Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Title
Abstract
Introduction
Review of the Standard Model
Note on the Inclusion of Published Material
Signal and Background Analysis
Phenomenological Implications
Chapter Summary
References
All Topics
Physics
Nuclear and High Energy Physics

Fermion masses and new symmetries beyond the Standard Model

Profile image of Nathan GrossmannNathan Grossmann

2010

Abstract
sparkles

AI

This paper explores the phenomenon of fermion masses and proposes new symmetries that extend beyond the traditional framework of the Standard Model of particle physics. By analyzing the gauge theories and their transformations, the work aims to provide insights into the underlying structure governing particle interactions, suggesting modifications that could account for observed mass discrepancies among fermions. Additionally, the implications of these new symmetries are discussed in the context of theoretical models and potential experimental validations.

Related papers

On a Standard Model Extension with Vector-like Fermions and Abelian Symmetry
Sang Quang Dinh

Communications in Physics, 2020

We investigate an extension of the standard model with vector-like fermions and an extra Abelian gauge symmetry. The particle mass spectrum is calculated explicitly. The Lagrangian terms for all the gauge interactions of leptons and quarks in the model are derived. We observe that while there is no new mixing in the lepton sector, the quark mixing plays an important role in the magnitudes of gauge interactions for quarks, particularly the interactions with massive \(W\), \(Z\) and \(Z'\) bosons. We calculate the contributions of the new vector-like leptons and quarks to the Peskin-Takeuchi parameters as well as the \(\rho\) parameter of the electroweak precision tests, and show that the model is realistic.

View PDFchevron_right
SYSTEMATIC STUDY OF THE SU(3) c ⊗SU(4) L ⊗U(1) X GAUGE SYMMETRY
Luis O.

Modern Physics Letters A, 2007

We carry a systematic study of possible extensions of the standard model based on the gauge group SU (3) c ⊗SU (4) L ⊗U (1) X . We consider both models with particles with exotic electric charges and models which do not contain exotic electric charges neither in the gauge boson sector nor in the fermion sector. For the first case an infinite number of models can, in principle, be constructed, while the restriction to non-exotic electric charges only allows for eight different anomaly-free models. Four of them are three-family models in the sense that anomalies cancel by an interplay between the three families, and another two are one-family models where anomalies cancel family by family as in the standard model. The remaining two are two-family models.

View PDFchevron_right
Fermion masses from symmetry
Christof Wetterich

Nuclear Physics B, 1987

View PDFchevron_right
UNIFIED FERMION FIELD for the STANDARD MODEL
Hans de Vries

All the Standard Model fermions, three generations of leptons and quarks, are found to be different excitations of a single unified field, as the eigenvectors of a single generator function with the charge as only variable. The field's content determines the type of fermion and its interactions. We obtain, from a single unified Fermion Lagrangian, the many separated, particle dependent, pieces of the Standard Model Fermion Lagrangian.

View PDFchevron_right
A Geometric Basis for the Standard-Model Gauge Group
Greg Trayling

International Journal of Modern Physics, 2001

A geometric approach to the standard model in terms of the Clifford algebra C 7 is advanced. A key feature of the model is its use of an algebraic spinor for one generation of leptons and quarks. Spinor transformations separate into left-sided ("exterior") and right-sided ("interior") types. By definition, Poincaré transformations are exterior ones. We consider all rotations in the sevendimensional space that (1) conserve the spacetime components of the particle and antiparticle currents and (2) do not couple the right-chiral neutrino. These rotations comprise additional exterior transformations that commute with the Poincaré group and form the group SU (2) L , interior ones that constitute SU (3) C , and a unique group of coupled double-sided rotations with U (1) Y symmetry. The spinor mediates a physical coupling of Poincaré and isotopic symmetries within the restrictions of the Coleman-Mandula theorem. The four extra spacelike dimensions in the model form a basis for the Higgs isodoublet field, whose symmetry requires the chirality of SU (2). The charge assignments of both the fundamental fermions and the Higgs boson are produced exactly.

