest that some coercive interrogation techniques are used in practice (e.g. offering moral justifications, alluding to have evidence of guilt, good cop/bad cop routine, and minimization). The study is the first insight into the practices of Slovenian investigators when questioning suspects. Differences among general, white-collar and organized crime investigators are also discussed.

Related papers

POLICE INTERVIEWING OF CRIMINAL SUSPECTS: A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
Professor Karl A Roberts

This paper provides an historical overview of the development of police suspect interviewing. The paper highlights how different approaches developed based upon the prevailing needs of the time, from early approaches involving torture and threats, simple question and answer approaches, through to methods incorporating knowledge from the behavioural sciences such as persuasive interviewing. The paper highlights some of the problems associated with these approaches in particular risks of unreliable information and potential miscarriages of justice and discusses more recent ethically oriented interview approaches developed to minimise some of these risks. The paper stresses the importance of sensitivity to the rights and needs of suspects even when carrying out interviews under pressured conditions.

View PDFchevron_right
Assessing the Effectiveness of Police Interrogation Practices in Eliciting Accurate Information Versus False Confession-The Suspect Torture Principle
Iniobong M Eduok

This study examines the relationship between effective police interrogation techniques and the psychological pressures that may lead to false confessions, particularly under certain conditions I would term the "Suspect Torture Principle." This principle looks at the ethical principle of torture and certain interrogation strategies, employed by the police. In their quest to retrieve truthful and accurate information from suspects. Torture practices, may inadvertently cause severe psychological distress, thereby increasing the likelihood of a false confession. The research systematically reviews existing literature on various police interrogation methods, and examines their relative effectiveness in obtaining accurate information versus their potential to induce false confessions. Through qualitative and quantitative analysis of case studies, records of law enforcement, and interviews with legal and psychological experts, the study identifies major factors that contribute to both successful interrogations and coercive and ugly outcomes. These factors include the duration and intensity of questioning, the use of deception or implied threats, the vulnerability of the suspect, and the training and intentions of the interrogators. The research also investigates the role of legal cover and policies in mitigating the risks associated with coercive interrogation practices. The findings further sheds light on the significant tension between the need for effective criminal investigations and the ethical practices of safeguarding individual rights and preventing miscarriages of justice. The study concludes with recommendations for policy reforms, enhanced training for law enforcement, and the development of more unique and balanced interrogation frameworks that embraces both the integrity of the investigation process and the protection of suspects' rights.

View PDFchevron_right
The investigative interview contribution to law enforcement: perceptions of Portuguese police officers and magistrates
Becky Milne

2019

The Cognitive Interview (CI) offers a systematic method for increasing the amount of relevant information obtained from a witness without compromising accuracy. Purpose: This research aimed to investigate police officers’ perceptions of their interviewing practices with specific reference to their use of the cognitive interview components. Second, it was intended to assess how useful prosecutors and judges consider the cognitive interview techniques. Method: A sample of 362 police officers’ from 4 Portuguese law enforcement agencies and a sample of 148 Magistrates (64 Judges and 84 Prosecutors) completed a self-report questionnaire con1 Paulo Barbosa Marques is a criminal investigator at the Criminal Investigation Department of the Public Security Police (PSP). He graduated in Psychology and is a chartered forensic psychologist with expertise in forensic psychological assessment. He also holds a Master’s degree in Law and Security from the Faculty of Law NOVA University of Lisbon an...

View PDFchevron_right
The Perspectives of American Police Officers Regarding Suspect Interrogation and Interview Legislation
Hakan Can

2018

Interrogations are a central component to criminal investigations, yet few studies have explored the views of police investigators toward interrogation techniques and policies. A random sample of law enforcement officers assigned to criminal investigations units in Texas was surveyed regarding their attitudes toward commonly used interrogation methods. In total, 135 homicide and other police investigators responded by questionnaire, reporting on their views toward interrogation tactics and the frequency they conducted custodial or noncustodial interrogations. Results showed that homicide detectives were significantly more likely to favor rapport building and gaining the suspect's confidence and to conduct interrogations at the police station as opposed to in the field. Respondents choosing to conduct interrogations after giving the Miranda warnings were more apt to use evidence disclosure tactics but also more likely to become antagonistic toward the suspect. Results were analyz...

