Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Title
Abstract
Introduction
Future Scopes
Conclusions
References
All Topics
Engineering

Carbon Dioxide Separation Technologies: Applicable to Net Zero

Profile image of Gourav RathGourav Rath

2023, Energies

https://doi.org/10.3390/EN16104100
visibility

…

description

22 pages

link

1 file

Abstract

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY

Related papers

Introduction: Carbon Capture and Separation
Jenny G. Vitillo

Chemical reviews, 2017

View PDFchevron_right
Research and development activities on high efficiency separation process technologies for carbon dioxide removal from industrial sources at University of Regina, Canada
Paitoon Tontiwachwuthikul

Energy Conversion and Management, 1996

This paper describes research and development activities at the University of Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada on "Optimization of CO 2 Extraction Process Technologies". The ultimate goal of this research is to develop better and more effective CO 2 separation processes which can be used to recover CO 2 from industrial sources such as coal-firod power plants and coal gasification complexes at the lowest possible capital and operating costs.

View PDFchevron_right
Review Article Carbon Dioxide Separation from Flue Gases: A Technological Review Emphasizing Reduction in Greenhouse Gas Emissions Academic Editors: D
Necdet Saltek

Increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases (GHGs) such as CO 2 in the atmosphere is a global warming. Human activities are a major cause of increased CO 2 concentration in atmosphere, as in recent decade, two-third of greenhouse effect was caused by human activities. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is a major strategy that can be used to reduce GHGs emission. There are three methods for CCS: pre-combustion capture, oxy-fuel process, and post-combustion capture. Among them, post-combustion capture is the most important one because it offers flexibility and it can be easily added to the operational units. Various technologies are used for CO 2 capture, some of them include: absorption, adsorption, cryogenic distillation, and membrane separation. In this paper, various technologies for post-combustion are compared and the best condition for using each technology is identified.

View PDFchevron_right
Progress on carbon dioxide capture, storage and utilisation
Malek Mohammad

International Journal of Global Warming, 2020

The negative impacts of global warming on climate have been witnessed worldwide, and therefore global efforts to decrease the emission of greenhouse gases (GHGs), particularly carbon dioxide, have increased. Carbon capture (CC) strategies can effectively reduce the quantity of CO2 being released into the atmosphere by various industries. In this study, several characteristics of CC technologies are analysed, the negative environmental impacts of CO2 emissions are highlighted, policies that have recently been adopted to decrease GHG emissions are discussed, and state-of-the-art post-combustion CC, pre-combustion CC, and oxyfuel combustion CC technologies are reviewed. Furthermore, this study investigates and compares the three most common carbon separation techniques, namely, absorption, adsorption, and membrane methods. Through the investigation of the CC technologies, we discuss the practicality of implementing such methods and discuss specific case studies that have implemented CC technologies. Furthermore, we summarise ways of utilising the end-product (the captured carbon) of these technologies. Much research has gone into investigating the

View PDFchevron_right
Recent Trends in Efficient CO2 separation-A Review
sidra saqib

Review paper, 2018

Carbon dioxide (CO 2) emission due to burning of fossil fuel produces pollution in environment. CO2 discharge from anthropogenic sources has raised worldwide environmental concerns and the proficient energy paradigm has tilted towards CO 2 capture. Membrane technology is one of the proficient technologies for CO 2 separation due to its environmental friendly, high surface area and low cost. Various approaches are discussed to improve membrane performance focusing mainly on permeability and selectivity parameters. Introduction of various types of fillers are incorporated to reach the Robeson's upper bound curve. In this review, a comprehensive discussion is done about polymer-inorganic nanocomposite membrane for the separation of CO2, CH4 and N2 from various gas mixture. Metal organic framework and ionic liquid mixed matrix membrane are also discussed.

View PDFchevron_right
Carbon Dioxide Capture Handbook - NETL
Mario Villarino

CARBON DIOXIDE CAPTURE HANDBOOK, 2015

This Handbook focuses on advanced solvent, sorbent, and membrane technologies for CO2 capture, as well as advanced CO2 compression technologies. The significant advances that have been made with CO2 capture and compression technologies are summarized with regard to thermodynamic, cost, and process characteristics. In addition, recommendations are provided regarding future carbon capture and compression R&D.

View PDFchevron_right
The International Test Centre for Carbon Dioxide Capture (ITC)
Malcolm Wilson

Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies 7, 2005

The GHG research team at the University of Regina, in collaboration with the two senior levels of the Canadian government, as well as industrial partners, has established the International Test Centre for CO 2 Capture (ITC) with the mandate to explore and develop new, cost-effective technologies for CO 2 capture. The team has designed a research program that aims at reducing the cost of CO 2 capture in the short to medium term while attempting to find "novel" approaches that can significantly reduce the cost in the long term. In order to accomplish these research objectives, we have invested over sixteen million dollars in infrastructure building in the ITC. The research infrastructure consists of a well-equipped bench-scale CO 2 separation unit at the University of Regina (U of R), a multipurpose technology development pilot plant unit at the U of R (UR units), and a revamped semi-commercial technology demonstration unit at the Boundary Dam Power Plant of SaskPower (BD unit).. In addition to these units which are based on conventional CO 2 absorption in a chemical solvent, the ITC is also developing expertise in the use of hollow fiber membranes for CO 2 separation. In order to support our membrane separation technology, we have built and operated a hollow fiber gas absorption module (GAM) unit. We have also acquired a hollow fiber and a flat sheet making machines, in order to enhance our ability to test GAM units made from any polymeric material of our choice. All our CO 2 separation units are equipped with top-of-the-line analytical and computer support. The ITC provides a unique, seamless basic science/technology development infrastructure, which comprises fundamental research, technology development and pre-commercial demonstration. This paper provides a description of bench, pilot plant and demonstration plant testing facilities as well as show how these are used to accomplish our research objectives on CO 2 capture. Background Energy is the most critical factor for the growth of any nation's economy. However, its use has a major impact on the environment especially as it contributes to presence of air pollutants in the atmosphere. In addition, energy production from fossil fuel, the world most important fuel, is known to be the key contributor of the CO 2 (a major greenhouse gas) that is blamed for climate change and global warming problems. In Canada, fossil fuels are, however, the major energy resources providing a healthy balance of trade to Canada and employment to many Canadians. Despite these positive contributions, the fossil fuel industry faces a major challenge. It is a major contributor to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in Canada. For example, energy related production activities accounted for 20% of CO 2 emissions in 1999. Electricity production also added another 17% making the total contribution of CO 2 emissions from fossil fuel industries (including coal) 37%. In order to minimize these adverse effects, industrialized countries under the Kyoto Protocol indicated their intent to reduce collective emissions of GHGs by 5.2%

View PDFchevron_right
CO2 Capture and Storage
Manuel Nepveu, C. Hofstee

Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2006

View PDFchevron_right
IL for CO2 capture and separation DOE
Hongxi Zhang
View PDFchevron_right
An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies
mario murcia

Global warming and climate change concerns have triggered global efforts to reduce the concentration of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO 2 ). Carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) is considered a crucial strategy for meeting CO 2 emission reduction targets. In this paper, various aspects of CCS are reviewed and discussed including the state of the art technologies for CO 2 capture, separation, transport, storage, leakage, monitoring, and life cycle analysis. The selection of specific CO 2 capture technology heavily depends on the type of CO 2 generating plant and fuel used. Among those CO 2 separation processes, absorption is the most mature and commonly adopted due to its higher efficiency and lower cost. Pipeline is considered to be the most viable solution for large volume of CO 2 transport. Among those geological formations for CO 2 storage, enhanced oil recovery is mature and has been practiced for many years but its economical viability for anthropogenic sources needs to be demonstrated. There are growing interests in CO 2 storage in saline aquifers due to their enormous potential storage capacity and several projects are in the pipeline for demonstration of its viability. There are multiple hurdles to CCS deployment including the absence of a clear business case for CCS investment and the absence of robust economic incentives to support the additional high capital and operating costs of the whole CCS process.

View PDFchevron_right

References (125)