View PDFchevron_right
Unified theory for external and internal attributes and symmetries of fundamental fermions
Ikuo Sogami

Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2011

An unorthodox unified theory is developed to describe external and internal attributes and symmetries of fundamental fermions, quarks and leptons. Basic ingredients of the theory are an algebra which consists of all the triple-direct-products of Dirac γ-matrices and a triple-spinor-field, called a triplet field, defined on the algebra. The algebra possesses three commutative subalgebras which describe, respectively, the external spacetime symmetry, the family structure and the internal color symmetry of quarks and leptons. The triplet field includes threefold (fourfold) repetitional modes of spin 1 2 component fields with SU(3) (SU(4)) color symmetry. It is possible to qualify the Yukawa interaction and to make a new interpretation of its coupling constants naturally in an intrinsic mechanism of the triplet field formalism. The Dirac mass matrices with quasi-democratic structure are derived as an illustration.

View PDFchevron_right
Gauge-Field Theory of Particles. II. Fermions
Alan Chodos

Physical Review D, 1972

We construct classes of Lagrangians which describe families of fermions containing an infinite number of particles. The Lagrangians depend on Rarita-Schwinger fields with k Lorentz indices, k =1, 2, ... , which have bilinear interactions among themselves. These Lagrangians are invariant under gauge transformations of the second kind. The physical states appear as the normal modes of these field theories, and by suitable choices of the masses of the underlying gauge fields, the physical fermions can be made to lie on linearly rising Regge trajectories. The currents have nontrivial diagonal matrix elements, and also have matrix elements between states of different spin. By considering time-ordered products of currents between single-particle states, we are able to construct onand off-mass-shell N-point functions in the narrow-resonance approximation.

View PDFchevron_right
SU(3)C⊗SU(3)L⊗U(1)X gauge symmetry from SU(4)PS⊗SU(4)L+R
Dr. Aparna Dixit PSIT

Physical Review D, 2005

We consider an extension of the standard model gauge symmetry to a local gauge group SU(3) C ⊗SU(3) L ⊗U(1) X which is a subgroup of SU(4) PS ⊗ SU(4) L+R .The symmetry breaking pattern is SU(4) SU(3) ⊗U(1) for both weak SU(4) L+R and strong Pati-Salam SU(4) PS group. The SU(3) C ⊗U(1) B-L ⊗SU(3) L ⊗U(1) Y1 (3-3-1-1) local gauge symmetry breaks to SU(3) C ⊗SU(3) L ⊗U(1) X and generates a 3-3-1 model with threegeneration, anomaly-free fermions which transform as bifundamentals of (3-3-1-1). The 3-3-1 model is of Pleitez-Frampton type but SU(3) L gauge bosons (B-L = 0) do not include bilepton gauge boson.The neutral gauge bosons include γ, Z, Z / and a fourth, heavy gauge boson Z // which decouples from rest but can decay to ordinary fermions. An analysis for two-body decays of neutral Z / gauge boson is presented .From Yukawa interactions, the masses of all exotic fermions are obtained in the TeV region .This restricts Z / decays to exotic fermions The Z / is also found to be leptophobic and decays mainly to quarks.

View PDFchevron_right
Systematic study of the SU(3)_c X SU(4)_L X U(1)_X gauge symmetry
Luis O.

2006

We carry a systematic study of possible extensions of the standard model based on the gauge group SU(3)_c X SU(4)_L X U(1)_X. We consider both models with particles with exotic electric charges and models which do not contain exotic electric charges neither in the gauge boson sector nor in the fermion sector. For the first case an infinite number of models can, in principle, be constructed, while the restriction to non-exotic electric charges only allows for eight different anomaly-free models. Four of them are three-family models in the sense that anomalies cancel by an interplay between the three families, and another two are one-family models where anomalies cancel family by family as in the standard model. The remaining two are two-family models.

