Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Interference well testing-variable fluid flow rate

2008, OURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS AND ENGINEERING

https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-2132/5/1/009

Abstract

At present, when conducting an interference well test, a constant flow rate (at the 'active' well) is utilized, and the type-curve matching technique (where only 2-3 values of pressure drops are matched) is used to estimate the porosity-total compressibility product and formation permeability. For oil and geothermal reservoirs with low formation permeability, the duration of the test may require an extended period, and it can be challenging to maintain a constant flow rate. The qualitative term 'long' period means that (at a given distance between the 'active' and 'observational' well) more test time (for low permeability formations) is needed to obtain tangible pressure drops in the 'observational' well. In this study, we present working equations that will allow us to process field data when the flow rate at the 'active' well is a function of time. The shut-in period is also considered. A new method of field data processing, where all measured pressure drops are utilized, is proposed. The suggested method allows us to use the statistical theory to obtain error estimates on the regression parameters. It is also shown that when high precision (resolution) pressure gauges are employed, the pressure time derivative equations can be used to determine formation hydraulic diffusivity. An example is presented to demonstrate the data processing procedure.

Key takeaways
sparkles

AI

  1. This study presents a new method for processing interference well test data with variable flow rates.
  2. Existing type-curve matching techniques use only 2-3 pressure drop values, limiting accuracy.
  3. Developed equations allow for pressure drop analysis over extended periods, improving results for low permeability formations.
  4. Utilizing high-resolution gauges enables the use of pressure time derivatives to estimate formation properties.
  5. An example demonstrates the application of the method, yielding formation permeability of 1433 mD and total compressibility of 2.74 × 10−5 1 psia−1.