  1. International Energy Agency. Global Energy Review: CO 2 Emissions in 2021 Global Emissions Rebound Sharply to Highest Ever Level; International Energy Agency: Paris, France, 2021.
  2. Leung, D.Y.C.; Caramanna, G.; Maroto-Valer, M.M. An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 39, 426-443. [CrossRef]
  3. Bhown, A.S.; Freeman, B.C. Analysis and Status of Post-Combustion Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 8624-8632. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Pandey, G.; Poothia, T.; Kumar, A. Hydrate based carbon capture and sequestration (HBCCS): An innovative approach towards decarbonization. Appl. Energy 2022, 326, 119900. [CrossRef]
  5. Aaron, D.; Tsouris, C. Separation of CO 2 from Flue Gas: A Review. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2005, 40, 321-348. [CrossRef]
  6. Takamura, Y.; Aoki, J.; Uchida, S.; Narita, S. Application of high-pressure swing adsorption process for improvement of CO 2 recovery system from flue gas. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2001, 79, 812-816. [CrossRef]
  7. Clausse, M.; Merel, J.; Meunier, F. Numerical parametric study on CO 2 capture by indirect thermal swing adsorption. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2011, 5, 1206-1213. [CrossRef]
  8. Adanez, J.; Abad, A.; Garcia-Labiano, F.; Gayan, P.; de Diego, L.F. Progress in Chemical-Looping Combustion and Reforming technologies. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2012, 38, 215-282. [CrossRef]
  9. Erlach, B.; Schmidt, M.; Tsatsaronis, G. Comparison of carbon capture IGCC with pre-combustion decarbonisation and with chemical-looping combustion. Energy 2011, 36, 3804-3815. [CrossRef]
  10. Wong, S.; Bioletti, R. Carbon Dioxide Separation Technologies. Available online: http://www.ipcc.ch/ (accessed on 23 November 2022).
  11. Songolzadeh, M.; Soleimani, M.; Takht Ravanchi, M.; Songolzadeh, R. Carbon Dioxide Separation from Flue Gases: A Technologi- cal Review Emphasizing Reduction in Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 828131. [CrossRef]
  12. Simpson, A.P.; Simon, A.J. Second law comparison of oxy-fuel combustion and post-combustion carbon dioxide separation. Energy Convers. Manag. 2007, 48, 3034-3045. [CrossRef]
  13. Mondal, M.K.; Balsora, H.K.; Varshney, P. Progress and trends in CO 2 capture/separation technologies: A review. Energy 2012, 46, 431-441. [CrossRef]
  14. Rackley, S.A. Absorption capture systems. In Carbon Capture and Storage, 2nd ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 151-185.
  15. Sifat, N.S.; Haseli, Y. A Critical Review of CO 2 Capture Technologies and Prospects for Clean Power Generation. Energies 2019, 12, 4143. [CrossRef]
  16. Theo, W.L.; Lim, J.S.; Hashim, H.; Mustaffa, A.A.; Ho, W.S. Review of pre-combustion capture and ionic liquid in carbon capture and storage. Appl. Energy 2016, 183, 1633-1663. [CrossRef]
  17. Yu, C.-H.; Huang, C.-H.; Tan, C.-S. A Review of CO 2 Capture by Absorption and Adsorption. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2012, 12, 745-769. [CrossRef]
  18. Jansen, D.; Gazzani, M.; Manzolini, G.; van Dijk, E.; Carbo, M. Pre-combustion CO 2 capture. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2015, 40, 167-187. [CrossRef]
  19. Figueroa, J.D.; Fout, T.; Plasynski, S.I.; McIlvried, H.; Srivastava, R.D. Advances in CO 2 Capture Technology-The U.S. Department of Energy's Carbon Sequestration Program. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2008, 2, 9-20. [CrossRef]
  20. Kim, Y.-S.; Yang, S.-M. Absorption of carbon dioxide through hollow fiber membranes using various aqueous absorbents. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2000, 21, 101-109. [CrossRef]
  21. Lee, S.C.; Choi, B.Y.; Lee, T.J.; Ryu, C.K.; Ahn, Y.S.; Kim, J.C. CO 2 absorption and regeneration of alkali metal-based solid sorbents. Catal. Today 2006, 111, 385-390. [CrossRef]
  22. Hu, G.; Nicholas, N.J.; Smith, K.H.; Mumford, K.A.; Kentish, S.E.; Stevens, G.W. Carbon dioxide absorption into promoted potassium carbonate solutions: A review. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2016, 53, 28-40. [CrossRef]
  23. Bosch, H.; Versteeg, G.F.; Van Swaaij, W.P.M. Kinetics of the reaction of CO 2 with the sterically hindered amine 2-Amino-2- methylpropanol at 298 K. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1990, 45, 1167-1173. [CrossRef]
  24. Shrier, A.L.; Danckwerts, P.V. Carbon Dioxide Absorption into Amine-Promoted Potash Solutions. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 1969, 8, 415-423. [CrossRef]
  25. Feron, P.H.; Jansen, A. The production of carbon dioxide from flue gas by membrane gas absorption. Energy Convers. Manag. 1997, 38, S93-S98. [CrossRef]
  26. Bougie, F.; Iliuta, M.C. CO 2 Absorption in Aqueous Piperazine Solutions: Experimental Study and Modeling. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2011, 56, 1547-1554. [CrossRef]
  27. Fredriksen, S.B.; Jens, K.-J. Oxidative Degradation of Aqueous Amine Solutions of MEA, AMP, MDEA, Pz: A Review. Energy Procedia 2013, 37, 1770-1777. [CrossRef]