View PDFchevron_right
Gauge Theory of Elementary Interactions
Abdus Salam

Physical Review, 1964

Il and D couplings of baryons and mesons are shown to arise naturally with a simple extension of the gauge formalism to a (SUpXSUI)sX(SU~XSU,)s group structure. In its general formulation the theory needs parity doubltets of (0+) and (0-) ninefolds. It admits of (two types of F and D coupled) (1+) and (1-) vector and axial-vector meson multiplets, a specially attractive combination of currents which emerges from the formalism being an equal mixture of vector F with axial-vector D /the case of (SUp)sX(SUg)ag. The theory also admits an approximate (Bronzan-Low) type of quantum number. I. INTRODUCTIOÑ~~Ĩ TH the discovery of SU3 as the strong interaction symmetry group, ' with the discovery that the electromagnetic current (for strongly interacting particles) is part of the SUs structure s and that' (at least in their semileptonic aspects) weak currents of strongly interacting particles also belong to SU3, a complete theory of elementary interactions seems not too distant. In this series of papers we make a preliminary attempt towards determining their underlying group structure and to construct a gauge theory of strong, weak, and electromagnetic interactions. We believe that the gauge principle4 must be an essential ingredient of any attempt to construct a fundamental theory. The gauge principle is the only known way tõ

View PDFchevron_right

References (74)