View PDFchevron_right
Interrogation: An Academic Peer-Review of the Literature
Dr. Craig T . Johnson

polygraph.org

Abstract: This article, written for the Polygraph Journal, is a condensed compilation of a germinal study that provided current successful methods for obtaining confessions during interrogations. The foundation of the study derived from active-duty police detectives that illustrated methods they used to gain confessions from suspects in criminal cases. The study also provided a literature review of past practices of renowned interrogation techniques that collaborated with oral interviews with police investigators from selective east coast and west coast law enforcement agencies.

View PDFchevron_right
Investigative Interviews with Suspects and Witnesses: A Survey of Perceptions and Interview Practices Among Malaysian Police
Magdalene Ng

Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology

Interviewing of suspects, victims, and eyewitnesses contributes significantly to the investigation process. While a great deal is known about the investigative interviewing practices in the United Kingdom and the Nordic region, very little is known about the framework used by Malaysian police officers. A survey was administered to 44 Royal Malaysian Police interviewers serving in the Sexual, Women and Child Investigations Division (D11) of the Crime Investigation Department. Respondents were asked about the investigative interviewing techniques they use with suspects, witnesses, and victims; how effective they think these techniques are; and the training they had received. Findings revealed that many police officers currently possess limited knowledge of best practice investigative interviewing. More training, feedback, and supervision is needed and desired.

View PDFchevron_right
Investigator's Interview Strategy in Interrogating Suspect: A Study in Forensic Linguistics
International Journal of Research & Review (IJRR)

https://www.ijrrjournal.com/IJRR_Vol.5_Issue.12_Dec2018/Abstract_IJRR0042.html, 2018

The ability to raise questions is important for investigators. The substance, kinds, and the direction of the questions determine the value of the information during investigation process. The research is aimed at revealing the investigators" strategies in finding the proven information. The investigators should be able to formulate the questions so they are able to get clear information from the suspects. They investigators are considered successful when they are able to convince the suspects to give the real information. By using descriptive qualitative paradigm, the data were collected and analyzed with observation and interview methods. The data were taken from the investigators from Galang-based Indonesian National Police in Galang District, Deli Serdang regency and consisted of the investigators" questions addressed to the suspects. The data were transcripted and analyzed by using content analysis method to find the dominant uses and the connection between one to another in finding the value meaning, purpose and aim of the information. The dominant questions used in the KPKS and KPy investigative interview are direct-opened question (102 or 27.1%) because the investigators needed the specific information. The investigative activities showed the physical and material truths from the criminal cases.

View PDFchevron_right
Interviewing suspects: Practice, science, and future directions
Jennifer Perillo

Legal and Criminological Psychology, 2010

Crime suspects in the USA are typically questioned in atwo-step process aimed, first, at behavioural lie detection during ap re-interrogation interview,f ollowed by the elicitation of aconfession during the interrogation itself (in Great Britain, the practice of investigativeinterviewing does not makethis sharp distinction). Research conducted on the first step shows that police investigators often target innocent people for interrogation because of erroneous but confident judgments of deception. Research on the second step shows that innocent people ares ometimes induced to confess to crimes they did not commit as afunction of certain dispositional vulnerabilities or the use of overly persuasive interrogation tactics. Citing recent studies, this paper proposes that laboratoryp aradigms be used to help build more diagnostic models of interrogation.S ubstantively, we suggestt hatt he BritishP EACE approach to investigativei nterviewing mayp rovide ap otentially effectivea lternative to the classic American interrogation. As amatter of policy,wesuggest that the videotaping of entire interrogations from ab alanced camera perspective is necessaryt oi mprovet he fact finding accuracy of judges and juries who must evaluate confession evidence in court.

