Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Logistics Organizations: Ideologies, Principles and Practice

2002, The International Journal of Logistics Management

https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090210806342

Abstract

The expanding focus on logistics management makes it necessary to rethink the concept of logistics organizations. In addition, there is a need for clarification of the relations between the practices of these organizations and the basic thinking that underlies their behavior. The paper presents a framework for understanding these relations by identifying certain teleological and ontological fundamentals of logistics organizational ideologies. We suggest certain principles and organizational practices that are underpinned by these ideologies. Furthermore, given the changes logistics organizations are experiencing today, we discuss how the changes are viewed within the various ideologies. We conclude that there is a need for improved ability to deal with change within logistics organizations, and that this can be achieved by adopting new theoretical and practical perspectives into the established ideologies of these organizations.

FAQs

sparkles

AI

What key ideologies drive organizational thinking in logistics organizations?add

The paper identifies four logistics organizational ideologies: machine, process, sociotechnical, and network, each influencing practices differently. For instance, the machine ideology is linked to efficiency through hierarchical control, while the network ideology emphasizes cooperative advantage across supply chains.

How do teleological assumptions affect logistics organizational practices?add

The study reveals five types of teleological assumptions, including natural law and transformative teleology, influencing how organizations perceive stability and change. These assumptions dictate action principles that guide organizational practices in logistics over time.

What is the significance of network ideology in logistics organizations?add

The network ideology posits that competitive advantage emerges through cooperative relationships and coordination across organizational networks. This approach enhances value creation by linking suppliers, customers, and focal companies within a cohesive operational framework.

What methodologies were used to analyze logistics organizational ideologies?add

The research employs a conceptual framework integrating ontological and teleological perspectives to explore organizational ideologies. This dual approach allows for a deeper understanding of how different ideologies shape logistics practices and managerial strategies.

How do complexity theories intersect with logistics organizational change?add

The paper suggests that complexity theories provide insights into unpredictable changes in logistics organizations, highlighting the need for adaptive practices. Emerging theories illustrate how human interactions and technology influence organizational structures, potentially reshaping logistics ideologies.

References (30)

  1. Dröge, Cornelia and Richard Germain, "The Design of Logistics
  2. Organizations," Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 34, No. 1 (1998), pp. 25-37.
  3. Bowersox, Donald J. and Patricia J. Daugherty, "Logistics Paradigms: The Impact of Information Technology," Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 16, No. 1 (1995), pp. 65-80.
  4. Christopher, Martin, Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 2nd edition, London: Pearson Education, 1998.
  5. Stacey, Ralph D., Douglas Griffin and Patricia Shaw, Complexity and Management - Fad or Radical Challenge to Systems Thinking?, London: Routledge, 2001.
  6. Stacey, Ralph D., Douglas Griffin and Patricia Shaw, Complexity and Management - Fad or Radical Challenge to Systems Thinking?, London: Routledge, 2001.
  7. Fowler, H.W and F. G. Fowler (ed.), The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Current English, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1964.
  8. Stacey, Ralph D., Douglas Griffin and Patricia Shaw, Complexity and Management - Fad or Radical Challenge to Systems Thinking?, London: Routledge, 2001.
  9. Stacey, Ralph D., Douglas Griffin and Patricia Shaw, Complexity and Management - Fad or Radical Challenge to Systems Thinking?, London: Routledge, 2001.
  10. Taylor, Frederick W., Scientific Management, New York: Harper Brothers, 1911.
  11. Juga, Jari, "Changing Logistics Organization," The Turku School of Economics and Administration, Sarja/Series A-7, Turku, 1996.
  12. Mintzberg, Henry, The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning, New York: Prentice Hall, 1994.
  13. Lysgaard, Sverre, Arbeiderkollektivet, Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 1961. (In Norwegian).
  14. Womack, James P., Daniel T. Jones and Daniel Ross, The Machine that Changed the World, New York: Rawson Associates, 1990. [14] Davenport, Thomas H. and James E. Short, "The New Industrial Engineering: Information Technology and Business Process Redesign," Sloan Management Review, Vol. 31, No. 4 (1990), pp. 11-27; and, Michael Hammer, "Reengineering Work: Don't Automate, Obliterate," Harvard Business Review, Vol. 68, No. 4 (July-August 1990), pp. 104-112.
  15. Christopher, Martin and Uta Jüttner, "Developing Strategic Partnerships in the Supply Chain: A Practitioners Perspective," European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, Vol. 6, (2000), pp. 117-127.
  16. Mayo, Elton, The Social Problems of Industrial Civilization, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1949. [17] von Bertalanffy, Ludwig, General Systems Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications, New York: George Braziller, 1968. [18] Thorsrud, Einar, "Ledelse og administrasjon i 1980-og 90-årene," Conference talk SIA-NTH, Trondheim, 1983. (In Norwegian).
  17. Thorsrud, Einar and Fred Emery, Mot en ny bedriftsorganisasjon, Oslo: Tanum, 1969. (In Norwegian).
  18. Williamson, Oliver E., The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York: The Free Press, 1985.
  19. Eisenhardt, Kathleen M., "Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review," Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 1 (1989), pp. 57-74.
  20. Håkansson, Håkan, International Marketing and Purchasing of Industrial Goods: An Interaction Approach, Chichester, U.K: John Wiley & Sons, 1982.
  21. Nishiguchi, Toshihiro, Strategic Industrial Sourcing: The Japanese Advantage, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
  22. Lazzarini, Sergio, Fabio R. Chaddad and Michael L. Cook, "Integrating Supply Chain and Network Analyses: The Study of Netchains," Journal on Chain and Network Science, Vol. 1, No. 1 (2001), pp. 7-22. [25] Cummings, Thomas G. and Christopher G. Worley, Organizational Development & Change, 6th edition, Cincinnati, Ohio: South-Westem College Publishing, 1997; and Enid Mumford and Rick Hendricks, "Reengineering Rhetoric and Reality: The Rise and Fall of a Management Fashion," ESRC Business Processes Resource Center [www document],URL:http:/Ibprc.warwick.ac.uk/rc-rep b-6.html,1997.
  23. Lazzarini, Sergio, Fabio R. Chaddad and Michael L. Cook, "Integrating Supply Chain and Network Analyses: The Study of Netchains," Journal on Chain and Network Science, Vol. 1, No. 1 (2001), pp. 7-22.
  24. Johannessen, Stig and Olav Solem, "Complexity Thinking: A New Perspective on Strategy and Change in Logistics Organizations," Proceedings NOFOMA 2001 Conference, Reykjavik, 2001.
  25. Levy, David, "Chaos Theory and Strategy: Theory, Application, and Managerial Implications," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 15, (1994), pp. 167-178.
  26. Casti, John L., Would-be Worlds, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1997. [30] Stacey, Ralph D., Strategic
  27. Management & Organizational Dynamics: The Challenge of Complexity, London: Pearson Education Ltd, 2000.
  28. Williamson, Oliver E., The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York: The Free Press, 1985.
  29. Wernerfelt, Birger, "A Resource-based View of the Firm," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 5, (1984), pp. 171-180.
  30. Håkansson, Håkan, International Marketing and Purchasing of Industrial Goods: An Interaction Approach, Chichester, U.K: John Wiley & Sons, 1982.