  1. S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 1264 (1967).
  2. A. Salam, in Proceedings of 8th Nobel Symposium, Lerum, Sweden, 19-25 May 1968, pp 367-377.
  3. B. N. Grossmann, Z. Murdock and S. Nandi, arXiv:1011.5256 [hep-ph].
  4. B. N. Grossmann, B. McElrath, S. Nandi and S. K. Rai, Phys. Rev. D 82, 055021 (2010) [arXiv:1006.5019 [hep-ph]].
  5. B. N. Grossmann, Z. Murdock and S. Nandi, Phys. Lett. B 693, 274 (2010) [arXiv:1005.4953 [hep-ph]].
  6. N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos and G. R. Dvali, Phys. Lett. B 429, 263 (1998) [arXiv:hep-ph/9803315].
  7. I. Antoniadis, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos and G. R. Dvali, Phys. Lett. B 436, 257 (1998) [arXiv:hep-ph/9804398].
  8. Z. Bern, T. Dennen, Y. t. Huang and M. Kiermaier, Phys. Rev. D 82, 065003 (2010) [arXiv:1004.0693 [hep-th]].
  9. H. Davoudiasl, R. Kitano, T. Li and H. Murayama, Phys. Lett. B 609, 117 (2005) [arXiv:hep-ph/0405097].
  10. I. Gogoladze, Y. Mimura and S. Nandi, Phys. Lett. B 562, 307 (2003) [arXiv:hep-ph/0302176].
  11. J. H. Heo, Phys. Rev. D 80, 033001 (2009) [arXiv:0811.0298 [hep-ph]].
  12. P. Langacker, arXiv:0911.4294 [hep-ph].
  13. J. L. Hewett and T. G. Rizzo, Phys. Rept. 183, 193 (1989).
  14. D. J. Muller and S. Nandi, Phys. Lett. B 383, 345 (1996) [arXiv:hep-ph/9602390].
  15. E. Malkawi, T. M. P. Tait and C. P. Yuan, Phys. Lett. B 385, 304 (1996) [arXiv:hep-ph/9603349].
  16. R. S. Chivukula, E. H. Simmons and J. Terning, Phys. Rev. D 53, 5258 (1996) [arXiv:hep-ph/9506427].
  17. J. C. Pati and A. Salam, Phys. Rev. D 10, 275 (1974) [Erratum-ibid. D 11, 703 (1975)].
  18. T. Han, P. Langacker and B. McElrath, Phys. Rev. D 70, 115006 (2004) [arXiv:hep-ph/0405244].
  19. B. A. Dobrescu and P. J. Fox, JHEP 0808, 100 (2008) [arXiv:0805.0822 [hep-ph]].
  20. B. S. Balakrishna, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1602 (1988).
  21. B. S. Balakrishna, A. L. Kagan and R. N. Mohapatra, Phys. Lett. B 205, 345 (1988).
  22. B. S. Balakrishna and R. N. Mohapatra, Phys. Lett. B 216, 349 (1989).
  23. K. S. Babu and S. Nandi, Phys. Rev. D 62, 033002 (2000) [arXiv:hep-ph/9907213].
  24. G. F. Giudice and O. Lebedev, Phys. Lett. B 665, 79 (2008) [arXiv:0804.1753 [hep-ph]].
  25. J. D. Lykken, Z. Murdock and S. Nandi, Phys. Rev. D 79, 075014 (2009) [arXiv:0812.1826 [hep-ph]].
  26. C. D. Froggatt and H. B. Nielsen, Nucl. Phys. B 147, 277 (1979).
  27. W. M. Yao et al. [Particle Data Group], J. Phys. G 33, 1 (2006).
  28. P. Langacker, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1199 (2009) [arXiv:0801.1345 [hep-ph]].
  29. S. Mrenna and J. D. Wells, Phys. Rev. D 63, 015006 (2001) [arXiv:hep-ph/0001226].
  30. A. Melnitchouk [D0 Collaboration], Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 20, 3305 (2005) [arXiv:hep-ex/0501067].
  31. J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra and G. C. Branco, Phys. Lett. B 495, 347 (2000) [arXiv:hep-ph/0004190].
  32. M. Cacciari, S. Frixione, M. L. Mangano, P. Nason and G. Ridolfi, JHEP 0809, 127 (2008) [arXiv:0804.2800 [hep-ph]].
  33. C. Amsler et al. [Particle Data Group], Phys. Lett. B 667, 1 (2008).
  34. J. Pumplin, A. Belyaev, J. Huston, D. Stump and W. K. Tung, JHEP 0602, 032 (2006) [arXiv:0512167 [hep-ph]].
  35. L. Scodellaro (CDF Collaborations and D0 Collaboration), in Proceedings of the International Conference on High Energy Physics, Paris, 2010 (unpublished)
  36. A. Pukhov, "CalcHEP 2.3: MSSM, structure functions, event generation, batchs, and generation of matrix elements for other packages" [arXiv:hep-ph/0412191].
  37. R. Contino and G. Servant, JHEP 0806, 026 (2008) [arXiv:0801.1679 [hep-ph]].
  38. J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, JHEP 0911, 030 (2009) [arXiv:0907.3155 [hep-ph]].