  28. da Silva, C.F.N.; Dias, A.P.B.; Santana, A.P.R.; Pizzo, J.S.; de Souza, F.M.; Lazarin, A.M.; Sernaglia, R.L.; Andreotti, E.I.S. Retraction: Intercalation of Amines into Layered Calcium Phosphate and Their New Behavior for Copper Retention from Ethanolic Solution. Open J. Synth. Theory Appl. 2013, 2, 1-7. [CrossRef]
  29. Kozak, F.; Petig, A.; Morris, E.; Rhudy, R.; Thimsen, D. Chilled ammonia process for CO 2 capture. Energy Procedia 2009, 1, 1419-1426. [CrossRef]
  30. Songolzadeh, M.; Ravanchi, M.T.; Soleimani, M. Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage: A General Review on Adsorbents. Int. J. Chem. Mol. Eng. 2012, 6, 906-913. [CrossRef]
  31. Meisen, A.; Shuai, X. Research and development issues in CO 2 capture. Energy Convers. Manag. 1997, 38, S37-S42. [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, H.; Liu, B.; Lin, L.-C.; Chen, G.; Wu, Y.; Wang, J.; Gao, X.; Lv, Y.; Pan, Y.; Zhang, X.; et al. A hybrid absorption-adsorption method to efficiently capture carbon. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5147. [CrossRef]
  33. Mishra, A.K.; Ramaprabhu, S. Palladium nanoparticles decorated graphite nanoplatelets for room temperature carbon dioxide adsorption. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 187, 10-15. [CrossRef]
  34. Abid, H.R.; Pham, G.H.; Ang, H.-M.; Tade, M.O.; Wang, S. Adsorption of CH 4 and CO 2 on Zr-metal organic frameworks. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2012, 366, 120-124. [CrossRef]
  35. Choi, S.; Drese, J.H.; Jones, C.W. Adsorbent Materials for Carbon Dioxide Capture from Large Anthropogenic Point Sources. ChemSusChem 2009, 2, 796-854. [CrossRef]
  36. Jang, D.-I.; Park, S.-J. Influence of nickel oxide on carbon dioxide adsorption behaviors of activated carbons. Fuel 2012, 102, 439-444. [CrossRef]
  37. Anbia, M.; Hoseini, V. Development of MWCNT@MIL-101 hybrid composite with enhanced adsorption capacity for carbon dioxide. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 191, 326-330. [CrossRef]
  38. Lee, Z.H.; Lee, K.T.; Bhatia, S.; Mohamed, A.R. Post-combustion carbon dioxide capture: Evolution towards utilization of nanomaterials. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 2599-2609. [CrossRef]
  39. Chiao, C.-H.; Chen, J.-L.; Lan, C.-R.; Chen, S.; Hsu, H.-W. Development of carbon dioxide capture and storage technology-Taiwan power company perspective. Sustain. Environ. Res. 2011, 21, 1-8.
  40. Li, J.-R.; Ma, Y.; McCarthy, M.C.; Sculley, J.; Yu, J.; Jeong, H.-K.; Balbuena, P.B.; Zhou, H.-C. Carbon dioxide capture-related gas adsorption and separation in metal-organic frameworks. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2011, 255, 1791-1823. [CrossRef]
  41. Dantas, T.L.P.; Luna, F.M.T.; Silva, I.J., Jr.; Torres, A.E.B.; Azevedo, D.C.S.; Rodrigues, A.E.; Moreira, R.F.P.M. Carbon dioxide- nitrogen separation through pressure swing adsorption. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 172, 698-704. [CrossRef]
  42. Bolland, P.O.; Nord, P.L.O. Carbon Dioxide Emission Management in Power Generation; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2020.
  43. Boot-Handford, M.E.; Abanades, J.C.; Anthony, E.J.; Blunt, M.J.; Brandani, S.; Mac Dowell, N.; Fernández, J.R.; Ferrari, M.-C.; Gross, R.; Hallett, J.P.; et al. Carbon capture and storage update. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 130-189. [CrossRef]
  44. Osman, A.I.; Hefny, M.; Abdel Maksoud, M.I.A.; Elgarahy, A.M.; Rooney, D.W. Recent advances in carbon capture storage and utilisation technologies: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2021, 19, 797-849. [CrossRef]
  45. Kulkarni, A.R.; Sholl, D.S. Analysis of Equilibrium-Based TSA Processes for Direct Capture of CO 2 from Air. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51, 8631-8645. [CrossRef]
  46. Ritter, J.A. Radically New Adsorption Cycles for Carbon Dioxide Sequestration. In Proceedings of the University Coal Research Contractors Review Meeting, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2-3 June 2004.
  47. Yong, Z.; Mata, V.; Rodrigues, A. Adsorption of carbon dioxide at high temperature-A review. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2002, 26, 195-205. [CrossRef]
  48. Lai, J.Y.; Ngu, L.H.; Hashim, S.S. A review of CO 2 adsorbents performance for different carbon capture technology processes conditions. Greenh. Gases Sci. Technol. 2021, 11, 1076-1117. [CrossRef]
  49. Zhang, Y.; Sunarso, J.; Liu, S.; Wang, R. Current status and development of membranes for CO 2 /CH 4 separation: A review. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2013, 12, 84-107. [CrossRef]
  50. Norahim, N.; Yaisanga, P.; Faungnawakij, K.; Charinpanitkul, T.; Klaysom, C. Recent Membrane Developments for CO 2 Separation and Capture. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2018, 41, 211-223. [CrossRef]
  51. Dai, Z.; Noble, R.D.; Gin, D.L.; Zhang, X.; Deng, L. Combination of ionic liquids with membrane technology: A new approach for CO 2 separation. J. Memb. Sci. 2016, 497, 1-20. [CrossRef]
  52. Ismail, A.F.; Chandra Khulbe, K.; Matsuura, T. Gas Separation Membranes; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015.
