Information management and improvement of citation indices
2014, International Journal of Information Management
Abstract
Bibliometrics and citation analysis have become an important set of methods for library and information science, as well as an exceptional source of information and knowledge for many other areas. Their main sources are citation indices, which are bibliographic databases like Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, etc. However, bibliographical databases lack perfection and standardization. There are several software tools that perform useful information management and bibliometric analysis importing data from them. A comparison has been carried out to identify which of them perform certain pre-processing tasks. Usually, they are not strong enough to detect all the duplications, mistakes, misspellings and variant names, leaving to the user the tedious and time-consuming task of correcting the data. Furthermore, some of them do not import datasets from different citation indices, but mainly from Web of Science (WoS). A new software tool, called STICCI.eu (Software Tool for Improving and Converting Citation Indices-enhancing uniformity), which is freely available online, has been created to solve these problems. STICCI.eu is able to do conversions between bibliographical citation formats (WoS, Scopus, CSV, BibTex, RIS), correct the usual mistakes appearing in those databases, detect duplications, misspellings, etc., identify and transform the full or abbreviated titles of the journals, homogenize toponymical names of countries and relevant cities or regions and list the processed data in terms of the most cited authors, journals, references, etc.
References (31)
- Amón, I., & Jiménez, C. (2010). Funciones de Similitud sobre Cadenas de Texto: Una Comparación Basada en la Naturaleza de los Datos. Presented at the International Conference on Information Resources Managament (CONF-IRM2010), Montego Bay, Jamaica.
- Bar-Ilan, J., Levene, M., & Lin, A. (2007). Some measures for comparing citation databases. Journal of Informetrics, 1(1), 26-34. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2006.08.001
- Bornmann, L., Leydesdorff, L., Walch-Solimena, C., & Ettl, C. (2011). Mapping excellence in the geography of science: An approach based on Scopus data. Journal of Informetrics, 5(4), 537- 546. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2011.05.005
- Chiang, K. S. (2009). Tools, software -Translational Librarianship Consortium -Confluence. Retrieved December 27, 2012, from https://confluence.cornell.edu/display/TLC/Tools%2C+software
- Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382-1402. doi:10.1002/asi.21525
- Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2012). SciMAT: A new science mapping analysis software tool. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(8), 1609-1630. doi:10.1002/asi.22688
- Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (1990). Introduction to Informetrics : quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science. Elsevier Science Publishers.
- Elsevier. (2011). Content Coverage Guide of SciVerse Scopus. Retrieved October 7, 2012, from http://www.info.sciverse.com/UserFiles/sciverse_scopus_content_coverage_0.pdf
- Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. Faseb Journal, 22(2), 338-342. doi:10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF
- Gagolewski, M. (2011). Bibliometric impact assessment with R and the CITAN package. Journal of Informetrics, 5(4), 678-692. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2011.06.006
- Gomez-Jauregui, V., & Gomez-Jauregui, C. (2012). STICCI.eu. Retrieved January 4, 2013, from http://www.sticci.eu/
- Harzing, A. W. (2007). Publish or Perish. Retrieved January 3, 2013, from http://www.harzing.com/pop.htm#training
- Harzing, A. W. (2008). Google Scholar -a new data source for citation analysis. Retrieved December 15, 2013, from http://www.harzing.com/pop_gs.htm
- Harzing, A.W. (2010) Citation analysis across disciplines: The Impact of different data sources and citation metrics. Retrieved December 15, 2013, from http://www.harzing.com/data_metrics_comparison.htm
- Hood, W., & Wilson, C. (2001). The Literature of Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, and Informetrics. Scientometrics, 52(2), 291-314. doi:10.1023/A:1017919924342
- Ingwersen, P., & Christensen, F. H. (1997). Data set isolation for bibliometric online analyses of research publications: Fundamental methodological issues. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(3), 205-217. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097- 4571(199703)48:3<205::AID-ASI3>3.0.CO;2-0
- Klavans, R., & Boyack, K. W. (2007). Is there a convergent structure of science? A comparison of maps using the ISI and Scopus databases. (D. TorresSalinas & H. F. Moed, Eds.).
- Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Software and data of Loet Leydesdorff. Retrieved December 25, 2012, from http://www.leydesdorff.net/software.htm
- Libmann, F. (2007). Web of Science, Scopus, and Classical Online: Philosophies of Searching. Online, 31(3), 36-40.
- Morris, S. (2000). DIVA software / FrontPage. Retrieved December 25, 2012, from http://conceptsymbols.pbworks.com/w/page/16330153/FrontPage
- Perlman, G. (2011). User Interface Usability Evaluation with Web-Based Questionnaires. Retrieved December 8, 2012, from http://hcibib.org/perlman/question.html
- Postigo Jimenez, M. V., Díaz Casero, J. C., & Hernández Mogollón, R. (2008). Revisión de la literatura en fracaso empresarial: aproximación bibliométrica. In Estableciendo puentes en una economía global. Presented at the Asociación Europea de Dirección y Economía de Empresa. Congreso Nacional, Salamanca.
- Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical Bibliography Or Bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348-349.
- Schildt, H. A., & Mattsson, J. T. (2006). A dense network sub-grouping algorithm for co-citation analysis and its implementation in the software tool Sitkis. Scientometrics, 67(1), 143-163. doi:10.1556/Scient.67.2006.1.9
- Schildt, H.A. (2005). SITKIS -A software tool for bibliometric analysis. Retrieved September 29, 2012, from http://users.tkk.fi/hschildt/sitkis/news.html
- Sci2 Team. (2009). Science of Science (Sci2) Tool. Indiana University and SciTech Strategies,. Retrieved from http://sci2.cns.iu.edu
- Thomson Reuters. (2011). Web of Science factsheet. Retrieved October 7, 2012, from http://thomsonreuters.com/content/science/pdf/Web_of_Science_factsheet.pdf
- Thomson Reuters. (2012). HistCite. Retrieved January 3, 2013, from http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/science/science_products/a-z/histcite/#tab1
- Thornley, C. V., McLoughlin S. J., Johnson, A. C. & Smeaton, A. F. (2011). A bibliometric study of Video Retrieval Evaluation Benchmarking (TRECVid): A methodological analysis. Journal of Information Science. December 2011, vol. 37(6): pp. 577-593., first published on November 4, 2011
- Vieira, E. S., & Gomes, J. A. N. F. (2009). A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science for a typical university. Scientometrics, 81(2), 587-600. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-2178-0
- Web of Science Help. (2011). Web of Science Journal Title Abbreviations. Retrieved November 27, 2012, from http://images.webofknowledge.com/WOK45/help/WOS/0-9_abrvjt.html