Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Learning and Classification of Events in Monitored Environments

2009

Abstract

This paper presents a prototype system to automatically carry out surveillance tasks in monitored environments. This system consists in a supervised machine learning algorithm that generates a set of highly interpretable rules in order to classify events as normal or anomalous from 2D images without needing to build a 3D model of the environment. Each security camera has an associated knowledge base which is updated when the environmental conditions change. To deal with uncertainty and vagueness inherent in video surveillance, we make use of Fuzzy Logic. The process of building the knowledge base and how to apply the generated sets of fuzzy rules is described in depth for a virtual environment.

References (18)

  1. W. Wang and S. Maybank. A survey on visual surveillance of object motion and behaviors. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C, IEEE Transactions on, 34(3):334-352, 2004.
  2. M. Valera and S.A. Velastin. Intelligent distributed surveillance systems: a review. In Vision, Image and Signal Processing, IEE Proceedings-, volume 152, pages 192-204, 2005.
  3. G.J.D. Smith. Behind the screens: Examining constructions of deviance and informal practices among cctv control room operators in the uk. Surveillance and Society, 2(2/3):376-95, 2004.
  4. J.F. Allen. An interval-based representation of temporal knowl- edge. In Proc. 7th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vancouver, Canada, pages 221-226, 1981.
  5. J. Allen and G. Ferguson. Actions and events in interval tem- poral logic. In Journal of Logic and Computation, volume 4(5), pages 531-579, 1994.
  6. F. Fusier, V. Valentin, F. Bremond, M. Thonnat, M. Borg, D. Thirde, and J. Ferryman. Video understanding for com- plex activity recognition. Machine Vision and Applications, 18(3):167-188, 2007.
  7. H.M. Dee and D.C. Hogg. Navigational strategies and surveil- lance. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Visual Surveillance, pages 73-81, 2005.
  8. D. Makris and T. Ellis. Path detection in video surveillance. Image and Vision Computing, 20(12):895-903, 2002.
  9. G.L. Foresti, C. Micheloni, and L. Snidaro. Event classification for automatic visual-based surveillance of parking lots. Proc. of the 17th International Confrence on Pattern Recognition, 3:314-317, 2004.
  10. H. Buxton and S. Gong. Visual surveillance in a dynamic and uncertain world. Artificial Intelligence, 78(1-2):431-459, 1995.
  11. P. Remagnino and GA Jones. Classifying Surveillance Events from Attributes and Behaviour. In the Proceeding of the British Machine Vision Conference, pages 10-13.
  12. Lotfi A. Zadeh. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8:338- 353, 1965.
  13. T. Takagi and M. Sugeno. Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modelling and control. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 15(1):116-132, Jan-Feb 1985.
  14. P. Angelov and X. Zhou. Evolving Fuzzy-Rule-Based Classi- fiers From Data Streams. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 16(6):1462-1475, 2008.
  15. H. Stern, U. Kartoun, and A. Shmilovici. A prototype Fuzzy System for Surveillance Picture Understanding. IASTED In- ternational Conference Visualization, Imaging, and Image Pro- cessing (VIIP 2001), Marbella, Spain, pages 624-629, 2001.
  16. L. Rodriguez-Benitez, J. Moreno-Garcia, J.J. Castro-Schez, J. Albusac, and L. Jimenez-Linares. Automatic objects be- haviour recognition from compressed video domain. Image and Vision Computing, 27(6):648 -657, 2009.
  17. J.L. Castro, J.J. Castro-Schez, and J.M. Zurita. Learning max- imal structure rules in fuzzy logic for knowledge acquisition in expert systems. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 101(3):331-342, 1999.
  18. M. Shimrat. Algorithm 112: Position of point relative to poly- gon. Communications of the ACM, 5(8):434, 1962.