Incremental Versus Optimized Network Design
2011, arXiv (Cornell University)
https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1109.6347Abstract
Even though the problem of network topology design is often studied as a "clean-slate" optimization, in practice most service-provider and enterprise networks are designed incrementally over time. This evolutionary process is driven by changes in the underlying parameters and constraints (the "environment") and it aims to minimize the modification cost after each change in the environment. In this paper, we first formulate the incremental design approach (in three variations), and compare that with the more traditional optimized design approach in which the objective is to minimize the total network cost. We evaluate the cost overhead and evolvability of incremental design under two network expansion models (random and gradual), comparing incremental and optimized networks in terms of cost, topological similarity, delay and robustness. We find that even though incremental design has some cost overhead, that overhead does not increase as the network grows. Also, it is less costly to evolve an existing network than to design it "from scratch" as long as the network expansion factor is less than a critical value.
References (26)
- R. Albert, H. Jeong, and A. Barabasi. Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature, 406:378, 2000.
- D. Applegate, R. Bixby, V. Chvtal, and W. Cook. The Trav- eling Salesman Problem:(A Computational Study) . Princeton University Press, 2006.
- S. Arya, D. Mount, N. Netanyahu, R. Silverman, and A. Wu. An optimal algorithm for approximate nearest neighbor searching fixed dimensions. J. ACM, 45:891-923, 1998.
- J. Beardwood, J. Halton, and J. Hammersley. The shortest path through many points. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cam- bridge Philosophical Society, (55):299-327, 1959.
- P. Carvalho, L. Ferreira, F. Lobo, and L. Barruncho. Optimal distribution network expansion planning under uncertainty by evolutionary decision convergence. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 20(2):125-129, 1998.
- M. Chiang and M. Yang. Towards Network X-ities From a Topological Point of View: Evolvability and Scalability. Proc., Allerton Conf. on Comm., Control, and Computing, 2004.
- N. Geary, A. Antonopoulos, E. Drakopoulos, and J. O'Reilly. Analysis Of Optimisation Issues In Multi-Period DWDM Net- work Planning. In IEEE INFOCOM, 2001.
- S. Gopal and Krishna Jain. On Network Augmentation. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 35(5):541-543, 1986.
- M. Hahsler and K. Hornik. TSP Infrastructure for the Traveling Salesperson Problem. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 23(2), December 2007.
- M. Herzog, M. Maier, and M. Reisslein. Metropolitan area packet-switched wdm networks: A survey on ring systems. Communications Surveys & Tutorials, IEEE, 6(2):2-20, 2004.
- H. Lee and D. Dooly. Heuristic algorithms for the fiber op- tic network expansion problem. Telecommunication Systems, 7:355-378, 1997.
- L. Li, D. Alderson, W. Willinger, and J. Doyle. A First- Principles Approach to Understanding the Internet's Router- Level Topology. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM, 2004.
- A. Meyerson, K. Munagala, and S. Plotkin. Designing Net- works Incrementally. IEEE FOCS, 2001.
- In a communication network, to place a physical link in the inventory means that the corresponding fiber trunk would not be connected to any switching equipment, even though it it is already laid of course.
- In our computational experiments, two modification costs are rarely equal because link costs are based on distance and they are real numbers.
- The reader should note that the cost overhead metric is differ- ent than the well-known approximation ratio. The latter exam- ines the worse-case solution produced by an algorithm relative to the optimal solution of a given problem. The cost overhead compares the solutions (costs) of two algorithms that aim to minimize two different optimization objectives.
- We could move that edge to the inventory, but in the case of ring design the inventory is never used. So, in this section, the Inventory and Leasing options are equivalent.
- We assume that the propagation delay of a link is proportional to its straight-line length on the Euclidean plane.
- Obviously, Copt does not depend on the three inventory options of the incremental design process.
- M. Pickavet and P. Demeester. Long-term planning of WDM networks: A comparison between single-period and multi-period techniques. Photonic Network Communications, 1(4):331-346, 1999.
- M. Pioro and D. Medhi. Routing, Flow and Capacity Design in Communication and Computer Networks. The Morgan Kauf- mann Series in Networking, 2004.
- A. Tero, S. Takagi, T. Saigusa, K. Ito, D. Bebber, M. Fricker, K. Yumiki, R. Kobayashi, and T. Nakagaki. Rules for Biologically Inspired Adaptive Network Design. Science, 327(5964):439-442, 2010.
- K. Vajanapoom and D. Tipper. Risk based incremental surviv- able network design. 2007.
- T. Wu, R. Cardwell, and M. Broyden. A multi-period design model for survivable network architecture selection for SONET interoffice networks. IEEE Trans. on Reliability, 40:417-427, October 1991.
- B. Yaged. Minimum Cost Routing for Dynamic Network Mod- els. Networks, 3:193-224, 1973.
- N. Zadeh. On Building Minimum Cost Communication Net- works over time. Networks, 4:19-34, 1974.