Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Paradoxical decompositions and finitary rules

2018, arXiv (Cornell University)

Abstract

We colour every point x of a probability space X according to the colours of a finite list x 1 , x 2 ,. .. , x k of points such that each of the x i , as a function of x, is a measure preserving transformation. We ask two questions about a colouring rule: (1) does there exist a finitely additive extension of the probability measure for which the x i remain measure preserving and also a colouring obeying the rule almost everywhere that is measurable with respect to this extension?, and (2) does there exist any colouring obeying the rule almost everywhere? If the answer to the first question is no and to the second question yes, we say that the colouring rule is paradoxical. A paradoxical colouring rule not only allows for a paradoxical partition of the space, it requires one. We pay special attention to generalizations of the Hausdorff paradox.

References (6)

  1. S. Banach, Sur le problème de la mesure, Fund. Math. 4 (1923), 7-33.
  2. D. L. Cohn, Measure Theory, Second Edition, Birkhäuser, 2013.
  3. F. Hausdorff, Bemerkung über den Inhalt von Punktmengen, Math. Ann. 75 (1914), 428-433.
  4. A. S. Kechris, S. Solecki, S. Todorcevic. Borel Chromatic Numbers, Adv. in Math. 141-1 (1999), 1-44.
  5. R. S. Simon and G. Tomkowicz, A Bayesian Game without ǫ-equilibria, To appear in Israel Journal of Mathematics,
  6. G. Tomkowicz and S. Wagon, The Banach-Tarski Paradox, Second Edi- tion, Cambridge University Press, 2016.