Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Computer-based plagiarism detection methods and tools

2007, Proceedings of the 2007 international conference on Computer systems and technologies - CompSysTech '07

https://doi.org/10.1145/1330598.1330642

Abstract

The paper is dedicated to plagiarism problem. The ways how to reduce plagiarism: both: plagiarism prevention and plagiarism detection are discussed. Widely used plagiarism detection methods are described. The most known plagiarism detection tools are analysed.

References (20)

  1. Aslam, J.A., M. Frost. An information-theoretic measure for document similarity. Proceedings of the 26th international ACM/SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, pp. 449-450, 2003.
  2. Bao, J.P., J.Y. Shen, H.Y. Liu, X.D. Liu. A fast document copy detection model.
  3. Soft Computing -A Fusion of Foundations, Methodologies and Applications. Vol. 10 (1), pp. 41 -46, 2006.
  4. Brin, S., J. Davis, H. Garcia Molina. Copy detection mechanisms for digital documents. Proceedings of the 1995 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, San Jose, California, pp. 398-409,1995.
  5. Delvin, M. Plagiarism detection software: how effective is it? Assessing Learning in Australian Universities, 2002. Available at: http://www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/ assessinglearning/docs/PlagSoftware.pdf
  6. Gruner, S., S. Naven. Tool support for plagiarism detection in text documents. Proceedings of the 2005 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. pp. 776 -781, 2005.
  7. Halstead, M. Elements of Software Science, Elsevier Publishers, New York. 1977.
  8. iParadigms. Plagiarism Prevention: Stop plagiarism now… with Turnitin®. Product datasheet, 2006. Available online at: http://turnitin.com/static/pdf/datasheet_plagiarism.pdf [8] iParadigms, LLC. Turnitin. Plagiarism prevention engine. Available online at: http://www.turnitin.com
  9. Jones, E.W. Plagiarism monitoring and detection -towards and open discussion. In Proceedings of the twelfth annual CCSC South Central conference on The Journal of Computing in Small Colleges, pp. 229-236, 2001.
  10. Lancaster T., F. Culwin. A review of electronic services for plagiarism detection in student submissions. Paper presented at 8 th Annual Conference on the Teaching of Computing, Edinburgh, 2000. Available at: http://www.ics.heacademy.ac.uk/events/ presentations/317_Culwin.pdf
  11. Lancaster T., F. Culwin. A visual argument for plagiarism detection using word pairs. Paper presented at Plagiarism: Prevention, Practice and Policy Conference 2004.
  12. Lancaster, T., F. Culwin. Classifications of Plagiarism Detection Engines. ITALICS Vol. 4 (2), 2005.
  13. Maurer, H., F. Kappe, B. Zaka. Plagiarism -A Survey. Journal of Universal Computer Sciences, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 1050 -1084, 2006.
  14. Neill, C.J., G. Shanmuganthan. A Web -enabled plagiarism detection tool. IT Professional, vol. 6, issue 5, pp. 19 -23, 2004.
  15. Robertson, S., S. Walker. Some simple effective approximations to the 2- poissonmodel for probabilistic weighted retrieval. Proceedings of the 17th international ACM/SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, pp. 232- 241, 1994.
  16. Saxon, S. Comparison of plagiarism detection techniques applied to student code: Computer science project (Pt. II). Cambridge: Trinity College, 2000.
  17. Stein, B., S.M. zu Eissen. Near Similarity Search and Plagiarism Analysis. Proceeding of 29th Annual Conference of the German Classification Society, pp. 430-437, 2006.
  18. Schleimer, S., D.S. Wilkerson, A. Aiken. Winnowing: Local Algorithm for Document Fingerprinting. Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pp. 76-85, 2003. [19] The University of Sydney Teaching and Learning Committee. Plagiarism detection software report. Draft One, 2003.
  19. Tan, C.L, W. Huang, S.Y. Sung, Z. Yu, Y. Xu. Text Retrieval from Document Images Based on Word Shape Analysis. Applied Intelligence 18, pp. 257-270, 2003 [21] Wan, X. Beyond topical similarity: a structural similarity measure for retrieving highly similar documents. Knowledge and Information Systems, 2006.
  20. Zhai, C., J. Lafferty. A study of smoothing methods for language models applied to ad-hoc information retrieval. Proceedings of the 24th annual international ACM/SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, pp. 334-342, 2001.