View PDFchevron_right
Pragmatic Strategies in Police Interrogation of Accused Persons
Esther Olayinka

Kampala International University Interdisciplinary Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences

People of different characters make up the society. As we have the good ones, so also, we have the bad ones. The first category constitutes the good citizens while those in the second group are mostly labelled as accused persons. Under the law, an accused person is not yet a criminal until some facts of allegation have been levelled and proved against such a person. The interrogation techniques police employ to deduce facts from an accused person involve the use of language. In order to encourage professional use of language in crime detection and control, the aim of this study is to explore relevant pragmatic strategies for optimal policing and crime management. Seven recorded interrogations on a single case were sourced from a police station in Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria. The recorded interrogations were transcribed into texts. The pragmatic strategies examined include politeness, deixis, face threatening and face-saving acts. This work, being a descriptive study, adopts an eclect...

View PDFchevron_right
Establishing the structure of police evidentiary interviews with suspects
Georgina Heydon

International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law - Forensic Linguistics, 2004

This paper provides a description of the structure of police interviews which aligns the institutionally defined (functional) parts of the interview with a linguistic description meaningful for the analysis of talk in interaction. The analysis is based on data drawn from recordings of police interviews with suspects from rural Australia. It is found that, in particular, the shift from the formal introductory part of the interview to the information seeking part of the interview is marked by participants with an attempt to realign the participant roles (Goffman 1974) to a participation framework which will best facilitate the confessional narrative of the suspect. However this realignment is itself problematized by some police participants as, through their negotiation of the shift, they must routinely maintain their role as 'interrogator'.

View PDFchevron_right

References (59)