  53. Bodzek, M.; Konieczny, K.; Kwieci ńska, A. Application of membrane processes in drinking water treatment-state of art. Desalin. Water Treat. 2011, 35, 164-184. [CrossRef]
  54. Brunetti, A.; Scura, F.; Barbieri, G.; Drioli, E. Membrane technologies for CO 2 separation. J. Memb. Sci. 2010, 359, 115-125.
  55. Bodzek, M.; Bohdziewicz, J.; Konieczny, K. Techniki Membranowe W Ochronie Srodowiska; Wydawnictwo Politechniki Slaskiej: Gliwice, Poland, 1997.
  56. Narabska, A. Membranes and Membrane Separation Techniques; UMK Publishing House: Kota Bharu, Malaysia, 1997.
  57. Adewole, J.K.; Ahmad, A.L.; Ismail, S.; Leo, C.P. Current challenges in membrane separation of CO 2 from natural gas: A review. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2013, 17, 46-65. [CrossRef]
  58. Liu, X.; Jin, H.; Li, Y.; Bux, H.; Hu, Z.; Ban, Y.; Yang, W. Metal-organic framework ZIF-8 nanocomposite membrane for efficient recovery of furfural via pervaporation and vapor permeation. J. Memb. Sci. 2013, 428, 498-506. [CrossRef]
  59. Zhang, Y.; Wang, R. Novel method for incorporating hydrophobic silica nanoparticles on polyetherimide hollow fiber membranes for CO 2 absorption in a gas-liquid membrane contactor. J. Memb. Sci. 2014, 452, 379-389. [CrossRef]
  60. Zhang, Y.; Wang, R.; Zhang, L.; Fane, A.G. Novel single-step hydrophobic modification of polymeric hollow fiber membranes containing imide groups: Its potential for membrane contactor application. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2012, 101, 76-84. [CrossRef]
  61. Yan, S.; Fang, M.-X.; Zhang, W.-F.; Wang, S.-Y.; Xu, Z.-K.; Luo, Z.-Y.; Cen, K.-F. Experimental study on the separation of CO 2 from flue gas using hollow fiber membrane contactors without wetting. Fuel Process. Technol. 2007, 88, 501-511. [CrossRef]
  62. Ghasem, N.; Al-Marzouqi, M.; Duidar, A. Effect of PVDF concentration on the morphology and performance of hollow fiber membrane employed as gas-liquid membrane contactor for CO 2 absorption. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2012, 98, 174-185. [CrossRef]
  63. Mansourizadeh, A.; Ismail, A.F. A developed asymmetric PVDF hollow fiber membrane structure for CO 2 absorption. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2011, 5, 374-380. [CrossRef]
  64. Tomita, S.; Akatsu, S.; Ohmura, R. Experiments and thermodynamic simulations for continuous separation of CO 2 from CH 4 + CO 2 gas mixture utilizing hydrate formation. Appl. Energy 2015, 146, 104-110. [CrossRef]
  65. He, J.; Liu, Y.; Ma, Z.; Deng, S.; Zhao, R.; Zhao, L. A Literature Research on the Performance Evaluation of Hydrate-based CO 2 Capture and Separation Process. Energy Procedia 2017, 105, 4090-4097. [CrossRef]
  66. Yang, M.; Song, Y.; Jiang, L.; Zhao, Y.; Ruan, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, S. Hydrate-based technology for CO 2 capture from fossil fuel power plants. Appl. Energy 2014, 116, 26-40. [CrossRef]
  67. Xia, Z.-M.; Li, X.-S.; Chen, Z.-Y.; Li, G.; Yan, K.-F.; Xu, C.-G.; Lv, Q.-N.; Cai, J. Hydrate-based CO 2 capture and CH 4 purification from simulated biogas with synergic additives based on gas solvent. Appl. Energy 2016, 162, 1153-1159. [CrossRef]
  68. Kumar, A.; Veluswamy, H.P.; Jadhawar, P.; Chapoy, A.; Aman, Z. Gas Hydrates in Man-Made Environments: Applications, Economics, Challenges and Future Directions. In Status and Future Challenges for Non-Conventional Energy Sources Volume 1. Clean Energy Production Technologies; Springer: Singapore, 2022; pp. 173-192.
  69. Sabil, K.M.; Partoon, B. Recent advances on carbon dioxide capture through a hydrate-based gas separation process. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2018, 11, 22-26. [CrossRef]
  70. Babu, P.; Linga, P.; Kumar, R.; Englezos, P. A review of the hydrate based gas separation (HBGS) process for carbon dioxide pre-combustion capture. Energy 2015, 85, 261-279. [CrossRef]
  71. Yang, M.; Zhou, H.; Wang, P.; Song, Y. Effects of additives on continuous hydrate-based flue gas separation. Appl. Energy 2018, 221, 374-385. [CrossRef]
  72. Li, L.; Fan, S.; Yang, G.; Chen, Q.; Zhao, J.; Wei, N.; Meng, W.; Fan, J.; Yang, H. Continuous simulation of the separation process of CO2/H2 by forming hydrate. Chem. Eng. Sci. X 2020, 7, 100067. [CrossRef]
  73. Arora, A.; Kumar, A.; Bhattacharjee, G.; Kumar, P.; Balomajumder, C. Effect of different fixed bed media on the performance of sodium dodecyl sulfate for hydrate based CO 2 capture. Mater. Des. 2016, 90, 1186-1191. [CrossRef]
  74. Kumar, A.; Sakpal, T.; Linga, P.; Kumar, R. Impact of Fly Ash Impurity on the Hydrate-Based Gas Separation Process for Carbon Dioxide Capture from a Flue Gas Mixture. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 9849-9859. [CrossRef]
  75. Kumar, A.; Bhattacharjee, G.; Barmecha, V.; Diwan, S.; Kushwaha, O.S. Influence of kinetic and thermodynamic promoters on post-combustion carbon dioxide capture through gas hydrate crystallization. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 1955-1961. [CrossRef]
  76. Veluswamy, H.P.; Premasinghe, K.P.; Linga, P. CO 2 Hydrates-Effect of Additives and Operating Conditions on the Morphology and Hydrate Growth. Energy Procedia 2017, 105, 5048-5054. [CrossRef]
