Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Moderation in the blueprint of two wheeler’s suspension spring

INNOVATIONS IN COMPUTATIONAL AND COMPUTER TECHNIQUES: ICACCT-2021

https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0108924

Abstract

This is a computational study of the suspension spring of two wheeler's followed by modification suggestions. The current methods of calculations of the spring parameters fail to account for the role of the spring pitch in developing stresses. Stresses and deflections are critical factors for designing a sustainable spring and play critical roles in the performance. This paper suggests reducing the stresses developed by varying the pitch while proving the correlation between pitch variation and stress production. This is accomplished by geometric modeling of different models of spring and simulating it with applied boundary conditions. The study is further extending to propose ways to reduce stresses in the spring. Finally, the suggested changes can reduce the maximum stresses in the suspension spring components by as much as 50%, from 1963MPa in the original spring to 958MPa in a double coilspring.

References (14)

  1. Hence, we can observe from the above data that the stresses in the Proposed design, i.e., Double Coil HelicalSpring, have considerably reduced compared to the stresses induced in Spring-1 and Spring-2[9].
  2. The variation of deflection and stress concerning the variation in pitch for spring-1 can be observed as follows (allthe graphs below are plotted onMATLAB)[10]: REFERENCES
  3. M. C. N. Castorani, K. A. Hovel, S. L. Williams, and M. L. Baskett, "Disturbance facilitates the coexistence of antagonistic ecosystem engineers in California estuaries," Ecology, vol. 95, no. 8, pp. 2277-2288, 2014, doi: 10.1890/13-1846.1.
  4. A. C. Bose, S. I. Plasynski, and H. M. Ness, "Carbon dioxide mitigation via combustion modification: an overview of U.S. Department of Energy's Power Systems Technology R&D Program.," Fuel Energy Abstr., vol. 43, no. 1, p. 67, 2002, doi: 10.1016/s0140-6701(02)80659-2.
  5. T. d'Almeida et al., "Soft recovery of a ferrous alloy: Structural modification and properties," no. September, pp. 971-976, 2009, doi: 10.1051/dymat/2009136.
  6. E. Govindaraj and K. Duraisamy, "Comparison of performance characteristics of a 2-wheeler fuelled with gasoline and Hydrogen," Mater. Today Proc., vol. 45, no. xxxx, pp. 540-548, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.287.
  7. M. J. W. Hall, K. Kumar, and M. Reginatto, "Bosonic field equations from an exact uncertainty principle," J. Phys. A. Math. Gen., vol. 36, no. 37, pp. 9779-9794, 2003, doi: 10.1088/0305-4470/36/37/313.
  8. R. Gupta et al., "Robotic Vs Manual Percutaneous Coronary Intervention -Boon or a Bane?," J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., vol. 77, no. 18, p. 1024, 2021, doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(21)02383-4.
  9. N. Rustagi, A. Kumar, L. Norbu, and D. Vyas, "Applying Haddon Matrix for Evaluation of Road Crash Victims in Delhi, India," Indian J. Surg., vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 479-487, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s12262-017-1632-0.
  10. C. Jettanasen, P. Songsukthawan, and A. Ngaopitakkul, "Development of micro-mobility based on piezoelectric energy harvesting for smart city applications," Sustain., vol. 12, no. 7, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12072933.
  11. S. Egashira, Y. Wang, and K. Tanaka, "Fine-Grained Cryptography Revisited," Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics), vol. 11923 LNCS, no. 1, pp. 637-666, 2019, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-34618-8_22.
  12. H. Feng et al., "A novel feature-guided trajectory generation method based on point cloud for robotic grinding of freeform welds," Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 115, no. 5-6, pp. 1763-1781, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s00170-021-07095-2.
  13. E. Anderson, "Problem of time in quantum gravity," Ann. Phys., vol. 524, no. 12, pp. 757-786, 2012, doi: 10.1002/andp.201200147.
  14. S. A. Sree Ram, P. Raja, and K. Sreedaran, "Optimization of rollover stability for a three-wheeler vehicle," Adv. Manuf., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 279-288, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s40436-017-0191-8.