  1. Areh, I. (2011). Forenzična psihologija: predstavitev, pričanje in ugotavljanje laži [Forensic psychology: Introduction, witness testimony, and detecting lies]. Ljubljana: University of Maribor.
  2. Areh, I., Zgaga, S., & Flander, B. (in press). Police interrogation in Slovenia: Selected legal and psychological aspects. In D. Walsh, G. Oxburgh, A. Redlich, & T. Myklebust (Eds.), International developments and practices in investigative interviewing and interrogation: Volume 2 (suspects). London: Routledge.
  3. Blair, J. P. (2005). A test of the unusual false confession perspective using cases of proven false confessions. Criminal Law Bulletin, 41, 127-144.
  4. Bull, R., & Soukara, S. (2010). Four studies of what really happens in police interviews. In G. D. Lassiter & C. A. Meissner (Eds.), Police interrogations and false confessions: Current research, practice, and policy recommendations (pp. 81-95). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  5. Cassell, P. G., & Hayman, B. S. (1996). Police interrogation in the 1990s: An empirical study of the effects of Miranda. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.
  6. Clarke, C., Milne, R., & Bull, R. (2011). Interviewing suspects of crime: The impact of PEACE training, supervision, and the presence of a legal advisor. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 8(2), 149-162. doi:10.1002/jip.144
  7. Dando, C., Wilcock, R., & Milne, R. (2009). The cognitive interview: Novice police officers' witness/ victim interviewing practices. Psychology, Crime & Law, 15(8), 679-696. doi:10.1080/ 10683160802203963
  8. Evans, J. R., Meissner, C. A., Ross, A. B., Houston, K. A., Russano, M. B., & Horgan, A. J. (2013). Obtaining guilty knowledge in human intelligence interrogations: Comparing accusatorial and information- gathering approaches with a novel experimental paradigm. Journal of Applied Research in Memory & Cognition, 2(2), 83-88. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.03.002
  9. Fahsing, A., & Rachlew, A. (2012). Investigative interviewing in the Nordic region. In T. Williamson, B. Milne, & S. Savage (Eds.), International developments in investigative interviewing (pp. 39-65). New York, NY: Routledge.
  10. Feld, B. C. (2006). Police interrogation of juveniles: An empirical study of policy and practice. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 97, 219-316.
  11. Gallini, B. R. (2010). Police 'science' in the interrogation room: Seventy years of pseudo-psychological interrogation methods to obtain inadmissible confessions. Hastings Law Journal, 61, 529-580.
  12. Goodman-Delahunty, J., Martschuk, N., & Dhami, M. K. (2014). Interviewing high value detainees: Securing cooperation and disclosures. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(6), 883-897. doi:10.1002/ acp.3087
  13. Granhag, P. A., & Hartwig, M. (2015). The strategic use of evidence technique: A conceptual overview. In P. A. Granhag, A. Vrij, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), Detecting deception: Current challenges and cognitive approaches (pp. 231-251). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
  14. Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L., & Hartwig, M. (2007). The SUE technique: The way to interview to detect deception. Forensic Update, 88, 25-29.
  15. Griffiths, A. (2008). An examination into the efficacy of police advanced investigative interview training (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Portsmouth, UK.
  16. Gudjonsson, G. H. (2003). The psychology of interrogations and confessions: A handbook (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley.
  17. Häkkänen, H., Ask, K., Kebbell, M., Alison, L., & Granhag, P. A. (2009). Police officers' views of effective interview tactics with suspects: The effects of weight of case evidence and discomfort with ambi- guity. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(4), 468-481. doi:10.1002/acp.1491
  18. Holmberg, U., & Christianson, S. Å. (2002). Murderers' and sexual offenders' experiences of police interviews and their inclination to admit or deny crimes. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 20(1-2), 31-45. doi:10.1002/bsl.470
  19. Inbau, F. E., Reid, J. E., Buckley, J. P., & Jayne, B. C. (2013). Criminal interrogations and confessions (5th ed.). Burlingeon, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
  20. Kassin, S. M. (2008). Confession evidence common-sense myths and misconceptions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35(10), 1309-1322. doi:10.1177/0093854808321557