  77. Liu, Z.; Zeng, Y.; Wang, W. CO 2 Hydrate Formation Promoted by a Bio-friendly Amino Acid L-Isoleucine. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2020, 474, 052054. [CrossRef]
  78. Singh, A.; Veluswamy, H.P. Investigation of Kinetics of Methane and Carbon Dioxide Hydrates in the Presence of Biobased Additives. Energy Fuels 2022, 36, 14315-14330. [CrossRef]
  79. Ozturk, M.; Panuganti, S.R.; Gong, K.; Cox, K.R.; Vargas, F.M.; Chapman, W.G. Modeling natural gas-carbon dioxide system for solid-liquid-vapor phase behavior. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2017, 45, 738-746. [CrossRef]
  80. Göttlicher, G.; Pruschek, R. Comparison of CO 2 removal systems for fossil-fuelled power plant processes. Energy Convers. Manag. 1997, 38, S173-S178. [CrossRef]
  81. Babar, M.; Bustam, M.A.; Ali, A.; Shah Maulud, A.; Shafiq, U.; Mukhtar, A.; Shah, S.N.; Maqsood, K.; Mellon, N.; Shariff, A.M. Thermodynamic data for cryogenic carbon dioxide capture from natural gas: A review. Cryogenics 2019, 102, 85-104. [CrossRef]
  82. Tuinier, M.J.; Hamers, H.P.; van Sint Annaland, M. Techno-economic evaluation of cryogenic CO 2 capture-A comparison with absorption and membrane technology. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2011, 5, 1559-1565. [CrossRef]
  83. Mehrpooya, M.; Esfilar, R.; Moosavian, S.M.A. Introducing a novel air separation process based on cold energy recovery of LNG integrated with coal gasification, transcritical carbon dioxide power cycle and cryogenic CO 2 capture. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 142, 1749-1764. [CrossRef]
  84. De Silva, G.P.D.; Ranjith, P.G.; Perera, M.S.A. Geochemical aspects of CO 2 sequestration in deep saline aquifers: A review. Fuel 2015, 155, 128-143. [CrossRef]
  85. Daneshvar, E.; Wicker, R.J.; Show, P.L.; Bhatnagar, A. Biologically-mediated carbon capture and utilization by microalgae towards sustainable CO2 biofixation and biomass valorization-A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 427, 130884. [CrossRef]
  86. Hakkarainen, J.; Ialongo, I.; Maksyutov, S.; Crisp, D. Analysis of four years of global XCO 2 anomalies as seen by orbiting carbon observatory-2. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 850. [CrossRef]
  87. Vieira, É.D.; da Graça Stupiello Andrietta, M.; Andrietta, S.R. Yeast biomass production: A new approach in glucose-limited feeding strategy. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2013, 44, 551-558. [CrossRef]
  88. Zhao, B.; Su, Y. Process effect of microalgal-carbon dioxide fixation and biomass production: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 31, 121-132. [CrossRef]
  89. Singh, J.; Gu, S. Commercialization potential of microalgae for biofuels production. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2010, 14, 2596-2610. [CrossRef]
  90. Usui, N.; Ikenouchi, M. The biological CO 2 fixation and utilization project by RITE(1): Highly-effective photobioreactor system. Energy Convers. Manag. 1997, 38, S487-S492. [CrossRef]
  91. Samipour, S.; Ahmadi, A.; Manshadi, M.D.; Setoodeh, P. Challenges in Industrialization of Biological CO 2 Capture; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020.
  92. Guduru, R.K.; Gupta, A.A.; Dixit, U. Biological Processes for CO 2 Capture; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022.
  93. Wan, X.; Wang, X.; Wan, T.; Yan, Y.; Ye, Z.; Peng, X. Bio-inspired ferromagnetic graphene oxide/magnetic ionic liquid membrane for highly efficient CO 2 separation. Appl. Mater. Today 2021, 24, 101164. [CrossRef]
  94. Russo, F.; Galiano, F.; Iulianelli, A.; Basile, A.; Figoli, A. Biopolymers for sustainable membranes in CO 2 separation: A review. Fuel Process. Technol. 2021, 213, 106643. [CrossRef]
  95. Douskova, I.; Doucha, J.; Livansky, K.; Machat, J.; Novak, P.; Umysova, D.; Zachleder, V.; Vitova, M. Simultaneous flue gas bioremediation and reduction of microalgal biomass production costs. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 82, 179-185. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Ibn-Mohammed, T.; Greenough, R.; Taylor, S.; Ozawa-Meida, L.; Acquaye, A. Operational vs. embodied emissions in buildings- A review of current trends. Energy Build. 2013, 66, 232-245. [CrossRef]
  97. Goli, A.; Shamiri, A.; Talaiekhozani, A.; Eshtiaghi, N.; Aghamohammadi, N.; Aroua, M.K. An overview of biological processes and their potential for CO 2 capture. J. Environ. Manage. 2016, 183, 41-58. [CrossRef]
  98. Wyczalek, F. Energy Independence-A Nation Running on Empty. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Energy Conversion Engineering Conference, San Francisco, CA, USA, 15-18 August 2005. [CrossRef]
  99. Wang, Y.; Zhao, L.; Otto, A.; Robinius, M.; Stolten, D. A Review of Post-combustion CO 2 Capture Technologies from Coal-fired Power Plants. Energy Procedia 2017, 114, 650-665. [CrossRef]
  100. Damen, K.; van Troost, M.; Faaij, A.; Turkenburg, W. A comparison of electricity and hydrogen production systems with CO 2 capture and storage. Part A: Review and selection of promising conversion and capture technologies. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2006, 32, 215-246. [CrossRef]