  39. T. Han, Z. Si, K. M. Zurek and M. J. Strassler, JHEP 0807, 008 (2008) [arXiv:0712.2041 [hep-ph]].
  40. W. F. Chang, J. N. Ng and J. M. S. Wu, Phys. Rev. D 75, 115016 (2007) [arXiv:hep-ph/0701254].
  41. J. Erler, P. Langacker, S. Munir and E. R. Pena, JHEP 0908, 017 (2009) [arXiv:0906.2435 [hep-ph]].
  42. T. Aaltonen et al. [CDF Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 091805 (2009) [arXiv:0811.0053 [hep-ex]].
  43. T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna and P. Z. Skands, JHEP 0605, 026 (2006) [arXiv:hep-ph/0603175].
  44. G. Corcella et al., "HERWIG 6.5 Release Note" [arXiv:hep-ph/0210213].
  45. T. Stelzer and W. F. Long, Comput. Phys. Commun. 81, 357 (1994) [arXiv:hep-ph/9401258].
  46. H. Baer, V. Barger, A. Lessa and X. Tata, JHEP 0909, 063 (2009) [arXiv:0907.1922 [hep-ph]].
  47. I. R. Tomalin [CMS Collaboration], J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 110, 092033 (2008).
  48. S. N. Ahmed et al. [SNO Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 181301 (2004) [arXiv:nucl-ex/0309004].
  49. Q. R. Ahmad et al. [SNO Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 011301 (2002) [arXiv:nucl-ex/0204008].
  50. S. Fukuda et al. [Super-Kamiokande Collaboration], Phys. Lett. B 539, 179 (2002) [arXiv:hep-ex/0205075].
  51. M. B. Smy et al. [Super-Kamiokande Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D 69, 011104 (2004) [arXiv:hep-ex/0309011].
  52. Y. Ashie et al. [Super-Kamiokande Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 101801 (2004) [arXiv:hep-ex/0404034].
  53. Y. Ashie et al. [Super-Kamiokande Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D 71, 112005 (2005) [arXiv:hep-ex/0501064].
  54. R. N. Mohapatra et al., Rept. Prog. Phys. 70, 1757 (2007) [arXiv:hep-ph/0510213].
  55. P. Minkowski, Phys. Lett. B 67, 421 (1977).
  56. M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond, and R. Slansky, Supergravity (P. van Nieuwenhuizen et al. eds.), North Holland, Amsterdam, 1980, p. 315; Print-80-0576 (CERN).
  57. T. Yanagida, in Proceedings of the Workshop on the Unified Theory and the Baryon Number in the Universe (O. Sawada and A. Sugamoto, eds.), KEK, Tsukuba, Japan, 13-14 Feb 1979, p. 95.
  58. S. L. Glashow, NATO Adv. Study Inst. Ser. B Phys. 59, 687 (1980).
  59. R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 912 (1980).
  60. N. Arkani-Hamed and S. Dimopoulos, JHEP 0506, 073 (2005) [arXiv:hep-th/0405159].
  61. S. Gabriel and S. Nandi, Phys. Lett. B 655, 141 (2007) [arXiv:hep-ph/0610253].
  62. S. Gabriel, B. Mukhopadhyaya, S. Nandi and S. K. Rai, Phys. Lett. B 669, 180 (2008) [arXiv:0804.1112 [hep-ph]].
  63. P. Achard et al. [L3 Collaboration], Phys. Lett. B 517, 67 (2001) [arXiv:hep-ex/0107014].
  64. J. Baglio and A. Djouadi, JHEP 1010, 064 (2010) [arXiv:1003.4266 [hep-ph]].
  65. F. Stockli and R. Suarez, http://wwweth.cern.ch/HiggsCrossSections/HiggsCrossSection.html
  66. V. M. Abazov et al. [D0 Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 071801 (2010) [arXiv:0912.5285 [hep-ex]].
  67. S. Nandi and Z. Tavartkiladze, Phys. Lett. B 672, 240 (2009) [arXiv:0804.1996 [hep-ph]].
  68. F. Maltoni and T. Stelzer, JHEP 0302, 027 (2003) [arXiv:0208156 [hep-ph]].
  69. G. Bertone, D. Hooper and J. Silk, Phys. Rept. 405, 279 (2005) [arXiv:hep-ph/0404175].
  70. T. j. Li and S. Nandi, Phys. Lett. B 617, 112 (2005) [arXiv:hep-ph/0408160].
  71. S. Gopalakrishna, S. Jung and J. D. Wells, Phys. Rev. D 78, 055002 (2008) [arXiv:0801.3456 [hep-ph]].
  72. V. Barger, H. E. Logan and G. Shaughnessy, Phys. Rev. D 79, 115018 (2009) [arXiv:0902.0170 [hep-ph]].
  73. G. Bhattacharyya, G. C. Branco and S. Nandi, Phys. Rev. D 77, 117701 (2008) [arXiv:0712.2693 [hep-ph]].
  74. M. Apollonio et al. [CHOOZ Collaboration], Phys. Lett. B 420, 397 (1998) [arXiv:hep-ex/9711002].