  21. Kassin, S. M., Goldstein, C. C., & Savitsky, K. (2003). Behavioral confirmation in the interrogation room: On the dangers of presuming guilt. Law and Human Behavior, 27(2), 187-203. doi:10.1023/ A:1022599230598
  22. Kassin, S. M., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (2004). The psychology of confessions: A review of the literature and issues. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(2), 33-67. doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00016.x
  23. Kassin, S. M., Kukucka, J., Lawson, V. Z., & DeCarlo, J. (2013). Does video recording alter the behavior of police during interrogation? A mock crime-and-investigation study. Law and Human Behavior, 38 (1), 73-83. doi:10.1037/lhb0000047
  24. Kassin, S. M., Leo, R. A., Meissner, C. A., Richman, K. D., Colwell, L. H., Leach, A. M., & Fon, D. L. (2007). Police interviewing and interrogation: A self-report survey of police practices and beliefs. Law and Human Behavior, 31(4), 381-400. doi:10.1007/s10979-006-9073-5
  25. Kassin, S. M., & McNall, K. (1991). Police interrogations and confessions: Communicating promises and threats by pragmatic implication. Law and Human Behavior, 15(3), 233-251. doi:10.1007/ BF01061711
  26. Kebbell, M., Milne, R., & Wagstaff, G. (1999). The cognitive interview: A survey of its forensic effective- ness. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 5(1-2), 101-115.
  27. Kelly, C. E., Miller, J. C., Redlich, A. D., & Kleinman, S. M. (2013). A taxonomy of interrogation methods. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19(2), 165-178. doi:10.1037/a0030310
  28. Kelly, C. E., Redlich, A. D., Evans, J. R., & Meissner, C. A. (2014). Interview and interrogation methods: Effects on confession accuracy. In G. Bruinsma, & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Encyclopedia of criminology and criminal justice (pp. 2673-2679). New York, NY: Springer.
  29. King, L., & Snook, B. (2009). Peering inside the Canadian interrogation room: An examination of the Reid model of interrogation, influence tactics, and coercive strategies. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(7), 674-694. doi:10.1177/0093854809335142
  30. Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., Orbach, Y., Esplin, P. W., & Mitchell, S. (2002). Is ongoing feedback necess- ary to maintain the quality of investigative interviews with allegedly abused children? Applied Developmental Science, 6(1), 35-41. doi:10.1207/S1532480XADS0601_04
  31. Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., Orbach, Y., Hershkowitz, I., Horowitz, D., & Esplin, P. W. (2000). The effects of intensive training and ongoing supervision on the quality of investigative interviews with alleged sex abuse victims. Applied Developmental Science, 6(3), 114-125. doi:10.1207/ S1532480XADS0603_2
  32. Leo, R. A. (1996a). Inside the interrogation room. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 86. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/218393893?accountid=28931
  33. Leo, R. A. (1996b). Miranda's revenge: Police interrogation as a confidence game. Law & Society Review, 30(2), 259-288. doi:10.2307/3053960
  34. Leo, R. A., & Ofshe, R. J. (1998). The consequences of false confessions: Deprivations of liberty and miscarriages of justice in the age of psychological interrogation. Journal of Law and Criminology, 88(2), 429-496.
  35. Mann, S., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (2004). Detecting true lies: Police officers' ability to detect suspects' lies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 137-149. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.137
  36. Masip, J., Herrero, C., Garrido, E., & Barba, A. (2011). Is the behaviour analysis interview just common sense? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(4), 593-604. doi:10.1002/acp.1728
  37. Meissner, C. A., & Kassin, S. M. (2002). "He's guilty!": Investigator bias in judgments of truth and decep- tion. Law and Human Behavior, 26(5), 469-480. doi:10.1023/A:1020278620751
  38. Meissner, C. A., Redlich, A. D., Bhatt, S., & Brandon, S. (2012). Interview and interrogation methods and their effects on investigative outcomes. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 8(1), 4-52. doi:10.4073/csr. 2012.13
  39. Memon, A., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (2003). Psychology and law: Truthfulness, accuracy and credibility. London: Jossey Bass.