  101. Rubin, E.; Rao, A.; Chen, C. Comparative assessments of fossil fuel power plants with CO 2 capture and storage. In Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies 7; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2005; pp. 285-293.
  102. Porter, R.T.J.; Fairweather, M.; Pourkashanian, M.; Woolley, R.M. The range and level of impurities in CO 2 streams from different carbon capture sources. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2015, 36, 161-174. [CrossRef]
  103. Kanniche, M.; Le Moullec, Y.; Authier, O.; Hagi, H.; Bontemps, D.; Neveux, T.; Louis-Louisy, M. Up-to-date CO 2 Capture in Thermal Power Plants. Energy Procedia 2017, 114, 95-103. [CrossRef]
  104. Dillon, D.J.; White, V.; Allam, R.J.; Wall, R.A.; Gibbins, J. Oxy Combustion Processes for CO 2 Capture from Power Plant; Engineering Investigation Report; International Energy Agency (IEA): Paris, France, 2005; Volume 9.
  105. Zheng, L. Oxy-Fuel Combustion for Power Generation and Carbon Dioxide (CO 2 ) Capture; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2011.
  106. Hendriks, C. Carbon Dioxide Removal from Coal-Fired Power Plants; Energy & Environment; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1994; Volume 1.
  107. Olabi, A.G.; Obaideen, K.; Elsaid, K.; Wilberforce, T.; Sayed, E.T.; Maghrabie, H.M.; Abdelkareem, M.A. Assessment of the pre-combustion carbon capture contribution into sustainable development goals SDGs using novel indicators. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 153, 111710. [CrossRef]
  108. Lyngfelt, A.; Linderholm, C. Chemical-looping Combustion of Solid Fuels-Technology Overview and Recent Operational Results in 100 kW Unit. Energy Procedia 2014, 63, 98-112. [CrossRef]
  109. Rackley, S.A. Introduction. In Carbon Capture and Storage; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 3-21.
  110. Gielen, D. The energy policy consequences of future CO 2 capture and sequestration technologies. In Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Conference on Carbon Sequestration, Alexandria, Egypt, 6 May 2003; pp. 5-8.
  111. Audus, H. Leading options for the capture of CO 2 at power stations. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-5), Cairns, QLD, Australia, 13-16 August 2000.
  112. Zhang, X.; Song, Z.; Gani, R.; Zhou, T. Comparative Economic Analysis of Physical, Chemical, and Hybrid Absorption Processes for Carbon Capture. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2020, 59, 2005-2012. [CrossRef]
  113. Tuinier, M.J.; van Sint Annaland, M.; Kramer, G.J.; Kuipers, J.A.M. Cryogenic CO 2 capture using dynamically operated packed beds. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2010, 65, 114-119. [CrossRef]
  114. Li, J.; Zhang, H.; Gao, Z.; Fu, J.; Ao, W.; Dai, J. CO 2 Capture with Chemical Looping Combustion of Gaseous Fuels: An Overview. Energy Fuels 2017, 31, 3475-3524. [CrossRef]
  115. Castel, C.; Bounaceur, R.; Favre, E. Membrane Processes for Direct Carbon Dioxide Capture From Air: Possibilities and Limitations. Front. Chem. Eng. 2021, 3, 668867. [CrossRef]
  116. Zhai, H.; Rubin, E.S. The Effects of Membrane-based CO 2 Capture System on Pulverized Coal Power Plant Performance and Cost. Energy Procedia 2013, 37, 1117-1124. [CrossRef]
  117. Cuéllar-Franca, R.M.; Azapagic, A. Carbon capture, storage and utilisation technologies: A critical analysis and comparison of their life cycle environmental impacts. J. CO 2 Util. 2015, 9, 82-102. [CrossRef]
  118. Lyngfelt, A.; Leckner, B. A 1000 MWth boiler for chemical-looping combustion of solid fuels-Discussion of design and costs. Appl. Energy 2015, 157, 475-487. [CrossRef]
  119. Moldenhauer, P.; Linderholm, C.; Rydén, M.; Lyngfelt, A. Avoiding CO 2 capture effort and cost for negative CO 2 emissions using industrial waste in chemical-looping combustion/gasification of biomass. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang. 2020, 25, 1-24.
  120. Hong, W.Y. A techno-economic review on carbon capture, utilisation and storage systems for achieving a net-zero CO 2 emissions future. Carbon Capture Sci. Technol. 2022, 3, 100044. [CrossRef]
  121. Kenarsari, S.D.; Yang, D.; Jiang, G.; Zhang, S.; Wang, J.; Russell, A.G.; Wei, Q.; Fan, M. Review of recent advances in carbon dioxide separation and capture. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 22739. [CrossRef]
  122. Zoccali, M.; Donato, P.; Mondello, L. Recent advances in the coupling of carbon dioxide-based extraction and separation techniques. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2019, 116, 158-165. [CrossRef]
  123. Yang, H.; Xu, Z.; Fan, M.; Gupta, R.; Slimane, R.B.; Bland, A.E.; Wright, I. Progress in carbon dioxide separation and capture: A review. J. Environ. Sci. 2008, 20, 14-27. [CrossRef]
  124. Zach, B.; Pluskal, J.; Šomplák, R.; Jadrný, J.; Šyc, M. Tool for optimization of energy consumption of membrane-based carbon capture. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 320, 115913. [CrossRef]
  125. Disclaimer/Publisher's Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Related papers

