Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Rescaling of the Roe scheme in low Mach-number flow regions

2017, Journal of Computational Physics

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCP.2016.10.011

Abstract

A rescaled matrix-valued dissipation is reformulated for the Roe scheme in low Mach-number flow regions from a well known family of local low-speed preconditioners popularized by Turkel. The rescaling is obtained by suppressing the iterative preconditioning and by deriving explicitly the full set of eigenspaces of the Roe-Turkel matrix dissipation. This formulation preserves the time consistency and does not require to reformulate the boundary conditions based on the characteristic theory. The dissipation matrix achieves by construction the proper scaling in low-speed flow regions and returns the original Roe scheme at the sonic line. We find that all eigenvalues are nonnegative in the subsonic regime. By removing the iterative preconditioning, it becomes necessary to formulate a stringent stability condition to the explicit scheme in the low-speed flow regions based on the spectral radius of the rescaled matrix dissipation. This formulation also raises a two-timescale problem for the acoustic waves, which is circumvented for a steady-state iterative procedure by the development of a robust implicit characteristic matrix time-stepping scheme. The behaviour of the modified eigenvalues in the incompressible limit and at the sonic line also suggest applying the entropy correction carefully for complex non-linear flows.

References (30)

  1. H. Guillard, C. Viozat On The Behaviour of Upwind Schemes in The Low Mach Number Limit Computers & Fluids, 28 (1999), 63-86
  2. C. Viozat Implicit Upwind Schemes for Low Mach Number Compressible Flows INRIA Report No 3084, January 1997
  3. X.S. Li, C.W. Gu An All-Speed Roe-Type Scheme and its Asymptotic Analysis of Low Mach Number Behaviour J. Comput. Phys., 227 (2008), 5144-5159
  4. F. Rieper A Low Mach Number Fix for Roe's Approximate Riemann Solver J. Comput. Phys., 230 (2011), 5263- 5287
  5. I. Mary, P.Sagaut, M. Deville An Algorithm for Unsteady Viscous Flows at all Speeds Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids, Vol. 34 (2000), pp. 371401
  6. H. Guillard, A. Murone On the Behaviour of Upwind Schemes in the Low Mach Number Limit: II. Godunov Type Schemes INRIA report, No 4189, May 2001
  7. X.S. Li, C.W. Gu Mechanism of Roe-type Schemes for All-Speed Flows and its Application Computers & Fluids, 86 (2013), 56-70
  8. S. Dellacherie Analysis of Godunov Type Schemes Applied to The Compressible Euler System at Low Mach Number J. Comput. Phys., 229 (2010), 978-1016
  9. P. Birken, A. Meister Stability of Preconditioned Finite-Volume Schemes at Low Mach Number BIT Numerical Mathematics, 45, (2005), 463-480
  10. B. Thornber, A. Mosedale, D. Drikakis, D. Youngs, and R. Williams An Improved Reconstruction Method for Compressible Flows with Low Mach Number Features J. Comput. Phys., 227 (2008), 4873-4894
  11. K. Oßwald, A. Siegmund, P. Birken, V. Hannemann and A. Meister L2 Roe: a Low Dissipation Version of Roe's Approximate Riemann Solver for Low Mach Numbers Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids, (2015), DOI: 10.1002/fld.4175
  12. E. Turkel Review of Preconditioning Methods For Fluid Dynamics NASA CR 189712 (1992)
  13. E. Turkel, R. Radespiel and N. Kroll Assessment of Preconditioning Methods For Multidimensional Aerodynamics Computers & Fluids, 6 (1997), 613-634
  14. Turkel E. Preconditioned Methods For Solving the Incompressible And Low Speed Compressible Equations J. Comput. Phys., 72 (1987), 277-298
  15. E. Turkel, V.N. Vatsa, R.Radespiel Preconditioning Methods For Low Speed Flows NASA Contractor Report 201605 and ICASE Report 96-57, October 1996
  16. E. Turkel, V.N. Vatsa Choice of Variables and Preconditioning for Time Dependent Problems AIAA paper 2003- 3692, 2003
  17. Turkel E. Preconditioned Techniques in Computational Fluid Dynamics Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics (1999) Vol. 31, pp. 385-416
  18. E. Turkel, A. Fiterman, and B. Van Leer Preconditioning and the limit of the compressible to the incompressible flow equations for finite difference schemes eds. M.M. Hafez and D.A. Caughey (Wiley, Chichester, 1994), pp. 215-234
  19. H. Guillard -A. Murrone On the Behaviour of Upwind Schemes in the Low Mach Number Limit : II. Godunov Type Schemes INRIA Report No 4189, May 2001
  20. Choi Y.H. Merkle C.L. The Application of Preconditioning To Viscous Flows J. Comput. Phys., 105 (1993), 207- 223
  21. D.L. Darmofal and J. Schmid The Importance of Eigenvectors for Local Preconditioners of the Euler Equations J. Comput. Phys., 127 (1996), 346-362
  22. B. Van Leer, W.T. Lee and P. Roe Characteristic Time-Stepping or Local Preconditioning of the Euler Equations AIAA-91-1552-CP (1991)
  23. W. A. Mulder and B. Van Leer Experiments with Implicit Upwind Methods for the Euler Equations J. Comput. Phys., 59 (1985), 232-246
  24. Lerat, A. Multidimensional Centered Schemes of the Lax-Wendroff Type Computational Fluid Dynamics Review, pp. 124-140, 1995
  25. A. Lerat Difference Schemes for Nonlinear Hyperbolic Systems -A General Framework Lecture Notes in Math., 1402, pp. 12-29, 1989
  26. A. Harten and J.M. Hyman Self Adjusting Grid Methods for one-dimensional hyperbolic conservation laws J. Comput. Phys., 50 (1983), 253-269
  27. A. Harten High Resolution Schemes for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws J. Comput. Phys., 49 (1983), 357-393
  28. Y. Colin, H. Deniau and J.F. Boussuge. A Robust Low-Speed Preconditioning Formulation Computers & Fluids, 47 (2011), 1-15
  29. E. Turkel Robust Low Speed Preconditioning for Viscous High Lift Flows AIAA paper 2002-0962, 2002
  30. J. Vassberg and A. Jameson In Pursuit of Grid Convergence for Two-Dimensional Euler Solutions Journal of Air- craf, Vol. 47, No. 4, 2010