Analysis of Evolved Agents Performing Referential Communication
2013, International Conference on Artifical Life
Abstract
A pair of Continuous-time Recurrent Neural Network (CTRNN) based agents called "Sender" and "Receiver" is evolved on a circular world. Their collective objective is to communicate and move to a target -the Sender needs to communicate the address of a target location on the circle, and the Receiver needs to move to that location after receiving the communication. In extension of previous work , the agents are evolved under conditions different from the original work. Qualitative analysis of the most successful agent-pair shows that the Receiver's behavior is reminiscent of Newton's equations of motion in relating its initial velocity to the target address communicated to it. Further analysis using information-theoretic tools reveals a pair of neurons that hold crucial information required for the successful functioning of the Receiver. They are also shown to employ the same kind of information for slightly different purposes.
FAQs
AI
What are the evolutionary strategies observed in Sender-Receiver pairs?
The study reveals that evolved agents exhibit 'shepherding' and 'sit and wait' strategies for communication, demonstrating flexibility in their signaling methods.
How does the constraint zone influence the Sender's communication behavior?
The introduction of the constraint zone restricted Sender movement, leading to evolved communication strategies involving intricate V-shaped trajectories to convey target locations.
What was the best performing Sender-Receiver pair's success rate in trials?
The best performing agent-pair achieved a performance rate of 96% across 80 trials, showcasing the effectiveness of the evolved communication method.
How do mutual information metrics reflect Receiver's processing capabilities?
Mutual information analysis indicates that neuron outputs significantly encode distance-to-target and target address, enhancing the Receiver's ability to navigate effectively.
What roles do specific neurons play in the Receiver's decision-making process?
Neurons like N1 and N5 differentially influence the decision to stop based on target proximity, showcasing adaptive information use throughout the task.
References (4)
- Beer, R. D. (1995). On the dynamics of small continuous-time recurrent neural networks. Adaptive Behavior, 3(4):469-509.
- Williams, P. L. and Beer, R. D. (2008). Evolving referential communication in embodied dynamical agents. In S.Bullocak, J. Noble, R. Watson and M.A. Bedau, editors, Artificial Life XI, pages 702-709. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
- Williams, P. L. and Beer, R. D. (2010). Information Dynamics of Evolved Agents. In S. Doncieux, B. Girard, A. Guillot, J. Hallam, J.-A. Meyer and J-B. Mouret, editors, SAB'10, pages 38-49. Springer.
- Cover, T. M. and Thomas, J. A. editors (2006). Elements of Information Theory, 2 nd edn. Wiley-Interscience, New York.