Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

An Integrated Teaching Methodology for Manufacturing Processes

2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings

https://doi.org/10.18260/P.23534

Abstract

His research interests include; modeling for facility planning, genetic algorithms, education of manufacturing technologies, RFID applications in food and pharmaceutical applications, operations management in healthcare industry.

Key takeaways
sparkles

AI

  1. Implementing a three-tiered teaching approach enhances manufacturing education through integration of theory, simulation, and hands-on experience.
  2. The course ENGR 3600 emphasizes competency in basic manufacturing processes, tooling, and materials over 16 weeks.
  3. Student performance showed 86% and 91% achieved grades of B or higher for outcomes M2 and M3, respectively.
  4. CastView™ software enables effective simulation of casting processes, promoting quick analysis and design evaluation.
  5. Hands-on laboratory sessions, including sand casting, reinforce theoretical knowledge and improve student engagement.

References (10)

  1. Lee, K. (1999). Principles of cad/cam/cae systems. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Company.
  2. Ma, J., & Nickerson, J. V. (2006). Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: A comparative literature review. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 38(3), 7.
  3. De Jong, T., Linn, M. C., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2013). Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering education. Science, 340(6130), 305-308.
  4. Corter, J. E., Esche, S. K., Chassapis, C., Ma, J., & Nickerson, J. V. (2011). Process and learning outcomes from remotely-operated, simulated, and hands-on student laboratories. Computers & Education, 57(3), 2054- 2067.
  5. Klee, H., & Dumas, J. (1994). Theory, simulation, experimentation: an integrated approach to teaching digital control systems. Education, IEEE Transactions on, 37(1), 57-62.
  6. Abdulwahed, M., & Nagy, Z. K. (2009). Applying Kolb's experiential learning cycle for laboratory education. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(3), 283-294.
  7. North American Die Casting Association, Gateway to Metal Casting Resources, CastView, Online resource: located at: http://gateway.metalcasting.govtools.us/project.asp?catid=90&projectid=62&projecttitle=CastView, accessed December 23, 2014.
  8. Sirinterlikci, A., & Habib, S.G. (2003). Utilizing manufacturing process simulation tools as instructional aids. Proceedings of the 2003 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Session 3263. Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
  9. Stevens, D. D., & Levi, A. J. (2005). Introduction to Rubrics: An assessment tool to save grading time, convey effective feedback and promote student learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing; pp. 96-97.
  10. Writing@CSU |The Writing Studio. Rubric for Conducting an Experiment in the Lab, Online resource, located at: http://writing.colostate.edu/guides/teaching/commenting/experiment.cfm, accessed December 22, 2014.