Overview of Carbon Dioxide Separation Technology
Nilofar Asim

Power and Energy Systems and Applications, 2012

One of the most urgent environmental issues of our time is to lower the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere by decreasing CO 2 emission. Carbon capture and storage has been introduced as an option in reducing these harmful CO 2 emissions. CO 2 separation from gas streams has been done using a variety of physical, chemical and biological technologies and methods. These technologies allow large-scale CO 2 separation in different industries including coal-fired power plants, refinery and fertilizer industries. Hence, this article reviews different separation methods, such as absorption, adsorption, and membrane-based separation. Other concepts, such as biological separation are also introduced. KEY WORDS CO 2 , carbon capture and storage (CCS), absorption, adsorption, membrane separation 2.1 Absorption This method of separation is divided into two categories: physical absorption and chemical absorption. Most of commercial CO 2 capture plants use the chemical absorption process [4].

View PDFchevron_right
Progress in carbon dioxide separation and capture: A review
Rajender Gupta

Journal of Environmental Sciences-china, 2008

This article reviews the progress made in CO 2 separation and capture research and engineering. Various technologies, such as absorption, adsorption, and membrane separation, are thoroughly discussed. New concepts such as chemical-looping combustion and hydrate-based separation are also introduced briefly. Future directions are suggested. Sequestration methods, such as forestation, ocean fertilization and mineral carbonation techniques are also covered. Underground injection and direct ocean dump are not covered.

View PDFchevron_right
Review of recent advances in carbon dioxide separation and capture
Maohong Fan

RSC Advances, 2013

This review provides a comprehensive assessment of recently improved carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) separation and capture systems, used in power plants and other industrial processes. Different approaches for CO 2 capture are pre-combustion, post-combustion capture, and oxy-combustion systems, which are reviewed, along with their advantages and disadvantages. New technologies and prospective "breakthrough technologies", for instance: novel solvents, sorbents, and membranes for gas separation are examined. Other technologies including chemical looping technology (reaction between metal oxides and fuels, creating metal particles, carbon dioxide, and water vapor) and cryogenic separation processes (based on different phase change temperatures for various gases to separate them) are reviewed as well. Furthermore, the major CO 2 separation technologies, such as absorption (using a liquid solvent to absorb the CO 2 ), adsorption (using solid materials with surface affinity to CO 2 molecules), and membranes (using a thin film to selectively permeate gases) are extensively discussed, though issues and technologies related to CO 2 transport and storage are not considered in this paper.

View PDFchevron_right
CO 2 Separation by Membrane Technologies: Applications and Potentialities
G. Barbieri
View PDFchevron_right
Progress and trends in CO 2 capture/separation technologies: A review
Hemant kumar balsora

Coal-fired thermal power plants are the major source of CO 2 emission among fossil fuel power plants. In thermal power plants, coal combustion produces flue gas containing a number of gases including hazardous pollutants, such as CO 2 , mercury (Hg), sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ), and oxides of nitrogen (NO x ). Among all, CO 2 is the largest contributor to global warming. CO 2 capture and separation are therefore essential to keep the environment safe and secure. The present paper delineates the existing literature to examine the current status of various methods and technologies used for CO 2 capture and separation from thermal power plant flue gas. Various emerging technologies like, chemical-looping combustion, integrated gasification combined cycle, enzyme based separation, dual-alkali absorption approach, facilitated transport membrane, hydrate based separations, mixed matrix membrane and, calcium looping are also thoroughly discussed.

View PDFchevron_right

Related topics

  • Engineering
  • Environmental Science

    • Cited by

    Modeling and Optimal Operating Conditions of Hollow Fiber Membrane for CO2/CH4 Separation
    Thamer Mohammed

    Membranes

    In this work, the capture of carbon dioxide using a dense hollow fiber membrane was studied experimentally and theoretically. The factors affecting the flux and recovery of carbon dioxide were studied using a lab-scale system. Experiments were conducted using a mixture of methane and carbon dioxide to simulate natural gas. The effect of changing the CO2 concentration from 2 to 10 mol%, the feed pressure from 2.5 to 7.5 bar, and the feed temperature from 20 to 40 °C, was investigated. Depending on the solution diffusion mechanism, coupled with the Dual sorption model, a comprehensive model was implemented to predict the CO2 flux through the membrane, based on resistance in the series model. Subsequently, a 2D axisymmetric model of a multilayer HFM was proposed to simulate the axial and radial diffusion of carbon dioxide in a membrane. In the three domains of fiber, the CFD technique was used to solve the equations for the transfer of momentum and mass transfer by using the COMSOL 5.6...

    View PDFchevron_right
    580 California St., Suite 400
    San Francisco, CA, 94104
    © 2025 Academia. All rights reserved