  40. O'Neill, M., & Milne, R. (2014). Success within criminal investigations: Is communication still a key component. In R. Bull (Ed.), Investigative interviewing (pp. 123-146). New York, NY: Springer.
  41. Ragatz, L. L., Fremouw, W., & Baker, E. (2012). The psychological profile of white-collar offenders; Demographics, criminal thinking, psychopathic traits, and psychopathology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(7), 978-997. doi:10.1177/0093854812437846 PSYCHOLOGY, CRIME & LAW
  42. Redlich, A. D., & Meissner, C. A. (2009). Techniques and controversies on the interrogation of suspects: The artful practice versus the scientific study. In J. Skeem, K. Douglas, & S. Lilienfeld (Eds.), Psychological science in the courtroom: Controversies and consensus (pp. 124-148). New York, NY: Guilford Publications. Republic of Slovenia, Ministry of the Interior. (2015, May). Kriminaliteta -statistika [Crime statistics]. Retrieved from http://www.policija.si/index.php/statistika/kriminaliteta
  43. Snook, B., Luther, K., Quinlan, H., & Milne, R. (2012). Let 'em talk! A field study of police questioning practices of suspects and accused persons. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(10), 1328-1339. doi:10.1177/0093854812449216
  44. Soukara, S., Bull, R., Vrij, A., Turner, M., & Cherryman, J. (2009). What really happens in police interviews of suspects? Tactics and confessions. Psychology, Crime & Law, 15(6), 493-506. doi:10.1080/ 10683160802201827
  45. Stephenson, G. M., & Moston, S. J. (1993). Attitudes and assumptions of police officers when ques- tioning criminal suspects. Issues in Criminological & Legal Psychology, 18, 30-36.
  46. Sullivan, T. P. (2004). Police experiences with recording custodial interrogations. Chicago, IL: Northwestern University School of Law, Center on Wrongful Convictions.
  47. Sullivan, T. P., Vail, A. W., & Anderson, H. W. (2008). The case for recording police interrogation. Litigation, 34(3), 1-8.
  48. Tekin, S., Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L., Mac Giolla, E., Vrij, A., & Hartwig, M. (2015). Interviewing stra- tegically to elicit admissions from guilty suspects. Law and Human Behavior. doi:10.1037/ lhb0000131
  49. Vanderhallen, M., Vervaeke, G., & Holmberg, U. (2011). Witness and suspect perceptions of working alliance and interviewing style. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 8(2), 110- 130. doi:10.1002/jip.138
  50. Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
  51. Walkley, J. (1990). Police interrogation. A handbook for investigators. London: Police Review Publishing.
  52. Walsh, D., & Bull, R. (2010). What really is effective in interviews with suspects? A study comparing interviewing skills against interviewing outcomes. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15(2), 305-321. doi:10.1348/135532509X463356
  53. Walsh, D., & Bull, R. (2012). Examining rapport in investigative interviews with suspects: Does its build- ing and maintenance work? Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 27(1), 73-84. doi:10.1007/ s11896-011-9087-x
  54. Walsh, D., & Bull, R. (2013). The investigation and investigative interviewing of benefit fraud suspects in the UK: Historical and contemporary perspectives. In B. Cooper, D. Griesel, & M. Ternes (Eds.), Applied issues in investigative interviewing, eyewitness memory, and credibility assessment (pp. 33- 58). New York, NY: Springer.
  55. Walsh, D., & Bull, R. (2015). Interviewing suspects: Examining the association between skills, question- ing, evidence disclosure, and interview outcomes. Psychology, Crime & Law, 21(7), 661-680. doi:10. 1080/1068316X.2015.1028544
  56. Walsh, D., & Milne, R. (2007). Perceptions of benefit fraud staff in the UK: Giving P.E.A.C.E. a chance? Public Administration, 85(2), 525-540. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00645.x
  57. Walsh, D., Redlich, A., Oxburgh, G., & Myklebust, T. (in press). Interview and interrogations of suspects: Obtaining the truth, not just confessions. In D. Walsh, G. Oxburgh, A. Redlich, & T. Myklebust (Eds.), International developments and practices in investigative interviewing and interrogation: Volume 2 (suspects). London: Routledge.
  58. Walsh, D. W., & Milne, R. (2008). Keeping the PEACE.? An analysis of the taped interview performance of benefit fraud investigators within the DWP. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 13(1), 39-57. doi:10.1348/135532506X157179
  59. Zulawski, D. E., & Wicklander, D. E. (1993). Practical aspects of interview and interrogation. New York, NY: Elsevier.

