Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

List.MID: A MIDI-Based Benchmark for Evaluating RDF Lists

2019, Lecture Notes in Computer Science

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30796-7_16

Abstract

For guidance on citations see FAQs.

References (28)

  1. Aluç, G., Hartig, O., Özsu, M.T., Daudjee, K.: Diversified Stress Testing of RDF Data Management Systems. In: Mika, P., Tudorache, T., Bernstein, A., Welty, C., Knoblock, C., Vrandečić, D., Groth, P., Noy, N., Janowicz, K., Goble, C. (eds.) The Semantic Web -ISWC 2014. pp. 197-212. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2014)
  2. Beckett, D., Berners-Lee, T., Prud'hommeaux, E., Carothers, G.: RDF 1.1 Turtle -Terse RDF Triple Language. Tech. rep., World Wide Web Consrotium (2014), https://www.w3.org/TR/turtle/
  3. Beek, W., Rietveld, L., Bazoobandi, H.R., Wielemaker, J., Schlobach, S.: Lod laundromat: a uniform way of publishing other people's dirty data. In: International Semantic Web Conference. pp. 213-228. Springer (2014)
  4. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O., et al.: The semantic web. Scientific amer- ican 284(5), 28-37 (2001)
  5. Bizer, C., Schultz, A.: The Berlin SPARQL Benchmark. International Journal on Semantic Web & Information Systems 5(2), 1-24 (2009)
  6. Brickley, D., Guha, R.: RDF Schema 1.1. Tech. rep., World Wide Web Consrotium (2014), https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/
  7. Conrads, F., Lehmann, J., Saleem, M., Morsey, M., Ngomo, A.N.: Iguana: A generic framework for benchmarking the read-write performance of triple stores. In: The Semantic Web -ISWC 2017 -16th International Semantic Web Conference, Vienna, Austria, October 21-25, 2017, Proceedings, Part II. pp. 48-65 (2017)
  8. Daga, E., Meroño-Peñuela, A., Motta, E.: Modelling and Querying Lists in RDF. A Pragmatic Study. In: 3rd Workshop on Querying and Benchmarking the Web of Data (QuWeDa 2019), ISWC 2019 (under review) (2019)
  9. Eilbeck, K., Lewis, S.E., Mungall, C.J., Yandell, M., Stein, L., Durbin, R., Ash- burner, M.: The sequence ontology: a tool for the unification of genome annotations. Genome biology 6(5), R44 (2005)
  10. Gangemi, A.: Ontology Design Patterns for Semantic Web Content. In: The Seman- tic Web -ISWC 2005. 4th International Semantic Web Conference. pp. 262-276. Springer (2005)
  11. Gopan, D., Reps, T., Sagiv, M.: A framework for numeric analysis of array oper- ations. SIGPLAN Not. 40(1), 338-350 (Jan 2005), http://doi.acm.org.vu-nl. idm.oclc.org/10.1145/1047659.1040333
  12. Görlitz, O., Thimm, M., Staab, S.: Splodge: Systematic generation of sparql bench- mark queries for linked open data. In: International Semantic Web Conference. pp. 116-132. Springer (2012)
  13. Guo, Y., Pan, Z., Heflin, J.: LUBM: A Benchmark for OWL Knowledge Base Systems. Journal of Web Semantics -Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 3(2), 158-182 (2005)
  14. Hobbs, J.R., Pan, F.: Time Ontology in OWL. W3C working draft 27, 133 (2006)
  15. Hopcroft, J.E., Ullman, J.D.: Data structures and algorithms (1983)
  16. Ley, M.: The dblp computer science bibliography: Evolution, research issues, per- spectives. In: International symposium on string processing and information re- trieval. pp. 1-10. Springer (2002)
  17. Meroño-Peñuela, A., Hoekstra, R.: The Song Remains The Same: Lossless Con- version and Streaming of MIDI to RDF and Back. In: The Semantic Web: ESWC Satellite Events (ESWC 2016). LNCS, vol. 9989, pp. 194-199. Springer (2016)
  18. Meroño-Peñuela, A., Hoekstra, R., Gangemi, A., Bloem, P., de Valk, R., Stringer, B., Janssen, B., de Boer, V., Allik, A., Schlobach, S., Page, K.: The MIDI Linked Data Cloud. In: The Semantic Web -ISWC 2017, 16th International Semantic Web Conference. vol. 10587, pp. 156-164 (2017)
  19. Morsey, M., Lehmann, J., Auer, S., Ngomo, A.C.N.: Dbpedia sparql benchmark- performance assessment with real queries on real data. In: International Semantic Web Conference. pp. 454-469. Springer (2011)
  20. Reingold, E.M., Nievergelt, J., Deo, N.: Combinatorial algorithms: theory and prac- tice. Prentice Hall College Div (1977)
  21. Saleem, M., Ali, M.I., Mehmood, Q., Hogan, A., Ngomo, A.C.N.: LSQ: Linked SPARQL Queries Dataset. In: The Semantic Web -ISWC 2015. LNCS, vol. 9367, pp. 261-269. Springer (2015)
  22. Schmidt, M., Hornung, T., Lausen, G., Pinkel, C.: SPˆ2Bench: a SPARQL perfor- mance benchmark. In: Data Engineering, 2009. ICDE'09. IEEE 25th International Conference on. pp. 222-233. IEEE (2009)
  23. Schreiber, G., Raimond, Y.: RDF 1.1 Primer. Tech. rep., World Wide Web Con- srotium (2014), https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-primer/
  24. Sporny, M., Kellogg, G., Lanthaler, M.: JSON-LD 1.0. Tech. rep., World Wide Web Consrotium (2014), https://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-json-ld-20140116/
  25. Thakker, D., Osman, T., Gohil, S., Lakin, P.: A pragmatic approach to semantic repositories benchmarking. In: Extended Semantic Web Conference. pp. 379-393. Springer (2010)
  26. The MIDI Manufacturers Association: MIDI 1.0 Detailed Specification. Tech. rep., Los Angeles, CA (1996-2014), https://www.midi.org/specifications
  27. Van Hage, W.R., Malaisé, V., Segers, R., Hollink, L., Schreiber, G.: Design and use of the simple event model (sem). Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 9(2), 128-136 (2011)
  28. Vandenbussche, P.Y., Atemezing, G.A., Poveda-Villalón, M., Vatant, B.: Linked Open Vocabularies (LOV): a gateway to reusable semantic vocabularies on the Web. Semantic Web 8(3), 437-452 (2017)