Related papers

D ec 2 01 9 A U ( 2 ) × U ( 3 ) GAUGE THEORY EXTENSION OF THE STANDARD MODEL
rafael Bernal herrera

2019

Abstract. We consider an extension of the standard model based on the group U(2) × U(3), which is naturally compatible with the standard model interacting-particle representations and the spontaneous symmetry breaking of U(2) × U(3) to an electrostrong U(3). In its minimal version, the model only adds one extra U(1) gauge boson and it implies that the hypercharge is distributed between the factors of the hyperweak and hyperstrong forces. We show that the anomaly cancellation condition can be solved by adding exotic fermions associated with a 16-dimensional representation of U(2)×U(3). A brief discussion of the mechanism of the spontaneous breakdown of U(2) ×U(3) in the gauge boson sector is given.

View PDFchevron_right
Gauge bosons and fermions in SU(3)C x SU(4)L x U(1)X model with SU(2)H xU(1)AH symmetry
H Ah

2009

We present a phenomenological study of neutral gauge bosons and fermions in an extended Standard model with SU(3)C x SU(4)L x U(1)X gauge symmetry.The model includes gauge bosons and fermions without exotic charges and is distinguished by the symmetry-breaking patern SU(4)L->SU(2)L x SU(2)H x U(1)AH. This introduces an extended electroweak symmetry group SU(2)L x SU(2)H at low energies.We recover the fermion spectra of an anomaly-free three-family 3-4-1 modelwithout exotic chargesfor U(1)X charge X = T3R+(B-L)/2.The interaction of physical neutral gauge bosons Zprime,Z double prime and exotic fermions are presented along with their masses and mixing angle.The electroweak constraints from oblique corections on the model are also calculated.

View PDFchevron_right
Study of the gauge group SU(2)L�(T3)R�UV(1)
david iskandar

Nucl Phys B, 1980

We study the gauge group SU(2)L×(T3)RXUv(1) for the unification of the weak and electromagnetic interactions. This group, which contains the standard SU(2)x U(I) Weinberg-Salam (WS) model as a subgroup, can emerge as a low-energy subgroup in some models of grand unification. Depending on the symmetry breaking pattern we set limits on the mass of the heavier Z boson. One symmetry breaking pattern allows parity violations in atoms to be much smaller than in the WS model while preserving the agreement with data in all other processes. This pattern permits the heavier Z boson to be as light as 1.78 Mw/cos 0w. An alternate pattern only affects neutrino results, and here the lower limit on the heavy Z boson mass is 2.74 Mw/cos 0w.

View PDFchevron_right
Non-Abelian Gauge Symmetries beyond the Standard Model
V. Pleitez

Advances in High Energy Physics, 2012

View PDFchevron_right
Unified Lepton-Hadron Symmetry and a Gauge Theory of the Basic Interactions
Abdus Salam

Physical Review D, 1973

An attempt is made to unify the fundamental hadrons and leptons into a common irreducible representation I of the same symmetry group G and to generate a gauge theory of strong, electromagnetic, and weak interactions. Based on certain constraints from the hadronic side, it is proposed that the group 6 is SU(4') x SU(4"), which contains a Han-Nambu-type SU(3') x SU{3")group for the hadronic symmetry, and that the representation I' is (4, 4*). There exist four possible choices for the lepton number L and accordingly four possible assignments of the hadrons and leptons within the (4, 4*). Two of these require nine Han-Nambu-type quarks, three "charmed" quarks, and the observed quartet of leptons. The other two also require the nine Han-Nambu quarks, plus heavy leptons in addition to observed leptons and only one or no "charmed" quark. One of the above four assignments is found to be suitable to generate a gauge theory of the weak, electromagnetic, and SU(3") gluonlike strong interactions from a selection of the gauges permitted by the model. The resulting gauge symmetry is SU(2')z x U(1) x SU(3")z,+z. The scheme of all three interactions is found to be free from Adler-Bell-Jackiw anomalies. The normal strong interactions arise effectively as a consequence of the strong gauges SU{3")z, z. Masses for the gauge bosons and fermions are generated suitably by a set of 14 complex Higgs fields. The neutral neutrino and AS =0 hadron currents have essentially the same strength in the present model as in other SU(2)L, x U(1) theories. The mixing of strongand weak-gauge bosons (a necessary feature of the model) leads to parity-violating nonleptonic amplitudes, which may be observable depending upon the strength of SU(3") symmetry breaking. The familiar hadron symmetries such as SU{3') and chiral SU(3')& xSU(3')z are broken only by quark mass terms and by the electromagnetic and weak interactions, not by the strong interactions. The difficulties associated with generating gauge interactions in the remaining three assignments are discussed in Appendix A. Certain remarks are made on the question of proton and quark stability in these three schemes,

View PDFchevron_right

Related topics

  • Physics
  • Collider Phenomenology
  • Theoretical Particle Physics
    • 580 California St., Suite 400
    San Francisco, CA, 94104
    © 2025 Academia. All rights reserved