Related papers

Police interrogation practice in Slovenia Item type
Igor Areh

2018

Interrogation techniques are well explored, but in Slovenia it has remained unknown what interrogation techniques are used and what the basic characteristics of suspect interrogations are. The Slovenian interrogation manual proposes some coercive interrogation techniques and neglects their weaknesses. The aim of the current study was to examine Slovenian police officers’ beliefs as to the basic characteristics of their interrogations and whether techniques proposed by the manual are used in practice to begin to provide some insight into what actually happens in such interrogations. A survey instrument was used to obtain selfreport data from a sample of criminal investigators. From 86 completed questionnaires it was found that a typical interrogation of a suspect lasts around 90 minutes and is not recorded. Interviewers typically use three interrogation techniques namely (i) conducting interrogations in isolation; (ii) identifying contradictions in the suspect’s story; and (iii) conf...

View PDFchevron_right
Interrogating Suspects of Crime in Slovenia
Igor Areh

2018

The conference proceedings is a part of the series entitled Criminal Justice and Security in Central and Eastern Europe (previously Policing in Central and Eastern Europe) indexed in Conference Proceedings Citation Index.

View PDFchevron_right
Police Interviewing and Interrogation: A Self-Report Survey of Police Practices and Beliefs
Lory Miranda

Law and Human Behavior, 2007

By questionnaire, 631 police investigators reported on their interrogation beliefs and practices—the first such survey ever conducted. Overall, participants estimated that they were 77% accurate at truth and lie detection, that 81% of suspects waive Miranda rights, that the mean length of interrogation is 1.6 hours, and that they elicit self-incriminating statements from 68% of suspects, 4.78% from innocents. Overall, 81% felt that interrogations should be recorded. As for self-reported usage of various interrogation tactics, the most common were to physically isolate suspects, identify contradictions in suspects’ accounts, establish rapport, confront suspects with evidence of their guilt, and appeal to self-interests. Results were discussed for their consistency with prior research, policy implications, and methodological shortcomings.

View PDFchevron_right
Police interrogations through the prism of science
Igor Areh

Several approaches can be employed for information gathering from human sources, differing in their theoretical basis, goals, realisation, and ethical acceptability. The paper critically presents and compares two prevalent approaches to suspect interrogation used by the police. The older, prevalent interrogation approach focuses on obtaining suspects' incriminating statements and admissions, which severely elevates the risk of false confessions. Consequently, this interrogation approach is termed accusatorial or coercive since suspects are forced to admit to a crime. The newer interrogation approach is the information-gathering approach, also known as the investigative interview. It focuses on gathering accurate information in order to exclude or accuse a suspect in a criminal investigation. In comparison with coercive interrogation models, the information-gathering approach has a lower probability of false confessions since suspects are exposed to significantly lower levels of psychological pressure. Moreover, it is ethically more acceptable, has scientific grounds, enables the gathering of more accurate information, and has been found to be at least as effective as the coercive approach in criminal investigations. The investigative interview relies mainly on findings from social psychology. An analysis of coercive interrogation models reveals that they have no scientific basis and as such rely mainly on uncorroborated common-sense assumptions from authorities. In developed countries, coercive interrogation models are increasingly being replaced by the information-gathering approach, a trend connected with the enforcement of high human rights standards and a higher awareness of risks associated with coercive interrogation methods by the general public, academia, and professionals alike.

View PDFchevron_right
Police Interrogation from a Social Psychology Perspective
Maria Hartwig

Policing & Society, 2005

The interrogation of suspects is considered to be one of the most crucial stages in the investigative process. Cases of miscarriage of justice have led to public outcries for studies on the procedures, effectiveness and ethics of police interrogations. This article provides an overview of such studies of interrogation, and sheds light on two different interrogation techniques informed by a social psychological perspective. First, the effects of interrogation techniques that aim at obtaining confessions are discussed. Second, an overview is provided of techniques that emphasize the importance of obtaining the truth. Finally, in relation to recent findings from the area of psychology and law, the characteristics of a good interrogation are explored.

View PDFchevron_right

Related topics

  • Psychology
  • Police Interrogation
  • Eyewitness Testimony

    • Cited by

    International consensus on effective and ineffective interviewing strategies: a survey of experienced practitioners
    Diane Sivasubramaniam

    Police Practice and Research, 2019

    We explored interviewing practitioners' views about the effectiveness of a range of diverse interview strategies in the field. An online survey examined 73 interviewing practices comprising six broad strategy types and their perceived effectiveness. Interview practices were rated by a multinational sample of 324 criminal investigators and intelligence operators. Experienced interviewers reported preferences for cooperative, non-coercive information-gathering approaches. Rapport-building was rated highly effective in securing reliable information. Interviewers reported some use of coercive techniques, but more commonly employed procedural justice elements of respect, kindness, genuine concern, and addressing basic interviewee needs to build rapport. They favoured non-coercive presentations of testimonial inconsistencies and evidence. Results demonstrate support by a large, experienced, international sample of interviewing practitioners for rapport-based techniques over coercive techniques and revealed broad consensus on effective strategies. Furthermore, findings demonstrated that this consensus centres around the effectiveness of rapport-based investigative interviewing, rather than coercive or accusatorial techniques.

    View PDFchevron_right
    580 California St., Suite 400
    San Francisco, CA, 94104
    © 2025 Academia. All rights reserved